Citations

Inverted papilloma (IP) is a benign neoplasm of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses, known for its variable risk of recurrence and potential for developing carcinoma. Emerging evidence has shown high rates of activating EGFR mutation, and a smaller subset is associated with low-risk human papillomavirus (lrHPV). While certain morphologic features, including an inverted growth pattern, are well-established, the presence of condylomatous features, such as large fungating lesions with thick undulating surface epithelium, hyperkeratosis, cytoplasmic clearing, raisinoid nuclei, and binucleation (koilocytic changes) in low-risk HPV-associated IP suggests that these tumors may be a distinct subtype of sinonasal papilloma (SP) with features similar to low-risk HPV-associated anogenital condylomas. This study presents a series of SP with condylomatous morphology and explores the association with lrHPV, the clinicopathologic features, and the rates of carcinoma development. In total, 17 cases of SP exhibiting condylomatous morphology were retrospectively identified. We performed lrHPV and high-risk HPV (hrHPV) RNA in situ hybridization and p16 immunohistochemistry and gathered detailed clinical and pathologic data along with treatment, disease follow-up, and outcomes. These condylomatous papillomas almost all developed in active smokers, were large, were primarily located in the nasal cavity (47%), and showed frequent transformation to invasive squamous cell carcinoma (29%). This malignant transformation rate is much higher than what has been reported for inverted, exophytic, and oncocytic papillomas. The tumors were almost uniformly associated with transcriptionally-active lrHPV (94%) and were consistently negative for p16 and hrHPV. This study shows that a subgroup of IPs with condylomatous morphology have a predilection for the nasal cavity, strong association with lrHPV, and high rates of carcinoma. These findings support the concept that these tumors are a distinct (fourth) type of SP with a higher risk of malignant transformation.

Stem cell-derived kidney organoids enable human genetic disease modeling to identify the parathyroid hormone 1 receptor as a potential new therapeutic target for developmental polycystic kidney disease.

ImportanceSystemic antibiotic use for patients with a non–Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a major risk factor for recurrent CDI. Increasing use of oral vancomycin for secondary prophylaxis against recurrent CDI in this context has uncertain efficacy.ObjectiveTo evaluate whether oral vancomycin prophylaxis compared with placebo is effective against recurrent CDI during and 8 weeks after the end of study treatment.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis phase 2, placebo-controlled, double-blind randomized clinical trial was conducted in 4 large health systems across the upper Midwest US. Adults who had completed treatment for CDI within the past 180 days and were taking a systemic antibiotic for a non-CDI indication were enrolled between May 21, 2018, and March 30, 2023, and followed up for 8 weeks after the end of study treatment.InterventionParticipants were randomized 1:1 to 125 mg of oral vancomycin or placebo once daily during antibiotic use for a non-CDI plus 5 days following cessation of those antibiotics.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was recurrent CDI incidence during treatment and the 8-week follow-up period. The secondary outcome was vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus carriage in stool.ResultsAmong 81 randomized participants (median age, 59 years [IQR, 50-67 years]), all were included in the primary as-randomized analysis (39 in the vancomycin group; 42 in the placebo group). Sixty patients (74.1%) completed 8-week follow-up and were included in the secondary as–completed treatment analysis (31 in the vancomycin group; 29 in the placebo group). Recurrent CDI occurred in 17 of 39 participants in the oral vancomycin group (43.6%) and 24 of 42 in the placebo group (57.1%; absolute difference in percentage, −13.5% [95% CI, −35.1% to 8.0%]). Adverse events occurred in 27 of 39 participants in the oral vancomycin group (69.2%) and 27 of 42 in the placebo group (64.3%). Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus carriage was found in 15 of 30 patients in the oral vancomycin group (50.0%) and 6 of 25 in the placebo group (24.0%) (P = .048) 8 weeks after treatment.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this randomized clinical trial, the incidence of recurrent CDI was lower (though did not reach significance) in participants taking oral vancomycin compared with those taking placebo. Because the study was underpowered, it was unable to reveal firm conclusions about the efficacy (or lack thereof) of vancomycin prophylaxis with respect to recurrent CDI.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03462459

Background: The assessment of surgical competency is essential for clinical training and safety. No objective, real-time tools exist to evaluate competency during endoscopic stone operation. We sought to apply endoscopic computer vision models to define automated performance metrics (APMs) from videos of flexible ureteroscopy. Materials and Methods: We assessed three APMs for endoscopic treatment of kidney stones, including percentage of frames without stone visibility, screen occupancy by stone, and frame-to-frame change in stone occupancy. Surgical videos of a surgeon performing either stone localization or stone ablation were recorded. Using our previously validated computer vision model for endoscopic stone segmentation, APMs were compared between experts (fellowship-trained endourologists) and trainees. Results: Forty-six videos, including 28 of stone localization and 18 of stone laser ablation, were analyzed from nine surgeons (three experts and six trainees). During stone localization, trainee videos had a higher percentage of frames without visible stone (4% vs 27%, p < 0.01) and lower screen occupancy by stone (5% vs 14%, p = 0.03) compared with expert videos. During laser ablation, trainee videos had a higher frame-to-frame change in stone occupancy (3% vs 2%, p < 0.01) compared with expert videos. Conclusions: APMs from computer vision methods differ between expert and trainee surgical videos of endoscopic kidney stone treatment. These metrics could be used to objectively assess skill evaluation and acquisition.

Introduction Patients hospitalized for headache treatment pose unique challenges to the healthcare system. Currently, there is a lack of evidence-based guidance on management. This practice advisory aims to fill this critical gap by systematically reviewing the existing literature and providing comprehensive, evidence-based recommendations for managing headache patients during hospitalization. Methods In February 2023, the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine approved this practice advisory proposal. The steering committee selected committee members based on clinical and research expertise in the field of headache medicine. Nine questions were formulated by the committee, and each question was assigned to a group composed of 3–4 members. A systematic literature search for each question was performed in Medline, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Web of Science on June 21, 2023. The results from each search were imported into separate Covidence projects for screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment. Additionally, relevant systematic reviews (SR) were screened. Each group submitted a structured narrative review along with statements and recommendations based on the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) format for grading of evidence. While the USPSTF framework was used, including the language in the recommendations, the formal USPSTF methodology, including the SR with meta-analysis and summary tables with forest plots, was not followed because of low overall evidence quality. The interim draft was shared electronically with each collaborator, who was requested to vote anonymously using two rounds of the modified Delphi approach. A consensus recommendation required >75% agreement. Results The panel generated 12 statements and 17 recommendations, along with their strength and certainty of evidence. Following two rounds of Delphi voting, a high consensus was achieved for all statements and recommendations. Most statements received a low-to-moderate level of certainty, and all but one recommendation received grade B or C, which was consistent with the lack of randomized controlled trials supporting most of the drugs in this document. Conclusions This evidence-based practice advisory provides a foundational step toward standardizing inpatient headache care and highlights existing gaps in the literature that should be addressed through rigorous prospective randomized studies.