Citations

Abstract Background Platinum chemotherapy (carboplatin or cisplatin) + etoposide is the current 1L standard of care treatment (tx) for ES-SCLC. Despite high response rates on this regimen, patient (pt) outcomes remain poor. IMpower133 is a Ph1/3, double-blind, randomized, placebo (PBO)-controlled trial that is evaluating the efficacy and safety of adding PD-L1-inhibitor atezo or PBO to 1L tx for ES-SCLC (NCT02763579). Methods IMpower133 enrolled pts without prior tx for ES-SCLC; PD-L1 testing was not required. Pts were randomized 1:1 to four 21-day cycles of carboplatin (AUC 5 mg/mL/min IV, Day 1) + etoposide (100 mg/m2 IV, Days 1-3) with either atezo (1200 mg IV, Day 1) or PBO, then maintenance atezo or PBO until PD, unacceptable toxicity or loss of clinical benefit. Maintenance prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) was allowed per protocol, while definitive thoracic radiation (TR) was not. Coprimary endpoints were OS and investigator-assessed PFS. A key exploratory endpoint was outcomes by blood tumor mutation burden (bTMB) analyzed at prespecified cutoffs (≥ 16 vs < 16 and ≥ 10 vs < 10 mutations/Mb). Results Adding atezo to carboplatin + etoposide demonstrated significant improvement in efficacy (OS and PFS) in 1L ES-SCLC (Table). Survival benefits were consistent across key subgroups and prespecified bTMB cutoffs. 44 pts (22 in each arm [per ITT]) received PCI, and 7 (3 in atezo arm, 4 in PBO arm) received TR. Gr 3-4 tx-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 57% of atezo pts vs 56% of PBO pts; serious tx-related AEs occurred in 23% vs 19%. Occurrence of CNS-related AEs in pts who had PCI are shown in the Table. Conclusion Adding atezo to carboplatin + etoposide resulted in a significant improvement in survival in this 1L ES-SCLC all-comers population. There were no new safety signals, including in pts who received PCI or TR. Atezo + carboplatin + etoposide may represent a new standard regimen for untreated ES-SCLC. Atezo + carboplatin + etoposiden = 201PBO + carboplatin + etoposiden = 202Co-primary endpointsMedian OS, mo12.310.3HR 0.70 (95% CI: 0.54, 0.91); P = 0.0069Median PFS, mo5.24.3HR 0.77 (95% CI: 0.62, 0.96) P = 0.017Secondary efficacy endpointsInvestigator-assessed confirmed ORR, %60.264.4Median DoR, mo4.23.9CNS-related AEs in pts who had PCI, n (%)a,bn = 23n = 21Headache8 (34.8)4 (19.0)Asthenia5 (21.7)2 (9.5)Dizziness2 (8.7)0Insomnia2 (8.7)1 (4.8)Fall2 (8.7)1 (4.8)aSafety population; safety analyses conducted according to tx received (1 pt randomized to the control arm received a dose of atezo).bIncludes AEs occurring in ≥ 2 patients. Citation Format: Aaron S. Mansfield, Stephen V. Liu, Aleksandra Szczęsna, Libor Havel, Maciej Kzrakowski, Maximilian J. Hochmair, Florian Huemer, György Losonczy, Melissa L. Johnson, Makoto Nishio, Martin Reck, Tony S. Mok, Sivuonthanh Lam, David S. Shames, Juan Liu, Fairooz Kabbinavar, Alan Sandler, Leora Horn. IMpower133: Primary efficacy and safety + CNS-related adverse events in a Ph1/3 study of first-line (1L) atezolizumab (atezo) + carboplatin + etoposide in extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT199.

Abstract The IFCC Committee on Clinical Applications of Cardiac Bio-Markers (C-CB) has directives and initiatives focused on providing evidence-based educational resources to aid and improve understanding around key analytical and clinical aspects of cardiac biomarkers used in clinical practice and the research setting. As a task force, we have previously published position statements and recommendations focused on use and analytical aspects of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays. The current educational document is the first from the C-CB highlighting important biochemical, analytical, and clinical aspects as they relate to the natriuretic peptides (NPs), including B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), with a focus on heart failure.

