Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

2816 citation(s) found for "Nuño, Laura".

Effectiveness of an Intervention Supporting Shared Decision Making for Destination Therapy Left Ventricular Assist Device
Thompson, Jocelyn S. , LaRue, Shane , Lewis, Eldrin F. , Patel, Chetan B. , Blue, Laura , Fairclough, Diane L., Leister, Erin, Cleveland, Joseph C. , Phillips, Clifford , Baldridge, Vicie, Walsh, Mary Norine , Matlock, Daniel D. , Dunlay, Shannon M. , Matlock, Daniel D , Allen, Larry A. , McIlvennan, Colleen Kelley , Glasgow, Russell E.

JAMA Internal Medicine | February 26, 2018 | Volume: 178 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 520

10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.8713 | PMID 29482225 Get It

Aging and anatomical variations in lung tissue stiffness
Sicard, Delphine , Haak, Andrew J. , Choi, Kyoung Moo , Craig, Alexandria R., Fredenburgh, Laura E. , Tschumperlin, Daniel J.

American Journal of Physiology-Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology | February 22, 2018 | Volume: 314 | Issue: 6 | Pages: L946-L955

10.1152/ajplung.00415.2017 | PMID 29469613 Get It

Lung function is inherently mechanical in nature and depends on the capacity to conduct air and blood to and from the gas exchange regions. Variations in the elastic properties of the human lung across anatomical compartments and with aging are likely important determinants of lung function but remain relatively poorly characterized. Here we applied atomic force microscopy microindentation to characterize human lung tissue from subjects ranging in age from 11 to 60 yr old. We observed striking anatomical variations in elastic modulus, with the airways (200- to 350-µm diameter) the stiffest and the parenchymal regions the most compliant. Vessels (diameter < 100 µm) represented an intermediate mechanical environment and displayed diameter-dependent trends in elastic modulus. Binning our samples into younger (11–30 yr old) and older (41–60 yr old) groups, we observed significant age-related increases in stiffness in parenchymal and vessel compartments, with the most pronounced changes in the vessels. To investigate cellular mechanisms that might contribute to vascular stiffening with aging, we studied primary human pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells from subjects ranging in age from 11 to 60 yr old. While we observed no change in the mechanical properties of the cells themselves, we did observe trends toward increases in traction forces and extracellular matrix deposition with aging. These results demonstrate age-related changes in tissue mechanical properties that likely contribute to impaired lung function with aging and underscore the potential to identify mechanisms that contribute to mechanical tissue remodeling through the study of human cells and tissues from across the aging spectrum.
The BRCA2 c.68-7T > A variant is not pathogenic: A model for clinical calibration of spliceogenicity
Colombo, Mara , López‐Perolio, Irene, Caleca, Laura , Li, Hongyan , Vecchi, Giovanna De, Tudini, Emma , Foglia, Claudia , Mondini, P, Manoukian, Siranoush , Behar, Raquel, Gómez, E. , Meindl, Alfons, Montagna, Marco , Niederacher, Dieter , Schmidt, Ane Yde , Varesco, Liliana , Wappenschmidt, Barbara , Bolla, Manjeet K. , Michailidou, Kyriaki , Wang, Qin , Aittomäki, Kristiina, Andrulis, Irene L. , Beckmann, Matthias W. , Beeghly-Fadel, Alicia, Benı́tez, Javier , Bojesen, Stig E. , Bonanni, Bernardo, Brauch, Hiltrud , Brenner, Hermann , Burwinkel, Barbara , Chang‐Claude, Jenny , Conroy, Don, Eriksson, Mikael , Fasching, Peter A. , Figueroa, Jonine D. , Fletcher, Olivia , Flyger, Henrik, Gabrielson, Marike , García‐Closas, Montserrat , González‐Neira, Anna , Guénel, Pascal , Haiman, Christopher A., Hamann, Ute , Hartman, Mikael , Hauke, Jan , Hopper, John L. , Jakubowska, Anna , Kosma, Veli‐Matti , Lambrechts, Diether , Marchand, Loid Le, Lindblom, Annika , Lubiński, Jan , Mannermaa, Arto, Margolin, Sara , Miao, Hui, Peterlongo, Paolo , Peto, Julian , Pylkäs, Katri , Sawyer, Elinor J. , Schmutzler, Rita K., Schneeweiß, Andreas , Schoemaker, Minouk J. , See, Mee‐Hoong , Southey, Melissa C. , Swerdlow, Anthony J. , Teo, Soo‐Hwang , Tomlinson, Ian , Truong, Thérèse , Ouweland, Ans M.W. van den, Kolk, Lizet E. van der, Winqvist, Robert , Zheng, Wei , Investigators, kConFab/AOCS, Easton, Douglas F. , Henderson, Alex, Hogervorst, Frans B.L., Izatt, Louise, Offitt, Kenneth, Side, Lucy, Rensburg, Elizabeth J. van , EMBRACE, Study, HEBON, Study, McGuffog, Lesley, Antoniou, Antonis C. , Chenevix‐Trench, Georgia , Goldgar, David E., Hoya, Miguel de la , Radice, Paolo , Bowtell, David D.L. , Lambrechts, Diether , Lambrechts, Diether , Peterlongo, Paolo , Teo, Soo H , van Rensburg, Elizabeth J , Swerdlow, Anthony J , de la Hoya, Miguel , Radice, Paolo , Southey, Melissa C , Jakubowska, Anna , Lambrechts, Diether , Brenner, Hermann , Guénel, Pascal , Hartman, Mikael , García-Closas, Montserrat , Michailidou, Kyriaki , Benitez, Javier , Montagna, Marco , Chenevix-Trench, Georgia , Zheng, Wei , Eriksson, Mikael , Figueroa, Jonine D , Gabrielson, Marike , Bowtell, David D , Meeks, Huong , Parsons, Michael T. , Meindl, Alfons, Dennis, Joe , Anton‐Culver, Hoda , Arndt, Volker , Boeckx, Bram , Bogdanova, Natalia , Bonanni, Bernardo , Couch, Fergus J. , Cox, Angela , Cross, Simon S. , Czene, Kamila , Devilee, Peter , Dörk, Thilo , Giles, Graham G. , Hall, Per N , Hollestelle, Antoinette , Jung, Audrey , Mannermaa, Arto , Miao, Hui, Milne, Roger L. , Neuhausen, Susan L. , Nevanlinna, Heli , Olson, Janet E. , Schmidt, Marjanka K. , Toland, Amanda Ewart , Asperen, Christi J. van , Yannoukakos, Drakoulis , Investigators, kConFab/AOCS, Dunning, Alison M. , Spurdle, Amanda B. , Goldgar, David E., Pylkäs, Katri , Gómez-García, Encarna B , Hauke, Jan , Manoukian, Siranoush , Lubinski, Jan , Fletcher, Olivia , Bojesen, Stig E , Schoemaker, Minouk J , Truong, Therese , Brauch, Hiltrud , Lindblom, Annika , Sawyer, Elinor J

