Citations

Background: Cervical artery dissection (CeAD) accounts for nearly 25% of all ischemic strokes in young adults. CeAD can lead to the development of dissecting aneurysms (DA). However, the incidence, risk factors and outcomes of CeAD patients with DA is not well established. This study aims to identify risk factors for developing DA, subsequent growth, and impact on patient outcomes. Methods: This is a secondary analysis of the Antithrombotics for Stroke Prevention in Cervical Artery Dissection (STOP-CAD), a multicenter cross-sectional international retrospective study. CeAD patients were stratified for the presence of DA. We used multivariable regression to identify factors associated with DA. Patients with DA were further analyzed for DA growth. The primary outcome was ischemic stroke after CeAD+DA diagnosis. Secondary outcomes included ischemic stroke after CeAD+DA with DA growth. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess the association between DA and risk factors. We also performed univariate Cox regression and generated Kaplan-Meier survival curves comparing study outcomes based on presence of DA and subsequent growth. Results: Of the 4023 patients included in the STOP-CAD study, 4008 were included in this analysis and 767 (19%) patients had DA (546 with DA on initial presentation). Patients with DA had a mean age of 46 [IQR 37-55] years and 50% (383) were women. In combined adjusted analyses, DA patients were more often non-Hispanic (aOR 0.63, 95% CI 0.41-0.94, p<0.02), more commonly had a history of migraine (aOR 1.27, 95% CI 1.01-1.59, p=0.037), connective tissue disorder (aOR 2.02, 95% CI 1.22-3.36, p=0.007), minor neck trauma (aOR 1.70, 95% CI 1.29-2.26, p<0.001) and were more likely to present with ischemic stroke (aOR 1.73, 95% CI 1.05-2.87, p=0.031). DA growth was noted in 55 out of 546 (10%) patients with DA on presentation. There was no significant difference in the risk of ischemic stroke by day 180 in patients with DA (hazard ratio [HR] 0.92 [95% CI, 0.65-1.30]; P =0.63) or DA growth (HR 2.40, [95% CI, 0.79-7.24]; P =0.12). Conclusion: In this subanalysis of STOP-CAD, nearly one in five patients with CeAD developed a DA. Factors associated with a higher likelihood of DA included non-Hispanic ethnicity, history of migraine, connective tissue disorder, minor neck trauma, and ischemic stroke at presentation. DA diagnosis and DA growth did not impact the risk of subsequent ischemic stroke at 6 months.

Background: The clinical characteristics and complications associated with de novo pseudoaneurysm formation beyond the acute phase of cervical artery dissection remain poorly defined. In this study, we examined the incidence, risk factors, and related ischemic and hemorrhagic events of post-acute de novo pseudoaneurysm formation. Methods: We analyzed data from the STOP-CAD study (Antithrombotic Treatment for Stroke Prevention in Cervical Artery Dissection). A de novo pseudoaneurysm was defined as a new (not present on initial imaging) focal enlargement in the diameter of the artery, greater than the native lumen. The incidence of de novo pseudoaneurysm was assessed at 90 days, 180 days, and beyond 180 days of follow-up. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were conducted to identify risk factors for post-acute de novo pseudoaneurysm formation. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were used to compare ischemic and hemorrhagic events between patients with and without de novo pseudoaneurysms. Results: Among 4008 patients, 546 were excluded as they had dissecting pseudoaneursyms on initial presentation. Therefore, 3,462 patients were included in this analysis of whom 220 patients (6.35%) developed a de novo pseudoaneurysm over a maximum follow-up of 4.4 years. Of these, 127 (57.72%) were detected within the first 90 days, and 172 (78.18%) within the first 180 days. In multivariate regression analyses, in addition to hypertension, active smoking and Hispanic ethnicity, fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD) was an independent risk factor for post-acute de novo pseudoaneurysm formation (adjusted OR: 2.160; 95% CI: 1.408–3.315; p < 0.001). Notably, the presence of a de novo pseudoaneurysm was not associated with a significant increase in ischemic (hazard ratio [HR] 1.43 [95% CI, 0.89–2.30]; P=0.14) or hemorrhagic events (hazard ratio [HR] 1.42 [95% CI, 0.43–4.69]; P=0.57). Conclusion: De novo pseudoaneurysm formation following a diagnosis of a cervical artery dissection is not uncommon and most frequently occurs within the first 180 days. FMD was independently associated with this complication. The development of a de novo pseudoaneurysm did not significantly increase the risk of subsequent ischemic or hemorrhagic events.