Background:Injectable azacitidine (AZA) has been evaluated in a variety of malignancies, including acute myeloid leukemia (AML), myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), and solid tumors. CC‐486, the oral formulation of AZA, allows extended dosing schedules (>7 days per 28‐day treatment cycle) to increase AZA exposure to malignant cells over the course of the cycle. CC‐486 is under investigation in phase 3 clinical trials as maintenance therapy for patients with AML in first complete remission after induction chemotherapy (NCT01757535) and in lower‐risk MDS with concurrent thrombocytopenia and RBC transfusion dependence (NCT01566695). In these studies, patients receive CC‐486 300 mg QD administered in two 150 mg tablets. A single 300 mg CC‐486 tablet is in development for market approval.Aims:Evaluate the bioequivalence (BE) of a single 300 mg CC‐486 tablet relative to two 150 mg CC‐486 tablets, and the food effect (FE) on the bioavailability of the CC‐486 300 mg tablet.Methods:This was a phase 1, randomized, crossover study (NCT01519011). Adult patients had hematologic malignancies or solid tumors relapsed/refractory to prior therapy for which no standard treatments were available, and ECOG PS scores 0‐2. The BE phase assessed pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of CC‐486 administered as two 150 mg tablets (formulation A) and as one 300 mg tablet (formulation B). Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive each formulation at least 48 hours apart. In the FE phase, patients were randomized to receive formulation B on each of 2 PK study days under fed (high fat, ∼800‐1000 calories) and fasted conditions. PK parameters, including area under the plasma concentration‐time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUC∞), maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), time to Cmax (Tmax), terminal half‐life (t1/2), apparent total clearance (CL/F) and volume of distribution (Vz/F) were analyzed. BE of formulations A and B, and absence of FE on formulation B, were indicated when the 90% CI of the ratios of geometric means (RGM) based on log‐transformed data for AUC∞ and Cmax between formulations A and B, and between fed and fasted conditions, were within 80%>125%.Results:30 patients were enrolled in the BE phase (median age 68.5 yrs, range 46‐86); 3 patients (10%) had hematologic malignancies and 27 (90%) had solid tumors. Formulations A and B were bioequivalent: the Cmax RGM was 101.5% (90% CI 89.9, 114.7) and AUC∞ RGM was 105.7% (95.0, 117.6). Median Tmax was 1.0 hour for both formulations.57 patients enrolled in the FE phase (median age 62 yrs, 31‐88); all had solid tumors. Despite a lower Cmax under fed condition (RGM 78.9% [90%CI 68.6, 90.7]), overall drug exposure was similar (AUC∞ RGM 108.9% [90%CI 98.5, 120.5]) (Figure A). Consistent with an effect of gastric emptying, median Tmax was reached at 2 hrs and 1 hr post‐dose in fed and fasted states, respectively (Figure B) and mean t1/2 was 0.78 and 0.58 hr postdose. CL/F and Vz/F were comparable in fed and fasted states. Moderate to high intersubject variability was observed for all CC‐486 PK parameters (Figure A).Summary/Conclusion:A single oral CC‐486 300 mg tablet is bioequivalent to two 150 mg tablets. The PK profile for the CC‐486 300 mg tablet under fed and fasted conditions was comparable although Cmax occurred later and was decreased in fed vs. fasted condition. Systemic drug exposure (AUC∞) in fed and fasted states was similar and within the bioequivalence limits. Limited differences in other CC‐486 PK parameters between fed and fasted states are not expected to have a clinical impact.image

