Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

70 citation(s) found for "By, Karlan".

Bilateral Oophorectomy and All-Cause Mortality in Women With BRCA1 and BRCA2 Sequence Variations
Møller, Pål , McCuaig, Jeanna , Eisen, Andrea , Bordeleau, Louise , Zakalik, Dana , Metcalfe, Kelly , Olopade, Olufunmilayo I. , Sun, Ping , Narod, Steven A. , Sweet, Kevin , Elser, Christine , Wiesner, Georgia L. , Poll, Aletta, Kim, Raymond H. , Armel, Susan T., Demsky, Rochelle, Serfas, Kim, Panchal, Seema, Cullinane, Carey A., Reilly, Robert E., Mercer, L J, Dungan, J.S., Lemire, Edmond G., Zovato, Stefania , Rastelli, Antonella, Olopade, Olufunmilayo I , Metcalfe, Kelly A , Eisen, Andrea , Bordeleau, Louise , Kim, Raymond H , Kotsopoulos, Joanne , Gronwald, Jacek , Huzarski, Tomasz , Pal, Tuya , Singer, Christian F. , Karlan, Beth Y. , Aeilts, Amber M. , Eng, Charis , Foulkes, William D. , Tung, Nadine , Couch, Fergus J. , Fruscio, Robert , Neuhausen, Susan L. , Cybulski, Cezary , Lubiński, Jan , Armel, Susan, Steele, Linda, Saal, Howard M. , Rayson, Daniel , Mercer, Leanne, Cajal, Teresa Ramón y , Cohen, Stephanie A.

JAMA Oncology | February 29, 2024 | Volume: 10 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 484

10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.6937 | PMID 38421677 Get It

ImportancePreventive bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy is offered to women at high risk of ovarian cancer who carry a pathogenic variant in BRCA1 or BRCA2; however, the association of oophorectomy with all-cause mortality has not been clearly defined.ObjectiveTo evaluate the association between bilateral oophorectomy and all-cause mortality among women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 sequence variation.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsIn this international, longitudinal cohort study of women with BRCA sequence variations, information on bilateral oophorectomy was obtained via biennial questionnaire. Participants were women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 sequence variation, no prior history of cancer, and at least 1 follow-up questionnaire completed. Women were followed up from age 35 to 75 years for incident cancers and deaths. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for all-cause mortality associated with a bilateral oophorectomy (time dependent). Data analysis was performed from January 1 to June 1, 2023.ExposuresSelf-reported bilateral oophorectomy (with or without salpingectomy).Main Outcomes and MeasuresAll-cause mortality, breast cancer–specific mortality, and ovarian cancer–specific mortality.ResultsThere were 4332 women (mean age, 42.6 years) enrolled in the cohort, of whom 2932 (67.8%) chose to undergo a preventive oophorectomy at a mean (range) age of 45.4 (23.0-77.0) years. After a mean follow-up of 9.0 years, 851 women had developed cancer and 228 had died; 57 died of ovarian or fallopian tube cancer, 58 died of breast cancer, 16 died of peritoneal cancer, and 97 died of other causes. The age-adjusted HR for all-cause mortality associated with oophorectomy was 0.32 (95% CI, 0.24-0.42; P < .001). The age-adjusted HR was 0.28 (95% CI, 0.20-0.38; P < .001) and 0.43 (95% CI, 0.22-0.90; P = .03) for women with BRCA1 and BRCA2 sequence variations, respectively. For women with BRCA1 sequence variations, the estimated cumulative all-cause mortality to age 75 years for women who had an oophorectomy at age 35 years was 25%, compared to 62% for women who did not have an oophorectomy. For women with BRCA2 sequence variations, the estimated cumulative all-cause mortality to age 75 years was 14% for women who had an oophorectomy at age 35 years compared to 28% for women who did not have an oophorectomy.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this cohort study among women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 sequence variation, oophorectomy was associated with a significant reduction in all-cause mortality.
MRI Surveillance and Breast Cancer Mortality in Women With BRCA1 and BRCA2 Sequence Variations
Møller, Pål , Eisen, Andrea , Peck, Larissa , Bordeleau, Louise , Zakalik, Dana , Stempa, Klaudia , Dungan, J.S., Cullinane, Carey A., Olopade, Olufunmilayo I. , Metcalfe, Kelly , Sun, Ping , Narod, Steven A. , Sweet, Kevin , Velsher, Lea, McCuaig, Jeanna , Panchal, Seema, Poll, Aletta, Lemire, Edmond G., Serfas, Kim, Costalas, Josephine Wagner, Blum, Joanne L. , Olopade, Olufunmilayo I , Metcalfe, Kelly A , Eisen, Andrea , Bordeleau, Louise , Lubiński, Jan , Kotsopoulos, Joanne , Pal, Tuya , Karlan, Beth Y. , Aeilts, Amber M. , Eng, Charis , Foulkes, William D. , Tung, Nadine , Couch, Fergus J. , Fruscio, Robert , Cajal, Teresa Ramón y , Singer, Christian F. , Neuhausen, Susan L. , Cybulski, Cezary , Gronwald, Jacek , Huzarski, Tomasz , Senter, Leigha , Saal, Howard M. , Armel, Susan Randall , Reilly, Richard B. , Cohen, Stephanie A.