Human Mutation | February 21, 2018 | Volume: 39 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 729-741

10.1002/humu.23411 | PMID 29460995 Get It

Research Directions in the Clinical Implementation of Pharmacogenomics: An Overview of US Programs and Projects
Volpi, Simona , Bult, Carol J. , Chisholm, Rex L. , Deverka, Patricia A. , Jacob, Howard J., Kasapi, Melpomeni , McLeod, Howard L. , Roden, Dan M. , Green, Eric D. , Rodriguez, Laura Lyman , Aronson, Samuel , Cavallari, Larisa H. , Denny, Joshua C. , Dressler, Lynn G., Johnson, Julie A. , Leeder, J. Steven , Piquette‐Miller, Micheline , Rasmussen‐Torvik, Laura J. , Ritchie, Marylyn D. , Skaar, Todd C. , Wagle, Nikhil , Weinshilboum, Richard M. , Weitzel, Kristin, Wildin, Robert S. , Manolio, Teri A. , Relling, Mary V. , Weinshilboum, Richard, Denny, Joshua C , Ginsburg, Geoffrey S. , Roden, Dan M. , Williams, Marc S , Klein, Teri E. , Perera, Minoli A. , Rehm, Heidi L. , Weinshilboum, Richard M. , Wilson, John T. , Cavallari, Larisa H , Rasmussen-Torvik, Laura J

Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics | February 21, 2018 | Volume: 103 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 778-786

10.1002/cpt.1048 | PMID 29460415 Get It

Response to a drug often differs widely among individual patients. This variability is frequently observed not only with respect to effective responses but also with adverse drug reactions. Matching patients to the drugs that are most likely to be effective and least likely to cause harm is the goal of effective therapeutics. Pharmacogenomics (PGx) holds the promise of precision medicine through elucidating the genetic determinants responsible for pharmacological outcomes and using them to guide drug selection and dosing. Here we survey the US landscape of research programs in PGx implementation, review current advances and clinical applications of PGx, summarize the obstacles that have hindered PGx implementation, and identify the critical knowledge gaps and possible studies needed to help to address them.
Multigene Profiling of CTCs in mCRPC Identifies a Clinically Relevant Prognostic Signature
Wang, Yugang , Henderson, James , Niknafs, Yashar S., Qiao, Yuanyuan , Gursky, Amy, Chung, Jae‐Seung , Smith, David C. , Karnes, R. Jeffrey , Feng, Felix Y. , Palapattu, Ganesh S. , Tomlins, Scott A. , Morgan, Todd M. , Morgan, Todd M , Singhal, Udit , Zaslavsky, Alexander , Chang, S. Laura , Taichman, Russell S. , Chinnaiyan, Arul

