Ford, Marvella Elizabeth

Abstract Introduction: COE has become the gold standard in addressing health disparities. COE’s value is emphasized by NIH and leading cancer-related organizations e.g., AACR. The Alliance for COE (The Alliance) mission is to advance the art, science, and impact of COE; promote community health and wellness; and reduce cancer burden and disparities. Methods: This abstract builds on the Alliance’s Science of Community Outreach and Engagement (SoCOE) Conference a NCI R13 funded series. SoCOE Conference is organized by 10 NCI-designated Cancer Centers to provide a platform for COE academic-clinical-policy-community stakeholders to share best practices for solution-focused community responsive cancer prevention, diagnostics, therapeutics and survivorship research and practice. Results: > 500 researchers, clinicians, policymakers, healthcare administrators, with >12% being survivors and/or advocates, participated in our SoCOE Conferences. The delegates’ recommendations are: Decentralize who/entities that hold all the power in science and clinical research (trials). Communities hold valuable, necessary wisdom and resources to inform and guide science Include multisectoral partners early and always Community capacity building and compensation with gratitude Mentoring of junior COE researchers, clinicians, policymakers, healthcare administrators, survivors and advocates with humility is a must Develop virtual communities to share best practices across cancer centers and within regions Develop working groups to identify and explore commonalities across COE work in rural/urban, diverse/homogenous spaces Publish Science of COE papers on various topics related to COE Frameworks and evidenced-solutions Provide community reports on best practice guide that can be widely available to be shared locally and in-person, and digitally Partner and learn from COE teams working with other cultural/ethnic groups Attend to, measure and remedy societal/social drivers of health disparities that mirror barriers to care, and research engagement and participation. Discussion: Informed by our community advisory boards and the findings for our SoCOE Conferences, we present the pillars of the Alliance to tackle population cancer burden and disparities: Training future COE leaders/advocates, Advocating for public health policies/guidelines, Increasing access to cancer prevention and care that will also increase access to studies, Engaging and partnering with multisectoral stakeholders and communities, Building community capacity, Advancing COE science through catchment-relevant research, and Leading bi-directional communication and information and resource sharing between catchment area communities and cancer centers. The expectation and impact of COE can only be achieved if COE teams are valued, supported cancer center members with community advisory boards and community as cancer centers’ priority population. Citation Format: Kimlin Ashing, CHARNITA ZEIGLER-JOHNSON, Hayley S. Thompson, Kim Rhoads, Nadine Barrett, Lisa Carter Bawa, Timiya S. Nolan, Monica Baskin, Vanessa B. Sheppard, Marvella E. Ford, Erica Phillips, Lorna H. McNeill, Folakemi T. Odedina. Advancing the science, practice and impact of COE [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 7577.

Objectives: The goals of this study are to assess primary care provider (PCP) knowledge of and attitudes toward pediatric obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), and to identify variations in practice patterns. Design: A cross-sectional survey including the Obstructive Sleep Apnea Knowledge and Attitudes in Children (OSAKA-KIDS) questionnaire was administered to PCPs from August to December 2021. Univariable analyses and multivariable linear regressions were performed to analyze associations between demographics and knowledge, attitudes, and screening frequency. Results: Eighty-two PCPs completed the survey (age 43.4 ± 9.6 years, 69.6% female, 90.2% non-Hispanic White). Specialties included Pediatrics (65.9%) and Family Medicine (32.9%). Respondents answered a mean 84.9 ± 10.7% questions correctly on the knowledge portion. Years in practice, provider training, and academic affiliation were not associated with knowledge scores. Less than half (45.1%) of respondents screened for OSA “most of the time” (32.9%) or “always” (12.2%). Higher screening frequency was associated with clinics with higher Medicaid beneficiaries ( P = .002) and a lower proportion of Black patients ( P = .033). Providers who felt more confident in managing OSA were more likely to screen “most of the time” ( B = 0.532, 95% CI [0.120-0.926], P = .012), or “always” ( B = 0.708, 95% CI [0.129-1.29], P = .017). Conclusion: these results suggest guideline-recommended screening for OSA is low among PCPs. Higher confidence in OSA management was associated with higher screening rates. Further studies on interventions aimed to increase screening and confidence may improve equitable care.