Citations

Importance The clinical effects of risankizumab (a monoclonal antibody that selectively targets the p19 subunit of IL-23) for the treatment of ulcerative colitis are unknown. Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of risankizumab when administered as an induction and a maintenance therapy for patients with ulcerative colitis. Design, Setting, and Participants Two phase 3 randomized clinical trials were conducted. The induction trial was conducted at 261 clinical centers (in 41 countries) and enrolled 977 patients from November 5, 2020, to August 4, 2022 (final follow-up on May 16, 2023). The maintenance trial was conducted at 238 clinical centers (in 37 countries) and enrolled 754 patients from August 28, 2018, to March 30, 2022 (final follow-up on April 11, 2023). Eligible patients had moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis; a history of intolerance or inadequate response to 1 or more conventional therapies, advanced therapies, or both types of therapies; and no prior exposure to risankizumab. Interventions For the induction trial, patients were randomized 2:1 to receive 1200 mg of risankizumab or placebo administered intravenously at weeks 0, 4, and 8. For the maintenance trial, patients with a clinical response (determined using the adapted Mayo score) after intravenous treatment with risankizumab were randomized 1:1:1 to receive subcutaneous treatment with 180 mg or 360 mg of risankizumab or placebo (no longer receiving risankizumab) every 8 weeks for 52 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was clinical remission (stool frequency score ≤1 and not greater than baseline, rectal bleeding score of 0, and endoscopic subscore ≤1 without friability) at week 12 for the induction trial and at week 52 for the maintenance trial. Results Among the 975 patients analyzed in the induction trial (aged 42.1 [SD, 13.8] years; 586/973 [60.1%] were male; and 677 [69.6%] were White), the clinical remission rates at week 12 were 132/650 (20.3%) for 1200 mg of risankizumab and 20/325 (6.2%) for placebo (adjusted between-group difference, 14.0% [95% CI, 10.0%-18.0%], P < .001). Among the 548 patients analyzed in the maintenance trial (aged 40.9 [SD, 14.0] years; 313 [57.1%] were male; and 407 [74.3%] were White), the clinical remission rates at week 52 were 72/179 (40.2%) for 180 mg of risankizumab, 70/186 (37.6%) for 360 mg of risankizumab, and 46/183 (25.1%) for placebo (adjusted between-group difference for 180 mg of risankizumab vs placebo, 16.3% [97.5% CI, 6.1%-26.6%], P < .001; adjusted between-group difference for 360 mg of risankizumab vs placebo, 14.2% [97.5% CI, 4.0%-24.5%], P = .002). No new safety risks were detected in the treatment groups. Conclusion and Relevance Compared with placebo, risankizumab improved clinical remission rates in an induction trial and in a maintenance trial for patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis. Further study is needed to identify benefits beyond the 52-week follow-up. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT03398148 and NCT03398135

AbstractBackgroundHead and neck cancers (HNC) present diagnostic challenges due to multifocal disease manifestations, posing difficulties in distinguishing between metastatic disease and second primary malignancies (SPM). This complexity underscores the need for advanced diagnostic approaches. Emerging technologies, such as next‐generation sequencing (NGS) and molecular classifier assays, show promise in providing precise insights into the diverse etiologies of HNC.MethodIn this article, we employed NGS and molecular classifier assays to delve into three distinct clinical cases. The objective was to showcase the instrumental role of these technologies in facilitating accurate diagnoses and differentiating between metastatic disease and SPM in HNC cases.ResultsThe results of this series highlight the effectiveness of NGS and molecular classifier assays in enhancing diagnostic accuracy for HNC and contributing to the precise differentiation of disease etiologies. The utilization of these advanced technologies proved instrumental in avoiding unnecessary interventions and paved the way for more targeted and effective treatment strategies.ConclusionOur findings underscore the necessity of incorporating advanced molecular testing technologies into the diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for HNC, thereby championing a more nuanced and effective approach to managing these complex cases.