Molecular Cancer Research | February 16, 2018 | Volume: 16 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 643-654

10.1158/1541-7786.mcr-17-0539 | PMID 29453313 Get It

Abstract The trend toward precision-based therapeutic approaches dictated by molecular alterations offers substantial promise for men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). However, current approaches for molecular characterization are primarily tissue based, necessitating serial biopsies to understand changes over time and are limited by the challenges inherent to extracting genomic material from predominantly bone metastases. Therefore, a circulating tumor cell (CTC)-based assay was developed to determine gene expression across a panel of clinically relevant and potentially actionable prostate cancer–related genes. CTCs were isolated from the whole blood of mCRPC patients (n = 41) and multiplex qPCR was performed to evaluate expression of prostate cancer–related target genes (n = 78). A large fraction of patients (27/41, 66%) had detectable CTCs. Increased androgen receptor (AR) expression (70% of samples) and evidence of Wnt signaling (67% of samples) were observed. The TMPRSS2:ERG fusion was expressed in 41% of samples, and the aggressive prostate cancer–associated long noncoding RNA SChLAP1 was upregulated in 70%. WNT5a [HR 3.62, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.63–8.05, P = 0.002], AURKA (HR 5.56, 95% CI, 1.79–17.20, P = 0.003), and BMP7 (HR 3.86, 95% CI, 1.60–9.32, P = 0.003) were independently predictive of overall survival (FDR &lt; 10%) after adjusting for a panel of previously established prognostic variables in mCRPC (Halabi nomogram). A model including Halabi, WNT5a, and AURKA expression, termed the miCTC score, outperformed the Halabi nomogram alone (AUC = 0.89 vs. AUC = 0.70). Understanding the molecular landscape of CTCs has utility in predicting clinical outcomes in patients with aggressive prostate cancer and provides an additional tool in the arsenal of precision-based therapeutic approaches in oncology. Implications: Analysis of CTC gene expression reveals a clinically prognostic “liquid biopsy” signature in patients with metastatic castrate-resistance prostate cancer. Mol Cancer Res; 16(4); 643–54. ©2018 AACR.
Abstract PD6-14: Analysis of DNA repair deficiency biomarkers as predictors of response to the PD1 inhibitor pembrolizumab: Results from the neoadjuvant I-SPY 2 trial for stage II-III high-risk breast cancer
Sanil, Ashish, Singhrao, Ruby , Investigators, I-SPY 2 TRIAL, Asare, Smita , Berry, Donald A. , Esserman, L., Veer, Laura van ‘t , Nanda, Rita , Yau, Christina , Wolf, Denise M. , Swigart, Lamorna Brown , Hirst, Gillian L. , Investigators, I-SPY 2 TRIAL, DeMichele, Angela , Veer, Laura J. van’t , Liu, Ming , Yee, Douglas

Cancer Research | February 15, 2018 | Volume: 78 | Issue: 4_Supplement | Pages: PD6-14-PD6-14

10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs17-pd6-14 Get It

Abstract Background: Pembrolizumab (P), an anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor, has been approved for treatment of microsatellite instability-high and mismatch repair deficient cancers. In I-SPY 2, patients were randomized to receive standard chemotherapy alone or in combination with an experimental agent. P was one of the experimental agents evaluated in HER2- patients in I-SPY 2 and graduated in the TN, HR+HER2-, and HER2- signatures. We hypothesize that a combination of two signatures predicting response to veliparib/carboplatin therapy in I-SPY 2 [MammaPrint High2 (MP2)/PARPi7-high] and reflecting DNA damage repair deficiency, may also predict response to P. In addition, we also tested 9 gene expression signatures reflecting different aspects of DNA damage and repair: FA, MMR, BER, HR, TLS, NER, NHEJ, DR, and DNA damage sensing (DDS) pathways. Methods: Data from 249 patients (P: 69 and controls: 180) were available. Pre-treatment biopsies were assayed using Agilent gene expression arrays. All I-SPY 2 qualifying biomarker analyses follow a pre-specified analysis plan. We used logistic modeling to assess biomarker performance. A biomarker is considered a specific predictor of P response if it associates with response in the P arm but not the control arm, and if the biomarker x treatment interaction is significant (likelihood ratio test, p&lt;0.05). This analysis is also performed adjusting for HR status as a covariate, and within receptor subsets, sample size permitting. For successful biomarkers, we use Bayesian modeling to estimate the pCR rates of 'predicted sensitive' patients in each arm. Our statistics are descriptive rather than inferential and do not adjust for multiplicities of other biomarkers outside this study. Results: MP2 status associates with pCR in P (OR=7.7; p=0.00021), but also to a lesser extent in the control arm (OR=2.4:p=0.045), with an OR ratio of 3.3 which trends toward significance, even after adjusting for HR status (LR p=0.083). A majority of TN patients are MP2; and TN/MP2 patients have an estimated pCR rate of 67% in P (vs. 23% in control). Although only ~30% of HR+HER2- patients were MP2, their estimated pCR rate in P is 61%, compared to 29% in unselected HR+/HER2- patients. PARPi7 predicted response in the P arm only in the HR+HER2- group (LR p= 0.025), but not in the population as a whole or the TN subtype. Combining MP2 and PARPi7 into MP2/PARPi7-high did not improve performance over MP2 as a single biomarker. Of the 9 DDR pathway signatures tested, both BER and DDS associate with pCR in P, but only DDS (which includes ATM, ATR, CHEK1-2) associates with pCR in the P arm (LR p=0.00029), and not the control arm (LR p=0.53), with a significant interaction with treatment (LR p=0.0064) that retains significance in a model adjusting for HR status. When dichotomized to optimize the biomarker x treatment interaction, the estimated pCR rate is 75% in P vs 18% in control, in the DDS+ subset. Conclusion: In this small study, MP2 status and a DNA damage sensing pathway but not the PARPi7 or other repair pathways show promise as predictive biomarkers for immune checkpoint inhibition therapy in breast cancer. Citation Format: Yau C, Wolf D, Brown-Swigart L, Hirst G, Sanil A, Singhrao R, I-SPY 2 TRIAL Investigators, Asare S, DeMichele A, Berry D, Esserman L, van 't Veer L, Nanda R, Liu M, Yee D. Analysis of DNA repair deficiency biomarkers as predictors of response to the PD1 inhibitor pembrolizumab: Results from the neoadjuvant I-SPY 2 trial for stage II-III high-risk breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD6-14.
Abstract PD6-10: KEYNOTE-086 cohort B: Pembrolizumab monotherapy for PD-L1–positive, previously untreated, metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC)
Toppmeyer, D., Cescon, DW , Nanda, Rita , Winer, EP, Mukai, Hirofumi , Tamura, Kenji , Armstrong, AC, Liu, MC, Ryvo, L, Rugo, HS, Tan, Antoinette R. , D'Aquanno, C, Ding, Yi , Karantza, Vassiliki , Schmid, Peter , Adams, Sylvia , Loi, Sherene , Laurentiis, Michelino De , Iwata, Hiroji , Wimberger, Pauline

Cancer Research | February 15, 2018 | Volume: 78 | Issue: 4_Supplement | Pages: PD6-10-PD6-10

