Giri, Anshu

Importance The incidence of human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV16–positive) recurrent/metastatic (R/M) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is rising. Approved therapies offer a durable response to a minority of patients. Objective To determine the efficacy and safety of a therapeutic HPV16-targeted immunotherapy, PDS0101, in combination with pembrolizumab in participants with HPV16-positive R/M HNSCC, with separate evaluation of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)–naive and ICI-resistant cohorts. Design, Setting, and Participants VERSATILE-002 was a phase 2, open-label, multicenter nonrandomized clinical trial conducted at 26 oncology centers from March 29, 2021, to May 15, 2025, across the US, UK, and Ireland using the Simon 2-stage optimal design. Efficacy analyses were performed on modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population; safety analyses included all participants who received 1 or more doses. Eighty-eight participants with histologically confirmed R/M HPV16-positive HNSCC were enrolled, of whom 87 (98.9%) received treatment and composed the safety population. Seventy five (85.2%) were in the mITT population used for efficacy analyses, of whom 53 (70.7%) were ICI-naive with a programmed cell death ligand 1 combined positive score of 1 or greater and 22 (29.3%) were ICI-resistant. Exposures Pembrolizumab (200 mg, intravenously, every 3 weeks for up to 35 cycles) plus subcutaneous PDS0101 (5 scheduled doses per protocol). Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) per the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors , version 1.1, by a masked independent central reviewer. Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), median overall survival (mOS), and safety, with exploratory end points of duration of response, disease control rate, and response rates by programmed cell death ligand 1 status. Results Of the 75 patients in the mITT population, the mean (SD) age was 64.0 (8.3) years; 4 individuals (5%) were female and 71 (95%) were male; and 2 individuals (3%) were Asian, 1 (1%) was Black, 5 (7%) were Hispanic, and 71 (95%) were White. Among 53 ICI-naive participants in the mITT cohort, ORR by the central reviewer was 34.0%, median PFS was 5.3 months (95% CI, 2.10-9.00), and mOS was 39.3 months (95% CI, 23.90 to not evaluable). Among 22 ICI-resistant patients in the mITT cohort, no objective responses were observed and the primary end point (ORR by central reviewer) was not met, but mOS was 14.8 months (95% CI, 8.50-26.00). The treatment was well tolerated, with 13.8% experiencing grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events. Conclusions and Relevance The results of this nonrandomized clinical trial suggest that PDS0101 plus pembrolizumab showed antitumor activity in ICI-naive HPV16-positive R/M HNSCC, with favorable safety, response rates, and survival outcomes. The findings support further evaluation in a first-line setting. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04260126

6037 Background: The incidence of HPV-associated head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) continues to rise with over 90% of cases being driven by HPV16. Median overall survival (OS) with pembrolizumab in first-line recurrent/metastatic (R/M) HNSCC is 12.3 months in subjects with CPS ≥1, 10.8 months for CPS ≥1-19, and 14.9 months for CPS ≥20. There is an urgent need to improve survival rates in the growing population of HPV16-positive R/M HNSCC. PDS0101 (Versamune HPV) is an investigational T cell stimulating immunotherapy that unleashes a potent, durable attack against HPV16-positive cancers and is being studied in combination with pembrolizumab. Preliminary results were presented at ASCO 2023. (Price KAR, et al. ASCO 2023. Abstract 6012). Methods: VERSATILE-002 is a single-arm phase 2 study evaluating PDS0101 and pembrolizumab for first-line HPV16-positive R/M HNSCC with CPS ≥1. Subjects received pembrolizumab 200 mg IV Q3W with PDS0101 1 mL SC administered concurrently during Cycles 1, 2, 3, 4, and 12 and pembrolizumab alone for all other Cycles up to Cycle 35 (approx. 2 years). The primary study endpoint is confirmed objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST 1.1. Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival (PFS), OS, and safety. Results: The median follow-up is 18.4 months (range 0.2-42.7 months). The efficacy population consists of 53 subjects: 32 (60%) with CPS ≥1-19 and 21 (40%) with CPS ≥20. The median OS for subjects with CPS ≥1 is 30 months (95% CI 23.9, NE). For the CPS ≥1-19 subgroup, the median OS is 29.5 months (95% CI 15.3, NE). For the CPS ≥20 subgroup, the median OS is 39.3 months (95% CI 18.4, NE). Confirmed response rates by investigator assessment are shown in the Table. Twenty-three subjects are still on study: 3 on treatment and 20 in long-term follow-up. No new safety signals have emerged. The most common TRAEs are injection site reactions, fatigue, headache, and pruritus. Only 19% of subjects experienced Grade ≥3 TRAEs. No subject had a Grade 5 TRAE. Conclusions: These data represent one of the most extended follow-up periods to date of subjects receiving an HPV16-targeted therapy for HPV16-positive R/M HNSCC. The PDS0101 and pembrolizumab combination is well tolerated and has demonstrated deep and durable clinical responses. Median OS is promising in light of historic expectations, both overall and relative to PD-L1 subgroup, and remains durable with continued follow up. The results support further evaluation in a randomized phase 3 study with OS as the primary endpoint. Clinical trial information: NCT04260126 . Summary of results. CPS ≥1-19 (N=32) CPS ≥20 (N=21) CPS ≥1 (N=53) ORR, % 28.1 47.6 35.8 DCR, % 75.0 81.0 77.4 Median DOR, months (95 % CI) 21.8 (4.2, NE) NE (5.6, NE) 21.8 (11.5, NE) Median PFS, months (95% CI) 5.1 (2.4, 8.1) 14.1 (2.1, NE) 6.3 (3.5, 9.0) Median OS, months (95% CI) 29.5 (15.3, NE) 39.3 (18.4, NE) 30.0 (23.9, NE)

AbstractPlasmablastic lymphoma (PBL) is a rare entity, commonly associated with immunosuppressed states such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection or solid organ transplant. The clinical course is characterized by high relapse rates and a poor prognosis, leading some clinicians to recommend aggressive frontline therapy. However, a specific review of limited stage (LS) PBL patients is not available to evaluate outcomes and justify treatment recommendations. We performed a retrospective review of LS PBL cases to provide insight into this rare disease. Our cohort consisted of 80 stage I or II PBL patients from 13 US academic centers. With a median follow up of 34 months (1–196), the 3‐year progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of the entire cohort were 72% (95% CI 62, 83) and 79% (95% CI 70, 89), respectively. The 3‐year PFS and OS of patients treated with frontline chemotherapy alone was 65% (95% CI 50, 84) and 71% (95% CI 56, 89), respectively, compared to 85% (95% CI 72, 100) and 96% (95% CI 89, 100), respectively, in patients treated with combined frontline chemotherapy with radiation consolidation. Our data demonstrate favorable outcomes in LS PBL with no improvements in outcome from aggressive frontline treatment including Hyper‐CVAD or auto‐SCT consolidation. Multivariate regression analysis (MRA) demonstrated improved PFS for patients receiving EPOCH based frontline therapy versus CHOP (HR: 0.23; p = 0.029). Frontline chemotherapy followed by radiation consolidation versus chemotherapy alone appeared to be associated with improved relapse and survival outcomes but did not show statistical significance in MRA.

Background: Plasmablastic lymphoma (PBL) is a rare subtype of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma with a well-known association with HIV infection. The outcomes of PBL patients are typically described with high relapse rates and poor prognosis. (Loghavi S, J Hematol Oncol. 2015; Morscio J, Am J of Pathol. 2014; Castillo JJ, Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2011; Castillo JJ, Am J Hematol. 2008) There has been a paucity of data suggesting that limited stage disease (Ann Arbor stage I-II) may have a more favorable prognosis. However, due to the rarity of this disease there have been no large-scale reviews to confirm this. Thus, many patients with limited stage disease are subject to the aggressive therapy recommendations based on the poor outcomes of PBL patients as a whole. (Loghavi S, J Hematol Oncol. 2015; NCCN Guidelines, version 2.2020; Al-Malki MM, BBMT. 2014) We attempted to determine the treatment patterns and outcomes of patients with limited stage PBL. Methods: We conducted a multi-center (13 US academic centers) retrospective study of patients with limited stage (Ann Arbor stage I-II) Plasmablastic lymphoma. Determination of limited stage and diagnosis of PBL was determined by the investigators at each individual center. Patients diagnosed between 1/1/1990 and 6/1/2018 were included. Baseline demographic, clinical, laboratory, pathology, and outcomes data were extracted by retrospective chart review. Kaplan Meier was utilized for time to event analysis. Results: Baseline characteristics are included in table 1. A total of 80 patients were identified with limited stage disease. With a median follow up of 34 months the 3-yr Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was 71.9% and 78.7% respectively (Figure 1A and 1B). Patients that received frontline chemotherapy with (n=29) and without RT (n=36) had a 3-yr PFS and OS of 84.6% and 96.2% as compared to 64.5% and 70.8%, respectively (Figure 2A and 2B; Figure 3A and 3B). The Hazard ratio (HR) for PFS and OS for chemo (reference) vs chemo-RT was 0.47 (95% CI 0.18-1.3; P=0.131) and 0.18 (95% CI 0.04-0.84; p=0.029) respectively. The HR for PFS and OS for CHOP (n=14, reference) vs EPOCH (n=33) based regimens was 0.37 (95% CI 0.11-1.2; p=0.106) and 0.36 (95% CI 0.079-1.6; p=0.182) respectively. Patients with stage I/IE disease (n=56) had a 3-yr PFS and OS of 73.1% and 81.2% respectively. Patients with stage II/IIE disease (n=24) had a 3-yr PFS and OS of 69.3% and 73.4% respectively. Patients