Back to Authors

Nader, Antoun

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9874-5507

Mayo Clinic

Northwestern University

Citations 2

Practice advisory for intravenous management of headache disorders in hospitalized patients: a review of the evidence and consensus recommendations
Hoydonckx, Yasmine , Feoktistov, Alexander, Amoozegar, Farnaz , Anderson, C. , Barad, Meredith , Burke, Emeralda , Chitsantikul, Prin, Doshi, Tina L , Englesakis, Marina , Goel, Akash , Gupta, Himanshu , Kirschner, Abby, Kohan, Lynn , Lauritsen, Clinton G. , Miller, Franziska , Monsour, Danny, Nader, Antoun , Ogunlaja, Oyindamola, Silberstein, Stephen D., Souza, Dmitri , Kohan, Lynn R , Nader, Antoun , Schwenk, Eric S , Yuan, Hsiangkuo , Englesakis, Marina , Doshi, Tina L , Barad, Meredith J , Gupta, Himanshu, Kissoon, Narayan , Schuster, Nathaniel M. , Schwenk, Eric S. , Yuan, Hsiangkuo , Narouze, Samer

Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine | July 2, 2025 | Volume: 51 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 117-131

10.1136/rapm-2025-106718 Get It

Introduction Patients hospitalized for headache treatment pose unique challenges to the healthcare system. Currently, there is a lack of evidence-based guidance on management. This practice advisory aims to fill this critical gap by systematically reviewing the existing literature and providing comprehensive, evidence-based recommendations for managing headache patients during hospitalization. Methods In February 2023, the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine approved this practice advisory proposal. The steering committee selected committee members based on clinical and research expertise in the field of headache medicine. Nine questions were formulated by the committee, and each question was assigned to a group composed of 3–4 members. A systematic literature search for each question was performed in Medline, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Web of Science on June 21, 2023. The results from each search were imported into separate Covidence projects for screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment. Additionally, relevant systematic reviews (SR) were screened. Each group submitted a structured narrative review along with statements and recommendations based on the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) format for grading of evidence. While the USPSTF framework was used, including the language in the recommendations, the formal USPSTF methodology, including the SR with meta-analysis and summary tables with forest plots, was not followed because of low overall evidence quality. The interim draft was shared electronically with each collaborator, who was requested to vote anonymously using two rounds of the modified Delphi approach. A consensus recommendation required >75% agreement. Results The panel generated 12 statements and 17 recommendations, along with their strength and certainty of evidence. Following two rounds of Delphi voting, a high consensus was achieved for all statements and recommendations. Most statements received a low-to-moderate level of certainty, and all but one recommendation received grade B or C, which was consistent with the lack of randomized controlled trials supporting most of the drugs in this document. Conclusions This evidence-based practice advisory provides a foundational step toward standardizing inpatient headache care and highlights existing gaps in the literature that should be addressed through rigorous prospective randomized studies.
Standardizing nomenclature in regional anesthesia: an ASRA-ESRA Delphi consensus study of upper and lower limb nerve blocks
El‐Boghdadly, Kariem , Albrecht, Éric , Wolmarans, Morné , Mariano, Edward R. , Kopp, Sandra L. , Perlas, Anahi , Thottungal, Athmaja , Tulgar, Serkan , Adhikary, Sanjib Das , Barrington, Michael J. , Blanco, Rafael, Boretsky, Karen , Breebaart, Margaretha , Laurent, David Burckett-St , Carvalho, Brendan , Chin, Ki Jinn , Coppens, Steve , Costache, I. , Dam, Mette , Desmet, Matthias , Egeler, C., Elsharkawy, Hesham , Bendtsen, Thomas Fichtner , Fox, Ben, Franco, Carlo D. , Gautier, Philippe , Grant, Stuart A. , Grape, Sina , Guheen, Carrie R., Hebbard, Peter , Hernandez, Nadia , Hogg, Rosemary , Holtz, Margaret, Ihnatsenka, Barys , Ilfeld, Brian M. , Kalagara, Hari , Kessler, Paul, Kwofie, Kwesi , Le-Wendling, Linda , Lirk, Philipp , Ludwin, Danielle, Macfarlane, Alan , Μakris, Alexandros , McCartney, Colin J. L. , McDonnell, John G., McLeod, Graeme , Memtsoudis, Stavros G. , Merjavy, Peter , Moran, EML , Nader, Antoun , Neal, Joseph M. , Niazi, Ahtsham U. , Njathi-Ori, Catherine , OʼDonnell, Brian D. , Oldman, Matt, Orebaugh, Steven L. , Parras, Teresa, Pawa, Amit , Peng, Philip , Pulos, Bridget P. , Saporito, Andrea , Sauter, Axel R. , Sebastian, Maria Paz , Sinha, Sanjay K. , Stimpson, James, Tang, Raymond , Tsui, Ban C. H. , Turbitt, Lloyd , Uppal, Vishal , Geffen, Geert J. van, Vermeylen, Kris , Vlassakov, Kamen, Volk, Thomas , Xu, Jeff L. , Elkassabany, Nabil , Kopp, Sandra , Tulgar, Serkan , Adhikary, Sanjib , Altıparmak, Başak , Bloc, Sébastien , Boretsky, Karen , Bowness, James , Carvalho, Brendan , Chin, Ki Jinn , Chuan, Alwin , Costache, Ioana , Dam, Mette , Dhir, Shalini , Elsharkawy, Hesham , Bendtsen, Thomas Fichtner , Franco, Carlo D , Grape, Sina , Harbell, Monica W , Hebbard, Peter , Ilfeld, Brian M , Ip, Vivian H Y , Johnson, Rebecca L , Kwofie, M Kwesi , Le-Wendling, Linda , Lobo, Clara , Macfarlane, Alan James Robert , Makris, Alexandros , McLeod, Graeme , Memtsoudis, Stavros G , Moran, E M Louise , Nader, Antoun , Neal, Joseph M , Niazi, Ahtsham U , Orebaugh, Steven L , Pawa, Amit , Peng, Philip , Porter, Steven B , Sala-Blanch, Xavier , Sauter, Axel R , Schwenk, Eric S , Sebastian, Maria Paz , Soffin, Ellen M , Tsui, Ban C H , Turbitt, Lloyd , Uppal, Vishal , van Geffen, Geert J , Vermeylen, Kris , Vlassakov, Kamen , Xu, Jeff L , Elkassabany, Nabil M , Mariano, Edward R , El-Boghdadly, K , Volk, Thomas , Kalagara, Hari , Albrecht, Eric , Coppens, Steve , Wolmarans, Morné , Gadsden, Jeff , Aguirre, José Alejandro , Agur, Anne Maria Reet , Bedforth, Nigel M. , Blanco, Rafael, Chelly, Jacques E. , Chuan, Alwin , Harbell, Monica W. , Ip, Vivian , Johnson, Rebecca L. , Kessler, Paul, Lobo, Clara , Porter, Steven B. , Sala‐Blanch, Xavier , Schwenk, Eric S. , Sidhu, Navdeep S. , Soffin, Ellen M.

Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine | November 22, 2023 | Volume: 49 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 782-792

10.1136/rapm-2023-104884 Get It

Background Inconsistent nomenclature and anatomical descriptions of regional anesthetic techniques hinder scientific communication and engender confusion; this in turn has implications for research, education and clinical implementation of regional anesthesia. Having produced standardized nomenclature for abdominal wall, paraspinal and chest wall regional anesthetic techniques, we aimed to similarly do so for upper and lower limb peripheral nerve blocks. Methods We performed a three-round Delphi international consensus study to generate standardized names and anatomical descriptions of upper and lower limb regional anesthetic techniques. A long list of names and anatomical description of blocks of upper and lower extremities was produced by the members of the steering committee. Subsequently, two rounds of anonymized voting and commenting were followed by a third virtual round table to secure consensus for items that remained outstanding after the first and second rounds. As with previous methodology, strong consensus was defined as ≥75% agreement and weak consensus as 50%–74% agreement. Results A total of 94, 91 and 65 collaborators participated in the first, second and third rounds, respectively. We achieved strong consensus for 38 names and 33 anatomical descriptions, and weak consensus for five anatomical descriptions. We agreed on a template for naming peripheral nerve blocks based on the name of the nerve and the anatomical location of the blockade and identified several areas for future research. Conclusions We achieved consensus on nomenclature and anatomical descriptions of regional anesthetic techniques for upper and lower limb nerve blocks, and recommend using this framework in clinical and academic practice. This should improve research, teaching and learning of regional anesthesia to eventually improve patient care.