Meeks, Huong

AbstractBackgroundImmune thrombocytopenia (ITP) and Evans syndrome (ES) are manifestations of immune dysregulation. Genetic variants in immune‐related genes have been identified in patients with ITP and especially ES. We aimed to explore familial autoimmunity in patients with ITP and ES to understand possible contributions to chronicity.ProcedureWe assessed family history in two ways: via patient report for ITP and ES and by population‐based analysis using the Utah Population Database (UPDB) for ITP. A total of 266 patients with ITP and 21 patients with ES were identified via chart review, and 252 of the 266 patients with ITP were also identified in the UPDB.ResultsChart review showed familial autoimmunity in 29/182 (15.9%) and 25/84 (29.8%) of patients with newly diagnosed+persistent (nd+p) ITP and chronic ITP (cITP), respectively, (p = .009). The UPDB analysis revealed that autoimmunity in relatives of patients with nd+pITP was higher than in relatives of controls (odds ratio [OR]: 1.69 [1.19–2.41], p = .004), but was not significantly increased in relatives of patients with cITP (OR 1.10 [0.63–1.92], p = .734). Incomplete family history in medical records likely contributed to the observed discrepancy.ConclusionsThe findings suggest that familial autoimmunity may have a stronger association with the development of ITP rather than its duration. Twelve (57.1%) patients with ES reported autoimmunity in their relatives. UPDB analysis was omitted due to the small number of patients with ES. The use of population databases offers a unique opportunity to assess familial health and may provide clues about contributors to immune dysregulation features within families.

Background We previously showed that the BRCA1 variant c.5096G>A p.Arg1699Gln (R1699Q) was associated with an intermediate risk of breast cancer (BC) and ovarian cancer (OC). This study aimed to assess these cancer risks for R1699Q carriers in a larger cohort, including follow-up of previously studied families, to further define cancer risks and to propose adjusted clinical management of female BRCA1*R1699Q carriers. Methods Data were collected from 129 BRCA1*R1699Q families ascertained internationally by ENIGMA (Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles) consortium members. A modified segregation analysis was used to calculate BC and OC risks. Relative risks were calculated under both monogenic model and major gene plus polygenic model assumptions. Results In this cohort the cumulative risk of BC and OC by age 70 years was 20% and 6%, respectively. The relative risk for developing cancer was higher when using a model that included the effects of both the R1699Q variant and a residual polygenic component compared with monogenic model (for BC 3.67 vs 2.83, and for OC 6.41 vs 5.83). Conclusion Our results confirm that BRCA1*R1699Q confers an intermediate risk for BC and OC. Breast surveillance for female carriers based on mammogram annually from age 40 is advised. Bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy should be considered based on family history.

Abstract Breast cancer risks conferred by many germline missense variants in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, often referred to as variants of uncertain significance (VUS), have not been established. In this study, associations between 19 BRCA1 and 33 BRCA2 missense substitution variants and breast cancer risk were investigated through a breast cancer case–control study using genotyping data from 38 studies of predominantly European ancestry (41,890 cases and 41,607 controls) and nine studies of Asian ancestry (6,269 cases and 6,624 controls). The BRCA2 c.9104A>C, p.Tyr3035Ser (OR = 2.52; P = 0.04), and BRCA1 c.5096G>A, p.Arg1699Gln (OR = 4.29; P = 0.009) variant were associated with moderately increased risks of breast cancer among Europeans, whereas BRCA2 c.7522G>A, p.Gly2508Ser (OR = 2.68; P = 0.004), and c.8187G>T, p.Lys2729Asn (OR = 1.4; P = 0.004) were associated with moderate and low risks of breast cancer among Asians. Functional characterization of the BRCA2 variants using four quantitative assays showed reduced BRCA2 activity for p.Tyr3035Ser compared with wild-type. Overall, our results show how BRCA2 missense variants that influence protein function can confer clinically relevant, moderately increased risks of breast cancer, with potential implications for risk management guidelines in women with these specific variants. Cancer Res; 77(11); 2789–99. ©2017 AACR.

Abstract Multigene panel testing (MGPT) for hereditary cancer is increasing in popularity in the USA. Many panels include genes identified as hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer (HBOC) genes despite limited data regarding the precise cancer risks associated with mutations in these genes. Here we report on results from BreastNext and OvaNext panel testing of 20 genes (ATM, BARD1, BRCA1, BRCA2, BRIP1, CDH1, CHEK2, MLH1, MRE11A, MSH2, MSH6, NBN, NF1, PALB2, PMS2, PTEN, RAD50, RAD51C, RAD51D, TP53) in a cohort of 15,083 individuals. The majority of individuals were from high-risk breast and/or ovarian (Br/Ov) cancer families, with 92.4% of all probands meeting National Comprehensive Cancer Network HBOC testing criteria. Pathogenic mutations were identified in 9.4% of the overall cohort. To estimate gene-specific breast and ovarian cancer risks, case-control analyses were performed comparing the frequencies of pathogenic mutations from Caucasian breast or ovarian cancer cases from BreastNext and OvaNext with frequencies from Caucasian, non-Finnish, non-TCGA controls from the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC) database. Mutations in the well studied ATM and CHEK2 genes were associated with moderate risks (OR>2) of breast cancer and mutations in PALB2 were associated with high-risks (OR>5) of breast cancer, consistent with previous reports. In addition, the study suggested that pathogenic mutations in MSH6, RAD51D, CDH1, and NF1 are associated with moderate to high risks of breast cancer. In contrast, RAD51C, RAD51D, and BRIP1 mutations were associated with high risks of ovarian cancer, PALB2 mutations were associated with moderate risks, but ATM and CHEK2 mutations were not associated with increased ovarian cancer risk. In addition, modeling of missense mutations in the predisposition genes using in silico prediction algorithms suggested that missense mutations in CDH1, CHEK2, MSH2, and MSH6 are associated with moderate risks of breast cancer and missense mutations in RAD51C increase risks of ovarian cancer. This large breast and ovarian cancer case-control analysis provides useful data for many predisposition genes previously lacking risk estimates, and should prove useful for clinical risk management of patients after clinical panel testing. Citation Format: Fergus J. Couch, David E. Goldgar, Steven N. Hart, Emily Hallberg, Raymond Moore, Huong Meeks, Robert Huether, Holly LaDuca, Elizabeth Chao, Jill Dolinsky. Breast and ovarian cancer risks associated with cancer predisposition gene mutations identified by multigene panel testing. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 2597.