10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs17-pd6-10 Get It

Abstract Background: Patients with previously untreated mTNBC typically receive cytotoxic chemotherapy as first-line therapy for metastatic disease. However, efficacy and safety are suboptimal. KEYNOTE-086 (NCT02447003) is a multicohort, single-arm, phase 2 study of pembrolizumab monotherapy for mTNBC. In cohort B, we assessed the safety and antitumor activity of pembrolizumab as first-line therapy for patients with PD-L1-positive mTNBC. Methods: Key eligibility criteria for cohort B were age ≥18 y, centrally confirmed TNBC, no prior systemic anticancer therapy for metastatic disease, ECOG performance status 0-1, measurable disease per RECIST v1.1 by central review, no radiographic evidence of brain metastases, and a tumor PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥1. Pembrolizumab 200 mg was given once every 3 wk for 24 mo or until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or investigator or patient decision. Tumor imaging was performed every 9 wk for 12 mo and every 12 wk thereafter. Clinically stable patients with radiologic progression could remain on pembrolizumab until progression was confirmed on subsequent assessment. Primary end point was safety. Secondary end points included ORR, duration of response, and PFS (all RECIST v1.1 by central review) and OS. Results: Of the 206 patients with tumors evaluable for PD-L1 expression, 128 (62%) had PD-L1 CPS ≥1. Of these, 84 met all eligibility criteria and enrolled. All patients were women, median age was 52.5 y, 29 (35%) had ECOG PS 1, 40 (48%) had elevated LDH, 55 (65%) had visceral ± nonvisceral metastases, and 73 (87%) received prior (neo)adjuvant therapy. All patients received ≥1 pembrolizumab dose, and after median follow-up of 10.6 mo, 18 (21%) remained on pembrolizumab. Treatment-related AEs occurred in 53 (63%) patients and were of grade 3-4 severity in 7 (8%); no patients died or discontinued pembrolizumab because of treatment-related AEs. The most common treatment-related AEs were fatigue (26%), nausea (13%), and diarrhea (12%). No grade 3-4 treatment-related AE occurred in &gt;1 patient. The most common immune-mediated AE was hypothyroidism (10%). Three patients had complete response and 16 had partial response for an ORR of 23% (95% CI 15-33). Of the 11 patients with a best response of stable disease, 1 had stable disease for ≥24 wk, leading to a disease control rate of 24% (95% CI 16-34). 12 of 19 (63%) responses were ongoing at data cutoff, and median duration of response was 8.4 mo (range 2.1+ to 13.9+). Median PFS was 2.1 mo (95% CI 2.0-2.2), with an estimated 6-mo PFS rate of 26%. Median OS was 16.1 mo (95% CI 11.3-NR), with an estimated 6-mo OS rate of 83%. Conclusions: Pembrolizumab monotherapy continues to demonstrate a favorable safety profile and robust, durable antitumor activity in patients with PD-L1-positive, previously untreated mTNBC. Citation Format: Adams S, Loi S, Toppmeyer DL, Cescon DW, De Laurentiis M, Nanda R, Winer EP, Mukai H, Tamura K, Armstrong AC, Liu MC, Iwata H, Ryvo L, Wimberger P, Rugo HS, Tan A, D'Aquanno C, Ding Y, Karantza V, Schmid P. KEYNOTE-086 cohort B: Pembrolizumab monotherapy for PD-L1–positive, previously untreated, metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD6-10.
Abstract PD6-08: Analysis of immune infiltrates (assessed via multiplex fluorescence immunohistochemistry) and immune gene expression signatures as predictors of response to the checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab in the neoadjuvant I-SPY 2 trial
Borowsky, Alexander D. , Vandenberg, Scott , Wolf, DM, Nanda, Rita , Liu, M, Asare, Smita , Veer, Laura van’t, Yee, Dean Y., Berry, Daniella R. A. I., Esserman, Laura, Campbell, Matthew T. , Yau, Christina , Wolf, DM, Rimm, David L. , Swigart, Lamorna Brown , Hirst, Gillian L. , DeMichele, Angela

Cancer Research | February 15, 2018 | Volume: 78 | Issue: 4_Supplement | Pages: PD6-08-PD6-08

10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs17-pd6-08 Get It

Abstract Background: Pembrolizumab (Pembro), an anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor, has been approved for the treatment of a variety of cancers including melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, and urothelial carcinoma. Pembro was recently evaluated in HER2- breast cancer patients in the neoadjuvant I-SPY 2 TRIAL and graduated in the triple negative (TN), HR+HER2-, and HER2- signatures. HER2- patients were randomized to receive Pembro+paclitaxel followed by doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (P+T -&gt; AC) vs. T -&gt; AC. We and others have shown that TN breast cancers tend to have high numbers of immune infiltrates, including T cells and tumor associated macrophages (TAMs). We evaluated expression signatures representing 14 immune cell types (TILs, T cells, CD8 T cells, exhausted T cells, Th1, Tregs, cytotoxic cells, NK, NK CD56dim, dendritic cells, mast cells, B cells, macrophages, and neutrophils) as specific predictors of response to Pembro. Methods: Data from 248 patients (Pembro: 69; controls: 179) were available. Pre-treatment biopsies were assayed using Agilent gene expression arrays. Signature scores are calculated by averaging cell type specific genes. All I-SPY 2 qualifying biomarker analyses follow a pre-specified analysis plan. We used logistic modeling to assess biomarker performance. A biomarker is considered a specific predictor of Pembro response if it associates with response in the Pembro arm but not the control arm, and if the biomarker x treatment interaction is significant (likelihood ratio test, p&lt;0.05). This analysis is also performed adjusting for HR status as covariates, and within receptor subsets. For successful biomarkers, we use Bayesian modeling to estimate the pCR rates of 'predicted sensitive' patients in each arm. Our statistics are descriptive rather than inferential and do not adjust for multiplicities of other biomarkers outside this study. Results: 10 out of the 14 cell-type signatures tested are associated with response in the Pembro arm. Higher expression levels of 9 of these cell-type signatures are associated with higher pCR rates (T cells, exhausted T cells, Th1, cytotoxic cells, NK, NK CD56dim, dendritic cells, B cells, and macrophages), whereas higher mast cell signature expression is associated with non-pCR. Interestingly, many of these same signatures also associate or trend towards association with response in the control arm; and in a model adjusting for HR status, only 3 of these signatures (Th1, B cells and dendritic cells) show significant interaction with treatment. Within the whole population and the TN subtype, the dendritic cell signature is the strongest predictor of specific response to Pembro (OR/1SD: 4.04 and 4.4, LR p &lt; 0.001 overall and in TN). Although other immune signatures (T cells, exhausted T cells, NK, and macrophages) also associate with response in the Pembro arm in the TN subtype, only the dendritic cell and Th1 signatures have a significant interaction with treatment. In contrast, in the HR+HER2- subtype, only 3 signatures (Th1, B cells, and mast cells) associate with response to Pembro; but none of these signatures have significant interaction with treatment. Of note, in both the Pembro and control arms, HR+HER2- patients with higher average mast cell marker expression have lower pCR rates (OR/1SD: 0.33 and 0.51, LRp: 0.006 and 0.04 in Pembro and control arm). Conclusion: As expected, multiple immune cell expression signatures are predictive of response in the Pembro arm; but only dendritic cells and Th1 cells are specific to Pembro in both the population as a whole and the TN subtype. Interestingly, the presence of mast cells may impede response, especially in HR+HER2- patients. Correlation of these signatures with multiplex-IF immune markers is pending. Citation Format: Campbell M, Yau C, Borowsky A, Vandenberg S, Wolf D, Rimm D, Nanda R, Liu M, Brown-Swigart L, Hirst G, Asare S, van't Veer L, Yee D, DeMichele A, Berry D, Esserman L. Analysis of immune infiltrates (assessed via multiplex fluorescence immunohistochemistry) and immune gene expression signatures as predictors of response to the checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab in the neoadjuvant I-SPY 2 trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD6-08.
Mutational spectrum in a worldwide study of 29,700 families with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations
Friebel, Tara M. , Friedman, Eitan , Hamann, Ute, Huo, Dezheng , Kwong, Ava , Oláh, Edith , Olopade, Olufunmilayo I., Solano, Ángela R. , Teo, Soo‐Hwang , Thomassen, Mads , Weitzel, Jeffrey N. , Chan, TL, Couch, Fergus J., Goldgar, David E., Kruse, Torben A., Palmero, Edenir Inêz , Park, Sue K. , Torres, Diana , Rensburg, Elizabeth J. van , McGuffog, Lesley, Aalfs, Cora M. , Abugattas, Julio E. , Aittomäki, Kristiina, Andrews, Lesley , Andrulis, Irene L., Arason, Aðalgeir , Arun, Banu, Asseryanis, Ella, Auerbach, Leo, Azzollini, Jacopo , Balmañà, Judith , Barile, Monica, Barkardóttir, Rósa B. , Barrowdale, Daniel , Benı́tez, Javier , Berger, Andreas, Berger, Raanan , Blanco, Amie , Blazer, Kathleen R. , Blok, Marinus J. , Bonadona, Valérie , Bradbury, Angela R. , Brewer, Carole, Buecher, Bruno , Caldés, Trinidad, Caliebe, Almuth , Caligo, Maria A. , Caputo, Sandrine M. , Chiquette, Jocelyne , Claes, Kathleen , Collée, J. Margriet, Davidson, Rosemarie, Hoya, Miguel de la , Leeneer, Kim De , Pauw, Antoine De , Delnatte, Capucine, Ding, Yuan Chun , Ditsch, Nina , Dorfling, Cecilia M., Dworniczak, Bernd , Eason, Jacqueline , Easton, Douglas F. , Eeles, Rosalind A. , Ehrencrona, Hans , Ejlertsen, Bent , EMBRACE, Engel, Christoph , Engert, Stefanie, Evans, D. Gareth , Faivre, Laurence, Feliubadaló, Lídia , Ferrer, Sandra Fert, Foretová, Lenka , Fowler, Jeffrey M., Frost, Debra, Galvão, Henrique C.R. , Ganz, Patricia A. , Gauthier‐Villars, Marion , Gehrig, Andrea, Collaborators, GEMO Study, Gerdes, Anne‐Marie , Gesta, Paul , Giannini, Giuseppe , Giraud, Sophie , Glendon, Gord , Godwin, Andrew K., Greene, Mark H. , Gutierrez‐Barrera, Angelica M. , Hahnen, Eric , Hauke, Jan , HEBON, Henderson, Alex, Hogervorst, Frans B. L., Honisch, Ellen, Imyanitov, Evgeny N., Izatt, Louise , Izquierdo, Á. , Jakubowska, Anna , James, Paul A. , Janavičius, Ramūnas , Jensen, Uffe Birk , Vijai, Joseph , Kaczmarek, Katarzyna, Karlan, Beth Y., Kast, Karin, Investigators, kConFab, Kim, Sung-Won, Konstantopoulou, Irene , Korach, Jacob, Laitman, Yael , Lasset, Christine, Lázaro, Conxi , Lee, Annette, Lee, Min Hyuk , Lester, Jenny, Lesueur, Fabienne , Liljegren, Annelie, Lindor, Noralane M. , Longy, Michel, Loud, Jennifer T. , Lu, Karen H. , Lubiński, Jan , Macháčková, Eva , Manoukian, Siranoush , Mari, Véronique , Martínez-Bouzas, Cristina, Mátrai, Zoltán , Mebirouk, Noura, Meijers‐Heijboer, Hanne , Meindl, Alfons , Mensenkamp, Arjen R. , Mickys, Ugnius, Montagna, Marco , Moysich, Kirsten B., Mulligan, Anna Marie , Musinsky, Jacob, Ngeow, Joanne , Niederacher, Dieter , Nielsen, Henriette Roed, Nielsen, Finn C., Offit, Kenneth, Öfverholm, Anna , Ong, Kai‐Ren , Osório, Ana , Papp, J., Pasini, Barbara , Pedersen, Inge Søkilde , Peixoto, Ana , Peruga, Nina, Peterlongo, Paolo , Pohl, Esther, Pradhan, Nisha , Prajzendanc, Karolina , Prieur, Fabienne, Radice, Paolo , Ramus, Susan J. , Rantala, Johanna, Rashid, Muhammad Usman , Rhiem, Kerstin, Rodriguez, Gustavo C. , Rogers, Mark T., Rudaitis, Vilius , Schmidt, Ane Yde , Schmutzler, Rita K., Senter, Leigha , Shah, Payal D. , Side, Lucy, Simard, Jacques , Skytte, Anne‐Bine , Slavin, Thomas P. , Snape, Katie , Sobol, Hagay, Southey, Melissa C. , Sukiennicki, Grzegorz, Sutter, Christian , Tan, Yen Y. , Teixeira, Manuel R. , Terry, Mary Beth , Teulé, Àlex , Thomas, Abigail, Thull, Darcy L. , Tognazzo, Silvia , Toland, Amanda Ewart, Topka, Sabine , Trainer, Alison H. , Hout, Annemieke H. van der, Kolk, Lizet E. van der, Luijt, Rob B. van der , Heetvelde, Mattias Van , Varesco, Liliana, Varon‐Mateeva, Raymonda, Vega, Ana , Villarreal‐Garza, Cynthia , Wachenfeldt, Anna von , Walker, Lisa, Wang‐Gohrke, Shan , Wappenschmidt, Barbara, Yoon, Sook-Yee, Zanzottera, Cristina, Zidan, Jamal, Zorn, Kristin K. , Selkirk, Christina G. , Hulick, Peter J. , Chenevix‐Trench, Georgia , Antoniou, Antonis C. , Nathanson, Katherine L. , Durocher, Francine , Olopade, Olufunmilayo I. , Faivre, Laurence , Białkowska, Katarzyna , Caligo, Maria A , Hulick, Peter J , James, Paul , Lesueur, Fabienne , Peterlongo, Paolo , Ramus, Susan J , Teixeira, Manuel R , Teo, Soo H , van Rensburg, Elizabeth J , Moysich, Kirsten , Vega, Ana , de la Hoya, Miguel , Radice, Paolo , Weitzel, Jeffrey N , Claes, Kathleen B M , Azzollini, Jacopo , Eeles, Rosalind A , Ehrencrona, Hans , Evans, D Gareth , Joseph, Vijai , Konstantopoulou, Irene , Olopade, Olufunmilayo I , Southey, Melissa C , van der Luijt, Rob B , Jakubowska, Anna , Palmero, Edenir I , Torres, Diana , Nathanson, Katherine L , Arason, Adalgeir , Barrowdale, Daniel , Benitez, Javier , Engel, Christoph , Izquierdo, Angel , Lazaro, Conxi , Montagna, Marco , Simard, Jacques , Chenevix-Trench, Georgia , Senter, Leigha , Topka, Sabine , Rebbeck, Timothy R. , Couch, Fergus J. , Parsons, Michael T. , Leslie, Goska , Adlard, Julian , Agata, Simona , Arnold, Norbert , Bonanni, Bernardo , Buys, Saundra S. , Campbell, Ian , Chung, Wendy K. , Cook, Jackie A , Dı́ez, Orland , Domchek, Susan M. , Velázquez, Carolina , EMBRACE, Garber, Judy E. , Collaborators, GEMO Study, Gronwald, Jacek , HEBON, Hentschel, Julia , Hogervorst, Frans B.L., Isaacs, Claudine , John, Esther M. , Karlan, Beth Y. , Lasa, Adriana , Lasset, Christine , Liljegren, Annelie , Meindl, Alfons , Miller, Austin , Moysich, Kirsten B. , Neuhausen, Susan L. , Nevanlinna, Heli , Nguyen, Huu Phuc , Nussbaum, Robert L. , Papi, Laura , Pujol, Pascal , Rhiem, Kerstin , Robson, Mark E. , Sharma, Priyanka , Singer, Christian F. , Sobol, Hagay , Steele, Linda Roslyn , Steinemann, Doris , Szabo, Csilla I. , Tischkowitz, Marc D. , Toland, Amanda Ewart , Tung, Nadine , Asperen, Christi J. van , Varesco, Liliana , Varon-Mateeva, Raymonda, Wappenschmidt, Barbara , Weber, Bernhard H. F. , Yannoukakos, Drakoulis , Spurdle, Amanda B. , Faivre, Laurence , Rashid, Muhammad U , De Leeneer, Kim , Feliubadaló, Lidia , Hauke, Jan , Pasini, Barbara , Ngeow, Joanne , Manoukian, Siranoush , Lubinski, Jan , Terry, Mary Beth , Villarreal-Garza, Cynthia , Balmaña, Judith , Kwong, Ava

