Panwar, Deepak

ABSTRACT The cohesin complex, composed of SMC1, SMC3, RAD21, and STAG1/STAG2, is essential for chromosome cohesion, DNA repair, and transcriptional regulation. Pathogenic variants in cohesin components cause cohesinopathies. The classical characteristics of cohesinopathies include developmental delay (DD), intellectual disability (ID), feeding difficulties, hypotonia, short stature, hearing loss, and dysmorphic features. Here, we present a 5‐year‐old boy with classical cohesinopathy features, including DD/ID and feeding difficulties, along with non‐classical features such as hypoglycemia, recurrent fever, and immunodeficiency. Trio exome sequencing identified a novel de novo missense variant of uncertain significance (NM_005862.3:c.643G>A(p.Val215Ile)) in the STAG1 gene. The variant localizes to the RAD21 interaction interface, and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations revealed conformational changes comparable to other STAG1 variants reported as likely pathogenic in patients, supporting a deleterious effect which may disrupt the STAG1‐RAD21 interaction interface. This case expands the phenotypic and molecular spectrum of STAG1‐related cohesinopathy and advances our understanding of the disease mechanism.

ABSTRACT Pathogenic variants in AMMECR1 have been associated with a rare multisystem disorder characterized by midface hypoplasia, hearing impairment, elliptocytosis, and nephrocalcinosis (MFHIEN). To date, most reported cases involve copy number variants or presumed loss‐of‐function alterations, with only a single prior report describing a missense variant supported by functional studies. Here, we report a patient with a heterozygous de novo AMMECR1 missense variant, NM_015365.3:c.649G>A p.(Val217Met) presenting with clinical features consistent with MFHIEN, including midface hypoplasia, partial hearing impairment, nephrocalcinosis, and elliptocytosis identified on peripheral blood smear. Comparative review of the literature highlights that while previously reported missense variants in AMMECR1 demonstrated altered intranuclear protein distribution and reduced expression in functional assays, clinical evidence supporting pathogenicity of non‐truncating variants remains limited. The phenotypic overlap between our patient and prior report strengthens the association between missense variations and the MFHIEN phenotype. Our findings support the pathogenic relevance of missense variation in AMMECR1 and emphasize the importance of integrating detailed phenotyping, including hematologic evaluation, with genomic data in the diagnosis of rare multisystem disorders. Additional cases and functional studies are needed to clarify genotype–phenotype correlations and underlying disease mechanisms.

ABSTRACT Polyglucosan body myopathy type 2 (PGBM2; OMIM #616199) is an autosomal recessive myopathy caused by biallelic variants in GYG1 , which encodes glycogenin‐1. It is characterized by progressive muscle weakness and PAS‐positive, diastase‐resistant polyglucosan inclusions on muscle biopsy. We report a 64‐year‐old woman who developed progressive proximal weakness beginning in her early 50s, with polyglucosan bodies identified on muscle histopathology. Genome sequencing (GS) detected a single heterozygous pathogenic splice‐site variant, NM_004130.4( GYG1 ):c.143+3G>C. Given strong histopathologic evidence of PGBM2, GS data were reanalyzed, revealing an additional rare deep intronic variant, NM_004130.4( GYG1 ):c.7+992T>G, predicted to activate a cryptic exon. RNA sequencing (RNA‐seq) confirmed aberrant splicing from both variants, demonstrating exon 2 skipping associated with c.143+3G>C and cryptic exon inclusion caused by c.7+992T>G. Variant phasing posed a diagnostic challenge due to unavailable parental DNA, and long‐range PCR results were inconclusive. Long‐read GS definitively demonstrated that the two variants were in trans , establishing compound heterozygosity and confirming the molecular diagnosis. These findings enabled reclassification of the deep intronic variant as likely pathogenic. This case highlights the diagnostic limitations of conventional phasing approaches in adult‐onset recessive disorders and demonstrates the clinical utility of integrating genome reanalysis, RNA‐seq, and long‐read GS for resolving complex phasing challenges.