Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

372 citation(s) found for "O'Driscoll, MC".

Characteristics of electrically evoked potentials in patients with auditory neuropathy/auditory dys-synchrony
Shallop, Jon K., Jin, Su-Hyun, Driscoll, Colin L. W., Tibesar, Robert J. , Jin, Su-Hyun

International Journal of Audiology | February 18, 2026 | Volume: 43 | Issue: sup1 | Pages: No page available

10.1080/17088186.2004.12561713 Get It

Present Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potentials and Lack of Auditory Sensation Through a Cochlear Implant After Vestibular Schwannoma Resection
Kolberg, Courtney, Babajanian, Eric E. , DeJong, Melissa D., Deep, Nicholas L. , Dornhoffer, James R. , Neff, Brian A., Driscoll, Colin L.W., Carlson, Matthew L., Saoji, Aniket A. , Kolberg, Courtney, Driscoll, Colin L. W., Carlson, Matthew L.

Otology & Neurotology | February 2, 2026 | Volume: 47 | Issue: 4 | Pages: e623-e626

10.1097/mao.0000000000004846 | PMID 41622559 Get It

Objective: Auditory nerve monitoring through electrically evoked compound action potentials (eCAP) can be used to assess cochlear neural integrity during vestibular schwannoma (VS) resection. Herein, we report on 5 cochlear implant (CI) patients who underwent VS resection with present eCAP responses both intraoperatively and postoperatively. Patients either did not perceive any sound through their CI or rapidly adapted to electrical stimulation, suggesting that the presence of eCAP does not guarantee auditory nerve function in patients with VS resection. Patients: Five patients who underwent simultaneous VS translabyrinthine resection and cochlear implantation. Interventions: Simultaneous cochlear implantation and translabyrinthine microsurgical VS resection. Main outcome measure: Electrically evoked compound action potential. Results: All patients had eCAP responses present during their VS resection and for at least 50 days post-surgery. Three of the 5 patients did not perceive any sound with their cochlear implant. This shows that the presence of an eCAP alone does not guarantee a functional auditory nerve or auditory perception. The other 2 patients could hear non-speech sounds, but these sounds quickly became inaudible, indicating that their auditory nerve lacked the ability to integrate the electrical stimulus over time. Conclusions: The presence of an eCAP response does not guarantee auditory sensation through a CI. Although eCAP measurements provide insight into the function of the distal end of the nerve, it does not ascertain integrity or function of the larger auditory nerve pathway. Therefore, eCAPs should not be used in isolation to monitor auditory nerve function during VS resection.
Long-term tumor control after Gamma Knife radiosurgery for sporadic vestibular schwannoma
Marinelli, John P. , Daher, Ghazal S. , Khandalavala, Karl R. , Babajanian, Eric E. , Dornhoffer, James R. , Lohse, Christine M., Pollock, Bruce E., Brown, Paul D., Gompel, Jamie J. Van, Celda, María Peris, Neff, Brian A., Driscoll, Colin L. W., Carlson, Matthew L. , Link, Michael J., Lohse, Christine M. , Pollock, Bruce E. , Gompel, Jamie J. Van , Link, Michael J.

Journal of Neurosurgery | January 22, 2026 | Volume: 144 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 965-971

10.3171/2025.8.jns25829 | PMID 41569741 Get It

OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to describe the long-term efficacy of single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for the primary treatment of sporadic vestibular schwannoma. METHODS Adult (≥ 18 years of age) patients with sporadic vestibular schwannoma who underwent SRS from 2000 through 2022 were included. RESULTS A total of 749 patients met inclusion criteria, the majority (n = 566, 76%) of whom had tumors extending into the cerebellopontine angle at SRS. The median patient age at SRS was 62 years, half (50%) of the patients were women, and 744 (99%) exhibited House-Brackmann grade I facial nerve function at SRS. A total of 42 patients experienced radiosurgical failure and underwent salvage treatment; the median duration of follow-up for the patients who did not undergo salvage treatment was 7.0 years. Overall tumor control rates (95% CI, number still at risk) at 1, 3, 5, 10, and 15 years after SRS were 100% (100%–100%, 718), 98% (97%–99%, 589), 96% (94%–97%, 464), 92% (90%–95%, 258), and 91% (89%–94%, 125), respectively. Patient age (hazard ratio [HR] for a 10-year increase of 0.92, 95% CI 0.71–1.19; p = 0.5), presence of a macrocystic tumor (HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.14–2.46; p = 0.5), and treated tumor volume (HR for a 1-cm 3 increase of 1.02, 95% CI 0.88–1.18; p = 0.8) were not significantly associated with the risk of salvage. Three distinct post-SRS tumor behavior patterns were observed, with 13% of patients demonstrating tumor pseudoprogression, all but 4 of whom demonstrated pseudoprogression by year 5 post-SRS. CONCLUSIONS SRS demonstrates durable tumor control through 15 years of follow-up in most patients (91%); however, a minority are found to still experience SRS failure even beyond 10 years of surveillance. Although occurring in only a minority of patients, tumor pseudoprogression can be evident out to 5 years or longer post-SRS.
Defining clinically significant tumor size in sporadic vestibular schwannoma to inform timing of radiosurgery during wait-and-scan management: further evidence supporting size threshold surveillance
Carlson, Matthew L. , Marinelli, John P. , Babajanian, Eric E. , Daher, Ghazal S. , Dornhoffer, James R. , Khandalavala, Karl R. , Lohse, Christine M., Gompel, Jamie J. Van, Celda, María Peris, Neff, Brian A., Driscoll, Colin L. W., Link, Michael J., Lohse, Christine M. , Gompel, Jamie J. Van , Link, Michael J.

Journal of Neurosurgery | January 22, 2026 | Volume: 144 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 955-964

10.3171/2025.8.jns25830 | PMID 41569717 Get It

OBJECTIVE Wait-and-scan surveillance is now commonly employed for initial management of small- and medium-sized vestibular schwannomas. Although small differences in tumor size are unlikely to impact outcomes significantly, treatment with either radiosurgery or microsurgery is usually recommended following radiological detection of tumor growth. The objective of the current study was to identify potential inflection points in vestibular schwannoma tumor size, where the risks of treatment with single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) accelerate to inform timing of intervention. METHODS Adult (≥ 18 years old) patients with sporadic vestibular schwannoma who underwent SRS from 2000 through 2022 were included. RESULTS A total of 749 patients with a median age at SRS of 62 years were studied, the majority (n = 566 [76%]) of whom had tumors extending into the cerebellopontine angle (CPA) at SRS. The optimal tumor size cut point to predict SRS failure and need for salvage treatment was 4 mm or more of CPA extension (c-index 0.59, HR 3.60, p = 0.01). The optimal tumor size cut point to predict the outcome of facial nerve paresis was 13 mm or more of CPA extension, resulting in a c-index of 0.63 (HR 2.88, p = 0.01). Among patients with at least 3 months of surveillance before SRS, those with a tumor growth rate ≥ 2.5 mm/year were more likely to undergo salvage treatment than those with a growth rate < 2.5 mm/year, although this difference did not achieve statistical significance (HR 1.82, p = 0.18). CONCLUSIONS The risk of SRS failure requiring salvage treatment and the risk of post-SRS facial nerve paralysis increase at sizes of approximately 4 and 13 mm extension into the CPA, respectively, providing a size threshold anchor to help guide treatment decision-making regarding timing of SRS. Furthermore, rapid tumor growth during the initial wait-and-scan period may be associated with an increased risk of radiosurgical failure, which may influence choice of treatment.
Total elbow arthroplasty for the management of post-traumatic sequelae of distal humeral fractures
Fossum, Bradley W., O'Driscoll, Shawn W., Sanchez-Sotelo, Joaquin L., Rudisill, Samuel S. , You, Daniel Z, Sanchez-Sotelo, Joaquin, You, Daniel , Fossum, Bradley W. , O’Driscoll, Shawn W. , Tangtiphaiboontana, Jennifer , Sánchez‐Sotelo, Joaquín , Morrey, Mark E.

The Bone & Joint Journal | January 1, 2026 | Volume: 108-B | Issue: 1 | Pages: 21-29

10.1302/0301-620x.108b1.bjj-2025-0475.r1 | PMID 41475369 Get It

Aims Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) has shown favourable outcomes in the management of severely comminuted distal humeral fractures in low-demand elderly patients, leading to its increased use in recent years. Less is known about the outcomes of TEA when used for the failure of either internal fixation or conservative management, particularly whether not performing TEA acutely influences the options for further management if fixation fails. This systematic review aimed to assess the clinical and functional outcomes following TEA when used for the post-traumatic sequelae of a distal humeral fracture, and to compare these outcomes with those in patients with a distal humeral fracture who undergo TEA acutely. Methods MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Scopus databases were searched from January 2000 to September 2024 for studies reporting complications, reoperations, the range of motion of the elbow, or functional outcomes following the use of TEA in the management of the post-traumatic sequelae of distal humeral fractures, including those due to failed fixation, nonunion, and post-traumatic arthritis. Demographic and clinical data were collected, descriptive statistics were summarized, and meta-analyses were undertaken to compare the outcomes between salvage and acute TEA. Results A total of 16 studies were included, with a total of 380 patients who underwent salvage TEA and 251 who underwent TEA as the initial management. Salvage TEA was associated with a significantly higher overall risk of complications (odds ratio (OR) 2.5 (95% CI 1.0 to 5.9)), though the rate of reoperations did not differ from those who underwent TEA acutely (OR 1.4 (95% CI 0.8 to 2.4)). Pooled analyses revealed a similar postoperative range of flexion (mean difference (MD) -2.4° (95% CI -9.1 to 4.3)) and extension of the elbow (MD 1.1° (95% CI -2.3 to 4.5)) and pronation (MD 0.0° (95% CI -1.1 to 1.1)) and supination (MD -0.0° (95% CI -1.0 to 0.9)) of the forearm. However, salvage TEA showed significantly inferior functional outcomes, as assessed by the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MD 9.7 (95% CI -18.8 to -0.6)). Conclusion These findings indicate that salvage TEA represents a viable option for the management of post-traumatic sequelae following the teatment of a distal humeral fracture, although patients who underwent salvage TEA had a significantly increased rate of complications and significantly inferior functional outcomes compared with those who underwent TEA acutely. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2026;108-B(1):21–29.
Vestibular and Audiometric Outcomes in Cochlear Implantation With Simultaneous Endolymphatic Sac Decompression for Patients With Ménière Disease
Khandalavala, Karl R. , Babajanian, Eric E. , Marinelli, John P. , Lohse, Christine M. , Driscoll, C W, Carlson, Matthew L., Neff, Brian A., Dornhoffer, James R. , Olson, Brennan G, Driscoll, Colin L., Olson, Brennan , Driscoll, Colin L. W., Carlson, Matthew L.

Otology & Neurotology | December 23, 2025 | Volume: 47 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 475-478

10.1097/mao.0000000000004788 | PMID 41432410 Get It

Objective: To evaluate the impact of cochlear implantation (CI) and simultaneous endolymphatic sac decompression (ELSD) on vestibular and audiometric outcomes in patients with advanced Ménière disease (MD). Study design: Historical cohort. Setting: Tertiary academic medical center. Patients: Patients with medically refractory MD who underwent CI with or without simultaneous ELSD from 2000 through 2024. Interventions: CI with or without ELSD. Main outcome measures: Post-CI patient-reported changes in vertigo severity and frequency, Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant word (CNCw) scores, and AzBio sentences in quiet scores. Results: Ninety-nine patients with preoperative vertigo secondary to MD were eligible for study, including 17 (17%) who underwent simultaneous ELSD. In total, 15 (88%) and 2 (12%) of the 17 patients with simultaneous ELSD reported improvement and stability in vertigo severity, respectively; in comparison, 26 (32%), 40 (49%), and 16 (20%) of the 82 patients with CI alone reported improvement, stability, and worsening in vertigo severity, respectively ( P <0.001). Likewise, 15 (88%) and 2 (12%) of the patients with simultaneous ELSD reported improvement and stability in vertigo frequency, respectively, whereas 21 (26%), 43 (52%), and 18 (22%) of patients with CI alone reported improvement, stability, and worsening in vertigo frequency, respectively ( P <0.001). Post-CI speech recognition scores were not significantly different between the simultaneous ELSD and CI alone groups [median (IQR) CNCw 70 (38 to 82) vs. 72 (58 to 82) and median (IQR) AzBio quiet 87 (67 to 96) vs. 87 (73 to 94), respectively]. Conclusions: In patients with MD, CI with simultaneous ELSD provides improvement in vertigo symptoms and similar audiometric outcomes when compared with CI alone. In appropriately selected patients with both refractory vestibular symptoms and sensorineural hearing loss meeting criteria for implantation, CI with simultaneous ELSD offers improvement in severity and frequency of vertigo as well as successful auditory rehabilitation.
Automated Insulin Delivery Is Beneficial in Adults With Insulin-Treated Type 2 Diabetes With and Without GAD65 Antibodies
Beck, Roy W. , Hirsch, Irl B., Raghinaru, Dan, Lum, John W. , Pinsker, Jordan E. , Kudva, Yogish C. , Group*, 2IQP Study, Desjardins, Donna, Kurek, Corey, Kaur, Ravinder Jeet , Livingood, Daine, Rizvi, Shafaq , Graham, Timothy E., Terry, Adrienne, Luker, Ryan, Mellenthin, Melanie, Rezac, Stephanie, Liljenquist, David R., Rogers, Justin, Williams, Jonathan, Christensen, Rochelle, Lee, In‐Kyoung, Malone, Joann, Spanakis, Elias K. , Singh, Lakshmi G., Churchill, Jade, Comen, Kathleen, Scott, William H., Davis, Georgia M. , Arroyo, Lizda Guerrero, Oladejo, Omolade , Usman, Sabeena, Ahmann, Andrew , Schmid, Caleb, Dean, Ariel, Branigan, Deborah , Caswell, Brittany, Heyerman, Tess, Tessman, Brian, Vanderheide, Jnh, Dennis, Brittany , Hendricks, Lisa, Reyes-Rodriguez, Clemente, Wolf, Valerie, Coyne, Kasey, Kravarusic, Jelena, Fronczyk, Evelyn, Herrmann, Stefanie, Penn, Samsam C., Blevins, Thomas , Casaubon, Luis, Espinosa, Valerie, Pandit, Keta, Perez, Jennifer, Stewart, Ana, Assir, Courtney, Fields, Cory, Kruger, Davida , Estrada, Kathleen, Jones, J. Kimberly, Mukhashen, Shereen, Corker, Natalie, Hunter, Heather, Layton, Paula, Brown, Sue A. , Afreen, Samina , Dhillon, Jasmeen, Emory, Emma, Fulkerson, David, Fuller, Morgan, Holmes, Viola, Kollar, Laura, Toole, Elyse, Levister, Camilla, O’Malley, Grenye , Ipek, Aslihan, Alabi, Denise, Ellis, Emily, Hassan, Shaziah, Ogyaadu, Selassie, Tamarez, Denisa, Weinstock, Ruth S. , Stone, Sheri , Bzdick, Suzan, Agostini, Lynn, Bulger, Jane , Wolpert, Howard , Atakov-Castillo, Astrid , Sullivan, Asya, Aia, Corinne, Brouillard, Elizabeth, Driscoll, Marsha, Lapier, Heather, Payra, Sherryl, Vancer, Louise, Averkiou, Xenia, Baran, Jesica, Holod, Rosanna, Litvicov, Patrisia, Mandava, Patali, Swinton, Sydney, Khakpour, Dori , Broyles, Frances E. , Marks, Sheryl, Mitchell, Tina, Hairston, Babette, Costello, Reilly, Curtis, Stella, Kamimoto, Jorge Jo, Peleckis, Amy J. , Sultan, Rahaf , Dalton-Bakes, Cornelia, Bourne, Patricia, Haidar, Ahmad, Pasqua, Melissa, Tardio, Vanessa , Moore, Adelyn, Kemp, Gabrielle, Raskin, Philip, Jordan, L.F., Shao, Baomei, DoNguyen, Trang, Meeks, Tram, Phan, Michael , Lesniak, Amanda, Becerra, Mario, Bellini, Natalie J. , Denallo, Erica, Lewis, Claudia , Tribout, Jerry, Tribout, Megan, DiFrancesco, Kathryn, Phillips, Kylie, Raghinaru, Dan, Campos, Tiffany, Morrell, Beth, Oduah, Vanessa, Cardenas-Villamil, Gabriela, Morales, Amanda, Murphy, Carlos, Strayer, Heidi, Spanbauer, Charles , Kollman, Craig, Sasson-Katchalski, Ravid, Piquette, Nicole, Wheatcroft, Alex, WHITE, KIRSTIN N., Carmelo, KC, Janicek, Robert, Gabrielson, Deanna, Mercado, Kevin, Beck, Roy W , Group*, 2IQP Study, Smith, Joshua W. , Christensen, Rochelle, Malone, Joann, Pasquel, Francisco J. , Tajrishi, Farbod Zahedi , Arroyo, Lizda Guerrero, Dean, Ariel, Howard, Matthew, Vander-Heide, Jesse, Ahn, David , Aleppo, Grazia , Fields, Cory, Layton, Paula, Oliveri, Mary Clancy , Levy, Carol J. , Agostini, Lynn, Steenkamp, Devin W , Spaic, Tamara , Liu, Selina , Marks, Sheryl, Mitchell, Tina, Costello, Reilly, Curtis, Stella, Rickels, Michael R. , Bourne, Patricia, Tsoukas, Michael A. , Pasqua, Melissa-Rosina , Moore, Adelyn, Kemp, Gabrielle, Meeks, Tram, Phan, Michael, Hatipoğlu, Betül , Lesniak, Amanda, Howard, Quiana , DiFrancesco, Kathryn, Raghinaru, Dan, Morrell, Beth, Morales, Amanda, Kanapka, Lauren , Le, Van

Diabetes Care | December 5, 2025 | Volume: 49 | Issue: 2 | Pages: e18-e20

10.2337/dc25-2059 | PMID 41348329 Get It

Highly Coordinated Cochlear Implant Care With Remote Programming: Clinical, Financial, and Implementation Outcomes for the Complete Cochlear Implant Care (CCIC) Model
Nassiri, Ashley M. , Saoji, Aniket A. , DeJong, Melissa D., Tombers, Nicole M. , Lohse, Christine M. , Driscoll, Colin L. W., Neff, Brian A., Haynes, David S. , Daher, Ghazal S. , Carlson, Matthew L., Moriarty, James P. , Borah, Bijan J. , Carlson, Matthew L.

Otology & Neurotology | November 14, 2025 | Volume: 47 | Issue: 2 | Pages: e201-e207

10.1097/mao.0000000000004720 | PMID 41236091 Get It

Objective: The Complete Cochlear Implant Care (CCIC) model is a highly coordinated care delivery model reducing and condensing in-person visits for cochlear implant (CI) patients, leveraging telehealth and remote programming. Clinical, quality-of-life, implementation, patient experience, and financial outcomes of the clinical trial are reported. Study design: Prospective, nonrandomized, 2-arm clinical trial Setting: Tertiary referral CI center Patients: Adult CI candidates Interventions: Cochlear implantation Main outcome measures: Speech perception, quality of life, implementation, patient experience, and financial outcomes for both CCIC and traditional care delivery models. Results: Patients participating in the traditional and CCIC delivery models demonstrated 12-month postoperative speech perception scores comparable to nationally reported outcomes (CNC 61% and 72% and AzBio in quiet 75% and 87% for traditional and CCIC cohorts, respectively). Quality-of-life evaluation using the CIQOL-10 demonstrated similar 12-month postoperative scores between groups (52 and 54 for traditional and CCIC cohorts, respectively). The CI Patient Experience Survey demonstrated high satisfaction outcomes in ease of communication, preparedness for surgery, and overall care in both cohorts. Implementation analysis of the CCIC model revealed perceived benefits from staff and clinicians; however, support for expansion of the program was contingent upon the availability of app-based or web-based remote programming technology. Finally, financial analysis revealed decreased out-of-pocket costs for CCIC patients. Conclusion: The CCIC model has the potential to dramatically streamline hearing health care delivery and reduce out-of-pocket costs for CI recipients. Clinical outcomes between cohorts were comparable in this feasibility study; however, a sufficiently powered trial is required to definitively comment on clinical outcomes with the new care delivery model.
Biomechanical Simulation of Rotator Cuff Tear and Glenohumeral Stability
Hsu, Horng Chaung, Luo, Zong-Ping, An, Kai , Luo, Zong-Ping, O’Driscoll, Shawn W.

Advances in Bioengineering | October 7, 2025 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: 145-146

10.1115/imece1995-0138 Get It

Abstract This study examined in vitro glenohumeral instability under two simulated biomechanical models of rotator cuff tear: 1) tendon-defect model and 2) muscle-unloaded model. The results indicated that rotator cuff tear significantly increased the joint instability. Significant difference also existed between the two tested models. The tendon-defect model underestimated the joint instability in most simulated shoulder positions.
Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Benefit From Automated Insulin Delivery Irrespective of C-Peptide Level
Hirsch, Irl B., Kudva, Yogish C. , Blevins, Thomas , Raghinaru, Dan, Lum, John W. , Kollman, Craig, Pinsker, Jordan E. , Beck, Roy W. , Group*, 2IQP Study, Desjardins, Donna, Kurek, Corey, Kaur, Ravinder Jeet , Livingood, Daine, Rizvi, Shafaq , Graham, Timothy E., Terry, Adrienne, Luker, Ryan, Mellenthin, Melanie, Rezac, Stephanie, Liljenquist, David R., Rogers, Justin, Williams, Jonathan, Christensen, Rochelle, Lee, In‐Kyoung, Malone, Joann, Spanakis, Elias K. , Singh, Lakshmi G., Churchill, Jade, Comen, Kathleen, Scott, William H., Davis, Georgia M. , Arroyo, Lizda Guerrero, Oladejo, Omolade , Usman, Sabeena, Ahmann, Andrew , Schmid, Caleb, Dean, Ariel, Branigan, Deborah , Caswell, Brittany, Heyerman, Tess, Tessman, Brian, Vanderheide, Jnh, Dennis, Brittany , Hendricks, Lisa, Reyes-Rodriguez, Clemente, Wolf, Valerie, Coyne, Kasey, Kravarusic, Jelena, Fronczyk, Evelyn, Herrmann, Stefanie, Penn, Samsam C., Casaubon, Luis, Espinosa, Valerie, Pandit, Keta, Perez, Jennifer, Stewart, Ana, Assir, Courtney, Fields, Cory, Kruger, Davida , Estrada, Kathleen, Jones, J. Kimberly, Mukhashen, Shereen, Corker, Natalie, Hunter, Heather, Layton, Paula, Brown, Sue A. , Afreen, Samina , Dhillon, Jasmeen, Emory, Emma, Fulkerson, David, Fuller, Morgan, Holmes, Viola, Kollar, Laura, Toole, Elyse, Levister, Camilla, O’Malley, Grenye , Ipek, Aslihan, Alabi, Denise, Ellis, Emily, Hassan, Shaziah, Ogyaadu, Selassie, Tamarez, Denisa, Weinstock, Ruth S. , Stone, Sheri , Bzdick, Suzan, Agostini, Lynn, Bulger, Jane , Wolpert, Howard , Atakov-Castillo, Astrid , Sullivan, Asya, Aia, Corinne, Brouillard, Elizabeth, Driscoll, Marsha, Lapier, Heather, Payra, Sherryl, Vancer, Louise, Averkiou, Xenia, Baran, Jesica, Holod, Rosanna, Litvicov, Patrisia, Mandava, Patali, Swinton, Sydney, Khakpour, Dori , Broyles, Frances E. , Marks, Sheryl, Mitchell, Tina, Hairston, Babette, Costello, Reilly, Curtis, Stella, Rickels, Michael R., Kamimoto, Jorge Jo, Peleckis, Amy J. , Sultan, Rahaf , Dalton-Bakes, Cornelia, Bourne, Patricia, Haidar, Ahmad, Pasqua, Melissa, Tardio, Vanessa , Moore, Adelyn, Kemp, Gabrielle, Raskin, Philip, Jordan, L.F., Shao, Baomei, DoNguyen, Trang, Meeks, Tram, Phan, Michael , Lesniak, Amanda, Becerra, Mario, Denallo, Erica, Lewis, Claudia , Tribout, Jerry, Tribout, Megan, DiFrancesco, Kathryn, Phillips, Kylie, Lum, John W., Campos, Tiffany, Morrell, Beth, Oduah, Vanessa, Cardenas-Villamil, Gabriela, Morales, Amanda, Murphy, Carlos, Strayer, Heidi, Spanbauer, Charles , Kollman, Craig, Sasson-Katchalski, Ravid, Piquette, Nicole, Wheatcroft, Alex, WHITE, KIRSTIN N., Carmelo, KC, Janicek, Robert, Gabrielson, Deanna, Mercado, Kevin, Hirsch, Irl B. , Pinsker, Jordan E , Beck, Roy W , Hirsch, Irl B , Ahn, David , Rickels, Michael R. , Group*, 2IQP Study, Smith, Joshua W. , Christensen, Rochelle, Malone, Joann, Pasquel, Francisco J. , Tajrishi, Farbod Zahedi , Arroyo, Lizda Guerrero, Dean, Ariel, Howard, Matthew, Vander-Heide, Jesse, Aleppo, Grazia , Fields, Cory, Layton, Paula, Oliveri, Mary Clancy , Levy, Carol J. , Agostini, Lynn, Steenkamp, Devin W , Spaic, Tamara , Liu, Selina , Marks, Sheryl, Mitchell, Tina, Costello, Reilly, Curtis, Stella, Rickels, Michael R., Bourne, Patricia, Tsoukas, Michael A. , Pasqua, Melissa-Rosina , Moore, Adelyn, Kemp, Gabrielle, Meeks, Tram, Phan, Michael, Hatipoğlu, Betül , Lesniak, Amanda, Bellini, Natalie J. , Howard, Quiana , Lewis, Claudia, DiFrancesco, Kathryn, Lum, John W., Morrell, Beth, Morales, Amanda, Kanapka, Lauren , Kollman, Craig, Le, Hung V.

Diabetes Care | September 15, 2025 | Volume: 48 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 2061-2066

10.2337/dc25-1125 | PMID 40953318 Get It

OBJECTIVE The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) requires a low C-peptide level for insulin pump coverage unless the individual is β-cell autoantibody positive, which precludes coverage of automated insulin delivery (AID) systems for many people with type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS In the Randomized Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Control-IQ+ Technology in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Using Basal-Bolus Insulin Therapy study evaluating the t:slim X2 insulin pump with Control-IQ+ technology, adults with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes were categorized into high C-peptide (n = 195) and low C-peptide (n = 59) groups based on CMS criteria. RESULTS In the AID group, mean HbA1c decreased from baseline by 0.8%, which was significantly greater than in the control group with both high (P &lt; 0.001) and low (P = 0.02) C-peptide levels. Results were similar in participants ≥65 years old. CONCLUSIONS The benefit of AID is present with high and low C-peptide levels. Thus, requiring a low C-peptide level as a prerequisite for AID therapy is not warranted.