Objective To assess real‐world effectiveness of switching disease‐modifying therapy (DMT) in pediatric multiple sclerosis (MS) and clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) initially treated with platform injectables on disease activity. Methods Of 2615 pediatric‐onset demyelinating disease patients at 12 clinics in the United States (US) Network of Pediatric MS Centers, those with MS/CIS on initial therapy with a platform injectable who switched to another class of platform injectable, oral or infusion DMT were analyzed. Relapse rate was modeled with negative binomial regression, adjusted for preidentified confounders. Results A total of 212 children switched DMT before age 18 (67% female, 95% MS). Ninety‐three switched from injectable to injectable, 76 injectable to oral, and 43 injectable to infusion. Switchers to oral or infusion were older at onset (injectable 12.3 years, oral 13.5 years, and infusion 14.2 years) and switch (injectable 14.6 years, oral 16.0 years, and infusion 15.7 years). Switchers to infusion DMT were more likely to have enhancing lesions (injectable 45%, oral 28%, and infusion 67%). Compared to injectable (annualized relapse rate [ARR] = 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.52–1.48), relapse rates were lower for injectable to oral (ARR = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.20–0.57; rate ratio: 0.38, 95% CI = 0.21–0.69) and injectable to infusion (ARR = 0.18, 95% CI = 0.09–0.37; rate ratio: 0.21, 95% CI = 0.10–0.44) ( p < 0.001). Adjusted number needed to treat in person‐years to prevent 1 relapse with oral over injectable was 1.84 (95% CI = 1.03–8.69) and infusion over injectable 1.43 (95% CI = 1.00–3.88). Interpretation Switching from platform injectable to oral or infusion compared to other platform injectable DMT led to better disease control in pediatric MS. Long‐term safety data are required. ANN NEUROL 2026;99:715–729
Evaluating Efficacy Outcomes in Pediatric Multiple Sclerosis Patients While Using Avonex or Plegridy via USNPMSC Registry
This study evaluated the efficacy of the multiple sclerosis disease-modifying therapies, intramuscular interferon beta-1a (Avonex) and subcutaneous peginterferon beta-1a (Plegridy), using data from the United States Network of Pediatric Multiple Sclerosis Centers. In this retrospective analysis, 154 patients with multiple sclerosis were included who were treated with Avonex (n = 130), Plegridy (n = 23), or both treatments (n = 1) before the age of 18 years. After 3 months’ sustained use acclimation (“wash-in”), the probability of being relapse-free during the first year was 68.3% for Avonex-treated patients and 69.9% for Plegridy-treated patients; annualized relapse rates were 0.50 and 0.59, respectively. Both disease-modifying therapies demonstrated efficacy similar to that reported in adult populations. Despite the lack of formal approval for pediatric multiple sclerosis, these outcomes indicate that patients may benefit from treatment with Avonex or Plegridy. Understanding efficacy of specific disease-modifying therapies in pediatric multiple sclerosis is essential to making informed treatment decisions.
Epidemiology and Impact of Social Hardships in Children With Multiple Sclerosis in the United States
Real-world effectiveness of switching treatment after initial platform injectable disease-modifying therapies in pediatric multiple sclerosis in the US (P14-3.008)
Background: Pediatric patients with multiple sclerosis (POMS) and related disorders, clinically isolated syndrome (CIS), myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody disorder (MOGAD), and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD), are commonly treated with immunosuppressants. Understanding the impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients may inform treatment decisions. Objective: Characterize SARS-CoV-2 infection prevalence and severity among a cohort of patients with POMS and related disorders, as well as the impact of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). Methods: POMS and related disorders patients enrolled in a large, prospective registry were screened for COVID-19 during standard-of-care neurology visits. If confirmed positive of having infection, further analysis was undertaken. Results: Six hundred and sixty-nine patients were surveyed between March 2020 and August 2021. There were 73 confirmed COVID-19 infections. Eight of nine hospitalized patients (89%), and all patients admitted to the ICU were treated with B cell depleting therapy. The unadjusted odds ratio of hospitalization among those who tested positive of having had COVID-19 was 15.27 among those on B-cell-depleting therapy ( p = 0.016). Conclusions: B-cell-depleting treatment was associated with a higher risk of COVID-19, higher rates of hospitalization, and ICU admission, suggesting this therapy carries a higher risk of severe infection in POMS and related disorders.
Anakinra usage in febrile infection related epilepsy syndrome: an international cohort
AbstractFebrile‐infection related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES) is a devastating neurological condition characterized by a febrile illness preceding new onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE). Increasing evidence suggests innate immune dysfunction as a potential pathological mechanism. We report an international retrospective cohort of 25 children treated with anakinra, a recombinant interleukin‐1 receptor antagonist, as an immunomodulator for FIRES. Anakinra was potentially safe with only one child discontinuing therapy due to infection. Earlier anakinra initiation was associated with shorter duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU and hospital length of stay. Our retrospective data lay the groundwork for prospective consensus‐driven cohort studies of anakinra in FIRES.