Citations

Importance The incidence of human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV16–positive) recurrent/metastatic (R/M) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is rising. Approved therapies offer a durable response to a minority of patients. Objective To determine the efficacy and safety of a therapeutic HPV16-targeted immunotherapy, PDS0101, in combination with pembrolizumab in participants with HPV16-positive R/M HNSCC, with separate evaluation of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)–naive and ICI-resistant cohorts. Design, Setting, and Participants VERSATILE-002 was a phase 2, open-label, multicenter nonrandomized clinical trial conducted at 26 oncology centers from March 29, 2021, to May 15, 2025, across the US, UK, and Ireland using the Simon 2-stage optimal design. Efficacy analyses were performed on modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population; safety analyses included all participants who received 1 or more doses. Eighty-eight participants with histologically confirmed R/M HPV16-positive HNSCC were enrolled, of whom 87 (98.9%) received treatment and composed the safety population. Seventy five (85.2%) were in the mITT population used for efficacy analyses, of whom 53 (70.7%) were ICI-naive with a programmed cell death ligand 1 combined positive score of 1 or greater and 22 (29.3%) were ICI-resistant. Exposures Pembrolizumab (200 mg, intravenously, every 3 weeks for up to 35 cycles) plus subcutaneous PDS0101 (5 scheduled doses per protocol). Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) per the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors , version 1.1, by a masked independent central reviewer. Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), median overall survival (mOS), and safety, with exploratory end points of duration of response, disease control rate, and response rates by programmed cell death ligand 1 status. Results Of the 75 patients in the mITT population, the mean (SD) age was 64.0 (8.3) years; 4 individuals (5%) were female and 71 (95%) were male; and 2 individuals (3%) were Asian, 1 (1%) was Black, 5 (7%) were Hispanic, and 71 (95%) were White. Among 53 ICI-naive participants in the mITT cohort, ORR by the central reviewer was 34.0%, median PFS was 5.3 months (95% CI, 2.10-9.00), and mOS was 39.3 months (95% CI, 23.90 to not evaluable). Among 22 ICI-resistant patients in the mITT cohort, no objective responses were observed and the primary end point (ORR by central reviewer) was not met, but mOS was 14.8 months (95% CI, 8.50-26.00). The treatment was well tolerated, with 13.8% experiencing grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events. Conclusions and Relevance The results of this nonrandomized clinical trial suggest that PDS0101 plus pembrolizumab showed antitumor activity in ICI-naive HPV16-positive R/M HNSCC, with favorable safety, response rates, and survival outcomes. The findings support further evaluation in a first-line setting. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04260126

Abstract Background Evaluation of middle ear prostheses requires high-resolution imaging to assess position and structural integrity. Purpose To assess the diagnostic performance of photon-counting-detector (PCD)-CT for middle ear prosthesis imaging in cadaveric specimens. Materials and Methods Nine different middle ear prostheses were implanted in five fresh-frozen whole-head specimens, both in correct anatomic position and displaced to mimic malposition. Specimens were scanned on PCD-CT (NAEOTOM Alpha, Siemens) and energy-integrating-detector (EID)-CT (SOMATOM Force, Siemens), reconstructed at 0.2mm and 0.4mm, respectively. Eighteen cases (9 prostheses, 2 positions) per scanner were evaluated by two neuroradiologists (36 readings), blinded to scanner and position, who scored prosthesis position, reader confidence, and overall image quality. Agreement with the reference standard and between readers was compared. Results PCD-CT showed higher diagnostic confidence compared with EID-CT, while accuracy and inter-reader agreement did not demonstrate significant differences between scanners. Correct readings, PCD-CT versus EID-CT: lateral contact, 31/36 (86.1%; 95% CI: 58.3%-94.4%) vs. 29/36 (80.6%; 55.6%-91.7%), p = 0.500; medial contact, 30/36 (83.3%; 55.6%-94.4%) vs. 26/36 (72.2%; 50.0%-83.3%), p = 0.250. PCD-CT identified all cases of complete contact loss (score 3), while EID-CT missed one reading per contact. Inter-reader agreement may be higher with PCD-CT vs EID-CT (lateral: κw: 0.804 [0.578-0.941] vs. 0.571 [0.302-0.778], p = 0.250; medial: 0.684 [0.191-0.934] vs. 0.481 [0.024-0.835], p = 0.250). Reader confidence was significantly higher with PCD-CT; mean paired differences for Readers 1 and 2 were 9.4 (1.8-17.1; Holm-adjusted p = 0.019) and 23.1 points (13.4-32.7; p < 0.001) for lateral contact, and 16.4 (10.0-22.8; p < 0.001) and 17.8 points (6.8-28.8; p = 0.007) for medial contact. Readers preferred PCD-CT image quality in 16/18 (88.9%; 65.3%-98.6%) and 17/18 cases (94.4%; 72.7%-99.9%), respectively. Conclusion PCD-CT was associated with significantly higher reader confidence and preferred image quality, without significant differences in diagnostic accuracy or inter-reader agreement. These findings suggest PCD-CT is a promising modality for postoperative middle ear evaluations that warrants further investigations.