JAMA Oncology | February 29, 2024 | Volume: 10 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 493

10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.6944 | PMID 38421676 Get It

Importance Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) surveillance is offered to women with a pathogenic variant in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene who face a high lifetime risk of breast cancer. Surveillance with MRI is effective in downstaging breast cancers, but the association of MRI surveillance with mortality risk has not been well defined. Objective To compare breast cancer mortality rates in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 sequence variation who entered an MRI surveillance program with those who did not. Design, Setting, and Participants Women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 sequence variation were identified from 59 participating centers in 11 countries. Participants completed a baseline questionnaire between 1995 and 2015 and a follow-up questionnaire every 2 years to document screening histories, incident cancers, and vital status. Women who had breast cancer, a screening MRI examination, or bilateral mastectomy prior to enrollment were excluded. Participants were followed up from age 30 years (or the date of the baseline questionnaire, whichever was later) until age 75 years, the last follow-up, or death from breast cancer. Data were analyzed from January 1 to July 31, 2023. Exposures Entrance into an MRI surveillance program. Main Outcomes and Measures Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for breast cancer mortality associated with MRI surveillance compared with no MRI surveillance using a time-dependent analysis. Results A total of 2488 women (mean [range] age at study entry 41.2 [30-69] years), with a sequence variation in the BRCA1 (n = 2004) or BRCA2 (n = 484) genes were included in the analysis. Of these participants, 1756 (70.6%) had at least 1 screening MRI examination and 732 women (29.4%) did not. After a mean follow-up of 9.2 years, 344 women (13.8%) developed breast cancer and 35 women (1.4%) died of breast cancer. The age-adjusted HRs for breast cancer mortality associated with entering an MRI surveillance program were 0.20 (95% CI, 0.10-0.43; P < .001) for women with BRCA1 sequence variations and 0.87 (95% CI, 0.10-17.25; P = .93) for women with BRCA2 sequence variations. Conclusion and Relevance Results of this cohort study suggest that among women with a BRCA1 sequence variation, MRI surveillance was associated with a significant reduction in breast cancer mortality compared with no MRI surveillance. Further studies of women with BRCA2 sequence variations are needed to ascertain these women obtain the same benefits associated with MRI surveillance.
NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast, Ovarian, and Pancreatic, Version 2.2024
Churpek, Jane , Kohlmann, Wendy , Al‐Hilli, Zahraa , Friedman, Susan , Hagemann, Andrea R. , Hendrix, Ashley, Hutton, Mollie L., Kassem, Nawal , Khan, Seema, Khoury, Katia , Kurian, Allison W. , Laronga, Christine , Mak, Julie , Mansour, John C. , McDonnell, Kevin , Menendez, Carolyn S. , Merajver, Sofía D. , Norquist, Barbara S., Offit, Kenneth , Rash, Dominique , Reiser, Gwen , Senter-Jamieson, Leigha, Shannon, Kristen M. , Visvanathan, Kala , Welborn, Jeanna, Wick, Myra , Wood, Marie , Yurgelun, Matthew B. , Dwyer, Mary A., Darlow, Susan, Norquist, Barbara M. , Churpek, Jane E. , Visvanathan, Kala , Kurian, Allison W , Norquist, Barbara , Churpek, Jane E , Daly, Mary Beryl , Pal, Tuya , Maxwell, Kara N. , Arun, Banu , Buys, Saundra S. , Cheng, Heather H. , Domchek, Susan M. , Giri, Veda N. , Goggins, Michael , Karlan, Beth Y.

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | October 12, 2023 | Volume: 21 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 1000-1010

10.6004/jnccn.2023.0051 | PMID 37856201 Get It

The NCCN Guidelines for Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast, Ovarian, and Pancreatic focus primarily on assessment of pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants associated with increased risk of breast, ovarian, pancreatic, and prostate cancer, including BRCA1 , BRCA2 , CDH1 , PALB2 , PTEN , and TP53 , and recommended approaches to genetic counseling/testing and care strategies in individuals with these P/LP variants. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize important updates regarding: (1) a new section for transgender, nonbinary and gender diverse people who have a hereditary predisposition to cancer focused on risk reduction strategies for ovarian cancer, uterine cancer, prostate cancer, and breast cancer; and (2) testing criteria and management associated with TP53 P/LP variants and Li-Fraumeni syndrome.
p53 and ovarian carcinoma survival: an Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium study
Köbel, Martin , Kang, Eunyoung , Weir, Ashley , Rambau, Peter , Nelson, Gregg , Meagher, Nicola S. , Riggan, Marjorie J. , Alsop, Jennifer , Anglesio, Michael S. , Beckmann, Matthias W. , Bisinotto, Christiani, Boisen, M.M. , Boros, Jessica , Brand, Alison H. , Carney, Michael E. , Coulson, Penny , Courtney‐Brooks, Madeleine , Cushing‐Haugen, Kara L. , Deen, Suha , El‐Bahrawy, Mona , Group, AOCS, Fischer, Anna , Gayther, Simon A. , Hartmann, Arndt, Hendley, Joy , Huang, Yajue, Jimenez‐Liñan, Mercedes , Jones, Michael E. , Kennedy, Catherine J. , Kluz, Tomasz , Koziak, Jennifer M. , Lesnock, Jaime, Lester, Jenny , Longacre, Teri A. , Lycke, Maria , Mateoiu, Constantina , McCauley, Bryan M. , McGuire, Valerie , Ney, Britta, Olawaiye, Alexander , Oršulić, Sandra , Osório, Ana , Paz‐Ares, Luis , Rothstein, Joseph H. , Ruebner, Matthias , Shah, Mitul , Sharma, Raghwa , Shvetsov, Yurii B. , Singh, Naveena , Talhouk, Aline , Whittemore, Alice S. , Widschwendter, Martin , Bowtell, David D.L. , Reis, Francisco José Cândido dos , Fasching, Peter A. , García, María J. , Goodman, Marc T. , Goode, Ellen L. , Huntsman, David G. , Kelemen, Linda E. , Kommoss, Stefan , Le, Nhu D. , Menon, Usha , Schildkraut, Joellen M. , Sieh, Weiva , Staebler, Annette , Ramus, Susan J. , Anglesio, Michael S , Erber, Ramona , Gilks, C. Blake , Shvetsov, Yurii B , Campbell, Ian G , Huntsman, David G , Ramus, Susan J , Köbel, Martin , Menon, Usha , Kennedy, Catherine J , Widschwendter, Martin , Jones, Michael E , Sieh, Weiva , Brand, Alison H , Bowtell, David D , Nelson, Gregg S , El-Bahrawy, Mona A , Kluz, Tomasz , Goodman, Marc T , Kang, Eun‐Young, Lee, Cheng‐Han , Ghatage, Prafull , Brooks‐Wilson, Angela , Cybulski, Cezary , Elishaev, Esther , Fereday, Sián , Group, AOCS, Barquín, Arántzazu , Gentry‐Maharaj, Aleksandra , Gronwald, Helena , Grube, Marcel , Harnett, Paul R. , Harris, Holly R. , Hartkopf, Andreas D , Hein, Alexander , Hernandez, Brenda Y. , Jakubowska, Anna , Lubiński, Jan , Cajal, Teresa Ramón y , Schoemaker, Minouk J. , Sherman, Mark E. , Steed, Helen , Storr, Sarah J. , Traficante, Nadia , Wang, Chen , Wilkens, Lynne R. , Winham, Stacey J. , Benı́tez, Javier , Berchuck, Andrew , Campbell, Ian , Cook, Linda S. , DeFazio, Anna , Doherty, Jennifer A. , Fortner, Renée T. , Gronwald, Jacek , Karlan, Beth Y. , Martin, Stewart G. , Modugno, Francesmary , Pharoah, Paul D.P. , Sundfeldt, Karin , Swerdlow, Anthony J. , Brenton, James D.

