Citations

Background: A vast amount of literature is available on the burden of acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Yet, most information on AIS burden does not stratify by stroke severity, and the inclusion of mild strokes (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale < 5) might obscure the true impact of moderate-to-severe AIS. Therefore, it is important to understand the literature as it pertains to the epidemiological, clinical, humanistic, and economic burden of moderate-to-severe AIS from a global perspective. Methods: A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted, including articles published between January 2015 and June 2023. The clinical burden search focused on patients with moderate or severe AIS. Due to the paucity of evidence, the humanistic and economic burdens were evaluated based on overall AIS studies. Abstract and full-text screening were conducted by 2 reviewers, with data extraction completed by 1 reviewer. In all, 136 studies were included in the SLR. Results: AIS caused a substantial burden for patients and the healthcare system. The clinical burden of AIS (specifically severe AIS) resulted in high mortality and worse functional outcomes across multiple demographics (female sex, older age, and patients with comorbidities). The economic burden of overall AIS was substantial, with inpatient costs as the primary driver (a mean or median stay of 7 days). The highest inpatient costs were reported in South Korea ($45,180) and the United States ($38,470). Conclusions: The review highlighted the huge burden of moderate-to-severe AIS, with patients experiencing worse outcomes with increased stroke severity. Further focus is needed on outcomes relating to moderate-to-severe AIS to fully understand the burden of stroke in this patient population.

AbstractBackgroundPlasma Aβ42/40 and p‐tau217 can predict amyloid positivity in cross‐sectional studies. However, it is unclear how plasma biomarkers perform longitudinally, which is important to inform their utility in tracking disease progression. The goal of this study is to describe temporal evolutions of plasma Aβ42/40 and ptau217 ratio (p‐tau217r) measured via mass spectrometry, p‐tau217 measured via an immunoassay, and amyloid PET.MethodsWe included participants in the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging with amyloid PET (PiB) and plasma Aβ42/40 + ptau217r (mass spectrometry, C2N) and/or p‐tau217 (Lilly, MSD). We fit a joint non‐linear mixed effects model with Aβ42/40, p‐tau217r, p‐tau217 (Lilly), and amyloid PET as outcomes and age, sex, APOE ε4 carriership and education as covariates. The model included a per‐participant adjustment (time‐shift) for each biomarker indicating how much earlier or later in time the biomarker was estimated to progress relative to the average participant, a correlation (R) between adjustments for each pair of biomarkers, and the impact of covariates on each biomarker’s timing.ResultsThe study included 1459 participants, age 77 (10) years, 44% female, 82% cognitively unimpaired. Mean (SD) years of followup was 5.6(3.0) years for mass spectrometry plasma measures, 2.5(0.7) years for p‐tau217 (Lilly), and 4.6(3.3) for amyloid PET. Model fits are shown for each biomarker, with greater variability in serial measurements for plasma than PET (Figure 1). Individual adjustments between each of the plasma biomarkers and amyloid PET were highly correlated: p‐tau217r, R=0.73 (95%CI: 0.67, 0.78); p‐tau217 (Lilly), R=0.66 (0.62, 0.7); Aβ42/40, R=0.6 (0.52, 0.68) (Figure 2). The p‐tau217r and Aβ42/40 individual adjustments were modestly correlated, R=0.39 (0.28, 0.49). APOE ε4 carriership had the strongest covariate effect on all biomarkers, e.g. p‐tau217r progression 9.4 (6.7, 12) years earlier (Figure 3).ConclusionsPlasma Aβ42/40 and p‐tau217 measured with currently available assays may both be amenable to longitudinal modeling, although the degree of variability in Aβ42/40 over time may pose challenges. Findings suggest that both plasma Aβ42/40 and p‐tau217r may provide information regarding an individual’s timing of progression on amyloid PET; lower correlations with each other than amyloid PET suggests that each analyte may provide complimentary information.

Abstract Background While serial sampling of glioma tissue is rarely performed prior to recurrence, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is an underutilized longitudinal source of candidate glioma biomarkers for understanding therapeutic impacts. However, the impact of key variables to consider in longitudinal CSF samples for monitoring biomarker discovery, including anatomical location and post-surgical changes, remains unknown. Methods Aptamer-based proteomics was performed on 147 CSF samples from 74 patients; 71 of whom had grade 2–4 astrocytomas or grade 2–3 oligodendrogliomas. This included pre- versus post-resection intracranial CSF samples obtained at early (1–16 days; n = 20 patients) or delayed (86–153 days; n = 11 patients) time points for patients with glioma. Paired lumbar versus intracranial glioma CSF samples were also obtained (n = 14 patients). Results Significant differences were identified in the CSF proteome between lumbar, subarachnoid, and ventricular CSF in patients with gliomas. Importantly, we found that resection had a significant, evolving longitudinal impact on the CSF proteome, with distinct sets of proteins present at different time points since resection. Our analysis of serial intracranial CSF samples suggests the early potential for disease monitoring and evaluation of pharmacodynamic impact of targeted therapies, such as bevacizumab and immunotherapies. Conclusions The intracranial glioma CSF proteome serves as a rich and dynamic reservoir of potential biomarkers that can be used to evaluate the effects of resection and other therapies over time. All data within this study, including detailed individual clinical annotations, are shared as a resource for the neuro-oncology community to collectively address these unanswered questions and further understand glioma biology through CSF proteomics.

Abstract Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) has emerged as a valuable liquid biopsy source for glioma biomarker discovery and validation. CSF produced within the ventricles circulates through the subarachnoid space, where the composition of glioma-derived analytes is influenced by the proximity and anatomical location of sampling relative to tumor, in addition to underlying tumor biology. The substantial gradients observed between lumbar and intracranial CSF compartments for tumor-derived analytes underscore the importance of sampling site selection. Moreover, radiographic features, such as tumor-CSF contact and blood-brain barrier disruption, are critical covariates that may affect biomarker detection and the abundance of plasma-derived analytes in CSF, respectively. Longitudinal intracranial CSF sampling, enabled by access devices like Ommaya reservoirs, may offer a window into treatment response and disease progression, though variability in analyte yield, sample volumes, and the dynamic effects of surgical resection pose challenges. This review critically evaluates the anatomic, radiographic, and longitudinal factors, or “time-space continuum,” that impact glioma CSF biomarker abundance. Practical considerations for longitudinal CSF biobanking, including access device placement and collection, are also reviewed. Key takeaways and recommendations for CSF glioma biomarker discovery and validation are provided as a “hitchhiker’s guide” based on our collective experience, along with resources for investigators aiming to develop CSF biobanking at their institutions.

Importance Molecular techniques, including next-generation sequencing, genomic copy number profiling, fusion transcript detection, and genomic DNA methylation arrays, are now indispensable tools for the workup of central nervous system (CNS) tumors. Yet there remains a great deal of heterogeneity in using such biomarker testing across institutions and hospital systems. This is in large part because there is a persistent reluctance among third-party payers to cover molecular testing. The objective of this Review is to describe why comprehensive molecular biomarker testing is now required for the accurate diagnosis and grading and prognostication of CNS tumors and, in so doing, to justify more widespread use by clinicians and coverage by third-party payers. Observations The 5th edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification system for CNS tumors incorporates specific molecular signatures into the essential diagnostic criteria for most tumor entities. Many CNS tumor types cannot be reliably diagnosed according to current WHO guidelines without molecular testing. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network also incorporates molecular testing into their guidelines for CNS tumors. Both sets of guidelines are maximally effective if they are implemented routinely for all patients with CNS tumors. Moreover, the cost of these tests is less than 5% of the overall average cost of caring for patients with CNS tumors and consistently improves management. This includes more accurate diagnosis and prognostication, clinical trial eligibility, and prediction of response to specific treatments. Each major group of CNS tumors in the WHO classification is evaluated and how molecular diagnostics enhances patient care is described. Conclusions and Relevance Routine advanced multidimensional molecular profiling is now required to provide optimal standard of care for patients with CNS tumors.

Abstract Purpose: Current methods for glioma response assessment are limited. This study aimed to assess the technical and clinical feasibility of molecular profiling using longitudinal intracranial cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from patients with gliomas. Experimental Design: Adults with gliomas underwent longitudinal intracranial CSF collection via Ommaya reservoirs or ventriculoperitoneal shunts. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) was extracted and analyzed using PredicineCARE for cancer variant profiling and/or PredicineSCORE for low-pass whole-genome sequencing. Results: Five patients (two females and three males; median age, 40 years; range, 32–64 years) underwent longitudinal intracranial CSF collection via Ommaya reservoirs (n = 4) or ventriculoperitoneal shunts (n = 1). In total, 47 CSF samples were obtained (median volume, 4.00 mL; 0.5–5 mL). Forty-one samples (87.2%) yielded sufficient cfDNA for testing. Patient-specific tumor-associated variant allelic frequencies (VAF), and thus tumor fraction, decreased in pre- versus postchemoradiation samples, including through pseudoprogression. These also increased with radiographic progression in three patients, although identifying the time of definitive disease progression from MRIs was a significant limitation. In two patients with isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)–mutant gliomas, decreasing IDH1 VAF after resection and chemoradiation correlated with decreased CSF D-2-hydroxyglutarate levels (0.64× and 0.62×, respectively, for the first patient and 0.01× and 0.07× for the other patient), although D-2-hydroxyglutarate and IDH1 VAF were not concordant in one patient thereafter. Moreover, the copy-number burden decreased below the limit of quantification during treatment and increased above the limit at progression. Conclusions: Longitudinal intracranial CSF cfDNA can be obtained in patients with gliomas during their disease course. However, before deploying this technique, numerous questions and challenges should be answered.

Purpose: To identify areas of consensus among experts on the performance of endothelial keratoplasty by using a modified Delphi approach, to help create a framework for novice surgeons to adopt these procedures. Methods: Thirty-one international experts in endothelial keratoplasty participated. Two rounds of electronic survey were followed by a hybrid, virtual meeting. Consensus was set at 75%, and results with agreement between 70% and 75% were deemed as achieving near consensus. Results: A consensus was reached for 98 statements covering the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative aspects of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) and Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty/Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Four statements achieved near consensus, and consensus could not be achieved for 11 statements. For DMEK, the panel supported a peel technique to prepare tissue for endothelium out DMEK, implanted via an injector and supported by a near full air/gas fill as a baseline procedure onto which more advanced techniques can be built. DMEK tissue should be marked to ensure correct orientation. An inferior peripheral iridotomy should be used to prevent pupil block when a near full air/gas fill in used in endothelial keratoplasty (EK). Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty was considered preferable to Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty where access to microkeratome preparation was available. Conclusions: The Delphi process allowed areas of consensus on the performance of EK to be established by a group of international experts. The statements generated are a helpful framework for novice surgeons learning EK. Further research is needed to help determine what specific tomographic features indicate EK, when guttae are considered visually significant and how to approach combined aphakia and endothelial dysfunction.

Abstract Menopausal users of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) are at increased breast cancer risk and decreased colorectal cancer (CRC) risk compared with individuals who have never used HRT, but these opposing associations may differ by familial risk of breast cancer and CRC. We harmonized data from 3 cohorts and generated separate breast cancer and CRC familial risk scores based on cancer family history. We defined moderate or strong family history as a risk score of 0.4 or higher, where 0.4 was equivalent to a 50-year-old woman with 1 parent diagnosed with either breast cancer or CRC at 55 years of age. Of 24 486 women assessed, 1243 and 405 were diagnosed with incident breast cancer and CRC, respectively. For breast cancer, menopausal HRT ever use versus never use hazard ratios were 1.27 (95% CI = 1.11 to 1.45) for a breast cancer familial risk score below 0.4 and 1.01 (95% CI = 0.82 to 1.25) for a breast cancer familial risk score of 0.4 or higher (Pdifference = .08). For CRC, menopausal HRT hazard ratios were 0.63 (95% CI = 0.50 to 0.78) for a CRC familial risk score below 0.4 and 1.21 (95% CI = 0.73 to 2.00) for a CRC familial risk score of 0.4 or higher (Pdifference = .03). Associations with menopausal HRT use that apply to the general population may not hold for women at moderate or strong familial risk of these cancers.