Citations

Abstract Background: Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is an aggressive and rare B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma with poor prognosis, even with treatment. Despite its clinical importance, the etiology of MCL remains largely unknown. Some studies have reported a positive association with family history, suggesting that genetic factors could contribute to risk. Methods: To identify germline genetic variants associated with risk, we conducted the first genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and GWAS meta-analysis for MCL, comprising 1,163 cases and 61,271 controls. The most significant loci were taken forward for replication in three independent studies, including 576 cases and 771,773 controls. To identify potential target genes and pathways of discovered loci, we conducted F-MAGMA, colocalization, and transcriptome-wide association study (TWAS) analyses. To gain insight into underlying regulatory mechanisms, we performed integrative epigenomic analyses using DNase I hotspots and histone mark ChIP-seq data across diverse cell types applying the FORGE2 framework. Results: In the joint analyses, we identified eight genome-wide significant loci (P<5x10-8) associated with MCL risk, several of which were located near genes with known DNA repair (ATM), telomere (TERT), or RNA-binding functions (RBM20). Further analyses using F-MAGMA, which uses DNase-seq data to prioritize genes from GWAS, identified genes that were significantly associated with risk, including SP140, a chromatin reader and immune regulator of pathogen response. This gene also displayed strong colocalization with our lead variant in whole blood (COLOC posterior probability PP4=0.97). TWAS demonstrated significant associations with SP140 and ACTA2, which has been linked to cell proliferation (P<3x10-6). Enrichment for DNase I hotspots was observed in B and T lymphocytes (q-value<0.05), providing evidence for a role in immune cell-specific regulatory regions. Enrichment for enhancer-associated histone mark H3K4me1 was observed in B cells (q-value<0.01), highlighting a role for immune cell-specific enhancers. Transcription factor (TF) motif enrichment analysis pointed to TFs critical for B-cell development and differentiation, notably TCF3 and EP300 (q<0.01 for both), suggesting an association between B-cell lineage regulation and MCL risk. Finally, genome-wide SNP-based heritability was estimated to be 17%, underscoring the importance of common variants in MCL risk. Conclusion: Our study provides novel insight into the inherited susceptibility of MCL by identifying eight significant loci and estimating substantial common variant heritability. These findings highlight a role for several distinct biological pathways -specifically DNA repair, telomerase function, and B-cell differentiation- in the etiology of MCL, offering new targets for mechanistic investigation. Citation Format: Charles E. Breeze, Alyssa Clay-Gilmour, Hanla A. Park, Ólafur B. Davíðsson, Angelica Macauda, Brenda M. Birmann, Elizabeth E. Brown, Murat Güler, Michelle A. T. Hildebrandt, Alexandra Nieters, Krystle Ong, Jojo Biel-Nielsen Dietz, Karin E. Smedby, Karl Smith-Byrne, Rosalie Griffin, Sophia S. Wang, Susan Slager, James R. Cerhan, Jonathan N. Hofmann, Qing Lan, Nathaniel Rothman, Ingrid Glimelius, Henrik Hjalgrim, James Mckay, Sonja I. Berndt. Genome-wide association study of mantle cell lymphoma identifies novel loci suggesting a critical role for B-cell chromatin readers and DNA repair mechanisms [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 3602.