The Journal of Pathology: Clinical Research | March 22, 2023 | Volume: 9 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 208-222

10.1002/cjp2.311 | PMID 36948887 Get It

AbstractOur objective was to test whether p53 expression status is associated with survival for women diagnosed with the most common ovarian carcinoma histotypes (high‐grade serous carcinoma [HGSC], endometrioid carcinoma [EC], and clear cell carcinoma [CCC]) using a large multi‐institutional cohort from the Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis (OTTA) consortium. p53 expression was assessed on 6,678 cases represented on tissue microarrays from 25 participating OTTA study sites using a previously validated immunohistochemical (IHC) assay as a surrogate for the presence and functional effect of TP53 mutations. Three abnormal expression patterns (overexpression, complete absence, and cytoplasmic) and the normal (wild type) pattern were recorded. Survival analyses were performed by histotype. The frequency of abnormal p53 expression was 93.4% (4,630/4,957) in HGSC compared to 11.9% (116/973) in EC and 11.5% (86/748) in CCC. In HGSC, there were no differences in overall survival across the abnormal p53 expression patterns. However, in EC and CCC, abnormal p53 expression was associated with an increased risk of death for women diagnosed with EC in multivariate analysis compared to normal p53 as the reference (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.36–3.47, p = 0.0011) and with CCC (HR = 1.57, 95% CI 1.11–2.22, p = 0.012). Abnormal p53 was also associated with shorter overall survival in The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage I/II EC and CCC. Our study provides further evidence that functional groups of TP53 mutations assessed by abnormal surrogate p53 IHC patterns are not associated with survival in HGSC. In contrast, we validate that abnormal p53 IHC is a strong independent prognostic marker for EC and demonstrate for the first time an independent prognostic association of abnormal p53 IHC with overall survival in patients with CCC.
CCNE1 and survival of patients with tubo‐ovarian high‐grade serous carcinoma: An Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium study
Kang, Eunyoung , Weir, Ashley , Meagher, Nicola S. , Farrington, Kyo , Nelson, Gregg , Lee, Cheng‐Han , Riggan, Marjorie J. , Popović, Gordana , Leung, Betty, Tang, Katrina , Lambie, Neil, Millstein, Joshua , Alsop, Jennifer , Anglesio, Michael S. , Barlow, Ellen , Beckmann, Matthias W. , Berger, Jessica, Bisinotto, Christiani, Bösmüller, Hans , Boros, Jessica , Brand, Alison H. , Carney, Michael E. , Casablanca, Yovanni , Cohen, Paul A. , Coulson, Penny , Courtney‐Brooks, Madeleine , Cunningham, Julie M. , Darcy, Kathleen M. , El‐Bahrawy, Mona A., Farrell, Rhonda , Fischer, Anna , García, María J. , Gayther, Simon A. , Group, AOCS, Harnett, Paul R. , Harrington, Shariska P. , Harter, Philipp , Hartmann, Arndt , Hecht, Jonathan L. , Heikaus, Sebastian, Hendley, Joy , Polo, Susanna Hernando, Heublein, Sabine , Hirasawa, Akira , Huntsman, David G. , Jimenez‐Liñan, Mercedes , Jones, Michael E. , Kennedy, Catherine J. , Khabele, Dineo , Lambrechts, Diether , Le, Nhu D. , Lener, Marcin , Lester, Jenny , Leung, Yee , Linder, Anna , Loverix, Liselore , Madan, Rashna , Maxwell, G. Larry , Olawaiye, Alexander , Oršulić, Sandra , Palacios, José , Pearce, Celeste Leigh , Pike, Malcolm C. , Quinn, Carmel M. , Mohan, Ganendra Raj , Rodríguez‐Antona, Cristina , Ruebner, Matthias , Ryan, Andy , Salfinger, Stuart , Sasamoto, Naoko , Schildkraut, Joellen M. , Schoemaker, Minouk J. , Shah, Mitul , Sharma, Raghwa , Shvetsov, Yurii B. , Singh, Naveena , Steele, Linda , Stewart, Colin J.R. , Talhouk, Aline , Tan, Adeline , Terry, Kathryn L. , Tołoczko, Aleksandra, Aa, Maaike A. van der , Gorp, Toon Van , Nieuwenhuysen, Els Van , van‐Wagensveld, Lilian, Vergote, Ignace , Wu, Anna H. , Reis, Francisco José Cândido dos , Fasching, Peter A. , Goode, Ellen L. , Goodman, Marc T. , Kommoss, Stefan , Menon, Usha , Sinn, Hans‐Peter , Staebler, Annette , Bowtell, David D.L. , Ramus, Susan J. , Lambrechts, Diether , El‐Bahrawy, Mona , Lee, Cheng-Han , Fereday, Sian , Kennedy, Catherine J , Sasamoto, Naoko , Schildkraut, Joellen M , Talhouk, Aline , Vergote, Ignace , Köbel, Martin , Lambrechts, Diether , Ramus, Susan J , Rodríguez-Antona, Cristina , Menon, Usha , Sinn, Peter , Anglesio, Michael S , Jones, Michael E , Lambrechts, Diether , Brand, Alison H , Bowtell, David D , Nelson, Gregg S , El-Bahrawy, Mona A , Harnett, Paul R , Schoemaker, Minouk J , Goodman, Marc T , Linder, Anna , Cohen, Paul , Kang, Eun‐Young, Ghatage, Prafull , Bolithon, Adelyn , Ataseven, Beyhan , Brooks‐Wilson, Angela , Brucker, Sara Yvonne , Cazorla, Alicia , Conrads, Thomas , Cook, Linda S. , Cramer, Daniel W. , Crowe, Philip John , Cybulski, Cezary , Elishaev, Esther , Erber, Ramona , Fereday, Sián , Gentry‐Maharaj, Aleksandra , Gilks, C. Blake , Group, AOCS, Grube, Marcel , Hein, Alexander , Heitz, Florian , Hernandez, Brenda Y. , Høgdall, Estrid , Høgdall, Claus , Horlings, Hugo , Huzarski, Tomasz , Jewell, Andrea , Kaufmann, Scott H. , Kommoss, Felix , Kruitwagen, Roy F.P.M. , Lubiński, Jan , Modugno, Francesmary , Neuhausen, Susan L. , Olbrecht, Siel , Sonke, Gabe S. , Sundfeldt, Karin , Swerdlow, Anthony J. , Taylor, Sarah E. , Traficante, Nadia , Van de Vijver, Koen , Vierkant, Robert A. , Wang, Chen , Wilkens, Lynne R. , Winham, Stacey J. , Benı́tez, Javier , Berchuck, Andrew , DeFazio, Anna , Gronwald, Jacek , Karlan, Beth Y. , Brenton, James D. , Pharoah, Paul D.P. , Köbel, Martin

Cancer | December 27, 2022 | Volume: 129 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 697-713