Background and Objectives: Pregnancy and the postpartum period increase the risk of cervical artery dissection (CEAD), a notable cause of stroke in young women. We aimed to describe the clinical presentation, imaging findings, and outcomes of CEAD occurring during pregnancy or shortly after delivery. Methods: We analyzed data from the STOP-CAD registry, a large international multicenter study of patients treated with antithrombotic therapy for non-traumatic CEAD between 2015 and 2021. This sub-study focused on women who were pregnant or within 12 weeks postpartum at the time of symptom onset. We assessed baseline clinical features, imaging results, acute stroke treatments, and functional outcomes. Results: Among 1,783 women in the registry, 62 (3.5%) had pregnancy-associated CEAD, with a median age of 34 years (IQR, 30-38). One-third had a history of migraine (33.9%), one-fifth had hypertension (21.0%), while other vascular risk factors were rare. Recent minor neck trauma was reported in 17.7%. Ischemic stroke symptoms occurred in 25 (40.3%) patients, and 23 (37.1%) had acute infarcts on imaging. However, most (59.7%) presented with non-ischemic symptoms. Vertebral artery dissections were more common than carotid dissections (62.9% vs. 48.4%), and 33.9% had multivessel involvement. Among patients presenting with ischemic stroke symptoms, 4 received thrombolysis and 7 underwent thrombectomy. Remarkably, 92% had excellent functional recovery (modified Rankin Score 0–1) at 90 days, and there were no stroke recurrences at 180 days. Conclusion: Pregnancy- and postpartum-associated CEAD is uncommon and associated with ischemic stroke in nearly half of patients. A history of migraine and hypertension may be potential risk factors. Despite the severity of presentation, most patients had favorable outcomes with timely treatment.

Background and Objectives: Cervical artery dissection (CeAD) is a common cause of ischemic stroke in young adults. We aim to identify age-based differences in clinical presentation, imaging findings, and outcomes after CeAD. Methods: This was a sub-study using the STOP-CAD registry, a multicenter cross-sectional international retrospective study of patients diagnosed with CeAD and treated with an antithrombotic from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2021. Baseline clinical and imaging characteristics were compared between younger and older adults with CeAD (≤45 versus >45 years of age) using multivariable logistic regression. We chose this age cut off due to its frequent usage in stroke in the young literature. Multiple logistic regression models were used to determine association between young age and outcomes after CeAD (ischemic stroke at 180 days, excellent functional outcome with modified Rankin Scale of 0-1 at 90 days, and mortality) after adjusting for sex, vascular risk factors, CeAD characteristics, and NIHSS on presentation. Results: Among 4023 CeAD patients included in the study, 1901 (47.3%) were ≤45 years of age. Patients were followed for a median of 307 days (IQR 102-831). Young adults with CeAD were more likely to be women (Odds Ratio [OR], 2.4; 95% CI, 2.1-2.9; p<0.001), of Hispanic ethnicity (OR, 1.8; 95% CI 1.3-2.5; p<0.001), have a history of migraines (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.3-2.0; p<0.001) and recent neck trauma (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.3-1.9; p<0.001) while having fewer traditional vascular risk factors. Young adults with CeAD had higher odds of a non-ischemic presentation (OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1-1.5; p=0.013), vertebral artery dissection (OR 2.5; 95% CI, 2.2-3.0; p<0.001), and multivessel involvement (OR 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1-1.9; p=0.004). In adjusted analysis, younger age was not associated with an increased risk of recurrent ischemic stroke (adjusted Hazard Ratio [HR], 0.48; 95% CI 0.2-1.2; p=0.119). Younger age was associated with significantly greater odds of excellent functional outcome at 90 days (aOR, 1.48; 1.20-1.84, p<0.001) and lower risk of death at follow up (aHR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.17-0.81; p=0.012) after CeAD. Conclusion: In a large international cohort, young adults with CeAD had a distinct clinical phenotype with higher odds of non-ischemic presentation, vertebral artery dissection, and multivessel involvement while having fewer traditional vascular risk factors. Young adults had a decreased odds of disability and mortality after CeAD.