Abstract Background. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified 35 genetic susceptibility single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for multiple myeloma (MM) in individuals of European ancestry (EA) and shown strong genetic correlation between MM and its precursor, monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS). We evaluate the contribution of the 35 MM variants to MGUS susceptibility overall and by prognostic subgroups. Methods. The study included 20,756 participants (14,486 controls, 1,883 with MGUS, and 2,163 with MM) from the Mayo Clinic. Logistic regression assuming an additive model estimated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for individual SNPs and for the MM-PRS, adjusted for age, sex, study, and principal components. The PRS was a weighted sum of 35 SNPs with effect estimates from the largest MM GWAS and was modeled continuously (per SD) and by quintiles (Q1-Q5). SNPnexus annotated variants that replicated in MGUS (P < 0.05 and OR > 1.01) versus those that did not (P > 0.05 and OR < 1.01). Results. The 35-SNP MM-PRS was strongly associated with MM risk and modestly with MGUS. Compared with the middle quintile (Q3), MM odds rose from OR=0.55 (CI=0.46-0.65, P=2.2e-11) in Q1 to OR = 1.82 (CI=1.59-2.09, P=6.2e-18) in Q5. MGUS showed a similar, attenuated pattern (Q1 OR = 0.74, CI=0.64-0.84, P=6.4e-6 / Q5 OR=1.36, CI=1.21-1.53, P=3.4e-7). Each SD increase in PRS corresponded to OR=1.52 (CI=1.45-1.59, P=1.3e-66) for MM and OR = 1.22 (CI=1.18-1.27, P=1.0e-23) for MGUS. Higher PRS values were linked to larger M-protein ((0.1-1.5 g/dL: OR=1.40, CI=1.18-1.65, P=5.8e-12) vs <0.1 g/dL: OR = 1.19, CI=1.13-1.24, P=5.8e-12)) and abnormal free light chain (FLC) ratio ((OR = 1.33, CI=1.21-1.46, P=1.0e-9) vs normal ratio (OR=1.19, CI=1.14-1.25, P=1.4e-13)). Ten risk loci replicated in MGUS, mapping to genes involved in plasma-cell function, immune regulation, and DNA repair and enriched for Rho GTPase signaling, NF-κB-mediated apoptosis, and RNA polymerase II transcription, implicating early plasma-cell activation and transcriptional control. The 12 non-replicating loci, including PHC3, ATG5, and NFIC, mapped to genes involved in chromatin remodeling, autophagy, and SUMOylation, suggesting roles in stress response and genomic maintenance. Conclusions. The MM-PRS captures shared heritability between MM and MGUS and correlates with MGUS subtype and severity. Replicating variants highlight immune and cell-cycle pathways relevant to MGUS onset, whereas non-replicating loci cluster in DNA-repair and stress-response processes, underscoring their potential role in progression. Citation Format: Alyssa Ione Clay-Gilmour, Angelica Macauda, Cristine Allmer, Danelle Moonen, Aaron D. Norman, Nicholas Boddicker, Janet E. Olson, Elizabeth E. Brown, Vincent S. Rajkumar, Esteban Braggio, David Murray, Susan Slager, Shaji Kunnathu Kumar, Celine Vachon. Implications of multiple myeloma polygenic risk scores (PRS) for MGUS [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 3603.

Abstract Introduction: COE has become the gold standard in addressing health disparities. COE’s value is emphasized by NIH and leading cancer-related organizations e.g., AACR. The Alliance for COE (The Alliance) mission is to advance the art, science, and impact of COE; promote community health and wellness; and reduce cancer burden and disparities. Methods: This abstract builds on the Alliance’s Science of Community Outreach and Engagement (SoCOE) Conference a NCI R13 funded series. SoCOE Conference is organized by 10 NCI-designated Cancer Centers to provide a platform for COE academic-clinical-policy-community stakeholders to share best practices for solution-focused community responsive cancer prevention, diagnostics, therapeutics and survivorship research and practice. Results: > 500 researchers, clinicians, policymakers, healthcare administrators, with >12% being survivors and/or advocates, participated in our SoCOE Conferences. The delegates’ recommendations are: Decentralize who/entities that hold all the power in science and clinical research (trials). Communities hold valuable, necessary wisdom and resources to inform and guide science Include multisectoral partners early and always Community capacity building and compensation with gratitude Mentoring of junior COE researchers, clinicians, policymakers, healthcare administrators, survivors and advocates with humility is a must Develop virtual communities to share best practices across cancer centers and within regions Develop working groups to identify and explore commonalities across COE work in rural/urban, diverse/homogenous spaces Publish Science of COE papers on various topics related to COE Frameworks and evidenced-solutions Provide community reports on best practice guide that can be widely available to be shared locally and in-person, and digitally Partner and learn from COE teams working with other cultural/ethnic groups Attend to, measure and remedy societal/social drivers of health disparities that mirror barriers to care, and research engagement and participation. Discussion: Informed by our community advisory boards and the findings for our SoCOE Conferences, we present the pillars of the Alliance to tackle population cancer burden and disparities: Training future COE leaders/advocates, Advocating for public health policies/guidelines, Increasing access to cancer prevention and care that will also increase access to studies, Engaging and partnering with multisectoral stakeholders and communities, Building community capacity, Advancing COE science through catchment-relevant research, and Leading bi-directional communication and information and resource sharing between catchment area communities and cancer centers. The expectation and impact of COE can only be achieved if COE teams are valued, supported cancer center members with community advisory boards and community as cancer centers’ priority population. Citation Format: Kimlin Ashing, CHARNITA ZEIGLER-JOHNSON, Hayley S. Thompson, Kim Rhoads, Nadine Barrett, Lisa Carter Bawa, Timiya S. Nolan, Monica Baskin, Vanessa B. Sheppard, Marvella E. Ford, Erica Phillips, Lorna H. McNeill, Folakemi T. Odedina. Advancing the science, practice and impact of COE [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 7577.