10.1002/cncr.34582 | PMID 36572991 Get It

AbstractBackgroundCyclin E1 (CCNE1) is a potential predictive marker and therapeutic target in tubo‐ovarian high‐grade serous carcinoma (HGSC). Smaller studies have revealed unfavorable associations for CCNE1 amplification and CCNE1 overexpression with survival, but to date no large‐scale, histotype‐specific validation has been performed. The hypothesis was that high‐level amplification of CCNE1 and CCNE1 overexpression, as well as a combination of the two, are linked to shorter overall survival in HGSC.MethodsWithin the Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium, amplification status and protein level in 3029 HGSC cases and mRNA expression in 2419 samples were investigated.ResultsHigh‐level amplification (>8 copies by chromogenic in situ hybridization) was found in 8.6% of HGSC and overexpression (>60% with at least 5% demonstrating strong intensity by immunohistochemistry) was found in 22.4%. CCNE1 high‐level amplification and overexpression both were linked to shorter overall survival in multivariate survival analysis adjusted for age and stage, with hazard stratification by study (hazard ratio [HR], 1.26; 95% CI, 1.08‐1.47, p = .034, and HR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.05‐1.32, p = .015, respectively). This was also true for cases with combined high‐level amplification/overexpression (HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.09‐1.47, p = .033). CCNE1 mRNA expression was not associated with overall survival (HR, 1.00 per 1‐SD increase; 95% CI, 0.94‐1.06; p = .58). CCNE1 high‐level amplification is mutually exclusive with the presence of germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants and shows an inverse association to RB1 loss.ConclusionThis study provides large‐scale validation that CCNE1 high‐level amplification is associated with shorter survival, supporting its utility as a prognostic biomarker in HGSC.
Copy Number Variants Are Ovarian Cancer Risk Alleles at Known and Novel Risk Loci
DeVries, Amber A , Peng, Pei-Chen , Reyes, Alberto Luiz P., Plummer, Jasmine , Davis, Brian , Chen, Stephanie S., Dezem, Felipe Segato , Antonenkova, Natalia, Beckmann, Matthias W. , Beeghly‐Fadiel, Alicia, Bogdanova, Natalia , Bogdanova-Markov, Nadja, Brenton, James D. , Chang‐Claude, Jenny , Dörk, Thilo , Eccles, Diana M, Fasching, Peter A. , Goode, Ellen L. , Goodman, Marc T. , Group, OPAL Study, Grant, Peter , Nagle, C.A., Chevenix-Trench, G, Bowtell, D, Blomfield, Penny, Davis, Alison , Leung, Yee , Livingstone, Karen, O’Neill, Helen C. , Black, Amanda , Hadley, Alison , Shannon, Colleen, Neesham, Deborah, Otton, Geoffrey, Au‐Yeung, George , Goss, Geraldine , Wain, Gerard, Gard, Grace , Robertson, G S M, Lombard, Janine , Tan, Joanne , McNeilage, Jane, Power, J. , Miller, Jessica A., Lamont, John, Wong, Kit Man , Reid, Kate , Milishkin, L, Buck, Martin , Bunting, Michael W, McNally, Orla , Awad, Reda, Mohan, Rahul , Farrell, Rhonda , McIntosh, Rachel, Rome, Robert, Houghton, R., Hogg, Russell , Land, R., Baron‐Hay, Sally , Paramasivum, S, Pather, Selvan , Hyde, Samuel M. , Salfinger, Stuart , Valmadre, Susan, Jobling, Thomas W., Manolitsas, Tom, Bonaventura, T, Group, AOCS, Bowtell, D, Green, A, Webb, P, Gertig, DM, Moore, S., Hung, Jillian A., Harrap, Karen L. , Sadkowsky, T., Malt, M. , Robertson, R. Paul , Bergh, T. Vanden, Jones, Michelle