Citations

Abstract Cytokine receptor–like factor 2 rearrangement (CRLF2r), an aberration causing a Philadelphia chromosome–like gene expression profile and a poor prognostic marker in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), endows relative chemotherapeutic resistance. Extramedullary disease (EMD), including both central nervous system (CNS) and non-CNS involvement, can also be associated with worse outcomes. The relationship between CRLF2r and EMD is unknown. Based on an initial observation of patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) CRLF2r B-ALL and EMD, a single-center retrospective review was conducted to evaluate the incidence of EMD in patients with CRLF2r B-ALL. Across 177 children, adolescents, and young adults with R/R B-ALL, 21 (11.9%) harbored CRLF2r, of whom 19 (90.5%) had EMD at some point during their treatment course. In contrast, only 78 of the 156 patients (50%) without CRLF2r ever had EMD (P = .0003). In the CRLF2r cohort, 8 (38.1%) presented with EMD at diagnosis: 7 with CNS and 1 with non-CNS EMD. At relapse, 17 (80.9%) had EMD: 4 (19%) had CNS EMD, 9 (42.9%) had non-CNS EMD, and 4 (19%) had both. Isolated EMD was observed in 2 patients (11.8%) at first relapse and in 3 (17.6%) with multiple relapses. Given these findings, further study to evaluate this potential association between EMD and CRLF2r in R/R B-ALL is indicated.

Abstract Response Assessment in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology (RAPNO) is an international working group dedicated to developing standardized recommendations for response assessment in children with central nervous system tumors enrolled on clinical trials. This standardization facilitates easier and more reliable comparison of responses across trials. Since the first RAPNO publication in 2013, response guidelines have been issued for medulloblastoma (MB), low-grade glioma (LGG), high-grade glioma (HGG), diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma, ependymoma, and craniopharyngioma. Many of these guidelines have already been incorporated into clinical trials to evaluate their effectiveness and accuracy. RAPNO has always been predicated on the idea that these consensus recommendations will require updates over time as they are applied in practice given technological advancements, evolving treatment approaches, and growing knowledge of disease pathology. A half-day RAPNO symposium sponsored by the Society of Neuro-Oncology was held in San Diego, California, United States, on May 15, 2025. This event coincided with the 8th Biennial Pediatric Society of Neuro-Oncology meeting. The main objectives were to identify ongoing RAPNO challenges, discuss potential updates, and plan future initiatives across 3 specific groups: (1) LGG/Craniopharyngioma, (2) HGG/diffuse midline glioma (DMG)/Ependymoma, and (3) MB and other seeding tumors. This manuscript reviews the symposium proceedings and highlights key topics and challenges discussed, as well as outlining future RAPNO initiatives.

Abstract PURPOSE: CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i), used in combination with endocrine therapy (ET), are standard of care for advanced and higher risk early stage hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2 negative (HER2-) breast cancer. PALLAS investigated the addition of 2 years (y) of palbociclib to adjuvant ET (ET/P) compared to ET alone in patients (pts) with stage II-III HR+/HER2- breast cancer. We now present overall survival (OS) with 7-y outcomes and impact of post-recurrence therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This global phase III trial randomized pts to ET for at least 5 y with or without 2 y of P. Primary endpoint was iDFS; distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS) and OS were preplanned endpoints. Kaplan Meier estimates and hazard ratios (HR) from Cox and Fine & Gray models were performed. Post-recurrence OS was analyzed as time from first distant recurrence (DR) until death. The post-recurrence OS model adjusted for both clin/path factors (including DR-free y, DR site) and time-dependent post-DR therapy (chemo, CDK4/6i). Results: 5,796 pts enrolled at 406 centers in 21 countries worldwide over 3 y. In the intent-to-treat (ITT) population, with a median follow-up of 82.7 months (mo), 7-y outcomes for iDFS, DRFS and OS are shown in the table. DR occurred in 781 pts (377 ET/P, 404 ET alone) with balanced pt/disease characteristics between arms. ET/P had more visceral (46% vs. 36%) and fewer non-visceral (61% vs. 68%) DR compared to ET alone (p=0.03). Unadjusted post-recurrence OS was significantly worse for ET/P vs. ET (median 22.6 vs. 27.9 mo, HR 1.21 (95% CI 1.01-1.46, p=0.04). However, receipt of any post-recurrence CDK4/6i was significantly higher on ET vs. ET/P arms (41% vs. 66%) and time to post-progression CDK4/6i initiation was significantly shorter for those in the ET vs. ET/P arms (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.41-0.61, p<0.001) adjusting for region, bone/visceral DR type, DR-free time and age. Conversely, time to post-progression chemotherapy initiation was significantly longer for ET alone vs. ET/P arms (HR 1.31, 95% CI 1.07-1.61, p=0.01). However, after adjustment for clinical factors and post-DR treatment, the OS difference was no longer seen (HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.85-1.28, p=0.65). 