Abstract Purpose We compared perioperative morbidity after repeat transurethral resection (re-TURP) versus primary TURP, focusing on transfusion and broader bleeding-related complications relevant to counseling and risk stratification. Methods We analyzed the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (2013–2023) to identify men undergoing primary TURP (Current Procedural Terminology [CPT] 52601) or re-TURP (CPT 52630). The primary outcome was 30-day red blood cell transfusion. Secondary outcomes included a prespecified postoperative hematuria endpoint based on ICD-10 codes. Multivariable logistic regression evaluated associations with bleeding endpoints and downstream complications. Results Among 83,539 TURP procedures, 76,983 (92.2%) were primary and 6,556 (7.8%) were repeat. Re-TURP patients were older, had higher ASA class, and more often underwent urgent surgery. Transfusion occurred in 1.9% after re-TURP versus 1.5% after primary TURP; hematuria-coded events occurred in 3.5% versus 1.3%, respectively. After adjustment, re-TURP was associated with postoperative hematuria (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.42, 95% CI 2.03–2.88) but not with transfusion (aOR 1.09, 95% CI 0.87–1.36). Older age, urgent/emergent status, bleeding disorder, and lower hematocrit predicted both bleeding endpoints. Re-TURP was associated with slightly lower odds of readmission (aOR 0.87; 95% CI 0.76–0.99) and was not associated with return to the operating room. Transfusion strongly predicted return to the operating room (aOR 7.21) and readmission (aOR 2.05), whereas hematuria predicted return to the operating room only (aOR 1.50). Conclusions Compared with primary TURP, re-TURP was associated with more hematuria-coded events but not higher adjusted transfusion risk, suggesting a relative shift toward lower-severity bleeding morbidity.