Abstract Approximately 288,000 men are diagnosed with prostate cancer (PCa) in the United States each year, with cases expected to double by 2040. While metastatic PCa can be treated with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and AR pathway inhibitors (ARPI), it inevitably develops into treatment resistant, lethal disease. The most common ARPI resistance mechanism in PCa is the expression of AR splice variant AR-V7 that lacks the ligand binding domain and is constitutively active. Patients with PCa expressing AR-V7 experience inferior overall survival. Speckle-type POZ protein (SPOP) is an adaptor protein of the Cullin3-based E3 ubiquitin ligase that facilitates both degradative and non-degradative polyubiquitination of targets such as AR. Loss-of-function SPOP mutations occur in approximately 10-15% of prostate cancers, and SPOP-mutant PCa is a unique subtype that has been shown to be exquisitely sensitive to ADT and ARPI treatment. This sensitivity is mediated in part by increased androgen availability via upregulation of hydroxysteroid 17-beta dehydrogenase 4 (HSD17B4) and related steroid synthesis pathways, reduced AR degradation, and enhanced AR cofactor activity. The remarkable efficacy of ARPI in ADT-resistant SPOP-mutant prostate cancer is not well understood. We hypothesized a novel mechanism by which wild-type SPOP promotes AR-V7-mediated resistance to ARPI in PCa. This mechanism may explain the exceptional ARPI sensitivity of SPOP-mutant PCa, distinct from its susceptibility to ADT. We further proposed that clinical SPOP inhibition may broaden this enhanced ARPI susceptibility to the 85-90% of PCa expressing wild-type SPOP. Our results show that SPOP drives ARPI resistance in prostate cancer that can be reversed by SPOP inhibitor. Bulk RNA sequencing showed that SPOP inhibitor targets spliceosome machinery and more importantly, abrogated AR-V7 expression both at transcriptional and protein level. Further investigation revealed that wild-type SPOP ubiquitinates spliceosome regulator SFPQ, promoting AR-V7 alternative splicing and ARPI resistance. While SPOP loss is pathogenic in PCa, leveraging the weakness conferred by SPOP mutation in the 85% of patients with SPOP-wild type provides an innovative strategy to sensitize ARPI resistant disease to standard of care treatment and save lives. Citation Format: Joanina K. Gicobi, Susanna M. Gregory, Nicole A. Becker, Elizabeth A. Bering, Jacob J. Orme.. SPOP drives AR-V7-mediated ARPI resistance in prostate cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 3904.