that received aggressive treatment (n=17) with Hyper-CVAD based regimens and/or Auto-SCT as consolidation had a 3-yr PFS and OS of 63.6% and 72.7% respectively. Patients with concomitant HIV (n=16) had a 3-yr PFS and OS of 80.8% and 77.4% respectively. Seven patients received RT alone and 6 patients had surgical resection alone as frontline therapy; 1 patient received no therapy; 1 patient received HAART therapy only and remains in CR without any other treatment for PBL 29 months after diagnosis. There were 8 deaths (10%) related to PBL, 3 deaths (4%) related to treatment of PBL (2 during frontline chemo and 1 upon relapse with salvage chemo), and 9 deaths (11%) related to other causes. The 3-yr lymphoma free survival (LFS) of the entire cohort, pts receiving chemo alone, and pts receiving chemo-RT (without including treatment related mortality (TRM) as an event) was 89.1%, 85.2%, and 100% respectively. The 3-yr LFS survival of the entire cohort, pts receiving chemo alone, and pts receiving chemo-RT (including TRM as an event) was 85.1%, 80.0%, and 96.2% respectively. Discussion: Here we report the largest review to our knowledge of limited stage PBL. Outcomes appear to be excellent with 3-yr PFS and OS of 71.9% and 78.7% respectively and a 3-yr LFS of 89.1% (85.1% when attributing TRM as an event). There was no obvious benefit to receiving aggressive therapy with H-CVAD based regimens and/or Auto-SCT. Although this is a small, uncontrolled sample size the HR for OS was improved in patients receiving frontline chemo-RT vs chemo alone 0.18 (95% CI 0.04-0.84; p=0.029). However, this did not take into account TRM with or progression while receiving frontline chemotherapy. Patients who were HIV+ had similar PFS and OS outcomes compared to the entire cohort. This retrospective study clearly demonstrates the favorable outcomes in this patient population, especially in those able to receive definitive therapy for their disease. Disclosures Hess: ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS, AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Patel:Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Precision Biosciences: Research Funding; Nektar: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Poseida: Research Funding; Cellectis: Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Nowakowski:Nanostrings: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Curis: Consultancy; Ryvu: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other; Kymera: Consultancy; Denovo: Consultancy; Kite: Consultancy; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; MorphoSys: Consultancy, Research Funding. Chavez:Bayer: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; BeiGene: Speakers Bureau; Morphosys: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy; Genentech: Speakers Bureau; Epizyme: Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Verastem: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy. Hill:Beigene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; AstraZenica: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Maddocks:Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Morphosys: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Karyopharm: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics, AstraZeneca: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding. Wagner-Johnston:ADC Therapeutics, Regeneron, CALIB-R, Verastem: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kahl:AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics LLC: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Acerta: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BeiGene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche Laboratories Inc: Consultancy. Alderuccio:ADC Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Forma Therapeutics: Other: Family member; Agios Pharmaceuticals: Other: Family member; Oncinfo: Honoraria; Inovio Pharmaceuticals: Other: Family member; Foundation Medicine: Other: Family member; Puma Biotechnology: Other: Family member; OncLive: Honoraria. Lossos:Janssen Biotech: Honoraria; Verastem: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen Scientific: Consultancy, Other; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Other; Stanford University: Patents & Royalties; NCI: Research Funding. Portell:Bayer: Consultancy; BeiGene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite: Consultancy, Research Funding; Acerta/AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; AbbVie: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Infinity: Research Funding; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Xencor: Research Funding. Landsburg:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Triphase: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Curis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Morphosys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau. Castillo:TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Beigene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kymera: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding.