Back to Authors

Deverka, Patricia A.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1777-4286

Mayo Clinic

University of California, San Francisco

Citations 3

Progress in Pharmacogenomics Implementation in the United States: Barrier Erosion and Remaining Challenges
Smith, D. Max , Aquilante, Christina L. , Deverka, Patricia A. , Devine, Emily Beth , Dunnenberger, Henry M. , Empey, Philip E. , Hertz, Daniel L. , Monte, Andrew A. , Moyer, Ann M. , Pratt, Victoria M. , Saulsberry, Loren , Oni‐Orisan, Akinyemi , Douglas, Michael P , Devine, Beth , Dunnenberger, Henry M , Empey, Philip E , Hertz, Daniel L , Moyer, AM , Patel, Jai N , Pratt, Victoria M , Saulsberry, Loren , Scott, Stuart A , Voora, Deepak , Woodahl, Erica L , Whirl-Carrillo, Michelle , Oni-Orisan, Akinyemi , Smith, D Max , Scott, Stuart A. , Whirl‐Carrillo, Michelle

Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics | June 5, 2025 | Volume: 118 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 778-789

10.1002/cpt.3736 Get It

Barriers to incorporating pharmacogenetics into routine clinical practice in the United States are well documented. Initial surveys by the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) in 2009 and 2010 identified barriers across four key domains that have hindered the widespread adoption of clinical pharmacogenetic testing. These are presented verbatim as: (i) absence of a definition of the processes required to interpret genotype information and to translate genetic information into clinical actions; (ii) need for recommended drug/gene pairs to implement clinically now; (iii) clinician resistance to consider pharmacogenetic information at the bedside; and (iv) concerns about test costs and reimbursement. Over time, many of these challenges have been overcome, and clinical pharmacogenetic testing has subsequently reached broader implementation. Despite this progress, several barriers remain that block further adoption. This narrative review used authors' expertise and experience to identify and describe current barriers to pharmacogenetic implementation across seven domains in the United States: equity and inclusion; guidelines and supporting evidence; regulatory agency oversight; payer coverage and insurance; availability of quality pharmacogenetic tests; electronic health records; and provider and patient education. Within each domain, it revisits past successes and challenges and explores remaining barriers. We also propose solutions to address ongoing challenges across these domains, including further expansion of recommendations beyond pharmacogenetic‐specific guidelines, standards for designing clinical decision support tools, and broader pharmacogenetics education. Addressing these remaining obstacles directs work to enable broader adoption of clinical pharmacogenetic implementation to ultimately improve patient outcomes.
A research agenda to support the development and implementation of genomics-based clinical informatics tools and resources
Wiley, Ken, Findley, Laura, Goldrich, Madison P., Rakhra-Burris, Tejinder, Stevens, Ana, Bult, Carol J. , Deverka, Patricia A. , Green, Eric D. , Jarvik, Gail P. , Ramos, Erin M. , Relling, Mary V. , Roden, Dan M. , Rowley, Robb , Alterovitz, Gil , Aronson, Samuel , Bastarache, Lisa , Jeff, Janina M., Madhavan, Subha , Mendonça, Eneida A. , Ohno‐Machado, Lucila , Ritchie, Marylyn D. , Walton, Nephi , Zayas‐Cabán, Teresa, Manolio, Teri A. , Bult, Carol J , Roden, Dan M. , Cimino, James J , Del Fiol, Guilherme , Hoffman, Mark A , Kawamoto, Kensaku , Jarvik, Gail P , Williams, Pamela, Chisholm, Rex L. , Ginsburg, Geoffrey S. , Mensah, George A. , Cimino, James J. , Crowgey, Erin L. , Fiol, Guilherme Del , Freimuth, Robert R. , Hoffman, Mark A. , Johnson, Kevin B. , Pratap, Siddharth , Taylor, Casey Overby , Weng, Chunhua , Williams, Marc S

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association | April 14, 2022 | Volume: 29 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 1342-1349

10.1093/jamia/ocac057 Get It

Abstract Objective The Genomic Medicine Working Group of the National Advisory Council for Human Genome Research virtually hosted its 13th genomic medicine meeting titled “Developing a Clinical Genomic Informatics Research Agenda”. The meeting’s goal was to articulate a research strategy to develop Genomics-based Clinical Informatics Tools and Resources (GCIT) to improve the detection, treatment, and reporting of genetic disorders in clinical settings. Materials and Methods Experts from government agencies, the private sector, and academia in genomic medicine and clinical informatics were invited to address the meeting's goals. Invitees were also asked to complete a survey to assess important considerations needed to develop a genomic-based clinical informatics research strategy. Results Outcomes from the meeting included identifying short-term research needs, such as designing and implementing standards-based interfaces between laboratory information systems and electronic health records, as well as long-term projects, such as identifying and addressing barriers related to the establishment and implementation of genomic data exchange systems that, in turn, the research community could help address. Discussion Discussions centered on identifying gaps and barriers that impede the use of GCIT in genomic medicine. Emergent themes from the meeting included developing an implementation science framework, defining a value proposition for all stakeholders, fostering engagement with patients and partners to develop applications under patient control, promoting the use of relevant clinical workflows in research, and lowering related barriers to regulatory processes. Another key theme was recognizing pervasive biases in data and information systems, algorithms, access, value, and knowledge repositories and identifying ways to resolve them.
Research Directions in the Clinical Implementation of Pharmacogenomics: An Overview of US Programs and Projects
Volpi, Simona , Bult, Carol J. , Chisholm, Rex L. , Deverka, Patricia A. , Jacob, Howard J., Kasapi, Melpomeni , McLeod, Howard L. , Roden, Dan M. , Green, Eric D. , Rodriguez, Laura Lyman , Aronson, Samuel , Cavallari, Larisa H. , Denny, Joshua C. , Dressler, Lynn G., Johnson, Julie A. , Leeder, J. Steven , Piquette‐Miller, Micheline , Rasmussen‐Torvik, Laura J. , Ritchie, Marylyn D. , Skaar, Todd C. , Wagle, Nikhil , Weinshilboum, Richard M. , Weitzel, Kristin, Wildin, Robert S. , Manolio, Teri A. , Relling, Mary V. , Weinshilboum, Richard, Denny, Joshua C , Ginsburg, Geoffrey S. , Roden, Dan M. , Williams, Marc S , Klein, Teri E. , Perera, Minoli A. , Rehm, Heidi L. , Weinshilboum, Richard M. , Wilson, John T. , Cavallari, Larisa H , Rasmussen-Torvik, Laura J

Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics | February 21, 2018 | Volume: 103 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 778-786

10.1002/cpt.1048 Get It

Response to a drug often differs widely among individual patients. This variability is frequently observed not only with respect to effective responses but also with adverse drug reactions. Matching patients to the drugs that are most likely to be effective and least likely to cause harm is the goal of effective therapeutics. Pharmacogenomics (PGx) holds the promise of precision medicine through elucidating the genetic determinants responsible for pharmacological outcomes and using them to guide drug selection and dosing. Here we survey the US landscape of research programs in PGx implementation, review current advances and clinical applications of PGx, summarize the obstacles that have hindered PGx implementation, and identify the critical knowledge gaps and possible studies needed to help to address them.