3-mo landmark analysis showed similar effect on OS after adjusting for CDK4/6i initiation within 3 mo from DR (unadjusted HR 1.24, p=0.03 vs. adjusted HR 1.15, p=0.22). CONCLUSION: The PALLAS trial revealed significant differences in treatment post-DR that impact OS. Reduced/delayed use of metastatic CDK4/6i after adjuvant P was associated with significantly poorer OS, suggesting that patients who relapse after adjuvant CDK4/6i may still benefit from metastatic CDK4/6i. This has implications for optimal treatment in those who relapse after adjuvant CDK4/6i and warrants further study to determine if this is therapy-specific or an overarching biological effect. SUPPORT: AFT, ABCSG, NRG, PrECOG; Pfizer Citation Format: A. DeMichele, A. Dueck, M. Gnant, D. Hlauschek, M. Martin, A. Wolff, G. Rubovsky, F. Henao, O. Hahn, A. Chan, A. Brusky, P. Morris, H. Burstein, G. Huber, D. Anderson, L. Garcia-Estevez, G. Pfeiler, H. Rugo, N. Zdenkowski, S. Gampenrieder, N. Wolmark, D. Sabanathan, K. Miller, D. Cameron, E. Winer, C. Brunner, E. Gauthier, P. O’Brien, C. Fesl, E. Mayer. Adjuvant Palbociclib for ER+ Breast Cancer in the PALLAS Trial (ABCSG-42/AFT-05/PrE0109/BIG-14-13): Post-Recurrence Treatment and Overall Survival [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr RF7-07.

Abstract Background: DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) isoforms 1, 3A and 3B are enzymes that regulate DNA methylation, controlling gene expression, chromatin stability and genetic imprinting. We have previously shown that DNMT3A protein expression in early triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is associated with more aggressive clinicopathologic features (higher tumor grade, tumor proliferation and frequency of nodal metastases) and worse clinical outcomes in the absence of chemotherapy (Leon-Ferre et al, SABCS 2024). Pre-clinically, we have shown that DNMT3A protein expression predicts sensitivity to DNMT inhibitors (Yu J et al., J Clin Invest 2018), and that DNMT inhibitor treatment leads to downregulation of DNMT3A, enhanced expression of immune-related pathways, and halted tumor growth, particularly in combination with immunotherapy and paclitaxel. Methods: This is a phase 1, open-label, multicenter study evaluating the safety and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of the oral DNMT inhibitor ASTX727 + paclitaxel + pembrolizumab in metastatic TNBC. ASTX727 is an oral fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet of 35 mg decitabine (active agent) and 100 mg cedazuridine (a cytidine deaminase inhibitor that prevents decitabine degradation in the bowel and liver, allowing oral delivery). The study consists of two parts: Part 1 is a dose-finding cohort, using a 3+3 design, with 5 dose levels (Table), and its primary objective is to determine the RP2D. Part 2 is an expansion cohort (n=6), with the primary objective to confirm tolerability of the regimen at the RP2D. Secondary objectives are to record the antitumor activity of the regimen, describe the AE profile, explore the association of baseline gene expression profiles with clinical benefit, and to evaluate impact of treatment on tumor and ctDNA methylation. Exploratory objectives will evaluate the association of baseline DNMT3A protein expression and antitumor activity, and the impact of treatment on the tumor and peripheral blood immune phenotype. Eligible patients are adults 18 years or older with metastatic TNBC (ER/PR ≤10%, and HER2-negative per ASCO/CAP guidelines), independent of PD-L1 expression. Patients are allowed to have received 0-3 prior lines of systemic therapy in the metastatic setting, including prior immune checkpoint inhibitors in the early and/or metastatic settings. Patients must be eligible for taxanes and have adequate organ and bone marrow function. Patients with treated brain metastases are eligible if previously treated without evidence of progression after 4 weeks. Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis is not allowed. Patients must have an ECOG performance status of ≤2 and have no gastrointestinal disorders impacting absorption of oral medications. As of June 20, 2025, the study is enrolling patients, with 10 patients dosed in the dose-finding phase. Citation Format: R. Leon-Ferre, D. M. Zahrieh, P. P. Advani, D. Quiroga, K. V. Giridhar, P. J. Dizona, D. Stover, X. Wang, A. J. Tevaarwerk, G. M. Choong, S. Yasir, K. R. Kalari, J. Foldi, R. Parajuli, M. H. Hackney, H. K. Chew, R. Wajeeha, H. Bear, E. Sharon, B. Ko, G. I. Shapiro, S. Gore, L. Pelosof, L. Wang, M. P. Goetz. Trial in progress: Phase 1 Study Targeting DNA Methyltransferases in Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (NCI Protocol #10546) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS5-07-20.