Abstract Introduction: Ewing sarcoma (EwS) is a FET::ETS family member-driven primary bone cancer demonstrating vast heterogeneity. Between a patient’s primary diagnosis and disease progression, tumor cell state adaptation, microenvironment changes, and the landscape of evolving therapeutic vulnerabilities remain poorly understood. To address these gaps, the Sean Karl Cohort was established in 2025 to conduct the largest single-cell transcriptomic analysis of retrospective paired tumor samples from patients with EwS. Here, we present data from the five analytic teams, and through shared SOPs now expand this cohort to Europe. Methods: Common sample processing SOPs were established to isolate cells from FFPE material from paired patient EwS samples. Single-cell (sc) RNAseq was generated using the GEM-X Flex Gene Expression protocol (10x Genomics). Alex’s Lemonade Stand Foundation (ALSF) Data Lab established a common data processing and integration pipeline with an EwS-specific cell annotation workflow to create a harmonized dataset for downstream analyses. Analytic teams were created to define tumor cell subpopulations and their therapeutic vulnerabilities and to characterize the tumor microenvironment. Data: We demonstrate the feasibility of generating high-quality scRNAseq profiles from retrospective FFPE-preserved EwS tumors. To date, 116 samples have yielded ∼800,000 cells. Integrated analysis reveals reproducible EwS tumor cell states shared across patients with regulatory network analyses nominating candidate therapeutic vulnerabilities. The scale of this international cohort enables saturation analysis for rare cell populations. Paired and longitudinal samples further allow correlation of emergent cell states with therapy resistance and metastatic progression. For example, immune-focused analyses show increases in T cell and macrophage populations in post-therapy samples. A novel, standardized EwS-specific cell annotation workflow has been developed to harmonize analyses and findings. These data will be openly shared with the community through the ALSF Single-cell Pediatric Cancer Atlas Portal. Conclusion: Large-scale international collaborative sample sharing, standardized processing pipelines, and harmonized EwS-specific annotations now enable deep single-cell analyses to characterize tumor heterogeneity in this rare pediatric and adolescent cancer. An in vivo expansion of the Sean Karl Cohort is underway to assess conservation of EwS tumor cell states and regulatory vulnerabilities identified in human tumors pre- and post-therapy in preclinical models, further supporting translation of these findings toward therapeutic strategies. Citation Format: Abbe Pannucci, Elina Mukherjee, Jessica D. Daley, Shireen Sita Ganapathi, Elissa Boguslawski, Lea Surrey, Lauren Gutstein, Patrick Azar, Emily Stockfisch, Azfar Neyaz, Ivy John, Jennifer Picarsic, Yutaro Tanaka, Byron Butaney, Riaz Gillani, Brian D. Crompton, Katherine A. Janeway, Jaclyln Taroni, Jessica Davis, Damon Reed, Adam Shlien, Theodore W. Laetsch, Rajen Mody, Clémence Henon, Thomas G. Grünewald, Elizabeth R. Lawlor, Filemon Dela Cruz, Patrick J. Grohar, Jovana Pavisic, Ally Hawkins, Anthony R. Cillo, Kelly M. Bailey. The Sean Karl Cohort: An international single-cell RNAseq study of paired patient Ewing sarcoma specimens [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 643.

Abstract Background DDX3X- syndrome is a rare neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by varying degrees of intellectual disability, predominantly affecting females. We present an institutional cohort supplemented by a systematic literature review, expanding the cardiovascular phenotype of DDX3X- syndrome. Methods We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients diagnosed with DDX3X -syndrome at Mayo Clinic. Additionally, we performed a systematic literature review to identify studies reporting cardiovascular abnormalities in patients with DDX3X -syndrome. Results A total of 200 patients with DDX3X -syndrome were analyzed, comprising 14 patients from our institutional cohort and 186 patients identified through a systematic review of 9 published studies. Our institutional cohort included 14 patients (12 females and 2 males) from 13 unrelated families diagnosed with DDX3X -syndrome, at a median age of 4.5 years (IQR 1.2–9.5). Echocardiogram was performed on nine patients, and cardiovascular abnormalities were found in 7 out of 9 patients who underwent echocardiography (78%), two of whom had major congenital heart defect (CHD) requiring surgical intervention. At the time of assessment, 13 individuals were still alive, while one had died at age six due to extracardiac complications. The systematic review included 9 studies involving 186 patients, of whom 32 (17.4%, 25 females and 7 males) had reported cardiovascular abnormalities, ranging from simple CHDs to more complex defects. Conclusion DDX3X -syndrome carries a significant cardiovascular burden, which is possibly higher than previously reported, including complex congenital heart disease requiring surgical repair. A thorough cardiovascular assessment, including an electrocardiogram and echocardiogram, should be universally recommended for all patients at the time of diagnosis.