Human Mutation | February 15, 2018 | Volume: 39 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 593-620

10.1002/humu.23406 | PMID 29446198 Get It

Transcriptional Profiling of Synovial Macrophages Using Minimally Invasive Ultrasound‐Guided Synovial Biopsies in Rheumatoid Arthritis
Mandelin, Arthur M. , Homan, Philip , Shaffer, Alexander , Cuda, Carla M. , Dominguez, Salina , Bacalao, Emily, Carns, Mary , Lee, Jungwha , Aren, Kathleen , Thakrar, Anjali , Montgomery, Anna B. , Bridges, S. Louis , Bathon, Joan M. , Atkinson, John , Matteson, Eric L. , Buckley, Christopher D. , Pitzalis, Costantino , Parks, Deborah, Hughes, Laura B., Geraldino‐Pardilla, Laura , Ike, Robert W. , Phillips, Kristine, Wright, Kerry , Filer, Andrew , Kelly, Stephen, Morgan, Vince K. , Abdala‐Valencia, Hiam , Budinger, G. R. Scott , Bartom, Elizabeth T. , Perlman, Harris , Winter, Deborah R. , Atkinson, John P. , Hinchcliff, Monique , Fox, David A. , Ruderman, Eric , Misharin, Alexander V. , Budinger, G. R. Scott , Pope, Richard M. , Winter, Deborah R

Arthritis & Rheumatology | February 13, 2018 | Volume: 70 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 841-854

10.1002/art.40453 | PMID 29439295 Get It

ObjectiveCurrently, there are no reliable biomarkers for predicting therapeutic response in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The synovium may unlock critical information for determining efficacy, since a reduction in the numbers of sublining synovial macrophages remains the most reproducible biomarker. Thus, a clinically actionable method for the collection of synovial tissue, which can be analyzed using high‐throughput strategies, must become a reality. This study was undertaken to assess the feasibility of utilizing synovial biopsies as a precision medicine‐based approach for patients with RA.MethodsRheumatologists at 6 US academic sites were trained in minimally invasive ultrasound‐guided synovial tissue biopsy. Biopsy specimens obtained from patients with RA and synovial tissue from patients with osteoarthritis (OA) were subjected to histologic analysis, fluorescence‐activated cell sorting, and RNA sequencing (RNA‐seq). An optimized protocol for digesting synovial tissue was developed to generate high‐quality RNA‐seq libraries from isolated macrophage populations. Associations were determined between macrophage transcriptional profiles and clinical parameters in RA patients.ResultsPatients with RA reported minimal adverse effects in response to synovial biopsy. Comparable RNA quality was observed from synovial tissue and isolated macrophages between patients with RA and patients with OA. Whole tissue samples from patients with RA demonstrated a high degree of transcriptional heterogeneity. In contrast, the transcriptional profile of isolated RA synovial macrophages highlighted different subpopulations of patients and identified 6 novel transcriptional modules that were associated with disease activity and therapy.ConclusionPerformance of synovial tissue biopsies by rheumatologists in the US is feasible and generates high‐quality samples for research. Through the use of cutting‐edge technologies to analyze synovial biopsy specimens in conjunction with corresponding clinical information, a precision medicine–based approach for patients with RA is attainable.