Citations

Background The rapid evolution of artificial intelligence (AI) in conjunction with recent updates in dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) management guidelines emphasizes the necessity for innovative models to predict ischemic or bleeding events after drug‐eluting stent implantation. Leveraging AI for dynamic prediction has the potential to revolutionize risk stratification and provide personalized decision support for DAPT management. Methods and Results We developed and validated a new AI‐based pipeline using retrospective data of drug‐eluting stent‐treated patients, sourced from the Cerner Health Facts data set (n=98 236) and Optum's de‐identified Clinformatics Data Mart Database (n=9978). The 36 months following drug‐eluting stent implantation were designated as our primary forecasting interval, further segmented into 6 sequential prediction windows. We evaluated 5 distinct AI algorithms for their precision in predicting ischemic and bleeding risks. Model discriminative accuracy was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, among other metrics. The weighted light gradient boosting machine stood out as the preeminent model, thus earning its place as our AI‐DAPT model. The AI‐DAPT demonstrated peak accuracy in the 30 to 36 months window, charting an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 90% [95% CI, 88%–92%] for ischemia and 84% [95% CI, 82%–87%] for bleeding predictions. Conclusions Our AI‐DAPT excels in formulating iterative, refined dynamic predictions by assimilating ongoing updates from patients' clinical profiles, holding value as a novel smart clinical tool to facilitate optimal DAPT duration management with high accuracy and adaptability.

Abstract A variety of terms, such as “antiepileptic,” “anticonvulsant,” and “antiseizure” have been historically applied to medications for the treatment of seizure disorders. Terminology is important because using terms that do not accurately reflect the action of specific treatments may result in a misunderstanding of their effects and inappropriate use. The present International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) position paper used a Delphi approach to develop recommendations on English‐language terminology applicable to pharmacological agents currently approved for treating seizure disorders. There was consensus that these medications should be collectively named “antiseizure medications”. This term accurately reflects their primarily symptomatic effect against seizures and reduces the possibility of health care practitioners, patients, or caregivers having undue expectations or an incorrect understanding of the real action of these medications. The term “antiseizure” to describe these agents does not exclude the possibility of beneficial effects on the course of the disease and comorbidities that result from the downstream effects of seizures, whenever these beneficial effects can be explained solely by the suppression of seizure activity. It is acknowledged that other treatments, mostly under development, can exert direct favorable actions on the underlying disease or its progression, by having “antiepileptogenic” or “disease‐modifying” effects. A more‐refined terminology to describe precisely these actions needs to be developed.

Abstract Advances in genetic technology have led to the increasing use of genomic panels in precision oncology practice, with panels ranging from a couple to hundreds of genes. However, the clinical utilization and utility of oncology genomic panels, especially among vulnerable populations, is unclear. We examined the association of panel size with socioeconomic status and clinical trial matching. We retrospectively identified 9,886 eligible adult subjects in the Mayo Clinic Health System who underwent genomic testing between January 1, 2016 and June 30, 2020. Patient data were retrieved from structured and unstructured data sources of institutional collections, including cancer registries, clinical data warehouses, and clinical notes. Socioeconomic surrogates were approximated using the Area Deprivation Index (ADI) corresponding to primary residence addresses. Logistic regression was performed to analyze relationships between ADI or rural/urban status and (i) use of genomic test by panel size; (ii) clinical trial matching status. Compared with patients from the most affluent areas, patients had a lower odds of receiving a panel test (vs. a single-gene test) if from areas of higher socioeconomic deprivation [OR (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.71 (0.61–0.83), P < 0.01] or a rural area [OR (95% CI): 0.85 (0.76–0.96), P < 0.01]. Patients in areas of higher socioeconomic deprivation were less likely to be matched to clinical trials if receiving medium panel tests [(OR) (95% CI): 0.69 (0.49–0.97), P = 0.03]; however, there was no difference among patients receiving large panel tests (P > 0.05) and rural patients were almost 2x greater odds of being matched if receiving a large panel test [(OR) (95% CI): 1.76 (1.21–2.55), P < 0.01]. Significance: We identified socioeconomic and rurality disparities in the use of genomic tests and trial matching by panel size, which may have implications for equal access to targeted therapies. The lack of association between large panel tests and clinical trial matching by socioeconomic status, suggests a potential health equity impact, while removing barriers in access to large panels for rural patients may improve access to trials. However, further research is needed.

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) belongs to the group of human herpes virus and can cause clinical and subclinical infections. Although EBV-related disease presentations are similar, they can lead to oncogenic transformation with various clinical manifestations. A thorough workup with morphology, immunohistochemistry, and molecular studies is crucial for the diagnosis of EBV-positive polymorphic B-cell lymphoproliferative disorder, not otherwise specified (NOS), which is a new entity introduced by International Consensus Classification in 2022. We describe an interesting presentation of EBV-positive polymorphic B-cell lymphoproliferative disorder with laryngeal involvement to bring awareness to this entity and we would like to address the need for more accessible treatment options.

507 Background: Navitoclax (ABT-263) is an oral Bcl-2 homology-3 mimetic that binds with high affinity to pro-survival Bcl-2 proteins, resulting in apoptosis. Sorafenib, an oral multi kinase inhibitor inhibits tumor angiogenesis and also promotes apoptosis. The efficacy of either agent alone is limited; however, preclinical studies demonstrate synergy with the combination of navitoclax and sorafenib. Methods: In this phase 1 pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study (NCT01364051), we evaluated the combination of navitoclax and sorafenib in a dose escalation cohort of patients with refractory solid tumors, with an expansion cohort in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The study agents were provided by the Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program at National Cancer Institute under CRADA. Navitoclax and sorafenib were administered continuously on days 1 through 21 of 21-day cycles. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was determined using the continual reassessment method. Results: Ten patients were enrolled in the dose escalation cohort and 15 patients with HCC were enrolled in the expansion cohort. Two dose levels were tested, dose level 1 (navitoclax 150 mg daily plus sorafenib 400 mg twice daily) and dose level 2 (navitoclax 200 mg daily plus sorafenib 400 mg twice daily). At dose level 1, one dose limiting toxicity (DLT) [grade 3 aspartate aminotransferase elevation] was observed among 6 patients treated at this dose level. In a cohort of 3 patients treated at dose level 2, two DLTs were observed (grade 3 hypertension, and grade 3 rash), hence dose level 1 was identified as the MTD. Among all patients, the most common grade 3 toxicity was thrombocytopenia (5 patients, 20%): there were no grade 4 or 5 toxicities (Table). Patients received a median of 2 cycles (range 1-36 cycles) and all patients were off study treatment at data cut off. Six patients in the expansion cohort had stable disease, 5 had progressive disease and 4 with unavailable data. There were no partial or complete responses. Drug-drug interaction between navitoclax and sorafenib was not observed. The combination of navitoclax and sorafenib did not increase induction of apoptosis compared with navitoclax alone. Conclusions: Navitoclax plus sorafenib resulted in manageable, but not ideal toxicities for continuous oral administration which precluded dose escalation. The lack of clinical benefit in the HCC expansion cohort does not support further development of this combination for the treatment of advanced HCC. Clinical trial information: NCT01364051 . [Table: see text]

The 2023 Joint International Congress of the International Liver Transplantation Society (ILTS), the European Liver and Intestine Transplant Association (ELITA), and the Liver Intensive Care Group of Europe (LICAGE) held in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, marked a significant recovery milestone for the liver transplant community after COVID-19. With 1159 participants and a surge in abstract submissions, the event focused on “Liver Disorders and Transplantation: Innovations and Evolving Indications.” This conference report provides a comprehensive overview of the key themes discussed during the event, encompassing Hepatology, Anesthesia and Critical Care, Acute Liver Failure, Infectious Disease, Immunosuppression, Pediatric Liver Transplantation, Living Donor Liver Transplantation, Transplant Oncology, Surgical Approaches, and Machine Perfusion. The congress provided a platform for extensive discussions on a wide range of topics, reflecting the continuous advancements and collaborative efforts within the liver transplant community.

AbstractBackgroundPlasma biomarkers such as Aβ 42/40 have emerged as important tools to detect dementia risk, although whether plasma Aβ 42/40 levels and the associations with dementia risk differ by race is unclear. As part of the Health, Aging, and Body Composition study, we compared the plasma levels of Aβ 42/40 ratio and the associations with 15‐year dementia risk by race among community‐dwelling Black and White older adults.MethodsWe studied 997 dementia‐free participants (55% women, 54% Blacks) aged 70‐79 years (mean age 74.5±2.9) enrolled at baseline (1997‐98). We defined incidence dementia over 15 years based on hospital records, prescription for dementia medication, or a decline ≥1.5 standard deviations in the Modified Mini‐Mental State Examination score. Stored plasma obtained one year after baseline was used to measure Aβ with Innogenetics INNO‐BIA assays at Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL. Plasma Aβ42/40 ratio was categorized into low, medium, and high tertiles. We used linear regression to estimate the difference in log‐transformed Aβ42/40 in Black and White participants and back‐transformed the effect estimates. We assess the association between Aβ42/40 (by tertiles) and dementia risk using Cox proportional hazards model stratified by race. All models were adjusted for age, sex, hypertension, diabetes, high cholesterol, and obesity, and we tested for interactions by race.ResultsBlack participants had significantly lower Aβ42/40 than White participants (‐4.4%, 95% CI ‐8.1% to ‐0.6%). In stratified analysis, lower Aβ42/40 was significantly associated with an increased risk of incident dementia among Black participants: 27.8% in medium (hazard ratio [HR] 1.69, 95% CI 1.07 to 2.68) and 33.5% in low (HR 2.07, 95% CI 1.32 to 3.24) compared with 17.3% in high Aβ42/40 tertile. The associations were somewhat weaker but showed the same trend among White participants: 20.3% in medium (HR 1.49, 95% CI 0.85 to 2.61) and 22.9% in low (HR 1.59, 95% CI 0.92 to 2.76) compared with 15% in high Aβ42/40 tertile. The interaction between Aβ42/40 and race was not statistically significant.ConclusionAmong community‐dwelling, non‐demented older adults, plasma Aβ42/40 differs by race, although the association with dementia risk does not differ by race.

Background: Little is known about the relationship between carotid plaque formation and cognitive function in a middle-aged population. Hypothesis: We hypothesize that there will be an association between carotid atherosclerotic burden and cognitive function in middle-aged adults. Aim: The purpose of the present study is to examine the relationship between carotid artery (CA) plaque and cognitive function in middle-aged white and black men and women from the Bogalusa Heart Study (BHS) cohort. Methods: We included a total of 1,107 BHS participants with echocardiography and carotid ultrasound performed between 2013 and 2016. Cognitive function was quantified in a global cognitive score (GCS) comprised of the z standardized sum of 7 neuropsychiatric tests. CA plaque was defined by carotid intima media thickness ≥1.5mm in any segment of the CA including right and left common artery (RCC/LCC), bulbs (RCB/LCB) as well as right and left internal carotid artery (RIC/LIC). We compared demographic, clinical, and echocardiographic characteristics in participants with or without CA plaque and used linear regression analysis for the association between CA and GCS adjusted for age, sex, race and education. Results: Among all, 373 (33.7%) of participants had one or more CA plaque. The most common locations of CA plaque formation differed according to laterality, with 230 (61.7%), 189 (50.7%), 108 (29.0%), 92 (24.7%), 83 (22.3%), 10 (2.7%) participants having plaque in the RCB, LCB, LCA, RIC, LIC, and RCA, respectively. Participants with CA plaque were likely to be older (49.9 vs. 47.2 years), male (52 vs.38.9%), white (70.2 vs.63.4%,), have larger left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic volume (97.4 vs.94 ml) and LV mass index (83.4 vs.76.3 g/m 2 , all p -value<0.01), but similar LV ejection fraction (60.1 vs.60.0%) as compared to those without CA plaque. Moreover, CA is associated with poorer cognitive function (GCS, standardized β coefficient=-0.07; p =0.02) adjusted for age, sex, and race. However, the association was attenuated after adjusting for education. Conclusion: CA plaque was highly prevalent and inversely associated with cognitive function. The association was attenuated by education emphasizing the importance of social determinants in cognitive health.

Aducanumab, an anti-amyloid immunotherapy for Alzheimer’s disease, efficiently reduces Aβ, though its plaque clearance mechanisms, long-term effects, and effects of discontinuation are not fully understood. We assessed the effect of aducanumab treatment and withdrawal on Aβ, neuritic dystrophy, astrocytes, and microglia in the APP/PS1 amyloid mouse model. We found that reductions in amyloid and neuritic dystrophy during acute treatment were accompanied by microglial and astrocytic activation, and microglial recruitment to plaques and adoption of an aducanumab-specific pro-phagocytic and pro-degradation transcriptomic signature, indicating a role for microglia in aducanumab-mediated Aβ clearance. Reductions in Aβ and dystrophy were sustained 15 but not 30 wk after discontinuation, and reaccumulation of plaques coincided with loss of the microglial aducanumab signature and failure of microglia to reactivate. This suggests that despite the initial benefit from treatment, microglia are unable to respond later to restrain plaque reaccumulation, making further studies on the effect of amyloid-directed immunotherapy withdrawal crucial for assessing long-term safety and efficacy.