Abstract Background: PALLAS (PALbociclib CoLlaborative Adjuvant Study, NCT02513394) is a randomized phase III trial comparing two years of the CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib combined with the physician’s choice of adjuvant endocrine therapy, versus endocrine therapy alone for patients with Stage II-III hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) breast cancer. Molecular residual disease (MRD) detection via circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) testing was a predefined biomarker analysis to identify patients at highest risk of recurrence. Methods: PALLAS participants with available tumor block, at least a baseline (pre-study treatment) plasma sample, and either whole blood or buffy coat were randomly selected from the overall study population. Plasma samples on cycle 1 day 1 (C1D1), cycle 6 day 1 (C6D1), and at the end of treatment (EOT) were collected, processed, and stored. Nucleic acids were extracted from primary tumor tissue or, when primary tissue was insufficient, from post-neoadjuvant tumor tissue, provided the sample had sufficient material and tumor cellularity (>25 mm2 tissue area with ≥20% tumor nuclei). Data from next generation sequencing of tumor tissue and matched normal DNA were used to create a personalized ctDNA SignateraTM assay (Natera, Inc.) for MRD assessment in the peripheral blood. ctDNA was reported as mean tumor molecules/mL (MTM/mL) of plasma. The primary endpoint was distant recurrence-free interval (DRFI) based on ctDNA status. Cox Proportional Hazards models were used to evaluate prognosis and predictive interactions. To minimize bias, the biorepository and laboratory teams were blinded to participant identity. Results: In total, 1280 participants were randomly selected for inclusion in this preplanned ctDNA sub-study. WES and WGS are being conducted on tissue, and Signatera results will be generated. Results for association of MRD status (positive/negative) and MTM/mL with DRFI in the context of 7 year median follow up of this study cohort will be reported. Conclusions: The planned analysis is ongoing and the presented work will provide data from the first randomized phase 3 adjuvant study in HR+/HER2- breast cancer to report MRD status by treatment arm. Citation Format: H. A. Parsons, K. Ballman, E. Heitzer, M. Watson, M. Balic, D. Hlauschek, D. Renner, E. Kalashnikova, G. Steger, J. M. Balko, Y. Novik, M. Martin, A. A. Rodriguez, Z. Dayao, A. Chan, E. Nili Gal-Yam, M. C. Liu, C. Isaacs, M. Los, M. Gil Gil, B. Felder, C. Denkert, P. Fasching, F. Liu, T. O'Donnell, E. L. Mayer, M. Gnant, W. F. Symmans, A. DeMichele. Tumor-informed circulating tumor DNA analysis to assess molecular residual disease for prognosis and prediction of benefit from palbociclib in the PALLAS trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr RF3-04.

Abstract Background Central nervous system (CNS) metastases are a major clinical concern in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). The PATINA phase III study showed improved PFS with palbociclib added to maintenance anti-HER2/endocrine therapy (44.3 vs. 29.1 months; hazard ratio 0.75; 95% CI 0.59-0.96; 1-sided P=0.0109). Preclinical and early clinical data suggest palbociclib may have CNS activity. We conducted a pre-specified secondary analysis to evaluate the incidence and timing of CNS progression. Methods CNS progression was defined as the emergence of new intracranial lesions per investigator assessment. Baseline CNS imaging was not mandated but recommended if symptomatic. Competing risks analyses evaluated time from registration to first CNS progression or death (CNS PFS), treating non-CNS progression as a competing event. All randomized patients were included in the primary analysis, regardless of known baseline CNS involvement. Patients with baseline CNS metastases were not censored if progression involved the CNS. A secondary analysis excluded patients with CNS metastases present at baseline. Cumulative incidence functions were estimated and compared using 2-sided Gray’s test. Results Data cutoff for this analysis was on October 15, 2024. 518 participants were enrolled between June 2017 and July 2021, 261 to the palbociclib arm and 257 to the control arm. CNS metastases at baseline were present in 11 patients in the palbociclib arm and 9 patients in the control arm. Among all randomized patients, CNS progression occurred in 35 of 261 (13.4%; 95% CI: 9.5-18.2) in the palbociclib arm and 50 of 257 (19.5%; 95% CI: 14.8-24.8) in the control arm. When excluding patients with CNS metastases at baseline, CNS progression was observed in 32 of 250 (12.8%; 95% CI: 8.9-17.6) in the palbociclib arm and 47 of 248 (19.0%; 95% CI: 14.3-24.4) in the control arm. The median follow-up for patients who were alive and progression-free was 53.5 months. At 36 months, the cumulative incidence of CNS PFS was 13.4% vs. 19.9% for palbociclib versus control (Gray’s test p=0.0386). Importantly, when the analysis was restricted to pts without evidence of CNS disease at baseline (Table 1), —the CNS benefit with palbociclib was maintained (13.0% vs. 19.2% at 36 months, Gray’s test p = 0.0378). Conclusion The addition of palbociclib to anti-HER2 and endocrine therapy was associated with a lower incidence of CNS metastases. Among patients without known baseline CNS involvement, the absolute reduction in CNS progression at 36 months was 6.2% in favor of palbociclib. This benefit was observed at 12 months and sustained over 3 years (Table 1). These findings suggest that palbociclib may help delay or prevent CNS involvement in HR+/HER2+ MBC, warranting confirmation in future studies. Citation Format: O. Metzger, S. Mandrekar, T. Dockter, L. Gianni, E. Ciruelos, A. De Michele, J. Gligorov, E. Lim, S. Loibl, X. Gonzàlez Farré, F. Lynce, J. Lanzillotti, L. Carey, S. Goel, A. Partridge, E. Winer. Central Nervous System Outcomes from the Phase III PATINA Trial (AFT-38) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr RF4-01.

Abstract Background PARP inhibitors (PARPi) are active in patients (pts) with germline BRCA1/2 or PALB2 mutated (gBRCA1/2; gPALB2m) breast cancer (BC). Preclinical data suggest PARPi leads to intratumoral activation of the proinflammatory cGAS/STING pathway, recruiting CD8+ T cells, and sensitizing gBRCAm cancers to immune-targeted therapy. Prolonged preoperative treatment with PARPi monotherapy has demonstrated notable pathologic complete response (pCR) rates. The randomized phase II TBCRC 056 study evaluates the PARPi niraparib (N) with the anti-PD-1 antibody dostarlimab (D) as neoadjuvant treatment of gBRCAm or gPALB2mHER2-negative