Abstract Background Few antiviral therapies have been studied in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and kidney impairment. Herein, the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of remdesivir, its metabolites, and sulfobutylether-β-cyclodextrin excipient were evaluated in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and severe kidney impairment. Methods In REDPINE, a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, participants aged ≥12 years hospitalized for COVID-19 pneumonia with acute kidney injury, chronic kidney disease, or kidney failure were randomized 2:1 to receive intravenous remdesivir (200 mg on day 1; 100 mg daily up to day 5) or placebo (enrollment from March 2021 to March 2022). The primary efficacy end point was the composite of the all-cause mortality rate or invasive mechanical ventilation rate through day 29. Safety was evaluated through day 60. Results Although enrollment concluded early, 243 participants were enrolled and treated (remdesivir, n = 163; placebo, n = 80). At baseline, 90 participants (37.0%) had acute kidney injury (remdesivir, n = 60; placebo, n = 30), 64 (26.3%) had chronic kidney disease (remdesivir, n = 44; placebo, n = 20), and 89 (36.6%) had kidney failure (remdesivir, n = 59; placebo, n = 30); and 31 (12.8%) were vaccinated against COVID-19. Composite all-cause mortality or invasive mechanical ventilation rates through day 29 were 29.4% and 32.5% in the remdesivir and placebo group, respectively (P = .61). Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 80.4% for remdesivir versus 77.5% for placebo, and serious adverse events in 50.3% versus 50.0%, respectively. Pharmacokinetic plasma exposure to remdesivir was not affected by kidney function. Conclusions Although the study was underpowered, no significant difference in efficacy was observed between treatment groups. REDPINE demonstrated that remdesivir is safe in patients with COVID-19 and severe kidney impairment. Clinical Trials Registration EudraCT 2020-005416-22; Clinical Trials.gov NCT04745351.

4032 Background: RATIONALE-306 (NCT03783442) is the first global study to investigate anti-programmed cell death protein 1 therapy in combination with different chemotherapy (chemo) options in the first-line (1L) treatment of advanced/metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). At interim analysis (IA), tislelizumab (TIS) plus chemo demonstrated a statistically significant, clinically meaningful improvement in overall survival (OS) versus placebo (PBO) plus chemo, with a manageable safety profile. Here, we report updated efficacy and safety data with minimum 3 years’ follow-up after study unblinding at IA. Methods: Adults with unresectable locally advanced recurrent/metastatic ESCC and no prior systemic treatment for advanced disease were enrolled and randomized (1:1; stratified by region, prior definitive therapy, and investigator [INV]-chosen chemo) to receive TIS 200 mg (Arm A) or PBO (Arm B) IV every 3 weeks plus chemo (platinum plus fluoropyrimidine or platinum plus paclitaxel), until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary endpoint was OS in the intent-to-treat population. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and duration of response (DoR), all per INV, and safety. Results: In total, 649 patients (pts) were randomized (Arm A, n=326; Arm B, n=323). At a minimum study follow-up of 36.0 months, improvements in OS, PFS, and DoR in Arm A versus B (Table) were maintained relative to the IA. The hazard ratio (HR) for OS with TIS plus chemo versus PBO plus chemo was 0.70 (95% confidence interval: 0.59, 0.83). Similar to the IA, incidences of any-grade (96.6% vs 96.3%) or grade ≥3 (67.0% vs 64.5%) treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were comparable between Arms A and B, respectively; treatment-emergent adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation were higher in Arm A (32.1%) versus B (22.1%). In Arm A versus B, respectively, serious TRAEs occurred in 29.9% vs 19.6% of pts; TRAEs leading to death occurred in 1.9% and 1.2%. Conclusions: After minimum 3 years’ follow-up, 1L TIS plus chemo continued to demonstrate clinically meaningful improvements in OS and PFS and durable antitumor response benefit versus PBO plus chemo in pts with advanced/metastatic ESCC, with no new safety signals. Clinical trial information: NCT03783442 . [Table: see text]

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the fourth most frequently diagnosed cancer and the second leading cause of cancer death in the United States. Management of disseminated metastatic CRC involves various active drugs, either in combination or as single agents. The choice of therapy is based on consideration of the goals of therapy, the type and timing of prior therapy, the mutational profile of the tumor, and the differing toxicity profiles of the constituent drugs. This manuscript summarizes the data supporting the systemic therapy options recommended for metastatic CRC in the NCCN Guidelines for Colon Cancer.

6009 Background: E3311 is a phase II trial of TOS by credentialed surgeons with pathology-driven deintensified post-operative management in HPV+ OPC. Intermediate risk patients were randomized between standard and reduced dose radiation. We present mature outcome data, at median follow up of 52.4 months (m). Methods: Patients were eligible who had resectable cT1-2 stage III/IV AJCC7 p16+ OPC without matted neck nodes. Those with clear margins, 0-1 + nodes (LN), and no extranodal extension (ENE) were observed (Arm A, N=38); those with clear margins, 2-4 + LN, or ENE ≤1mm were randomized to 50Gy (Arm B, N=100) or 60Gy (Arm C, N=108); those with involved margins, >4 + LN, or >1mm ENE received weekly cisplatin 40 mg/m2 and 60-66Gy (Arm D, N=113). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using a log-rank test, stratified by arm for comparisons of primary site and smoking history. Results: Among 359 evaluable patients, 54-m PFS and OS were 90.6% (90% CI: 87.2%, 93.1%) and 95.3% (90% CI: 93.0%, 96.9%). 54-m PFS by arm was: A 93.2% (90% CI: 79.6%, 97.8%); B 94.9% (90% CI: 89.7%, 97.5%); C 90.2% (90% CI: 82.7%, 94.6%) and D 85.5% (90% CI: 77.5%, 90.8%). 54-m OS by arm was: A 97.1% (90% CI: 85.7%, 99.4%); B 97.9% (90% CI: 93.5%, 99.3%), C 95.1% (90% CI: 90.1%, 97.6%) and D 92.5% (90% CI: 86.9%, 95.7%). Among patients in Arm A, 11 had N0 and 27 N1 stage. Median Arm A lymph node yield (LNY) was 29 (11 to 91 LN) and did not differ for patients with/without recurrence (p=0.83). All Arm A recurrences were in N1 patients: 1 at 18 m and 3 at > 40 m. No significant difference in PFS or OS was observed by prescribed radiation dose for intermediate risk patients (Arm B vs. C). Outcome did not differ by primary site of tonsil vs. other OPC (oOPC): 54-m PFS Tonsil 89.3% (90% CI: 84.9%, 92.5%) vs. oOPC 92.9% (90% CI: 87.0%, 96.2%), p=0.28, and 54-m OS Tonsil 94.6% (90% CI: 91.5%, 96.6%) vs oOPC 96.6% (90% CI: 92.4%, 98.5%), p=0.35. Smoking history also did not impact outcome. 54-m PFS was 89.9% (90% CI: 85.9%, 92.9%) for those with ≤10 pack-years (PY) tobacco exposure and 91.7% (90% CI: 83.9%, 95.9%) for those with >10 PY. Conclusions: TOS, neck dissection with deintensified risk-based post-operative management results in outstanding 54-m PFS and OS across all subsites of T1-2 p16+ OPC, irrespective of smoking history. Late recurrence is not increased when post-operative radiation is reduced from 60 to 50Gy for intermediate risk patients. Pathologic >1mm ENE (N=87), involved margin (N=12) or >4 involved LN (N=30) accurately identify patients at increased recurrence risk and outcomes were favorable among such patients. Among patients with favorable pathologic characteristics, a subset with N1 disease are at risk for late recurrence and further characterization of these patients is warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT01898494 .