BACKGROUND: Cervical artery dissection (CeAD) may result in dissecting aneurysm (DA) formation. We aimed to characterize risk factors and clinical outcomes associated with DA in a large, international CeAD cohort. METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of STOP-CAD (Antithrombotic Treatment for Stroke Prevention in Cervical Artery Dissection), an international, multicenter, retrospective cohort. Patients with spontaneous CeAD were assessed for DA at baseline and de novo DA formation. Significant covariates in univariable analysis were included in multivariable regression models aiming to identify factors associated with DA formation. Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models evaluated the association of DA with ischemic and hemorrhagic outcomes. RESULTS: Among 4008 patients with CeAD, 546 (13.6%) had a DA at baseline, and 221/2938 (7.5%) patients developed a de novo DA during follow-up, of which 172/221 (78.2%) were detected in the first 180 days. Patients with DA had a mean age of 47 years, and 383 (49.9%) were women. Baseline or de novo DA was associated with a history of connective tissue disorder (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.02 [95% CI, 1.22–3.36]), fibromuscular dysplasia (aOR, 1.69 [95% CI, 1.28–2.25]), and multiple vessel dissection (aOR, 1.53 [95% CI, 1.19–1.98]). Lower odds of DA were seen in Hispanic ethnicity (aOR, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.43–0.97]) and ischemic stroke presentation (aOR, 0.41 [95% CI, 0.34–0.49]). Fibromuscular dysplasia was associated with de novo DA formation (aOR, 2.30 [95% CI, 1.52–3.49]). DA was not associated with ischemic stroke (hazard ratio, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.44–1.16]; P =0.173) or intracranial hemorrhage (HR, 1.09 [95% CI, 0.42–2.84]; P =0.86) by day 180. CONCLUSIONS: DAs are relatively common manifestations of CeAD, typically occurring within 6 months of CeAD diagnosis. DA was not associated with an increased risk of subsequent ischemic stroke or intracranial hemorrhage.

ABSTRACT Melasma is a chronic hyperpigmentation disorder that disproportionately affects women and individuals with darker skin types, leading to a significant psychosocial burden. This meta‐analysis aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the 755‐nm picosecond alexandrite laser (PSAL) compared with conventional therapies in the management of melasma. PubMed, Ovid Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were searched from inception to April 10, 2025, in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing PSAL versus control comparators in adults with melasma and reporting Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI) or Modified MASI outcomes were included. The review was registered prospectively on PROSPERO (CRD420251022381). Risk of bias was assessed using ROB2. Pooled effect sizes were calculated using a random‐effects model. Five RCTs ( n = 139 patients) were included. Change in MASI favoured triple combination cream (TCC) over PSAL therapy (MD = 1.82, 95% CI: 1.11, 2.52, I 2 = 0%). Post‐inflammatory hyperpigmentation was more common in the PSAL group compared to topical creams (OR = 6.86, 95% CI: 1.47, 32.07, I 2 = 0%) but had no difference with the Q ‐switched lasers (OR = 4.09, 95% CI: 0.62, 26.97, I 2 = 0%). There was no incidence of hypopigmentation or infection reported. PSAL appears inferior to the TCC in reducing MASI scores. Overall certainty is low due to small, heterogenous trials. Low rates of irreversible adverse events with PSAL may support trials in refractory cases, but long‐term RCTs with larger sample sizes are required to evaluate durability and recurrence outcomes.

Background: Sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma (SNUC) is an extremely rare, high-grade, and aggressive tumor of the sinonasal tract. Due to the rarity of this malignancy, current treatment guidelines are based on small and often/mainly single-center retrospective datasets. In the absence of a universally accepted standard of care for SNUC, treatment approaches vary across countries and institutions, reflecting real-world clinical practice. The primary aim of this study was to describe real-world treatment and outcomes for patients with confirmed SNUC. Methods: This was an international, multi-center, retrospective, observational cohort study that pooled patients into the largest SNUC dataset to date. Fifteen centers were enrolled to contribute data, including seven from Europe, four from the United States, three from the United Kingdom, and one from Canada. In the absence of a universally accepted standard of care for SNUC, treatment approaches varied across countries and institutions, reflecting real-world clinical practice. Patients included were those with histologically confirmed SNUC who were treated between 1997 and 2021. Results: This study yielded 485 patients treated for SNUC. The median age at diagnosis was 55.6 years (IQR: 44.5–67.6), and 63.7% were male. Most cases presented at advanced stages, with 70.8% as T4a or T4b. Overall survival (OS) outcomes were available for 412 patients, with a median follow-up of 26.0 months. The 5- and 10-year OS were 47.2% (95% CI: 40.8–53.3%) and 39.6% (95% CI: 32.5–46.6%), respectively. Advanced age, dichotomized T-stage (T4a/b vs. T1–3), M-stage, and orbital involvement were significant poor prognostic factors on univariable analysis (p’s < 0.01). On multivariable analysis, orbital involvement (HR: 2.73, 95% CI: 1.42–5.27, p = 0.003) and distance metastasis stage (HR: 3.00, 95% CI: 1.25–7.21, p = 0.014) were both independently associated with worse OS. Conclusions: This observational study presents the largest multi-center cohort analysis of SNUC to date, providing new insights into prognostic factors for a rare cancer treated at global centers of excellence. Orbital involvement and the presence of metastases are candidate independent risk factors associated with poorer OS.

