INTRODUCTION: The increasing prevalence of clarithromycin (CLA)-resistant Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) strains poses a significant challenge in the management of H. pylori infections. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigates the diagnostic accuracy of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in identifying CLA-resistant H. pylori strains in stool. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases from database inception to April 30, 2023. Eligible studies evaluated the effectiveness of PCR stool tests in detecting CLA-resistant H. pylori strains in adults (>18-year-old). Studies of pediatric populations, alternative methods to PCR or stool samples, and reference tests other than gastric biopsy were excluded. The bivariate random-effects model was used to pool diagnostic accuracy from the included studies. RESULTS: The analysis of 11 prospective diagnostic studies with a total of 866 patients showed a pooled sensitivity of 0.97 (95% CI: 0.9–0.99) and a pooled specificity of 0.98 (95% CI: 0.81–1.00). Subgroup analysis based on the used technique demonstrated consistent findings without notable variations. The diagnostic odds ratio was calculated at 1843.92 (95% CI: 134.28–25,321.3). The positive likelihood ratio was determined as 51.02 (95% CI: 4.61–564.5), while the negative likelihood ratio was found to be 0.03 (95% CI: 0.01–0.1). DISCUSSION: PCR testing for clarithromycin-resistant H. pylori was highly sensitive and specific across studies with proven reliability in clinical practice, particularly in outpatient settings. Their implementation offers cost-effectiveness and the potential for tailored treatment strategies, holding promise for improved patient outcomes.
Short-Term Outcomes of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Pancreatic Cyst Ablation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Abstract Background Pancreatic cysts (PC) are increasingly detected through abdominal imaging, prompting exploration of alternatives such as endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic cyst ablation (EUS-PCA) due to the risks and costs associated with surgery. This study conducts a systematic review and meta-analysis of EUS-PCA's short-term efficacy and complications for PC management. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis were carried out on PubMed, Ovid, Cochrane, and TRIP electronic databases. The primary outcome was cyst resolution (partial and complete) and persistence on imaging 12 months after ablation. The secondary outcome was procedure-related adverse events. Results Eight studies were eligible for analysis. Complete cyst resolution on imaging 12 months after EUS ablation was 50% [95% CI 36, 63, I2 = 85.31%]. Partial cyst resolution was 27% [95% CI 15, 41, I2 = 87.07%], and cyst persistence was 17% [95% CI 11, 24, I2 = 62.11%]. The rate of complete resolution varied depending on the treatment agent (for ethanol 29% [95% CI 10, 53], lauromacrogol 51% [95% Cl 36, 67], ethanol and paclitaxel 63% [95% CI 48, 76], paclitaxel and gemcitabine 67% [95% CI 45, 83], ethanol, paclitaxel and gemcitabine 61% [95% CI 39, 80]). Post-procedure adverse events included abdominal pain in 4% [95% CI 0, 11], pancreatitis in 3% [95% CI 1, 5], and fever in 1% [95% CI 0, 3] of all patients. Conclusion The treatment of pancreatic cysts with EUS ablation results in acceptable levels of complete resolution, and low incidence of severe adverse events. The effectiveness of this treatment is further enhanced when chemoablative agents are employed.