R. , Nattress, K., Chiew, Yoke-Eng, Stenlake, Annie, Ashover, P., Corrish, T., Jackman, Louisa, Ferguson, Kaltin , Martin, Kara, Martyn, Amanda C. , White, Jonathan, Jayde, V., Bowes, Laura, Mamers, Pamela, Galletta, Laura, Giles, Daniel A., Hendley, Joy , Shirley, H., Ball, C., Young, Christian D. , Viduka, S., Bilic, Sanela , Glavinas, Lydia, Brooks, Jacqueline D., Stuart‐Harris, R., Kirsten, Fred, Rutovitz, J , Clingan, P., Proietto, Anthony , Braye, Stephen, Shannon, J., Bonaventura, T, Begbie, Stephen , Hildebrandt, Michelle A.T., Huff, Chad D. , Huntsman, David G., Kar, Siddhartha , Labrie, Marilyne , Lambrechts, Diether , Le, Nhu D. , May, Taymaa, Menon, Usha , Moysich, Kirsten B. , Odunsi, Kunle , Olsson, Håkan , Pearce, Celeste Leigh , Ramus, Susan J. , Ríboli, Elio , Riggan, Marjorie J. , Romieu, Isabelle , Schildkraut, Joellen M. , Sieh, Weiva , Song, Honglin , Sutphen, Rebecca , Terry, Kathryn L. , Thompson, Pamela J., Titus, Linda , Tworoger, Shelley S. , Nieuwenhuysen, Els Van , Edwards, Digna Velez, Wentzensen, Nicolas , Whittemore, Alice S. , Wu, Anna H. , Freedman, Matthew L., Lawrenson, Kate , Easton, Douglas F. , Gayther, Simon A. , Eccles, Diana , Bowtell, David D.L. , Lambrechts, Diether , Dennis, Joe , Plummer, Jasmine T , Anton-Culver, Hoda , Campbell, Ian G , Chenevix-Trench, Georgia , Eliassen, A Heather , Jensen, Allan , Kar, Siddhartha , Menon, Usha , Riboli, Elio , Sieh, Weiva , Webb, Penelope M , Wentzensen, Nicolas , Wolk, Alicja , Ziogas, Argyrios , Lawrenson, Kate , Jones, Michelle R , Dörk, Thilo , Lambrechts, Diether , Ramus, Susan J , Tworoger, Shelley S , Eccles, Diana , Brenton, James D , Moysich, Kirsten , Lambrechts, Diether , Bogdanova, Natalia V , Bowtell, David D , Goodman, Marc T , Tyrer, Jonathan P. , Coetzee, Simon G. , Aben, Katja K.H. , Anton‐Culver, Hoda , Beeghly‐Fadiel, Alicia , Berchuck, Andrew , Bützow, Ralf C. , Campbell, Ian , Chenevix‐Trench, Georgia , Cook, Linda S. , DeFazio, Anna , Doherty, Jennifer A. , Eliassen, A. Heather , Fortner, Renée T. , Giles, Graham G. , Gronwald, Jacek , Group, OPAL Study, Friedländer, Michael , Obermair, Andreas , Nagle, C, Beesley, Vanessa L. , Bowtell, D, Brand, Alison H. , Nicklin, James , Quinn, Michael A. , Williams, M, Hadley, A, Glasgow, A, Garrett, A, Rao, A, Steer, Christopher , Allen, Deborah Emma , Robertson, G, Power, J, Coward, Jermaine , Carter, Jonathan , Lamont, J, Wong, K M, Perrin, Lewis C , Nascimento, M, Buck, M, Harrison, Michelle , Chetty, Naven , Hacker, Neville F. , Harnett, Paul R. , Beale, Philip James , Awad, R, McIntosh, R, Sayer, R, Hogg, R, Hyde, S, Bonaventura, T, Arora, Vivek , Group, AOCS, Bowtell, D, Webb, P, Gertig, Dorota M., Traficante, Nadia , Fereday, Sián , Pandeya, Nirmala , Robertson, R, McKenzie, P, Maidens, J, Sullivan, Helen T. , Alexander, Brian M. , Brown, S, Green, L, Jackman, L, Martyn, A, Ranieri, B, White, J, Giles, D, Alsop, Kathryn , Schmidt, T, Young, C, Tran, H, Rutovitz, J, Glasgow, A, Shannon, J, Bonaventura, T, Stewart, James , Håkansson, Niclas , Hildebrandt, Michelle A.T. , Jensen, Allan , Karlan, Beth Y. , Хуснутдинова, Э. К. , Kiemeney, Lambertus A. , Kjær, Susanne K. , Kupryjańczyk, Jolanta , Lubiński, Jan , Milne, Roger L. , Modugno, Francesmary , Monteiro, Álvaro N.A. , Pejovic, Tanja B. , Sandler, Dale P. , Setiawan, Veronica Wendy , Edwards, Digna R. Velez , Webb, Penelope M. , Wolk, Alicja , Ziogas, Argyrios , Pharoah, Paul D.P.

JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute | October 10, 2022 | Volume: 114 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 1533-1544

10.1093/jnci/djac160 | PMID 36210504 Get It

AbstractBackgroundKnown risk alleles for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) account for approximately 40% of the heritability for EOC. Copy number variants (CNVs) have not been investigated as EOC risk alleles in a large population cohort.MethodsSingle nucleotide polymorphism array data from 13 071 EOC cases and 17 306 controls of White European ancestry were used to identify CNVs associated with EOC risk using a rare admixture maximum likelihood test for gene burden and a by-probe ratio test. We performed enrichment analysis of CNVs at known EOC risk loci and functional biofeatures in ovarian cancer–related cell types.ResultsWe identified statistically significant risk associations with CNVs at known EOC risk genes; BRCA1 (PEOC = 1.60E-21; OREOC = 8.24), RAD51C (Phigh-grade serous ovarian cancer [HGSOC] = 5.5E-4; odds ratio [OR]HGSOC = 5.74 del), and BRCA2 (PHGSOC = 7.0E-4; ORHGSOC = 3.31 deletion). Four suggestive associations (P < .001) were identified for rare CNVs. Risk-associated CNVs were enriched (P < .05) at known EOC risk loci identified by genome-wide association study. Noncoding CNVs were enriched in active promoters and insulators in EOC-related cell types.ConclusionsCNVs in BRCA1 have been previously reported in smaller studies, but their observed frequency in this large population-based cohort, along with the CNVs observed at BRCA2 and RAD51C gene loci in EOC cases, suggests that these CNVs are potentially pathogenic and may contribute to the spectrum of disease-causing mutations in these genes. CNVs are likely to occur in a wider set of susceptibility regions, with potential implications for clinical genetic testing and disease prevention.
Molecular Subclasses of Clear Cell Ovarian Carcinoma and Their Impact on Disease Behavior and Outcomes
Chen, Denise, Corona, Rosario I. , Fu, Zhuxuan , Murali, Rajmohan , Köbel, Martin , Tazi, Yanis , Cunningham, Julie M. , Wiley, Brian , Armasu, Sebastian M. , Lester, Jenny , Laslavic, Angela , Kennedy, Catherine J. , Piskorz, Anna , Sekowska, Magdalena , Brand, Alison H. , Chiew, Yoke-Eng , Drapkin, Ronny , Gourley, Charlie , Brenton, James D. , Weigelt, Britta , Anglesio, Michael S. , Huntsman, David G. , Gayther, Simon A. , Lawrenson, Kate , Goode, Ellen L. , Papaemmanuil, Elli , Bolton, Kelly L , Corona de la Fuente, Rosario , Fu, Zhuxuan , Murali, Rajmohan , Köbel, Martin , Tazi, Yanis , Cunningham, Julie M , Moukarzel, Lea A , Winham, Stacey J , Elishaev, Esther , Kennedy, Catherine J , Sekowska, Magdalena , Brand, Alison H , Chiew, Yoke-Eng , Pharoah, Paul D P , Elias, Kevin M , Drapkin, Ronny , Churchman, Michael , Gourley, Charlie , Fazio, Anna de , Karlan, Beth Y , Brenton, James D , Weigelt, Britta , Anglesio, Michael S , Modugno, Francesmary , Lawrenson, Kate , Goode, Ellen L , Bolton, Kelly L. , Chan, Irenaeus C.C. , Moukarzel, Lea A. , Winham, Stacey J. , Elishaev, Esther , Pharoah, Paul D.P. , Elias, Kevin M. , DeFazio, Anna , Karlan, Beth Y. , Konner, Jason A , Modugno, Francesmary

Clinical Cancer Research | July 11, 2022 | Volume: 28 | Issue: 22 | Pages: 4947-4956

10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-3817 | PMID 35816189 Get It