OBJECTIVE Core outcome sets (COSs) are needed to promote data consistency across studies as well as data synthesis and comparability. The aim of the current study was to use a modified Delphi process to develop a COS for lateral femoral cutaneous neuropathy (LFCN), hereafter COS-LFCN. METHODS A 5-stage approach was used to develop the COS-LFCN: 1) consortium development, 2) literature review to identify potential outcome measures, 3) Delphi survey to develop consensus on outcomes for inclusion, 4) Delphi survey to develop definitions, and 5) consensus meeting to finalize the COS and definitions. This study followed the Core Outcome Set - STAndards for Development, (COS-STAD) recommendations. RESULTS The Core Outcomes in Nerve Surgery (COINS) Consortium comprised 25 participants, all neurological surgeons, representing 14 countries. The final COS-LFCN consisted of 41 factors and outcomes covering domains of demographics, diagnostics, patient-reported outcomes, motor/sensory outcomes, and complications. Appropriate instruments, methods of testing, and definitions were set. The consensus minimum duration of follow-up was 12 months, with the consensus optimal time points for assessment being preoperatively and 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS The COINS Consortium developed a consensus COS for LFCN and provided definitions, methods of implementation, and time points for assessment. The COS-LFCN should serve as the minimum data to be collected in all future neurosurgical studies on LFCN. Incorporation of this COS will help improve consistency in reporting, data synthesis and comparability, and minimize outcome reporting bias.

