Citations

Importance Transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR) demonstrated superior outcomes over medical therapy in patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) in the Edwards EVOQUE Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Replacement: Pivotal Clinical Investigation of Safety and Clinical Efficacy Using a Novel Device II (TRISCEND II) randomized clinical trial, and received regulatory approval in the US in 2024. Contemporary real-world data on its effectiveness and safety remain limited. Objective To evaluate 30-day clinical, echocardiographic, and health status outcomes of TTVR in real-world use. Design, Setting, and Population Retrospective cohort study of all consecutive patients who underwent TTVR in the US from February 2024 through March 2025 in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry. Patients had symptomatic, severe TR despite optimal medical therapy and TTVR was deemed appropriate by a heart team. Statistical analysis was conducted from September 2025 to February 2026. Exposure Device-enabled TTVR. Main Outcomes and Measures Thirty-day event rates (all-cause death, stroke, bleeding, new cardiac implantable electronic device [CIED] implantation, heart failure hospitalizations), TR reduction, and changes in health status (New York Heart Association [NYHA] functional class and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary [KCCQ-OS] score) are reported. Subgroup analyses examined the impact of baseline CIED status on outcomes. Results Among 1034 attempted procedures at 82 centers (mean [SD] age, 77.1 [10.6] years; 69.1% female; 73.2% NYHA functional class III/IV), a valve was successfully implanted in 1017 patients (98.4%). Mild or less TR was achieved in 98.4% of patients post procedure and in 97.7% at 30 days. At 30 days, all-cause mortality was 3.1%; stroke, 0.2%; bleeding, 7.9%; new CIED, 15.9% in CIED-naive patients; and heart failure hospitalization, 3.1%. There were significant improvements in NYHA functional class (class I/II, 82.7%; P < .001) and mean KCCQ-OS score (22.4 points; P < .001) from baseline to 30 days. There were no significant differences in 30-day mortality ( P = .47), heart failure hospitalization ( P > .99), and functional outcomes ( P = .55) when patients were stratified by baseline CIED status. Conclusions and Relevance Early US real-world experience with TTVR confirms safety and effectiveness in patients with severe TR. Thirty-day outcomes are consistent with the TRISCEND II pivotal trial, demonstrating acceptable safety, near-complete TR elimination, and significant health status improvements in an older, comorbid population. Rates of new CIED implantation and bleeding were lower than randomized clinical trial experience.

A systematic clinical approach is required for the diagnosis and management of renal and ureteral stones. The presenting symptoms, past medical history, medications, and physical examination all provide clues to the diagnosis of urinary stones. In the acute setting, noncontrast helical computerized tomography has emerged as the first line imaging test for renal colic. More traditional imaging tests are also important in the management of stone disease. After making the diagnosis of a urinary stone, the urologist should discuss the advantages and disadvantages of all treatment options with the patient. For most stone patients today, many equally effective treatment approaches can exist for the same problem. To help direct surgical management, guidelines for stone management have been devised. With technologic advances, stone treatment has improved and complications have decreased. While patient care has been significantly impacted by use of effective endourologic techniques, patients should complete imaging tests following surgery to assure a stone-free state. In addition, recurrent stone formers should complete a medical stone evaluation to identify treatable causes of their stones.

Organ transplantation has become an established treatment option for end-stage organ disease. Both living and end-of-life (so called deceased) organ donation narrow the gap between supply and demand for transplantable organs. Advances in human biology prove that death occurs as a gradual process over time and not as a single discrete event. Declaring death with either neurological criteria (heart-beating organ donation) or circulatory criteria (non-heart-beating organ donation) enables the procurement of transplantable organs before human death is complete, namely, from the incipiently dying donor. Thus, surgical procurement of organs from the incipiently dying donor is the proximate cause of death, raising new questions on end-of-life organ donation. It is imperative to first and foremost care for the patient as a dying person. International Muslim scholars should reevaluate previous Islamic rulings and provide guidance about current practice of end-of-life organ donation.