BC, with cohorts for both triple negative BC (TNBC, Arms A and B) and estrogen receptor positive (ER+) BC (Arm C). Results from Arms A and B are being presented. Methods Eligible pts (gBRCA1/2m/gPALB2m BC, T >1.0 cm, ER- (<10%), HER2-) were randomized to either Arm A: upfront combination N 200 mg orally QD and D 500 mg IV every 3 weeks (wks) for 18 wks (1 cycle = 3 wks), or Arm B: N monotherapy for 3 wks, followed by combination N plus D for 15 wks, with baseline (BL) and wk 3 tumor biopsies. After 18 wks, pts either underwent surgery or received additional preoperative systemic therapy (per MD choice) after an end of treatment biopsy if residual disease present. The primary study objectives are to evaluate pCR in Arms A and B combined, as well as change in stromal tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) from BL to 3 wks in each Arm separately; 46 pts and a target pCR rate of 50% provides 85% power to reject the null hypothesis of pCR < 30%. Results A total of 46 pts with TNBC enrolled to Arms A and B (38 gBRCA1m (82.6%), 8 gBRCA2m (17.4%), 0 gPALB2m). Median age was 39.3 years (range 24.8-72.8); 84.8% self-reported White, 6.5% Black, 4.3% Asian, and 8.7% Hispanic. Clinical stage distribution was 37.0% stage I, 45.7% stage II, and 17.4% stage III; most had ER- BC (42 ER <1%, and 4 ER 1-10%). Among all pts, 38 (82.6%) completed the target number of cycles of D, with mean cycles received 5.1. Five pts discontinued D early (3 inadequate response/progression, 2 unacceptable AE: LFTs, rash). A total of 38 pts (82.6%) completed 6 cycles of N, with mean cycles received 5.7. Seven pts discontinued N early (3 inadequate response/progression, 4 unacceptable AE: LFTs, anemia, rash (2)). Most common AEs (> grade 2) with D+N were anemia (26.1%), fatigue (21.7%), hypertension (15.2%), hypothyroidism (15.2%), and neutropenia (15.2%). Most common Grade >3 AEs with D+N were anemia (17%) and neutropenia (6.5%). Among all pts, 23 (50%) had a pCR at surgery (90% CI 37.1% - 62.9%), 12 (26.1%) had residual disease (4 RCB-I, 5 RCB-II, 2 RCB-III, 1 RCB not calculable), and 11 (23.9%) crossed over to additional preoperative therapy. The pCR rate exceeded the protocol efficacy criterion of >43%, a significant increase over null hypothesis. pCR rates were the same on Arms A (50%, 90% CI 31.1% - 68.9%) and B (50%, 90% CI 31.9% - 68.1%). Among 15 pts on Arm A with evaluable sTILs at BL and 3 wks, mean sTILs at BL was 16% (range 1% - 40%), and at 3 wks was 27.4% (range 0.5% - 60%), for an average increase of 11.4% (p=0.009). Among 22 pts on Arm B with evaluable sTILs at BL and 3 wks, mean sTILs at BL was 19.5% (range 1% - 75%), and at 3 wks was 42.1% (range 1% - 85%), for an average increase of 22.7% (p=0.0003). Among all pts, BL sTILs (continuous) were significantly higher among those who achieved pCR than those who did not (median 15% vs. 5%, p=0.03). There was no relationship between pCR and BL PD-L1 score, or pCR and ER-0 vs. ER-low. Conclusions In pts with gBRCAm early TNBC, 18 wks of targeted therapy using PARPi and anti-PD1 agents, with or without 3-week PARPi lead-in, resulted in a pCR rate of 50%, and a statistically significant increase in sTILs from BL to 3 wks. Further ongoing correlative work may identify best candidates for this non-chemotherapy-based approach. Citation Format: E. L. Mayer, N. Graham, R. A. Leon-Ferre, M. Rozenblit, C. A. Santa-Maria, S. Isakoff, J. Specht, N. Tung, V. Abramson, J. Desrosiers, A. Schubert, B. Koca, S. M. Tolaney, E. P. Winer, I. E. Krop, A. C. Wolff, G. I. Shapiro, N. Tayob, J. L. Guerriero. Tbcrc 056: a phase 2 study of neoadjuvant niraparib with dostarlimab for patients with BRCA- or PALB2-mutated breast cancer: results from the TNBC cohorts [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr RF5-02.

Abstract Background: While there are abundant data on the surgical management of BC after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), there is less guidance regarding surgical management of BC after NET, particularly with respect to lymph node (LN) surgery. While pathologic complete response (pCR) is common with NAC, it is a rare event with NET. In this analysis we assess the surgeons’ approach in the context of NET. Methods: The ALTERNATE trial is a phase III study that randomized postmenopausal patients (pts) with clinical stage II/III ER+ HER2- BC to receive neoadjuvant anastrozole (A), fulvestrant (F), or both for 6 mos. before surgery. The primary objective was to determine if neoadjuvant F or A+F increases the rate of pCR or ypT1-2N0/N1mic/Ki67 <2.7% residual disease over A alone. Breast surgery was per standard of care. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) with or without axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) was required to determine preoperative endocrine prognostic index PEPI score and residual cancer burden (RCB). Surgeons were required to indicate if the patient would be eligible for breast- conserving surgery (BCS) prior to NET. Patient accrual occurred from 2014-2018. The surgical outcomes are reported for the entire group. Results: Among the 3 treatment arms, 933 patients completed 6 cycles of NET. The clinical T stage at diagnosis was 73.6% T2, 22.6% T3and 3.8% T4. Initial tumor size was assessed by mammogram and ultrasound. Primary tumor histology was ductal in 64.8% and lobular in 25.4%.568 pts (60.9%) were clinically node negative (cN0), 36.2% cN1, 2.6% cN2 with 0.3% cN3. LNs were palpable in 25.2%. 383 had LN needle biopsy pre NET, of which 80.9% were positive. The surgeons’ initial impression of the patient’s eligibility for BCS was 74% while 0.6% were considered inoperable.75.5% of pts had post-NET imaging performed. Of those with tumor size recorded, 52.9% were T1 or not visible. Overall, 69.9% of the 933 patients had BCS. Of those 330 pts without post-NET imaging or who had post-NET imaging without a size noted, 64.8% underwent BCS. For pts undergoing BCS, 80.2% required only one surgery for margin clearance. Of the 690 pts deemed eligible for BCS pre NET, 79% had BCS. Of the 240 pts deemed ineligible for BCS pre-NET, 43.8% had BCS. Of the pre-NET cT2 tumors, 79% had BCS while only 45.5% of T3 tumors and 37.1% of T4 tumors had BCS. On surgical pathology, 474 (50.8%) pts were LN+ compared to pre-NET cN+ 39.1% and needle biopsy-proven 33.2%. For pts with pN0, 93.3% had SLNB alone. 6.7 % of pN0 had ALND alone or SLNB+ALND. For those with pN1-3 , 36.3% had SLN only; 37.3% SLN+ ALND; 26.4% ALND alone. Only 0.8% of the patients had no ALND or SLNB performed. Pts undergoing BCS were more likely to have SLNB alone for a +SLN compared to mastectomy pts (62.9% vs. 37.6%; chi-square p<0.0001). For pts with pre-NET +LN on needle biopsy, only 26.8% underwent SLNB alone, while 37.4% underwent ALND alone. Of the 204 LN-positive pts having SLNB alone, 55.9% had only 1 + LN and 27% had only 2+ LNs. For pN+ pts who underwent SLNB +ALND, 42.1% had 1-2 + LNs. Conclusion: With NET, 69.9% of pts achieved BCS, including 43.8% deemed ineligible pre-NET. Given the low rate of pCR to NET, there should not be the expectation of pCR in +LNs. Based on the procedures performed in pts with +SLNs, it appears that surgeons were applying ACOSOG Z0011 criteria for pts having BCS, but were less likely to omit ALND for +LN in pts having mastectomy. The finding of only 1-2 +LNs in many of the LN+ pts suggests that omission of ALND may be a reasonable approach post-NET. Longer follow-up is required to assess local-regional recurrence. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882; https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org. Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: NCT01953588 Citation Format: A. M. Leitch, T. Dockter, V. suman, A. Weiss, G. W. Unzeitig, J. Guenther, S. Sanati, K. Vij, J. Hoog, A. Caudle, A. Tiersten, M. Mita, W. Razaq, T. J. Hieken, Y. Wang, M. Rimawi, M. J. Ellis, E. Winer, K. K. Hunt, A. H. Partridge, L. A. Carey. Surgical outcomes in the ALTERNATE trial (Alliance A011106) -a randomized phase 3 neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) trial in postmenopausal women with clinical stage II/III estrogen receptor positive (ER+) and HER2 negative (HER2-) breast cancer (BC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr RF1-02.

Abstract Background: Most patients with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+), metastatic breast cancer (mBC) treated with endocrine therapy (ET) will ultimately develop resistance. A large unmet need exists especially when resistance occurs following treatment with a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i), which is potentially driven by a mutation in the ERα-coding gene, ESR1. Lasofoxifene (LAS), an oral, next-generation ET and ER breast antagonist, was evaluated in two phase 2 studies of women with ER+/HER2- mBC and an ESR1 mutation who had disease progression on previous ET and CDK4/6i. In the ELAINE 1 trial, LAS monotherapy provided numerically greater progression-free survival (PFS, median 5.6 mos vs 3.7 mos; HR: 0.669 [95% CI, 0.445‒1.125], P=0.138), objective response rate (ORR, 13% vs 3%; P=0.124), and clinical benefit rate (CBR, 37% vs 22%; P=0.117) compared with the ER degrader fulvestrant (fulv), with a favorable safety profile (Goetz MP et al. Ann Oncol 2023;34:1141‒51). The single-arm, ELAINE 2 trial showed that LAS combined with abemaciclib (Abema) was well tolerated with a median PFS of ∼13 mos, ORR of 56%, and CBR of 66% (Damodaran S et al. Ann Oncol 2023;34:1131‒40). The phase 3, registrational, ELAINE 3 trial was initiated based on these promising earlier-phase data. Recent results from postMONARCH confirmed superior efficacy of fulv/Abema over fulv/placebo (mPFS 6.0 mos vs 5.3 mos, HR 0.73 [0.57‒0.95], nominal P-value 0.017) in non-biomarker‒selected, mBC patients after progression on a prior CDK4/6i and aromatase inhibitor (AI), with similar HR in an ESR1-mutated cohort (Kalinsky K et al. J Clin Oncol 2025;43:1101‒12). Additionally, recent data from EMBER-3 demonstrated meaningful PFS with a novel ET combined with abemaciclib after progression on AI/CDK4/6i (Jhaveri KL et al. N Engl J Med 2025;392:1189‒202). The ELAINE 3, global trial will compare LAS/Abema with fulv/Abema in a post-CDK4/6i, ESR1-mutation‒selected, mBC population. Methods: ELAINE 3 (NCT05696626) is an open-label, phase 3, multicenter study evaluating the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of LAS plus Abema versus fulv plus Abema. Patients are being enrolled at approximately 152 sites in 13 countries (Australia, Belgium, Canada, China, France, Italy, Israel, Poland, Romania, Spain, Taiwan, United Kingdom, United States). Key inclusion criteria are pre- and postmenopausal women and men aged ≥18 yrs; ER+/HER2-, locally advanced and/or mBC (measurable and/or non-measurable disease); ≥1 acquired ESR1 mutation; progression on an AI plus palbociclib or ribociclib as their first hormonal treatment for advanced/mBC; and ≤1 line of chemotherapy in the advanced/metastatic setting. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive LAS 5 mg/day plus Abema 150 mg BID, or fulv 500 mg IM (days 1, 15, and 29, then once monthly) plus Abema 150 mg BID. Treatment will continue until progression, death, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal from the study. The primary endpoint is PFS per RESIST 1.1 by blinded independent central review (BICR); key secondary endpoints are ORR, overall survival, CBR, duration of response, and time to response. Safety, time to cytotoxic chemotherapy, and quality of life (including vaginal health) will also be evaluated. Blood samples for circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) will be collected for genomic analyses at screening, at weeks 4 and 8 and every 8 weeks thereafter, and at the final visit. Outcomes with LAS/Abema and fulv/Abema will be compared using a stratified Cox proportional hazards model and stratified logrank test with an expected PFS hazard ratio of 0.68 at final analysis. Enrollment is currently ongoing to meet the target sample size of 500 patients. Citation Format: M. P. Goetz, S. A. Wander, T. Bachelot, G. Curigliano, A. de Nonneville, E. N. Gal-Yam, K. Jhaveri, S. L. Sammons, S. Shen, C. J. Twelves, G. Gasper, P. V. Plourde, D. J. Portman, S. Damodaran. Open-label, randomized, multicenter, phase 3, ELAINE 3 study of the efficacy and safety of lasofoxifene plus abemaciclib for treating ER+/HER2-, locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer with an ESR1 mutation [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS5-07-30.

