Cohen, David J.

BACKGROUND: The EARLY TAVR trial (Evaluation of TAVR Compared to Surveillance for Patients with Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis) demonstrated that early transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) was superior to clinical surveillance (CS) in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis. The relative impact of early TAVR versus CS strategy by age is unknown. METHODS: The study population of the EARLY TAVR trial was stratified into 4 age groups: 65 to 69 years (n=141), 70 to 74 years (n=263), 75 to 79 years (n=250), and ≥80 years (n=247). Associations between age and the trial primary end point of death, stroke, or unplanned cardiovascular hospitalization; the composite end point of death, stroke, or heart failure hospitalization; and its individual components were examined. Interaction tests evaluated whether the treatment effect of early TAVR versus CS differed by age. RESULTS: No interaction was detected between age and the treatment effect of early TAVR versus CS for the composites or individual outcomes. We observed lower stroke rates with early TAVR compared with CS in the youngest (65–69 years, absolute risk reduction, 13%; P =0.008) and oldest (≥80 years; absolute risk reduction, 12.3%; P =0.029) age groups. The absolute difference in heart failure hospitalization rates between the early TAVR and CS arms at 2 years was greatest in the oldest patients (≥80 years, 9.1%; 75–79 years, 5.9%; 70–74 years, 5.1%; 65–69 years, 4.4%). In the CS group, time to conversion to AVR was similar across all age groups (median, 11 months; P =0.73). Approximately one-third of younger patients (65–69 years) in the CS arm presented with acute valve syndrome at the time of conversion, the frequency of which tended to increase with age ( P =0.06). CONCLUSIONS: In the EARLY TAVR trial, the relative benefit of early TAVR over CS was consistent among all age groups. The greatest absolute reduction in stroke rate with early TAVR compared with CS appeared in the youngest and oldest groups, whereas reduction in heart failure hospitalization was most pronounced in the oldest patients. These data suggest that early TAVR should be considered in all age groups above 65 years. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03042104.

BACKGROUND: Recent randomized trials have demonstrated that for patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR), transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions (TTVI) improve patients’ symptoms, function, and quality of life and that the amount of health status improvement correlates with the extent of TR reduction. Defining this relationship in greater detail can potentially provide insight into device selection and patient-specific treatment goals. We therefore sought to better understand the relationship between both baseline TR severity and change in TR after TTVI and the extent of improvement in health status after TTVI. METHODS: As part of the Tri-QOL (Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Validation in Tricuspid Valve Disease) study, data from 11 studies of TTVI devices were transferred to the US Food and Drug Administration to harmonize and anonymize before analysis by an independent center. This secondary, observational analysis used patient-level data from the 6 single-arm studies of patients who underwent TTVI to explore the association of change in KCCQ-OS with TR grade using multivariable models, adjusted for age, sex, chronic lung disease, and baseline KCCQ-OS. The primary model included TR grade at baseline, TR grade at 1 month, and the interaction between the two. RESULTS: Among 1056 patients with ≥severe TR who underwent TTVI, mean age was 79.1±7.1 years, 60.3% were female, and mean baseline Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-overall summary score [KCCQ-OS] was 49.5±22.3. Baseline TR grade was severe in 33.5%, massive in 35.9%, and torrential in 30.6%. One-month after TTVI, TR was none/trace in 21.7%, mild in 27.2%, moderate in 28.1%, and ≥evere in 23.1%, while the mean change in KCCQ-OS was 17.0±21.3 points. In a multivariable model that included TR grade at baseline, TR grade at 1 month, and their interaction, there was a strong association between reduction in TR and improvement in KCCQ-OS, with no consistent evidence of a threshold of TR grade below which there was no further improvement in KCCQ-OS. However, among patients with baseline torrential TR, the extent of health status improvement plateaued for patients achieving moderate or less TR at 1 month (ie, a 3-grade improvement from baseline). CONCLUSIONS: Health status improvement after TTVI was most strongly associated with the degree of TR reduction, although there was minimal additional improvement for most patients beyond a 3-grade reduction in TR. These findings support the goal of achieving mild or less TR with TTVI, although patients with torrential TR at baseline may be well served if moderate TR can be achieved.

BACKGROUND: Validly measuring disease-specific health status is critical in patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) to quantify the benefit of different interventions. The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) has been used to assess health status in patients with severe TR, but its content validity in this patient population is unknown, including whether additional questions are needed to supplement the KCCQ. METHODS: Twenty participants with symptomatic severe TR from 2 midwestern clinical sites were interviewed in 2023 using a semistructured guide. The interview guide addressed symptoms, physical and social functioning, and quality of life concepts of the KCCQ, as well as other potential TR symptoms not represented in the KCCQ. Interview transcripts were analyzed using inductive and deductive coding and content analysis, with additional participants recruited until thematic saturation occurred. RESULTS: Mean age of the participants was 80 (41–89), and 75% were female. Shortness of breath and fatigue were reported by virtually all participants (n=20 and n=19, respectively) and had a marked negative impact on their physical and social functioning and quality of life. Lower limb edema was also reported by 10 participants. Although these concepts are captured by the KCCQ, other symptoms were also reported, including appetite loss (n=8) and upper body edema (n=4), but did not seem to markedly affect participants’ function or quality of life. In addition, all participants who experienced these other symptoms reported symptoms that were already captured by the KCCQ. CONCLUSIONS: All participants experienced symptoms captured by the KCCQ, and these symptoms had a substantial impact on their physical and social functioning and quality of life. Although some participants reported additional symptoms not assessed by the KCCQ, their incorporation would only marginally improve content validity. Thus, the current KCCQ appears to be appropriate for capturing the disease-specific health status of patients with severe TR.

BACKGROUND: Following regulatory approval, medical devices may be used “off-label.” Patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure is indicated to reduce recurrent stroke but has been proposed for other indications, including migraine, transient ischemic attack, and diving decompression illness. We sought to evaluate PFO closure rates and indications relative to the timing of regulatory approval and publication of key randomized trials. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study using the OptumLabs Data Warehouse of US commercial insurance enrollees from 2006 to 2019. We quantified PFO closure among individuals with ≥2 years of preprocedure coverage to establish indications, classified hierarchically as stroke/systemic embolism, migraine, transient ischemia attack, or other. RESULTS: We identified 5315 patients undergoing PFO closure (51.8% female, 29.2%≥60 years old), which increased from 4.75 per 100 000 person-years in 2006 to 6.60 per 100 000 person-years in 2019. Patients aged ≥60 years accounted for 29.2% of closures. Procedure volumes corresponded weakly with supportive clinical publications and device approval. Among patients with PFO closure, 58.6% underwent closure for stroke/systemic embolism, 10.2% for transient ischemia attack, 8.8% for migraine, and 22.4% for other indications; 17.6% of patients had atrial fibrillation at baseline; and 11.9% developed atrial fibrillation postprocedure. Those aged ≥60 years and male were less likely to undergo closure for migraine than stroke/systemic embolism. CONCLUSIONS: From 2006 to 2019, PFO closure use was consistently low and corresponded weakly with clinical trial publications and regulatory status. Nearly half of patients underwent PFO closure for indications unapproved by the Food and Drug Administration. Regulators and payers should coordinate mechanisms to promote utilization for approved indications to ensure patient safety and should facilitate clinical trials for other possible indications.