Objective: Cuffless blood pressure measurement technologies have attracted significant attention for their potential to transform cardiovascular monitoring. This updated narrative review thoroughly examines the challenges, opportunities, and limitations associated with the implementation of cuffless blood pressure monitoring systems. By summarizing the current state of the art and identifying future directions, this article aims to participate in the debate around cuffless BP measurement while contributing substantial scientific value to this rapidly evolving field. Design and method: The search procedure involved using Google Scholar and PubMed databases. During the initial search, a substantial number of articles unrelated to this literature survey were retrieved. Authors then selected the articles that were relevant for this review on cuffless noninvasive BP measurement. Results: Diverse technologies, including photoplethysmography, tonometry, and ECG waveform analysis, enable cuffless blood pressure measurement and are integrated into devices like smartphones and smartwatches. Signal processing emerges as a critical aspect, dictating the accuracy and reliability of readings. Despite its potential, the integration of cuffless technologies into clinical practice faces obstacles, including the need to address concerns related to accuracy, calibration, and standardization across diverse devices and patient populations. The development of robust algorithms to mitigate artifacts and environmental disturbances is essential for extracting clear physiological signals. Based on extensive research, this review emphasizes the necessity for standardized protocols, validation studies, and regulatory frameworks to ensure the reliability and safety of cuffless blood pressure monitoring devices and their implementation in mainstream medical practice. Interdisciplinary collaborations between engineers, clinicians, and regulatory bodies are crucial to address technical, clinical, and regulatory complexities during implementation. Conclusions: While cuffless blood pressure monitoring holds immense potential to transform cardiovascular care. The resolution of existing challenges and the establishment of rigorous standards are imperative for its seamless incorporation into routine clinical practice. The emergence of these new technologies shifts the paradigm of cardiovascular health management, presenting a new possibility for non-invasive continuous and dynamic monitoring. The concept of cuffless blood pressure measurement is viable and more finely tuned devices are expected to enter the market, which could redefine our understanding of blood pressure and hypertension.

Objectives: Upregulation of endothelin-1 (ET-1) and its receptors have been linked to increases in hypoxic sensitivity of the carotid chemoreceptors and the development of hypertension. As such, chemoreflex sensitization has been shown in pre-clinical models to be attenuated by ET-1 receptor blockade. Herein, we sought to assess a role for ET-1 in the maintenance of resting blood pressure (BP) in healthy young men and determine whether chemoreflex control of BP could be altered by ET-1 blockade. We hypothesized endothelin receptor antagonism with oral bosentan would lower resting BP in healthy young men as well as the acute BP response to hypoxia. Methods: Twenty-four healthy young men (31±5 yrs, 26±3 kg/m2) completed two study visits (control, bosentan) separated by a minimum of 1 week. The nonspecific endothelin receptor antagonist bosentan (62.5 mg) was taken by mouth twice daily for 3 days prior to the second study visit. On each visit, beat-by-beat BP was assessed under 3 inspiratory air conditions: 1) steady-state normoxia (FiO2 0.21), 2) chemoreflex excitation produced by acute, graded hypoxia (FiO2 0.05 – 0.21), 3) chemoreflex inhibition elicited by transient hyperoxia (FiO2 1.00). Results: Oral bosentan treatment resulted in an increase in plasma ET-1 (0.9±0.9 to 1.3±0.6 pg/mL, p=0.004), supporting receptor blockade. Resting diastolic and mean BP were reduced following 3 days of bosentan treatment compared to control (diastolic: 73±5 to 69±7 mmHg, p=0.007; mean: 93±7 to 88±7 mmHg, p=0.005) with no change in systolic BP (p=0.507). Notably, the BP response to both acute hypoxia (-0.48±0.38 to -0.25±0.31 mmHg/%, p=0.004) and hyperoxia (main effect of bosentan, p=0.025) were attenuated following bosentan. Conclusions: Acute oral bosentan treatment resulted in a reduction in resting BP in healthy young men. The effect of endothelin receptor inhibition with bosentan further attenuated the rise in BP during chemoreflex excitation via acute, graded hypoxia as well as the fall in BP during chemoreflex inhibition (transient hyperoxia). Together these data support a role for ET-1 in control of resting BP in healthy young men, possibly through a chemoreceptor-mediated mechanism. NIH HL130339 (JL), Mayo Clinic Center for Biomedical Discovery (JL, SB). This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2024 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.