Abstract Purpose: To identify molecular subclasses of clear cell ovarian carcinoma (CCOC) and assess their impact on clinical presentation and outcomes. Experimental Design: We profiled 421 primary CCOCs that passed quality control using a targeted deep sequencing panel of 163 putative CCOC driver genes and whole transcriptome sequencing of 211 of these tumors. Molecularly defined subgroups were identified and tested for association with clinical characteristics and overall survival. Results: We detected a putative somatic driver mutation in at least one candidate gene in 95% (401/421) of CCOC tumors including ARID1A (in 49% of tumors), PIK3CA (49%), TERT (20%), and TP53 (16%). Clustering of cancer driver mutations and RNA expression converged upon two distinct subclasses of CCOC. The first was dominated by ARID1A-mutated tumors with enriched expression of canonical CCOC genes and markers of platinum resistance; the second was largely comprised of tumors with TP53 mutations and enriched for the expression of genes involved in extracellular matrix organization and mesenchymal differentiation. Compared with the ARID1A-mutated group, women with TP53-mutated tumors were more likely to have advanced-stage disease, no antecedent history of endometriosis, and poorer survival, driven by their advanced stage at presentation. In women with ARID1A-mutated tumors, there was a trend toward a lower rate of response to first-line platinum-based therapy. Conclusions: Our study suggests that CCOC consists of two distinct molecular subclasses with distinct clinical presentation and outcomes, with potential relevance to both traditional and experimental therapy responsiveness. See related commentary by Lheureux, p. 4838
Abstract 2248: Environmental factors associated with residual disease after ovarian cancer primary cytoreduction surgery
Phung, Minh Tung , Goode, Ellen L. , Goodman, Marc T. , Richardson, Jean , Grout, Bronwyn, Chase, Anne, Deurloo, Cindy McKinnon, Gorp, Toon Van , Pike, Malcolm C. , Schildkraut, Joellen M. , Pearce, Celeste Leigh , Goodman, Marc T , Phung, Minh Tung , Berchuck, Andrew , Hanley, Gillian E. , Chase, Anne, Karlan, Beth Y. , Matsuo, Keitaro , McLean, Karen, Terry, Kathryn L. , DeFazio, Anna , Webb, Penelope M. , Pharoah, Paul D.P. , Ramus, Susan J.

Cancer Research | June 15, 2022 | Volume: 82 | Issue: 12_Supplement | Pages: 2248-2248

10.1158/1538-7445.am2022-2248 Get It

Abstract Background: Ovarian cancer is the deadliest gynecologic cancer. Standard treatments for advanced stage high-grade serous ovarian cancer, the most common type, include (1) primary cytoreductive surgery (PCS) followed by adjuvant chemotherapy or (2) neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) with interval debulking surgery. Patients in whom PCS is unlikely to yield optimal cytoreduction to no visible residual disease (R0) or who have medical contraindications to PCS are recommended to undergo NACT. Previous studies on associations between environmental factors and risk of any macroscopic residual disease have yielded inconsistent results. We aimed to (1) comprehensively examine the associations between demographic, lifestyle and reproductive factors and risk of residual disease after PCS; and (2) develop and internally validate a risk prediction model based on these factors. Methods: We used pooled data on 3,492 women who had PCS following a diagnosis with advanced stage high-grade serous ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancers from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium. Fifteen exposures of interest included age at diagnosis, menopausal status, race/ethnicity, education level, first-degree family history of ovarian cancer, endometriosis, smoking, body mass index, parity, incomplete pregnancy, tubal ligation, use of combined oral contraceptives, depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate, estrogen (ET), and combined estrogen-progestin therapy. We fit logistic regression models to examine each exposure-residual disease association in 80% of the data (n=2,794; random selection of participants). We developed a risk prediction model including the factors with p-values ≤0.2. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to assess the model’s discrimination in the remaining 20% of the data (n=698). Results: Of the 3,492 participants, 2,003 (57%) had residual disease following PCS. Older age at diagnosis was associated with an increased risk of residual disease (OR=1.07 per five years, 95% CI 1.03-1.11). In contrast, a family history of ovarian cancer (OR=0.63, 95% CI 0.42-0.95) or ET use for 5+ years (OR=0.61, 95% CI 0.39-0.96) were associated with achieving R0. These above factors were included in the risk prediction model as were race/ethnicity, personal history of endometriosis, and smoking, whose p-values ≤0.2. The model showed modest performance in the validation set (AUC=0.64). Conclusions: Younger age at diagnosis, family history of ovarian cancer, and long-term ET use were associated with achieving R0 following PCS. Future studies incorporating genetic and clinical factors to improve the risk prediction for residual disease following PCS are warranted. Citation Format: Minh Tung Phung, Andrew Berchuck, Ellen L. Goode, Marc T. Goodman, Gillian E. Hanley, Jean Richardson, Bronwyn Grout, Anne Chase, Cindy McKinnon Deurloo, Beth Y. Karlan, Toon Van Gorp, Keitaro Matsuo, Karen McLean, Malcolm C. Pike, Joellen M. Schildkraut, Kathryn L. Terry, Anna DeFazio, Penelope M. Webb, Paul D. P. Pharoah, Susan J. Ramus, Celeste Leigh Pearce. Environmental factors associated with residual disease after ovarian cancer primary cytoreduction surgery [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 2248.
Bilateral Oophorectomy and the Risk of Breast Cancer in BRCA1 Mutation Carriers: A Reappraisal
Menkiszak, Janusz , McCuaig, Jeanna , Metcalfe, Kelly , Foulkes, William D. , Sun, Sophie , Karlan, Beth Y. , Eisen, Andrea , Olopade, Olufunmilayo I. , Senter, Leigha , Bordeleau, Louise , Sun, Ping , Narod, Steven A. , Kim, Raymond H. , Menkiszak, Janusz , Foulkes, William D , Karlan, Beth Y , Olopade, Olufunmilayo I , Couch, Fergus J. , Huzarski, Tomasz , Senter, Leigha , Singer, Christian F , Eng, Charis , Fruscio, Robert , Narod, Steven A , Metcalfe, Kelly A , Eisen, Andrea , Bordeleau, Louise , Kim, Raymond H , Kotsopoulos, Joanne , Lubiński, Jan , Gronwald, Jacek , Neuhausen, Susan L. , Tung, Nadine , Couch, Fergus J. , Huzarski, Tomasz , Singer, Christian F. , Eng, Charis , Fruscio, Robert , Pal, Tuya