Abstract Background There is an unmet need for ulcerative colitis (UC) treatments that show improved effectiveness while maintaining safety profiles comparable with existing advanced therapies. Dual targeted therapy (DTT) has been proposed as a strategy to combine benefits of different advanced therapies to improve outcomes. The ExiGem study (NCT06095128) aims to assess the efficacy and safety of combined therapy with vedolizumab (VDZ) and tofacitinib (TOF) in adults with UC. We report results for the induction phase from the first 24 patients. Methods ExiGem is an ongoing phase 4, single-arm, multicentre study including adults with moderately to severely active UC (complete Mayo [cMayo] score of 6–12 with a rectal bleeding subscore ≥ 1 and centrally read endoscopic subscore ≥ 2). Eligible patients have previously had an inadequate response, loss of response, or intolerance to 1 or 2 anti-tumour necrosis factor α treatments. Patients receive induction therapy with intravenous (IV) VDZ 300 mg at weeks 0, 2, and 6 plus twice-daily oral TOF 10 mg for 8 weeks and then VDZ 300 mg IV monotherapy as maintenance from week 14. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients in clinical remission by cMayo score at week 8. Secondary endpoints include clinical response and clinical remission by modified Mayo (mMayo) score at week 8. Changes in faecal calprotectin (FCP) levels and endoscopic improvement were evaluated. Efficacy data were analysed using non-responder imputation. For the final analysis a pre-specified Bayesian approach will be used. The safety profile of DTT was evaluated. Results Patient baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1. At week 8, 12/24 patients (50%) and 14/24 patients (58%) had clinical remission assessed by cMayo and mMayo scores, respectively; these rates were higher than pre-specified benchmark rates (Figure 1). Clinical response was observed in 21/24 patients (88%). At week 8, 14/24 patients (58%) showed endoscopic improvement, and 12/21 patients (57%) had normalization of FCP levels (&lt; 250 µg/g). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were experienced by 10 patients (42%), and 1 serious TEAE was reported (suspected viral infection). One severe adverse event (AE; cough) and 2 moderate AEs (herpes zoster, drug intolerance) were considered related to TOF. No moderate or severe AEs were considered related to VDZ. One patient withdrew from the study before week 8 owing to intolerance to TOF. Conclusion Initial data suggest that induction with a combination of VDZ and TOF can produce improved rates of response and remission in patients with UC with a comparable safety profile to existing advanced monotherapies. Further data, including outcomes of VDZ maintenance as monotherapy, are pending. Conflict of interest: Prof. Dr. Yarur, Andres: Andres Yarur has served as an advisory board member for Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, Roche/Genentech, and Takeda. This study was funded by Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. Medical writing support was provided by Adam Errington PhD of PharmaGenesis Cardiff, Cardiff, UK, and funded by Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. Barnes, Edward: Personal Fees: Consultant for Takeda, Pfizer, Roche, Merck, Abbvie, Eli Lilly. Bristol Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Johnson and Johnson. Deepak, Parakkal: Parakkal Deepak has received research support under a sponsored research agreement unrelated to the data in the abstract from AbbVie, Johnson and Johnson, Sanofi, Merck, Teva, Direct Biologics, Tr1x, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Prometheus Biosciences, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Roche Genentech, Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca, Spyre and Agomab, has received consulting fees from Johnson and Johnson, Abbvie, Merck, Sobi, Celltrion, Fresenius Kabi, Asahi Kasei Pharma, Sandoz and CorEvitas, LLC and has served on the board of the Srategic Alliance for Intercultural Advocacy in GI. Ha, Christina: Christina Ha has served as an advisory board member for AbbVie, Bausch Health, Johnson & Johnson, Lilly, Merck, Takeda, and Sanofi has received educational programming support from AbbVie, Celltrion, Johnson & Johnson, Lilly, Pfizer, and Takeda and has received consulting fees from AbbVie. Hudesman, David: Consultant: Abbvie, Abivax, BMS, Biocon, Eli Lilly, Fresenius Kabi, Pfizer, Prometheus, CorEvitas, Takeda, Johnson and Johnson, Sanofi Research Support: Johnson and Johnson, Pfizer Jairath, Vipul: Consulting Fees: Abbvie, Alimentiv, Amgen, Anaptys Bio, Asahi Kasei, Asieris, Astra Zeneca, Attovia, Blackbird Labs, BMS, Boehringer Ingleheim, Biomebank, Caldera, Calluna, Catalytic Health, Celltrion, Ensho, Enthera, Exeliome Biosciences, Ferring, Fresenius Kabi, Gilead, Granite Bio, GSK, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Mountainfield, MRM Health, Nxera, Organon, OSE Immunotherapeutics, Pendopharm, Pioneering Medicine, Pfizer, Prometheus, Roche/Genentech, Sanofi, SCOPE, Shattuck Labs, Sorriso, Spyre, Synedgen, Takeda, Teva, Tillotts, Union Therapeutics, Ventus, Ventyx, Vividion, Xencor, Zealand Pharma. Lukin, Dana: Dana Lukin has served as a consultant/advisory board member for AbbVie, AltruBio, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Johnson & Johnson, Palatin, Pfizer, Prime, PSI, Takeda, and Vedanta has received grants from Boehringer Ingelheim and Johnson & Johnson and serves as a speaker for AbbVie and Johnson & Johnson. Rubin, David T.: Grant support: Takeda Pharmaceuticals. Consultant: Abbvie, Abivax SA, Altrubio, Athos Therapeutics, Inc, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Connect BioPharma, Eli Lilly & Co., Genentech (Roche) Inc., Iterative Health, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Johnson & Johnson, Merck & Co., Mirador, Odyssey Therapeutics, Pfizer, Sanofi, Spyre, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Vedanta Biosciences, and Ventyx. Schreiber, Stefan Wolfgang: Stefan Schreiber has received consulting fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Arena, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Dr Falk Pharma, Eli Lilly, Ferring, Fresenius, Galapagos, Genentech, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, I-MAB Biopharma, Janssen, Merck, Novartis/Sandoz, Pfizer, Protagonist, Takeda, and Ventyx Biosciences. Gower, Megan: Megan Gower is an employee and hold stock/stock options at Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. Jones, Stephen: Stephen Jones is an independent medical consultant who provides services for Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. Robinson, Ian: Ian Robinson is an employee and hold stock/stock options at Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. Sanchirico, Marie: Marie Sanchirico is an employee and hold stock/stock options at Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. Yajnik, Vijay: Vijay Yajnik is an employee and hold stock/stock options at Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc.