Manrique‐Acevedo, Camila

AbstractEndothelin‐1 (ET‐1) and its receptors are linked to increases in sensitivity of the chemoreceptors to hypoxic stress and the development of hypertension in preclinical models. We hypothesized ET receptor antagonism would lower resting blood pressure (BP) as well as the acute BP response to chemoreflex stress. Twenty‐four men (31 ± 5 years, 26 ± 3 kg/m2) completed two study visits (control, bosentan). On each visit, BP was assessed under three conditions: (1) normoxia (FiO2 0.21), (2) chemoreflex excitation via hypoxia (FiO2 0.05–0.21), (3) chemoreflex inhibition via hyperoxia (FiO2 1.00). Bosentan increased plasma ET‐1 (0.94 ± 0.90 to 1.27 ± 0.62 pg/mL, p = 0.004), supporting receptor blockade. Resting diastolic (73 ± 5 to 69 ± 7 mmHg, p = 0.007) and mean (93 ± 7 to 88 ± 7 mmHg, p = 0.005) BP were reduced following bosentan compared to control with no change in systolic BP (p = 0.507). The mean BP response to both acute hypoxia (−0.48 ± 0.38 to −0.25 ± 0.31 mmHg/%, p = 0.004) and hyperoxia (area under the curve −93 ± 108 to −27 ± 66 AU, p = 0.018) were attenuated following bosentan. Acute ET receptor inhibition attenuates the rise in BP during chemoreflex excitation as well as the fall in BP during chemoreflex inhibition in healthy young men. These data support a role for ET‐1 in control of resting BP, possibly through a chemoreceptor‐mediated mechanism.

Objectives: Upregulation of endothelin-1 (ET-1) and its receptors have been linked to increases in hypoxic sensitivity of the carotid chemoreceptors and the development of hypertension. As such, chemoreflex sensitization has been shown in pre-clinical models to be attenuated by ET-1 receptor blockade. Herein, we sought to assess a role for ET-1 in the maintenance of resting blood pressure (BP) in healthy young men and determine whether chemoreflex control of BP could be altered by ET-1 blockade. We hypothesized endothelin receptor antagonism with oral bosentan would lower resting BP in healthy young men as well as the acute BP response to hypoxia. Methods: Twenty-four healthy young men (31±5 yrs, 26±3 kg/m2) completed two study visits (control, bosentan) separated by a minimum of 1 week. The nonspecific endothelin receptor antagonist bosentan (62.5 mg) was taken by mouth twice daily for 3 days prior to the second study visit. On each visit, beat-by-beat BP was assessed under 3 inspiratory air conditions: 1) steady-state normoxia (FiO2 0.21), 2) chemoreflex excitation produced by acute, graded hypoxia (FiO2 0.05 – 0.21), 3) chemoreflex inhibition elicited by transient hyperoxia (FiO2 1.00). Results: Oral bosentan treatment resulted in an increase in plasma ET-1 (0.9±0.9 to 1.3±0.6 pg/mL, p=0.004), supporting receptor blockade. Resting diastolic and mean BP were reduced following 3 days of bosentan treatment compared to control (diastolic: 73±5 to 69±7 mmHg, p=0.007; mean: 93±7 to 88±7 mmHg, p=0.005) with no change in systolic BP (p=0.507). Notably, the BP response to both acute hypoxia (-0.48±0.38 to -0.25±0.31 mmHg/%, p=0.004) and hyperoxia (main effect of bosentan, p=0.025) were attenuated following bosentan. Conclusions: Acute oral bosentan treatment resulted in a reduction in resting BP in healthy young men. The effect of endothelin receptor inhibition with bosentan further attenuated the rise in BP during chemoreflex excitation via acute, graded hypoxia as well as the fall in BP during chemoreflex inhibition (transient hyperoxia). Together these data support a role for ET-1 in control of resting BP in healthy young men, possibly through a chemoreceptor-mediated mechanism. NIH HL130339 (JL), Mayo Clinic Center for Biomedical Discovery (JL, SB). This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2024 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.

