Back to Authors

Velsher, Lea

Mayo Clinic

for the Hereditary Breast Cancer Clinical Study Group

Citations 2

MRI Surveillance and Breast Cancer Mortality in Women With BRCA1 and BRCA2 Sequence Variations
Møller, Pål , Eisen, Andrea , Peck, Larissa , Bordeleau, Louise , Zakalik, Dana , Stempa, Klaudia , Dungan, J.S., Cullinane, Carey A., Olopade, Olufunmilayo I. , Metcalfe, Kelly , Sun, Ping , Narod, Steven A. , Sweet, Kevin , Velsher, Lea, McCuaig, Jeanna , Panchal, Seema, Poll, Aletta, Lemire, Edmond G., Serfas, Kim, Costalas, Josephine Wagner, Blum, Joanne L. , Olopade, Olufunmilayo I , Metcalfe, Kelly A , Eisen, Andrea , Bordeleau, Louise , Lubiński, Jan , Kotsopoulos, Joanne , Pal, Tuya , Karlan, Beth Y. , Aeilts, Amber M. , Eng, Charis , Foulkes, William D. , Tung, Nadine , Couch, Fergus J. , Fruscio, Robert , Cajal, Teresa Ramón y , Singer, Christian F. , Neuhausen, Susan L. , Cybulski, Cezary , Gronwald, Jacek , Huzarski, Tomasz , Senter, Leigha , Saal, Howard M. , Armel, Susan Randall , Reilly, Richard B. , Cohen, Stephanie A.

JAMA Oncology | February 29, 2024 | Volume: 10 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 493

10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.6944 Get It

Importance Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) surveillance is offered to women with a pathogenic variant in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene who face a high lifetime risk of breast cancer. Surveillance with MRI is effective in downstaging breast cancers, but the association of MRI surveillance with mortality risk has not been well defined. Objective To compare breast cancer mortality rates in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 sequence variation who entered an MRI surveillance program with those who did not. Design, Setting, and Participants Women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 sequence variation were identified from 59 participating centers in 11 countries. Participants completed a baseline questionnaire between 1995 and 2015 and a follow-up questionnaire every 2 years to document screening histories, incident cancers, and vital status. Women who had breast cancer, a screening MRI examination, or bilateral mastectomy prior to enrollment were excluded. Participants were followed up from age 30 years (or the date of the baseline questionnaire, whichever was later) until age 75 years, the last follow-up, or death from breast cancer. Data were analyzed from January 1 to July 31, 2023. Exposures Entrance into an MRI surveillance program. Main Outcomes and Measures Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for breast cancer mortality associated with MRI surveillance compared with no MRI surveillance using a time-dependent analysis. Results A total of 2488 women (mean [range] age at study entry 41.2 [30-69] years), with a sequence variation in the BRCA1 (n = 2004) or BRCA2 (n = 484) genes were included in the analysis. Of these participants, 1756 (70.6%) had at least 1 screening MRI examination and 732 women (29.4%) did not. After a mean follow-up of 9.2 years, 344 women (13.8%) developed breast cancer and 35 women (1.4%) died of breast cancer. The age-adjusted HRs for breast cancer mortality associated with entering an MRI surveillance program were 0.20 (95% CI, 0.10-0.43; P < .001) for women with BRCA1 sequence variations and 0.87 (95% CI, 0.10-17.25; P = .93) for women with BRCA2 sequence variations. Conclusion and Relevance Results of this cohort study suggest that among women with a BRCA1 sequence variation, MRI surveillance was associated with a significant reduction in breast cancer mortality compared with no MRI surveillance. Further studies of women with BRCA2 sequence variations are needed to ascertain these women obtain the same benefits associated with MRI surveillance.
The risks of cancer in older women with BRCA pathogenic variants: How far have we come?
Metcalfe, Kelly , McCuaig, Jeanna , Eisen, Andrea , Elser, Christine , Senter, Leigha , Møller, Pål , Bordeleau, Louise , Velsher, Lea, Zakalik, Dana , Olopade, Olufunmilayo I. , Cullinane, Carey A., Sun, Ping , Narod, Steven A. , Metcalfe, Kelly A , Olopade, Olufunmilayo I , Kotsopoulos, Joanne , Narod, Steven A , Senter, Leigha , Eisen, Andrea , Bordeleau, Louise , Gronwald, Jacek , Tung, Nadine , Foulkes, William D. , Neuhausen, Susan L. , Fruscio, Robert , Eng, Charis , Pal, Tuya , Couch, Fergus J. , Kotsopoulos, Joanne , Lubiński, Jan

Cancer | December 26, 2022 | Volume: 129 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 901-907

10.1002/cncr.34615 Get It

AbstractBackgroundThe purpose of this study was to estimate the cumulative risks of all cancers in women from 50 to 75 years of age with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic variant.MethodsParticipants were women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic variants from 85 centers in 16 countries. Women were eligible if they had no cancer before the age of 50 years. Participants completed a baseline questionnaire and follow‐up questionnaires every 2 years. Women were followed from age 50 until a diagnosis of cancer, death, age 75, or last follow‐up. The risk of all cancers combined from age 50 to 75 was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method.ResultsThere were 2211 women included (1470 BRCA1 and 742 BRCA2). There were 379 cancers diagnosed in the cohort between 50 and 75 years. The actuarial risk of any cancer from age 50 to 75 was 49% for BRCA1 and 43% for BRCA2. Breast (n = 186) and ovarian (n = 45) were the most frequent cancers observed. For women who had both risk‐reducing mastectomy and bilateral salpingo‐oophorectomy before age 50, the risk of developing any cancer between age 50 and 75 was 9%.ConclusionWomen with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic variant have a high risk of cancer between the ages of 50 and 75 years and should be counselled appropriately.