ABSTRACT Commercial antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) systems for gram-negative bacteria provide operational advantages over reference broth microdilution (BMD) testing, but the results produced by commercial AST systems might not be as accurate as the reference method. Assessing and comparing the performance of AST systems can be informative for clinical microbiology practice. In total, 280 clinical isolates and 100 isolates from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Antimicrobial Resistance Isolate Bank, including Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, were intended to be tested using disk diffusion (DD) and automated commercial AST systems, such as Selux AST System (Selux Diagnostics), MicroScan (Beckman Coulter), Phoenix (Becton, Dickinson and Company), and Vitek 2 (bioMérieux). These results were compared to BMD as the reference standard. In total, 372 isolates were assessed. For Enterobacterales, the greatest frequency of very major errors was identified with cefepime by Vitek 2 (29.0%) and ertapenem by DD (9.1%); essential agreement less than 90% was identified with the following combinations: aztreonam by MicroScan (86.4%), aztreonam by Vitek 2 (88.9%), cefepime by Selux (86.3%), cefepime by Vitek 2 (76.8%), ceftazidime by Vitek 2 (89.9%), and levofloxacin by MicroScan (83.4%). For P. aeruginosa , essential agreement less than 90% was identified with the following combinations: gentamicin by Selux (87.2%), tobramycin by Selux (86.6%), and ciprofloxacin by Phoenix (88.4%). Overall, antimicrobials that had low demonstrable bias across all automated commercial AST systems included ampicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, ceftazidime-avibactam, ertapenem, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Comparing commercial testing systems head-to-head against a reference standard provides insight into the strengths and weaknesses of the performance of these test systems, and these insights can subsequently inform local decisions regarding further investigations and potential operational mitigation strategies. IMPORTANCE This study assessed and compared the performance of multiple commercial antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) systems and disk diffusion methods. The accuracy of determining minimum inhibitory concentrations or zone diameters of antimicrobials and the associated interpretive categories were studied for 372 isolates of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa . Performance of the evaluated systems revealed that multiple antimicrobial-organism combinations were below the standards typically required by regulatory agencies and clinical laboratories. These deficiencies varied across the commercial platforms and disk diffusion methods, highlighting the importance of benchmarking studies that compare the performance using identical isolates. These identified performance weaknesses may warrant further study and/or the implementation of mitigation strategies in clinical laboratory operations to prevent the reporting of errant results.

ABSTRACT The cohesin complex, composed of SMC1, SMC3, RAD21, and STAG1/STAG2, is essential for chromosome cohesion, DNA repair, and transcriptional regulation. Pathogenic variants in cohesin components cause cohesinopathies. The classical characteristics of cohesinopathies include developmental delay (DD), intellectual disability (ID), feeding difficulties, hypotonia, short stature, hearing loss, and dysmorphic features. Here, we present a 5‐year‐old boy with classical cohesinopathy features, including DD/ID and feeding difficulties, along with non‐classical features such as hypoglycemia, recurrent fever, and immunodeficiency. Trio exome sequencing identified a novel de novo missense variant of uncertain significance (NM_005862.3:c.643G>A(p.Val215Ile)) in the STAG1 gene. The variant localizes to the RAD21 interaction interface, and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations revealed conformational changes comparable to other STAG1 variants reported as likely pathogenic in patients, supporting a deleterious effect which may disrupt the STAG1‐RAD21 interaction interface. This case expands the phenotypic and molecular spectrum of STAG1‐related cohesinopathy and advances our understanding of the disease mechanism.

Background: Pulse pressure variation (PPV) is widely used to guide fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients, but its accuracy in the prone position remains uncertain. Prone positioning alters respiratory mechanics and venous return, potentially diminishing the respiratory variation in stroke volume that PPV is designed to detect. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of PPV for predicting fluid responsiveness during prone spine surgery. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane through July 2025 for prospective studies evaluating PPV in adults undergoing prone spine surgery. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, assessed risk of bias using QUADAS-2, and pooled diagnostic performance using a bivariate random-effects model. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD420251106134). Results: Of 599 records, 34 underwent full-text review, and 10 studies (433 patients) were included. PPV thresholds ranged from 7% to 15%. Most studies were at low risk of bias except for the index test because thresholds were determined post hoc. For predicting fluid responsiveness, PPV had a pooled sensitivity of 68% (95% CI: 61%-75%) and specificity of 76% (95% CI: 65%-84%), with a summary area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.72 (95% CI: 0.64-0.80). Conclusions: PPV showed only moderate diagnostic performance for predicting fluid responsiveness during prone spine surgery. Its performance may have been influenced by threshold variability, heterogeneous reference standards, fluid-challenge protocols, ventilation strategies, and positioning systems. PPV should therefore be interpreted alongside complementary dynamic assessments rather than in isolation, particularly during lung-protective ventilation.