Background Psychiatric disorders are increasingly contributing to global disability. Despite advances in conservative management, the prevalence of treatment-resistant cases remains high. Meanwhile, neurosurgery for psychiatric disorders (NPD) remains underused, largely due to strict regulations and historical concerns, particularly those related to neuropsychological side effects (NPSE). Objective To address this issue, we conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis to compare NPSE associated with radiofrequency ablative NPD to those observed in neuro-oncological, neurovascular and epilepsy surgeries. Methods PubMed, Embase and LILACS databases were searched in April 2024 for articles published in English/Spanish from 1990 to 2022, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Results A total of 48 articles with 2678 participants were included. The frequency of transient and permanent NPSE in the NPD group ranged from 0.94% to 11.50% and 0.94% to 2.03%, respectively, comparable to the other surgical groups (epilepsy: 0.31–11.70%; vascular: 0.52–22.90%; oncology: 0.94–17.60% for transient NPSE; epilepsy: 0.31–12%; vascular: 0.40–1.96% and oncology: 0.84–1.48% for permanent NPSE). Regarding permanent NPSE, arguably the most critical consideration, the NPD group showed better outcomes in memory, language and social cognition than the epilepsy group, but worse outcomes in executive and perceptual-motor functions. Compared with the vascular group, the NPD group had better executive function but worse complex attention. Finally, the NPD group had fewer permanent deficits than the oncology group in executive function, complex attention and perceptual-motor domains, although language performance was lower. Conclusions Contemporary NPD apparently carries a similar risk of NPSE as other conventional neurosurgical procedures, challenging misconceptions and this unjustified barrier to its broader use.

Introduction Preoperative testosterone exposure has been associated with various health outcomes, but its impact on postoperative complications in patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) has not been fully explored. This study aims to evaluate the association between preoperative testosterone exposure and postoperative medical and surgical complications in patients undergoing TSA. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the PearlDiver database. Patients who underwent TSA and used preoperative testosterone within 3 months of the index procedure were identified and matched 1:4 to controls without testosterone use using propensity score matching. Matching was performed based on age, gender, comorbidities, Charlson comorbidity index, obesity, tobacco use, and hypogonadism to balance the groups. Postoperative complications were assessed at 90 days and five years. Statistical comparisons were made using odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and a p -value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results The matched cohort included 677 testosterone users and 2554 controls. There were no statistically significant differences between the testosterone and control groups in 90-day complications such as myocardial infarction (OR 2.52, P = 0.31), pneumonia (OR 0.86, P = 0.70), and deep vein thrombosis (no cases in the testosterone group). Over five years, the testosterone group had a significantly higher risk of periprosthetic joint infection (4.1% vs. 2.4%, OR 1.76, 95% CI 1.10–2.75, P = 0.015), but no differences in revision rates, dislocation, aseptic loosening, or stiffness were observed. Conclusion Preoperative testosterone exposure was associated with a higher risk of periprosthetic joint infection following TSA, but no significant differences were found in major medical complications or revision rates.

Purpose: This letter addresses a recent paper by Mailend et al. (2025) that expressed concerns about the Apraxia of Speech Rating Scale (ASRS) and offered guidelines and definitions regarding its principles, scale labels, item definitions, and scoring procedures, including the addition of new items to the scale. The primary purpose of this letter is to clarify the uncertainty that other users of the scale may have about whether the current ASRS version (ASRS 3.5; Duffy et al., 2023) should be altered to include the numerous proposed revisions. It provides examples of proposed revisions that, in our judgment, are helpful, redundant, questionable or premature, or are misaligned with the primary purposes of the scale. Conclusions: Some of the proposed revisions to the ASRS are helpful and likely to improve reliability by reducing user uncertainty about ratings. Others are questionable or premature without supporting data or are not aligned with the primary purposes of the scale.