Background: Hepatorenal syndrome–acute kidney injury (HRS-AKI) is associated with high mortality in cirrhosis. Recent FDA approval of terlipressin and updated clinical guidance have expanded management options, but real-world practice patterns remain unknown. Methods: We conducted a nationwide survey of U.S. hepatology providers regarding HRS-AKI management practices. The 33-question survey assessed provider demographics, vasoconstrictor selection, treatment timing, and adherence to guideline recommendations. Results: Among 162 respondents, most were hepatologists (94%) at academic centers (83%). Only 11% obtained a nephrology consultation at AKI detection, with 44% waiting until worsening renal function. Terlipressin was available at 80% of institutions but more commonly at academic centers (84% vs. 53%, p =0.003). Consistent with guideline recommendations, 77% of providers initiate vasoconstrictors only after completing a trial of volume expansion (if no renal improvement), particularly in academic centers (80% vs. 60% non-academic, p =0.03). Terlipressin (49%) and midodrine/octreotide (44%) were preferred first-line treatments, with providers at academic centers more likely to use midodrine/octreotide (46% vs. 30%, p =0.008). Mean arterial pressure was used by 62% of providers to guide vasoconstrictor dosing. Most providers (73%) discontinued vasoconstrictor treatment after 4 days if no improvement. Conclusions: Significant variations exist between guideline recommendations and real-world HRS-AKI management, especially first-line treatment choice, treatment monitoring, and nephrology consultation. These findings highlight opportunities to improve guideline implementation and identify areas where practice patterns might inform provider education and future guidance updates.

Abstract Malignant histiocytic neoplasms (MHNs) are rare tumors derived from the mononuclear phagocyte system (MPS), encompassing histiocytic sarcoma, Langerhans cell sarcoma, interdigitating dendritic cell sarcoma, and other high-grade MPS lineage tumors. Despite advances in understanding histiocytic neoplasms, MHNs remain diagnostically challenging and lack standardized treatment algorithms. Current classification systems differ in lineage framing and fail to address mixed or ambiguous phenotypes, contributing to diagnostic uncertainty and inconsistent care. To address these gaps, the Histiocyte Society convened an international working group of pathologists and oncologists, including World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification contributors, to harmonize nomenclature, define minimum diagnostic criteria, and develop pragmatic treatment recommendations. Using a modified Delphi process and case-based review, the group formulated >40 consensus statements spanning classification, pathology, molecular testing, clinical evaluation, and therapeutic strategies. Key recommendations include the adoption of a unified MHN designation, use of a minimum immunophenotypic panel, integration of broad molecular profiling, and the documentation of previous hematopoietic malignancy. Treatment algorithms emphasize surgical resection for unifocal disease and targeted therapy or immune checkpoint inhibition for multifocal disease when actionable mutations or programmed death ligand 1 expression are present. These consensus recommendations aim to reduce diagnostic ambiguity, standardize reporting, and improve outcomes for both pediatric and adult patients. Future priorities include international registries to refine risk stratification and biomarker-driven trials exploring targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and combination approaches.

Disclaimer: These guidelines are intended for educational use to build the knowledge of physicians and other health professionals in assessing the conditions and managing the treatment of patients undergoing extracorporeal life support (ECLS)/ECMO and describe what are believed to be useful and safe practice for ECLS and ECMO. The aim of clinical guidelines was to help clinicians to make informed decisions about their patients. However, adherence to a guideline does not guarantee a successful outcome. Healthcare professionals must make their own treatment decisions about care on a case-by-case basis, after consultation with their patients, using their clinical judgment, knowledge, and expertise. These guidelines do not take the place of physicians’ and other health professionals’ judgment in diagnosing and treatment of patients. These guidelines are not intended to and should not be interpreted as setting a standard of care or being deemed inclusive of all proper methods of care nor exclusive of other methods of care directed at obtaining the same results. The ultimate judgment must be made by the physician and other health professionals and the patient considering all the circumstances presented by the individual patient, and the known variability and biologic behavior of the clinical condition. These guidelines reflect the data at the time the guidelines were prepared; the results of subsequent studies or other information may cause revisions to the recommendations in these guidelines to be prudent to reflect new data, but ELSO is under no obligation to provide updates. In no event will ELSO be liable for any decision made or action taken in reliance upon the information provided through these guidelines.