Repeat exposures to low oxygen (intermittent hypoxia, IH) elicit increases in muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) and blood pressure (BP) in men. Endothelin (ET) receptor antagonists can attenuate the sympathetic and BP response to IH in rodents; whether these data translate to humans were unclear. We show acute IH results in an increase in ET-1, MSNA, and BP in healthy young men; however, the effect of IH on MSNA and BP does not occur through activation of ET-receptors in healthy young men.

Objective Hyperinsulinemia elicits an increase sympathetic nervous system activity directed toward skeletal muscle (muscle sympathetic nerve activity, MSNA). The insulin‐mediated increase in MSNA is primarily attributed to its effect within the central nervous system. In addition to direct central effects, insulin also elicits peripheral vasodilation, which may further increase MSNA via arterial baroreflex‐mediated mechanisms in order to maintain blood pressure (BP). Herein we examined the contribution of insulin‐induced peripheral vasodilation and role for the arterial baroreflex in the MSNA response to hyperinsulinemia. We hypothesized that rescuing peripheral resistance with co‐infusion of the vasoconstrictor phenylephrine would attenuate the MSNA response to hyperinsulinemia. We further hypothesized the insulin‐mediated increase in MSNA would be recapitulated with another vasodilator (sodium nitroprusside, SNP). Methods In 33 healthy adults (28M/5F, 28±1 yrs, BMI 25.0±0.5 kg/m 2 ) MSNA (microneurography) and BP (Finometer/brachial catheter) were measured, and total peripheral resistance (TPR, ModelFlow) was calculated at rest and during intravenous insulin (n=20) or SNP (n=13) infusion. A subset of participants receiving insulin (n=7) were co‐infused with phenylephrine. Spontaneous arterial baroreflex sensitivity was determined over 5‐min at baseline and during pharmacological intervention(s). Results Insulin infusion increased MSNA (p=0.05) and decreased TPR (p<0.05), with no effects on arterial baroreflex sensitivity or BP (p>0.05). Co‐infusion with phenylephrine returned MSNA and TPR to baseline, with no effect on baroreflex sensitivity (p>0.05). Similar to insulin, SNP increased MSNA (p<0.01) and decreased TPR (p<0.05), with no effect on baroreflex sensitivity (p>0.05). Conclusions Present findings reveal that acute hyperinsulinemia increases MSNA without a change in arterial baroreflex sensitivity in healthy men and women. Insulin‐mediated increases in MSNA are lost with co‐infusion of phenylephrine and can be recapitulated with infusion of SNP. Results support a dynamic interplay between central and peripheral mechanisms during hyperinsulinemia to increase MSNA and maintain BP.

We hypothesized that elevation in muscle sympathetic nervous system activity (MSNA) during hyperinsulinemia is mediated by its peripheral vasodilator effect on the arterial baroreflex. Using three separate protocols in humans, we observed increases in both MSNA and cardiac output during hyperinsulinemia, which we attributed to the baroreflex response to peripheral vasodilation induced by insulin. Results show that peripheral vasodilation induced by insulin contributes to increased MSNA during hyperinsulinemia.

Sex-related differences in respiratory modulation of sympathetic activity have been observed in rodent models of sleep apnea [intermittent hypoxia (IH)]. In light of sex disparities in the respiratory response to acute IH in humans as well as changes in respiratory modulation of muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) in clinical sleep apnea, we examined sex-related differences in respiratory modulation of MSNA following acute IH. We hypothesized that respiratory modulation of MSNA would be altered in both male and female participants after IH; however, the respiratory patterning of MSNA following IH would be sex specific. Heart rate, MSNA, and respiration were evaluated in healthy male ( n = 21, 30 ± 5 yr) and female ( n = 10, 28 ± 5 yr) participants during normoxic rest before and after 30 min of IH. Respiratory modulation of MSNA was assessed by fitting polynomials to cross-correlation histograms constructed between sympathetic spikes and respiration. MSNA was elevated after IH in male (20 ± 6 to 24 ± 8 bursts/min) and female (19 ± 8 to 22 ± 10 bursts/min) participants ( P < 0.01). Both male and female participants exhibited respiratory modulation of MSNA ( P < 0.01); however, the pattern differed by sex. After IH, modulation of MSNA within the breath was reduced in male participants ( P = 0.03) but increased in female participants ( P = 0.02). Both male and female adults exhibit changes in respiratory patterning of MSNA after acute IH; however, this pattern differs by sex. These data support sex disparities in respiratory modulation of MSNA and may have implications for conditions such as sleep apnea.

