Bonikowske, Amanda

Background Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) leads to increased exercise capacity (VO 2 peak) and risk reduction of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). Women exhibit blunted VO 2 peak improvements following CR. The purpose was to examine sex differences in the clinical predictors of VO 2 peak improvement and odds of MACEs following CR. Methods From 1999 to 2017, all consecutive patients undergoing cardiopulmonary exercise testing before and after CR were included. Sex differences in peak exercise metrics in response to CR were compared. Multiple logistic regression models were fit to assess clinical predictors of VO 2 peak improvement (defined as >0% from pre‐CR) and MACEs following CR for men and women. Results A total of 513 men and 158 women were included. Men had greater increases in VO 2 peak than women following CR ( P =0.001). For men, independent predictors of VO 2 peak improvement following CR included higher CR session attendance (odds ratio [OR], 1.04 [95% CI, 1.02–1.06]), peripheral artery disease (OR, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.25–0.86]), and pre‐CR VO 2 peak (OR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.97–0.99]) (all, P <0.02). Independent predictors of lower odds of MACEs following CR in men included higher number of CR sessions (OR, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.95–0.99]), pre‐CR VO 2 peak (OR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.97–0.99]), surgical CR indication (OR, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.18–0.68]), and no history of peripheral artery disease (OR, 2.94 [95% CI, 1.60–5.38]) (all, P <0.02). For women, the selected clinical characteristics were not statistically significant independent predictors of VO 2 peak improvement or odds of MACEs (except for diabetes) following CR. Conclusions These findings suggest that clinical predictors of VO 2 peak improvement and odds of MACEs following CR are sex specific.

Background Extended sedentary behavior is a risk factor for chronic disease and mortality, even among those who exercise regularly. Given the time constraints of incorporating physical activity into daily schedules, and the high likelihood of sitting during office work, this environment may serve as a potentially feasible setting for interventions to reduce sedentary behavior. Methods and Results A randomized cross‐over clinical trial was conducted at an employee wellness center. Four office settings were evaluated on 4 consecutive days: stationary or sitting station on day 1 (referent), and 3 subsequent active workstations (standing, walking, or stepper) in randomized order. Neurocognitive function (Selective Attention, Grammatical Reasoning, Odd One Out, Object Reasoning, Visuospatial Intelligence, Limited‐Hold Memory, Paired Associates Learning, and Digit Span) and fine motor skills (typing speed and accuracy) were tested using validated tools. Average scores were compared among stations using linear regression with generalized estimating equations to adjust standard errors. Bonferroni method adjusted for multiple comparisons. Healthy subjects were enrolled (n=44), 28 (64%) women, mean±SD age 35±11 years, weight 75.5±17.1 kg, height 168.5±10.0 cm, and body mass index 26.5±5.2 kg/m 2 . When comparing active stations to sitting, neurocognitive test either improved or remained unchanged, while typing speed decreased without affecting typing errors. Overall results improved after day 1, suggesting habituation. We observed no major differences across active stations, except decrease in average typing speed 42.5 versus 39.7 words per minute with standing versus stepping ( P =0.003). Conclusions Active workstations improved cognitive performance, suggesting that these workstations can help decrease sedentary time without work performance impairment. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT06240286.

Calf muscle pump (CMP) promotes venous return from the lower extremity and contributes to preload and cardiac output. Impaired CMP function may reflect a measure of frailty or cumulative disease burden or may impede cardiac function. The study objective was to test the hypothesis that impaired CMP negatively impacts survival. Consecutive adult patients who underwent venous strain gauge plethysmography at the Mayo Clinic Gonda Vascular Laboratory (January 1, 1998 – December 31, 2011) were assessed for overall survival. Patients with venous incompetence, venous obstruction or unilateral calf pump dysfunction were excluded. Risk of mortality was assessed with Cox proportional hazard ratios and after adjusting for Charlson Comorbidity Index variables. Over the study period, 2728 patients were included in the analysis. Compared to patients with normal CMP, those with impaired CMP were older ( p < 0.001), predominantly female ( p = 0.01) and had higher mean Charlson scores ( p < 0.001). Patients with impaired CMP had a higher mortality rate at 5 (8.9% vs 2.4%), 10 (17.5% vs 5.9%), and 15 years (22.8% vs 8.3%) compared to those with normal CMP ( p < 0.001 for each comparison). Of patients with heart failure, those with impaired CMP had worse survival at each 5-year increment compared to those with normal CMP ( p < 0.05 at each increment). In conclusion, impaired CMP appears to be an independent predictor of poor outcomes after adjusting for variables within the Charlson Comorbidity Index. The association between impaired CMP, heart failure, and mortality may represent a negative impact on circulatory function or a surrogate measure of frailty.

Background Right bundle‐branch block (RBBB) occurs in 0.2% to 1.3% of people and is considered a benign finding. However, some studies have suggested increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. We sought to evaluate risk attributable to incidental RBBB in patients without prior diagnosis of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Methods and Results We reviewed the Mayo Clinic Integrated Stress Center database for exercise stress tests performed from 1993 to 2010. Patients with no known CVD—defined as absence of coronary disease, structural heart disease, heart failure, or cerebrovascular disease—were selected. Only Minnesota residents were included, all of whom had full mortality and outcomes data. There were 22 806 patients without CVD identified; 220 of whom (0.96%) had RBBB, followed for 6 to 23 years (mean 12.4±5.1). There were 8256 women (36.2%), mean age was 52±11 years; and 1837 deaths (8.05%), including 645 cardiovascular‐related deaths (2.83%), occurred over follow‐up. RBBB was predictive of all‐cause (hazard ratio [HR], 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1–2.0; P =0.0058) and cardiovascular‐related mortality (HR,1.7; 95% CI, 1.1–2.8; P =0.0178) after adjusting for age, sex, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, obesity, current and past history of smoking, and use of a heart rate‐lowering drug. Patients with RBBB exhibited more hypertension (34.1% versus 23.7%, P <0.0003), decreased functional aerobic capacity (82±25% versus 90±24%; P <0.0001), slower heart rate recovery (13.5±11.5 versus 17.1±9.4 bpm; P <0.0001), and more dyspnea (28.2% versus 22.4%; P <0.0399) on exercise testing. Conclusions Patients with RBBB without CVD have increased risk of all‐cause mortality, cardiovascular‐related mortality, and lower exercise tolerance. These data suggest RBBB may be a marker of early CVD and merit further prospective evaluation.

Body mass index (BMI) does not differentiate fat and lean mass or the distribution of adipose tissue. The purpose of this study was to examine the prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MetS) among patients entering outpatient cardiac rehabilitation (CR) across fat mass index (FMI) categories compared with BMI. This retrospective cross-sectional study evaluated dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in 483 CR patients from 1 January 2014, through 31 December 2017. Clinical data were extracted from the electronic health record. Patients were grouped by FMI and BMI categories. Mean (SD) age of patients was 64.3 (14) years. The normal FMI category had 15 patients; excess fat, 74; and obese, 384. In contrast, 93, 174, and 216 were in the normal, overweight, and obese BMI categories, respectively. Prevalence of MetS was 0 (0%) in normal, 5 (1%) in excess fat, and 167 (54%) in obese FMI, with 97% in the obese category. MetS prevalence was 4 patients (0.8%) in normal, 39 (8%) in overweight, and 129 (27%) in obese BMI categories, with 75% of MetS in the obese category. FMI more accurately classified CR patients with metabolically abnormal fat (p < 0.001). FMI is a more sensitive index than BMI for metabolically abnormal fat of outpatient CR patients.

Background The benefits of aerobic exercise are well-studied; there is no consensus on the association between resistance training and major adverse cardiovascular outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to address this issue. Design and methods We searched for randomized trials and cohort studies that evaluated the association between resistance training and mortality and cardiovascular events. Two investigators screened the identified abstracts and full-texts independently and in duplicate. Cochrane tools were used to assess the risk of bias. We calculated hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals using random effect models. Results From the 1430 studies identified, 11 (one randomized trial and 10 cohort studies) met the inclusion criteria, totaling 370,256 participants with mean follow-up of 8.85 years. The meta-analysis showed that, compared with no exercise, resistance training was associated with 21% (hazard ratio (95% confidence interval (CI)), 0.79 (0.69–0.91)) and 40% (hazard ratio (95% CI), 0.60 (0.49–0.72)) lower all-cause mortality alone and when combined with aerobic exercise, respectively. Furthermore, resistance training had a borderline association with lower cardiovascular mortality (hazard ratio (95% CI), 0.83 (0.67–1.03)). In addition, resistance training showed no significant association with cancer mortality. Risk of bias was low to intermediate in the included studies. One cohort study looked at the effect of resistance training on coronary heart disease events in men and found a 23% risk reduction (risk ratio, 0.77, CI: 0.61–0.98). Conclusion Resistance training is associated with lower mortality and appears to have an additive effect when combined with aerobic exercise. There are insufficient data to determine the potential beneficial effect of resistance training on non-fatal events or the effect of substituting aerobic exercise with resistance training.