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention | April 27, 2022 | Volume: 31 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 1351-1358

10.1158/1055-9965.epi-21-1196 | PMID 35477169 Get It

Abstract Background: The lack of consensus on whether bilateral oophorectomy impacts risk of developing breast cancer among BRCA1 mutation carriers might be attributed to various biases, specifically, cancer-induced testing bias due to inclusion of prevalent cases. We conducted two complementary matched case–control analyses to evaluate the association of oophorectomy and BRCA1 breast cancer. Methods: A research questionnaire was administered every two years to collect information on exposures and disease. In the first analysis, we limited the study to prevalent breast cancer cases (diagnosed prior to study entry; n = 2,962) who were matched to controls on year of birth and country of residence (n = 4,358). In the second approach, we limited to 330 incident cases (diagnosed in the follow-up period) and 1,548 matched controls. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate the adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of invasive breast cancer. Results: In the first approach, there was a significant inverse association between oophorectomy and the risk of developing breast cancer [OR = 0.43; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.34–0.55; P < 00001]. In the second approach, there was no association between oophorectomy and risk (OR = 1.21; 95% CI, 0.87–1.70; P = 0.26). Conclusions: The inclusion of women with a personal history of breast cancer prior to ascertainment likely impacts upon the association of oophorectomy and BRCA1 breast cancer risk. Impact: Oophorectomy is unlikely a determinant of breast cancer risk in BRCA1 mutation carriers but should be offered at age 35 to reduce the risk of ovarian and fallopian tube cancer.
CA-125 Levels Are Predictive of Survival in Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer—A Multicenter Analysis
Wohlmuth, Christoph , Djedovic, Vladimir, Kjær, Susanne K. , DeFazio, Anna , Johnatty, Sharon E. , Webb, Penelope M. , Lambrechts, Diether , Schildkraut, Joellen M. , Thomsen, Liv Cecilie Vestrheim , Bjørge, Line , Høgdall, Estrid , Høgdall, Claus , Goode, Ellen L. , Matsuo, Keitaro , Karlan, Beth Y. , Lester, Jenny, Goodman, Marc T. , Thompson, Pamela J., Riggan, Marjorie J. , Lajkosz, Katherine , Tone, Alicia , May, Taymaa, Lambrechts, Diether , Fazio, Anna de , Webb, Penelope M , Thomsen, Liv Cecilie Vestrheim , Bjorge, Line , Høgdall, Estrid , Høgdall, Claus K , Matsuo, Keitaro , Karlan, Beth Y , Tone, Alicia , Lambrechts, Diether , Kjaer, Susanne K , Lambrechts, Diether , Goodman, Marc T , Jensen, Allan , Glasspool, Rosalind , Roxburgh, Patricia , Modugno, Francesmary , Berchuck, Andrew , Winham, Stacey J. , Pejovic, Tanja B.

Cancers | April 13, 2022 | Volume: 14 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 1954

10.3390/cancers14081954 | PMID 35454861 Get It

Objective: Studies on low-grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSC) are limited by a low number of cases. The aim of this study was to define the prognostic significance of age, stage, and CA-125 levels on survival in a multi-institutional cohort of women with pathologically confirmed LGSC. Methods: Women with LGSC were identified from the collaborative Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (OCAC). Cases of newly diagnosed primary LGSC were included if peri-operative CA-125 levels were available. Age at diagnosis, FIGO stage, pre- and post-treatment CA-125 levels, residual disease, adjuvant chemotherapy, disease recurrence, and vital status were collected by the participating institutions. Progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated. Multivariable (MVA) Cox proportional hazard models were used and hazard ratios (HR) calculated. Results: A total of 176 women with LGSC were included in this study; 82% had stage III/IV disease. The median PFS was 2.3 years and the median OS was 6.4 years. Age at diagnosis was not significantly associated with worse PFS (p = 0.23) or OS (p = 0.3) (HR per year: 0.99; 95%CI, 0.96–1.01 and 0.98; 95%CI 0.95–1.01). FIGO stage III/IV was independently associated with PFS (HR 4.26, 95%CI 1.43–12.73) and OS (HR 1.69, 95%CI 0.56–5.05). Elevated CA-125 (≥35 U/mL) at diagnosis was not significantly associated with worse PFS (p = 0.87) or OS (p = 0.78) in MVA. Elevated CA-125 (≥35 U/mL) after completion of primary treatment was independently associated with worse PFS (HR 2.81, 95%CI 1.36–5.81) and OS (HR 6.62, 95%CI 2.45–17.92). In the MVA, residual disease was independently associated with PFS (0.022), but not OS (0.85). Conclusion: Advanced LGSC was associated with poor long-term prognosis. FIGO stage and abnormal post-treatment CA-125 level are key prognostic factors inversely associated with PFS and OS. Highlights: 1. Through a multi-center collaborative effort, data from 176 women with low-grade serous ovarian cancer were analyzed. 2. Although low-grade serous ovarian cancer is often considered indolent, the progression-free and overall survival are poor. 3. Elevated post-treatment CA-125 levels are independently associated with poor survival.