Abstract Background: Breast cancer (BC) chemoprevention with selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) and aromatase inhibitors (AIs) remains underutilized among high-risk women. Improving knowledge about BC risk and chemoprevention among high-risk patients and their healthcare providers may enhance informed decision-making about this BC risk reduction strategy. Methods: We conducted a cluster randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of web-based patient and provider decision support, RealRisks and BNAV, to improve chemoprevention informed choice among women with atypical hyperplasia (AH) or lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS). Thirty-one sites, including academic and community practices across the U.S., were randomized to standard patient educational materials alone or combined with RealRisks and BNAV. A total of 412 patients and 210 healthcare providers were enrolled. Patient surveys were administered at baseline, 6 and 12 months. The primary outcome at 6 months was chemoprevention informed choice, defined as adequate chemoprevention knowledge and attitudes congruent with decision. Secondary endpoints included BC risk perceptions, worry, chemoprevention knowledge, decision conflict and chemoprevention decision. Assuming 10% loss to follow up (LTFU), roughly equal accrual across sites, and an intraclass coefficient (ICC) of 0.02, we had 90% power to detect a 15% absolute difference in informed choice if the event rate in the control arm was 10%. Results: Among 24 evaluable sites, 14 were randomized to the intervention arm and 10 to the control arm. Among 210 enrolled providers, median age was 46 (range, 28-83) and 78% were female; 75% physicians and 25% advanced practice providers/nurses; 53% medical oncologists, 29% surgeons, and 10% gynecologists/family practitioners/internists; and 83% had previously prescribed chemoprevention. Among 412 enrolled patients, median age was 53 (range, 35-74), including 77% White, 8% Black, and 10% Asian race, and 14% Hispanic ethnicity. In terms of BC risk factors, 77% had AH and 23% LCIS, 34% had a first-degree family history of BC, and 65% had heterogeneously or extremely dense breasts on mammography. Thirty percent were unevaluable for the primary endpoint (1% ineligible, 26% LTFU, 3% missing data). Among 288 evaluable patients (148 at intervention sites, 140 at control sites), the proportion of patients exercising informed choice at 6 months in the intervention and control arms was 35% vs. 27%, respectively (odds ratio [OR]=1.44, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.84-2.46, p=0.19; observed ICC=0.006). Compared to patients in the control arm at 6 months, those in the intervention arm were more likely to have accurate BC risk perceptions (OR=1.80, 95% CI=1.11-2.91) and adequate chemoprevention knowledge (OR=1.62, 95% CI=1.00-2.61). We observed no significant differences in BC worry, decision conflict, or chemoprevention decision between study arms. At 6 months, 49% of women in the control arm and 51% in the intervention arm decided to take a SERM or AI for BC chemoprevention (p=0.58), a rate higher than anticipated. Conclusions: We did not observe a significant increase in informed choice among patients and providers assigned to chemoprevention decision support compared to standard educational materials alone. Among women with AH or LCIS seen mainly by breast specialists who prescribed chemoprevention, about half decided to take a SERM or AI. Therefore, relatively high chemoprevention uptake may be achieved among women with high-risk breast lesions managed by breast specialists. Chemoprevention decision support may improve decision antecedents, such as accurate BC risk perceptions and chemoprevention knowledge, but may have a limited role in changing health behaviors. Citation Format: K. D. Crew, G. L. Anderson, K. B. Arnold, A. Michel, M. T. DeLucie, C. W. Law, S. Pruthi, A. C. Sandoval Leon, R. Shirley, M. T. Grosse Perdekamp, S. V. Colonna, S. L. Krisher, T. King, L. D. Yee, T. J. Ballinger, C. Braun-Inglis, D. A. Mangino, K. B. Wisinski, C. A. DeYoung, M. Ross, J. D. Floyd, A. Kaster, L. VanderWalde, T. Saphner, C. Zarwan, S. Lo, C. Graham, A. K. Conlin, K. J. Yost, D. M. Agnese, C. Jernigan, D. L. Hershman, M. L. Neuhouser, J. A. Zell, B. Arun, R. Kukafka. Making informed choices on incorporating chemoprevention into care (MiCHOICE): Cluster randomized controlled trial of decision support for breast cancer chemoprevention, SWOG 1904 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS3-01-15.