Repetitive hypoxic apneas, similar to those observed in sleep apnea, result in resetting of the sympathetic baroreflex to higher blood pressures (BP). This baroreflex resetting is associated with hypertension in preclinical models of sleep apnea (intermittent hypoxia, IH); however, the majority of understanding comes from males. There are data to suggest that female rats exposed to IH do not develop high BP. Clinical data further support sex differences in the development of hypertension in sleep apnea, but mechanistic data are lacking. Here we examined sex-related differences in the effect of IH on sympathetic control of BP in humans. We hypothesized that after acute IH we would observe a rise in muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) and arterial BP in young men ( n = 30) that would be absent in young women ( n = 19). BP and MSNA were measured during normoxic rest before and after 30 min of IH. Baroreflex sensitivity (modified Oxford) was evaluated before and after IH. A rise in mean BP following IH was observed in men (+2.0 ± 0.7 mmHg, P = 0.03), whereas no change was observed in women (−2.7 ± 1.2 mmHg, P = 0.11). The elevation in MSNA following IH was not different between groups (4.7 ± 1.1 vs. 3.8 ± 1.2 bursts/min, P = 0.65). Sympathetic baroreflex sensitivity did not change after IH in either group ( P > 0.05). Our results support sex-related differences in the effect of IH on neurovascular control of BP and show that any BP-raising effects of IH are absent in young women. These data enhance our understanding of sex-specific mechanisms that may contribute to BP changes in sleep apnea.

We examined the role of sympathetic activation in restraining vasodilatory responses to hyperinsulinemia and sustaining blood pressure in healthy adults. Data are reported from two separate experimental protocols in humans and one experimental protocol in isolated arteries from mice. Contrary to our hypothesis, the present findings support the idea that during hyperinsulinemia, a sympathetically mediated increase in cardiac output, rather than restraint of peripheral vasodilation, is the principal contributor to the maintenance of systemic blood pressure.

Background Repetitive hypoxic apneas, similar to what is observed in sleep apnea, result in resetting of the sympathetic baroreflex to higher blood pressures (BP) in humans. This resetting of the baroreflex is associated with increased BP in preclinical models of sleep apnea (chronic intermittent hypoxia, CIH); however, the majority of our understanding comes from men. There are data to suggest female rats exposed to CIH do not develop high BP. With this, we sought to examine potential sex‐related differences in the effect of intermittent hypoxia (IH) on the sympathetic baroreflex. We hypothesized young men would exhibit resetting of the baroreflex to higher BP following IH, with no change in young women. Methods BP and muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) were assessed in 17 men (30±1 yrs) and 10 women (28±1 yrs) during quiet normoxic rest prior to and following 30‐min of experimental IH [30‐s hypoxic exposures (0.05 F i O 2 ) alternating with 90‐s room air breathing] resulting in 15 hypoxic events (91.7±0.5 % SpO2). Sympathetic baroreflex sensitivity was evaluated using the modified Oxford technique before and after 30‐min of IH. Results Diastolic BP increased in men following IH (71±2 to 74±2 mmHg; p<0.01) with no change in women (75±3 to 75±3 mmHg; p=0.97). Sympathetic baroreflex sensitivity did not change following IH in either group (Men: −1.8±0.2 to −1.9±0.3; Women: −1.6±0.3 to −2.1± 0.5 bursts/100 heart beats/mmHg; Main effect of IH, p=0.14; Interaction of group and IH, p=0.28). Conclusion Acute IH resets the sympathetic baroreflex to higher BP in young men, with no change in young women. Baroreflex sensitivity slopes were unchanged in either group following IH. Our results support sex differences in the effect of IH on sympathetic control of BP and show that young women are protected from the BP‐raising effects of IH. These data enhance our understanding of sex‐specific mechanisms that may contribute to the development of hypertension in sleep apnea. Support or Funding Information NIH HL130339, Mayo Clinic Center for Biomedical Discovery