Back to Authors

Niu, Shuteng

0000-0002-1069-9236

Mayo Clinic

McWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Houston TX USA.

Citations 4

Data Distribution Evolution for Robust EEG Emotion Recognition with Limited Data Resource
Wang, Zhenyi , Shen, Li, Niu, Shuteng , Doretto, Gianfranco , Adjeroh, Donald , Tao, Cui, Tao, Cui , Shen, Li , Tao, Cui , Niu, Shuteng , Duan, Tiehang

IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing | April 20, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: 1-14

10.1109/taffc.2026.3684827 Get It

Leveraging Vulnerabilities in Temporal Graph Neural Networks via Strategic High-Impact Assaults
Jeon, Dae-Seong , Zhu, Lijing , Li, Haifang , Li, Pengze , Feng, Jingna , Duan, Tiehang , Song, Houbing , Tao, Cui , Niu, Shuteng , Jeon, Dong Hyun , Song, Houbing Herbert , Tao, Cui , Niu, Shuteng , Zhu, Lijing

Proceedings of the 34th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management | November 7, 2025 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: 1035-1045

10.1145/3746252.3761282 Get It

Teleportation: Defense Against Stealing Attacks of Data-Driven Healthcare APIs
Wang, Zhenyi , Shen, Li , Luan, Siyu , Li, Fang , Doretto, Gianfranco , Adjeroh, Donald , Niu, Shuteng , Li, Jianfu , Tao, Cui , Tao, Cui , Niu, Shuteng , Li, Jianfu , Li, Fang , Duan, Tiehang , Shen, Li , Luan, Siyu

IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence | July 29, 2025 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 1273-1289

10.1109/tai.2025.3593470 Get It

Dynamic Prognosis Prediction for Patients on DAPT After Drug‐Eluting Stent Implantation: Model Development and Validation
Li, Fang , Rasmy, Laila , Xiang, Yang , Feng, Jingna , Abdelhameed, Ahmed , Hu, Xinyue , Sun, Zenan , Aguilar, David , Dhoble, Abhijeet , Du, Jingcheng , Wang, Qing , Zhang, Xinyuan , Xie, Ziqian , Nian, Yi , He, Jianping , Zhou, Yujia , Li, Jianfu , Prosperi, Mattia , Bian, Jiang , Zhi, Degui , Niu, Shuteng , Dang, Yifang , Zhang, Xinyuan , Xie, Ziqian , Nian, Yi , He, JianPing , Zhou, Yujia , Li, Jianfu , Prosperi, Mattia , Bian, Jiang , Zhi, Degui , Tao, Cui , Sun, Zenan , Li, Fang , Niu, Shuteng , Dang, Yifang , Tao, Cui

Journal of the American Heart Association | January 31, 2024 | Volume: 13 | Issue: 3 | Pages: No page available

10.1161/jaha.123.029900 Get It

Background The rapid evolution of artificial intelligence (AI) in conjunction with recent updates in dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) management guidelines emphasizes the necessity for innovative models to predict ischemic or bleeding events after drug‐eluting stent implantation. Leveraging AI for dynamic prediction has the potential to revolutionize risk stratification and provide personalized decision support for DAPT management. Methods and Results We developed and validated a new AI‐based pipeline using retrospective data of drug‐eluting stent‐treated patients, sourced from the Cerner Health Facts data set (n=98 236) and Optum's de‐identified Clinformatics Data Mart Database (n=9978). The 36 months following drug‐eluting stent implantation were designated as our primary forecasting interval, further segmented into 6 sequential prediction windows. We evaluated 5 distinct AI algorithms for their precision in predicting ischemic and bleeding risks. Model discriminative accuracy was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, among other metrics. The weighted light gradient boosting machine stood out as the preeminent model, thus earning its place as our AI‐DAPT model. The AI‐DAPT demonstrated peak accuracy in the 30 to 36 months window, charting an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 90% [95% CI, 88%–92%] for ischemia and 84% [95% CI, 82%–87%] for bleeding predictions. Conclusions Our AI‐DAPT excels in formulating iterative, refined dynamic predictions by assimilating ongoing updates from patients' clinical profiles, holding value as a novel smart clinical tool to facilitate optimal DAPT duration management with high accuracy and adaptability.