Background:It has been well documented that each additional line of treatment is associated with lower rates of deeper responses, shorter duration of treatment, and increased rates of toxicities/comorbidities in patients with multiple myeloma (MM; Yong K, et al. Br J Haematol 2016. 175[2]:252–264). These factors contribute to treatment discontinuation and impact the proportion of patients reaching subsequent lines of therapy.Aims:To characterize the rate of therapy attrition at relapse for patients with newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) who are transplant eligible in the United States.Methods:Patients with NDMM were identified from 3 US patient‐level data sources: the OPTUM™ Commercial Claims database (period: January 2000–March 2017), the OPTUM™ Electronic Medical Records (EMR) database (period: January 2007–March 2016), and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)‐Medicare Linked database (period: January 2007–December 2014). Patients had 1) an index MM diagnosis on or after 1 January 2007, 2) medical prescription coverage in place at diagnosis, 3) no prior malignancies in the one‐year period prior to index diagnosis, 4) a one‐year look‐back period prior to index diagnosis, and 5) received ≥1 lines of therapy. Patients were considered transplant eligible if they received stem cell transplantation anytime during the follow‐up period. Baseline characteristics including comorbidities, index age, frontline treatment regimens and attrition rates at each subsequent line of therapy were characterized. Attrition was defined as the percentage of patients who did not have any recorded subsequent MM treatments as a result of death or lost to follow‐up in the database for any reason, including end of the database.Results:A total of 1,599 patients were included in this analysis. Baseline patient characteristics and pre‐existing comorbidities are summarized in Table 1. The induction regimens used as frontline treatments included bortezomib/dexamethasone (22%), lenalidomide/dexamethasone (13%), bortezomib/lenalidomide/dexamethasone (25%), all other bortezomib combinations (20%), and other (20%). The proportions of patients observed to progress to each subsequent line of therapy are summarized in Table 2. In total, 77% of patients received a second line of therapy, and only 55% received a third line treatment. The proportion of patients not receiving a subsequent line of therapy due to death is also summarized by lines of therapy in Table 2.Summary/Conclusion:A substantial number of patients with NDMM who are transplant eligible did not receive subsequent lines of therapy, with attrition by lines of therapy ranging from 23–40%. The increase in attrition rates with each additional line of therapy underscores the need to utilize upfront therapy associated with optimal progression‐free survival. Further studies evaluating the etiologic basis for this unexpectedly high attrition rate are warranted.image

4515 Background: The phase 2 IMmotion150 study showed improved PFS with atezo + bev vs sun in patients (pts) whose tumors were PD-L1+ and corroborated the activity of atezo monotherapy in previously untreated mRCC. This study offers an opportunity to evaluate PROs with immunotherapy and VEGF-directed therapy alone and in combination. Methods: Pts randomized to atezo 1200 mg IV q3w alone or with bev 15 mg/kg IV q3w, or sun 50 mg po qd for 4 wk on/2 wk off completed the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI) and Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) q3w of each 6-wk cycle until progression (RECIST 1.1). Time to deterioration (TTD; first ≥ 2-point score increase over baseline [BL]) and change from BL (effect size [ES] ≥ 0.2 suggests a clinically important difference vs sun) in MDASI symptom severity and interference and BFI fatigue severity and interference scores are reported for all-comers. Results: Completion rates were > 90% at BL and ≥ 80% at most visits across arms. BL PRO scores indicating mild symptoms and interference were similar across arms. Delayed TTD of symptom severity and interference with daily life was seen with atezo vs sun and atezo + bev vs sun and was longest with atezo alone (Table). Pts reported milder symptoms and less interference during the first 6 cycles with atezo vs sun: ES mean (range) was 0.36 (0.07-0.68) for core symptom severity and 0.36 (0.04-0.83) for symptom interference. The 5 worst pt-reported symptoms during tx (dry mouth, fatigue, rash, drowsiness, lack of appetite) were all in the sun arm; all 16 symptoms measured were milder with atezo vs sun. Conclusions: PROs suggest that atezo alone or with bev maintained daily function with minimal symptom interference vs sun. Clinical activity, safety and PRO data for atezo support its investigation in adjuvant tx of high-risk RCC pts (IMmotion010; NCT03024996). Clinical trial information: NCT01984242. [Table: see text]