Assessing the Safety and Efficacy of Picosecond Alexandrite Lasers in the Management of Melasma: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Randomised Control Trials
ABSTRACT Melasma is a chronic hyperpigmentation disorder that disproportionately affects women and individuals with darker skin types, leading to a significant psychosocial burden. This meta‐analysis aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the 755‐nm picosecond alexandrite laser (PSAL) compared with conventional therapies in the management of melasma. PubMed, Ovid Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were searched from inception to April 10, 2025, in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing PSAL versus control comparators in adults with melasma and reporting Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI) or Modified MASI outcomes were included. The review was registered prospectively on PROSPERO (CRD420251022381). Risk of bias was assessed using ROB2. Pooled effect sizes were calculated using a random‐effects model. Five RCTs ( n = 139 patients) were included. Change in MASI favoured triple combination cream (TCC) over PSAL therapy (MD = 1.82, 95% CI: 1.11, 2.52, I 2 = 0%). Post‐inflammatory hyperpigmentation was more common in the PSAL group compared to topical creams (OR = 6.86, 95% CI: 1.47, 32.07, I 2 = 0%) but had no difference with the Q ‐switched lasers (OR = 4.09, 95% CI: 0.62, 26.97, I 2 = 0%). There was no incidence of hypopigmentation or infection reported. PSAL appears inferior to the TCC in reducing MASI scores. Overall certainty is low due to small, heterogenous trials. Low rates of irreversible adverse events with PSAL may support trials in refractory cases, but long‐term RCTs with larger sample sizes are required to evaluate durability and recurrence outcomes.
Comparative Outcomes of Septal Extension versus Columellar Strut Grafts for Nasal Tip Stabilization and Positioning in Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Abstract Columellar strut graft (CSG) and septal extension graft (SEG) are commonly used in septorhinoplasty for nasal tip support. We aimed to systematically review and compare CSG and SEG in achieving a desired nasolabial angle (NLA) and Goode's ratio (GR). Several databases were systematically searched from inception to August 2024. A two-arm meta-analysis of the pooled means was conducted with a random-effects model. This review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024574909). Eligible studies included primary septorhinoplasty patients (≥17 years) receiving CSG or SEG. Eight studies met eligibility criteria including 256 CSG and 371 SEG patients. Intergroup comparison of long-term postoperative NLA favored SEG (p < 0.05) while GR showed no differences. However, SEG patients had significant improvement in GR postoperatively (p < 0.05), unlike CSG patients. SEG may provide superior long-term nasal tip rotation and projection stability.
Healing Rates and Dressing Frequency of Silver Foam Dressings in Paediatric Burns: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis
Silver foam dressings have been extensively used in the management of burn injuries; however, its application in children requires elucidation. A literature search was conducted from database inception to October 2023. Eligible studies reported paediatrics patients under 21 years of age receiving silver dressings for burns or scalds. This review was registered prospectively with PROSPERO (CRD42023470239). 18 studies met the inclusion criteria with a total of 701 patients. The pooled mean time to re-epithelisation (TTRE) was 12.9 days (95% CI: 11.2, 14.6, I2 = 94%). The pooled mean duration of hospitalisation was 9.8 days (95% CI: 3.9, 15.7; I2 = 100%). Mean number of total dressing changes per patient was 3.6 (95% CI: 2.2, 4.9; I2 = 99%). There were a total of 98 complications, including 30 (30.6%) infections, 29 (29.6%) surgical requirements, 14 (14.3%) hypertrophic scarring, 17 (17.3%) escalations of care, 5 (5.1%) burn depth progression, and 3 (3.1%) others. Silver foam dressings appear as a safe and effective approach in terms of healing rate and dressing change frequency for selected paediatric patients with burn injuries. Despite the promising results, further comparative studies are required to evaluate the selection criteria and long-term effect of silver foam dressing.
Clinical Characteristics of Patients with Myocarditis following COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
COVID-19 mRNA vaccinations have recently been implicated in causing myocarditis. Therefore, the primary aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the clinical characteristics of patients with myocarditis following mRNA vaccination. The secondary aims were to report common imaging and laboratory findings, as well as treatment regimes, in these patients. A literature search was performed from December 2019 to June 2022. Eligible studies reported patients older than 18 years vaccinated with mRNA, a diagnosis of myocarditis, and subsequent outcomes. Pooled mean or proportion were analyzed using a random-effects model. Seventy-five unique studies (patient n = 188, 89.4% male, mean age 18–67 years) were included. Eighty-six patients had Moderna vaccines while one hundred and two patients had Pfizer-BioNTech vaccines. The most common presenting symptoms were chest pain (34.5%), fever (17.1%), myalgia (12.4%), and chills (12.1%). The most common radiologic findings were ST-related changes on an electrocardiogram (58.7%) and hypokinesia on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging or echocardiography (50.7%). Laboratory findings included elevated Troponin I levels (81.7%) and elevated C-reactive protein (71.5%). Seven patients were admitted to the intensive care unit. The most common treatment modality was non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs (36.6%) followed by colchicine (28.5%). This meta-analysis presents novel evidence to suggest possible myocarditis post mRNA vaccination in certain individuals, especially young male patients. Clinical practice must therefore take appropriate pre-cautionary measures when administrating COVID-19 mRNA vaccinations.