Citations

Background: The incidence of lymphomatous involvement of the central nervous system (CNS) has been increasing in recent years. However, the rarity of the disease has resulted in a scarcity of available data regarding its clinical presentation, natural history, and prognosis. We aimed to investigate the neurological characteristics of uncommon lymphomatous involvements confined to the CNS and to identify key variables that could serve as predictive biomarkers for treatment outcomes. Methods: We identified patients presenting with neurological symptoms and diagnosed with CNS-restricted lymphomatous involvement between 2005 and 2023. Results: We identified 44 cases, 93% of which were diagnosed with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) and 7% with intravascular lymphoma. The median time from symptom onset to diagnosis was 47 days (range: 6–573 days), with no statistically significant difference between patients older and younger than 60 years (p = 0.22). The median follow-up time was 1144 days (range: 27–3501 days). Cognitive deterioration was the most common presenting symptom, occurring in 19 out of 44 patients (43%). Brain MRI revealed that lobar lesions were the most frequent location of lesions, found in 24 out of 44 patients (55%). By the end of the study period, 30 patients (68%) had died, with a median survival of 666 days (range: 17–3291 days). Death was significantly more common in patients who experienced relapses (p = 0.04; 95% CI: 0.99–0.03), with these patients having a four times higher chance of death (HR = 4.1; 95% CI: 1.01–16.09). The time to diagnosis significantly correlated with survival (p = 0.02; 95% CI: 0.005–0.54), as did the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status at the last follow-up (p = 0.006; 95% CI: 0.0012–0.62). Patients aged over 60 years did not exhibit a higher likelihood of death (p = 0.19; HR = 2.3; 95% CI: 0.63–8.61); however, the threshold age at diagnosis for the maximally predicted mortality was 64 years (ROC = 0.73; p = 0.03). Conclusions: Patients had significant delays in diagnosis, affecting patient outcomes. Cognitive deterioration and lobar lesions were prominent clinical and radiological features. Mortality was notably higher in patients with relapses and those who had a longer time to diagnosis.

ImportanceThe prognosis of patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction (AEG) is poor. From current evidence, it remains unclear to what extent preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) or preoperative and/or perioperative chemotherapy achieve better outcomes than surgery alone.ObjectiveTo assess the association of preoperative CRT and preoperative and/or perioperative chemotherapy in patients with AEG with overall survival and other outcomes.Data SourcesLiterature search in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, ClinicalTrials.gov, and International Clinical Trials Registry Platform was performed from inception to April 21, 2023.Study SelectionTwo blinded reviewers screened for randomized clinical trials comparing preoperative CRT plus surgery with preoperative and/or perioperative chemotherapy plus surgery, 1 intervention with surgery alone, or all 3 treatments. Only data from participants with AEG were included from trials that encompassed mixed histology or gastric cancer. Among 2768 initially identified studies, 17 (0.6%) met the selection criteria.Data Extraction and SynthesisThe Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines were followed for extracting data and assessing data quality by 2 independent extractors. A bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted using the 2-stage approach.Main Outcomes and MeasuresOverall and disease-free survival, postoperative morbidity, and mortality.ResultsThe analyses included 2549 patients (2206 [86.5%] male; mean [SD] age, 61.0 [9.4] years) from 17 trials (conducted from 1989-2016). Both preoperative CRT plus surgery (hazard ratio [HR], 0.75 [95% credible interval (CrI), 0.62-0.90]; 3-year difference, 105 deaths per 1000 patients) and preoperative and/or perioperative chemotherapy plus surgery (HR, 0.78 [95% CrI, 0.64-0.91]; 3-year difference, 90 deaths per 1000 patients) showed longer overall survival than surgery alone. Comparing the 2 modalities yielded similar overall survival (HR, 1.04 [95% CrI], 0.83-1.28]; 3-year difference, 15 deaths per 1000 patients fewer for CRT). Similarly, disease-free survival was longer for both modalities compared with surgery alone. Postoperative morbidity was more frequent after CRT plus surgery (odds ratio [OR], 2.94 [95% CrI, 1.01-8.59]) than surgery alone. Postoperative mortality was not significantly more frequent after CRT plus surgery than surgery alone (OR, 2.50 [95% CrI, 0.66-10.56]) or after chemotherapy plus surgery than CRT plus surgery (OR, 0.44 [95% CrI, 0.08-2.00]).Conclusions and RelevanceIn this meta-analysis of patients with AEG, both preoperative CRT and preoperative and/or perioperative chemotherapy were associated with longer survival without relevant differences between the 2 modalities. Thus, either of the 2 treatments may be recommended to patients.

OBJECTIVE To compare postprandial glucose excursions following a bolus with inhaled technosphere insulin (TI) or subcutaneous rapid-acting analog (RAA) insulin. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS A meal challenge was completed by 122 adults with type 1 diabetes who were using multiple daily injections (MDI), a nonautomated pump, or automated insulin delivery (AID) and who were randomized to bolus with their usual RAA insulin (n = 61) or TI (n = 61). RESULTS The primary outcome, the treatment group difference in area under the curve for glucose >180 mg/dL over 2 h, was less with TI versus RAA (adjusted difference −12 mg/dL, 95% CI −22 to −2, P = 0.02). With TI, the glucose excursion was smaller (P = 0.01), peak glucose lower (P = 0.01), and time to peak glucose shorter (P = 0.006). Blood glucose <70 mg/dL occurred in one participant in each group. CONCLUSIONS Postmeal glucose excursion was smaller with TI than with RAA insulin in a cohort that included both AID and MDI users.

Abstract Background Few antiviral therapies have been studied in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and kidney impairment. Herein, the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of remdesivir, its metabolites, and sulfobutylether-β-cyclodextrin excipient were evaluated in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and severe kidney impairment. Methods In REDPINE, a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, participants aged ≥12 years hospitalized for COVID-19 pneumonia with acute kidney injury, chronic kidney disease, or kidney failure were randomized 2:1 to receive intravenous remdesivir (200 mg on day 1; 100 mg daily up to day 5) or placebo (enrollment from March 2021 to March 2022). The primary efficacy end point was the composite of the all-cause mortality rate or invasive mechanical ventilation rate through day 29. Safety was evaluated through day 60. Results Although enrollment concluded early, 243 participants were enrolled and treated (remdesivir, n = 163; placebo, n = 80). At baseline, 90 participants (37.0%) had acute kidney injury (remdesivir, n = 60; placebo, n = 30), 64 (26.3%) had chronic kidney disease (remdesivir, n = 44; placebo, n = 20), and 89 (36.6%) had kidney failure (remdesivir, n = 59; placebo, n = 30); and 31 (12.8%) were vaccinated against COVID-19. Composite all-cause mortality or invasive mechanical ventilation rates through day 29 were 29.4% and 32.5% in the remdesivir and placebo group, respectively (P = .61). Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 80.4% for remdesivir versus 77.5% for placebo, and serious adverse events in 50.3% versus 50.0%, respectively. Pharmacokinetic plasma exposure to remdesivir was not affected by kidney function. Conclusions Although the study was underpowered, no significant difference in efficacy was observed between treatment groups. REDPINE demonstrated that remdesivir is safe in patients with COVID-19 and severe kidney impairment. Clinical Trials Registration EudraCT 2020-005416-22; Clinical Trials.gov NCT04745351.

Abstract BACKGROUND Non-germinomatous germ cell tumors (NGGCT) constitute 35%- 45% of intracranial germ cell tumors. Growing teratoma syndrome has been observed in patients with NGGCTs after starting chemotherapy. While growing teratomas are typically benign, this process can rarely involve malignant transformation and result in poor prognosis. We present the case of a patient with pineal NGGCT and growing teratoma syndrome with malignant transformation to embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma. CASE REPORT A 13-year-old male presented with headaches and vision changes. An MRI brain demonstrated a 26 x 25 x 19 mm (AP X TR X CC) mixed solid and cystic pineal mass with no evidence of metastatic disease. Due to elevated alpha fetoprotein levels in the serum and cerebrospinal fluid, he was diagnosed with intracranial NGGCT. Treatment was initiated with alternating cycles of Carboplatin/Etoposide and Ifosfamide/Etoposide. After 2 cycles of chemotherapy, a complete biochemical response was noted but MRI showed increased tumor size (presumed growing teratoma syndrome). The patient underwent complete tumor resection. Histology showed embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma as a somatic malignancy arising in a mature teratoma. Further molecular characterization revealed somatic NF1 and KRAS pathogenic mutations that are consistent with the primary diagnosis. Methylation profiling, however, did not exhibit a match with any known malignancies. Continued complete response was noted following two additional chemotherapy cycles. The patient is planned for six total chemotherapy cycles followed by high-dose craniospinal radiation with boost to the primary tumor. CONCLUSIONS Malignant transformation is a rare phenomenon in NGGCT. There is no standard of care for these patients. Further studies are needed to define ideal therapy for this patient population.

Importance Pediatric consensus guidelines recommend antibiotic administration within 1 hour for septic shock and within 3 hours for sepsis without shock. Limited studies exist identifying a specific time past which delays in antibiotic administration are associated with worse outcomes. Objective To determine a time point for antibiotic administration that is associated with increased risk of mortality among pediatric patients with sepsis. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study used data from 51 US children’s hospitals in the Improving Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes collaborative. Participants included patients aged 29 days to less than 18 years with sepsis recognized within 1 hour of emergency department arrival, from January 1, 2017, through December 31, 2021. Piecewise regression was used to identify the inflection point for sepsis-attributable 3-day mortality, and logistic regression was used to evaluate odds of sepsis-attributable mortality after adjustment for potential confounders. Data analysis was performed from March 2022 to February 2024. Exposure The number of minutes from emergency department arrival to antibiotic administration. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was sepsis-attributable 3-day mortality. Sepsis-attributable 30-day mortality was a secondary outcome. Results A total of 19 515 cases (median [IQR] age, 6 [2-12] years) were included. The median (IQR) time to antibiotic administration was 69 (47-116) minutes. The estimated time to antibiotic administration at which 3-day sepsis-attributable mortality increased was 330 minutes. Patients who received an antibiotic in less than 330 minutes (19 164 patients) had sepsis-attributable 3-day mortality of 0.5% (93 patients) and 30-day mortality of 0.9% (163 patients). Patients who received antibiotics at 330 minutes or later (351 patients) had 3-day sepsis-attributable mortality of 1.2% (4 patients), 30-day mortality of 2.0% (7 patients), and increased adjusted odds of mortality at both 3 days (odds ratio, 3.44; 95% CI, 1.20-9.93; P = .02) and 30 days (odds ratio, 3.63; 95% CI, 1.59-8.30; P = .002) compared with those who received antibiotics within 330 minutes. Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort of pediatric patients with sepsis, 3-day and 30-day sepsis-attributable mortality increased with delays in antibiotic administration 330 minutes or longer from emergency department arrival. These findings are consistent with the literature demonstrating increased pediatric sepsis mortality associated with antibiotic administration delay. To guide the balance of appropriate resource allocation with time for adequate diagnostic evaluation, further research is needed into whether there are subpopulations, such as those with shock or bacteremia, that may benefit from earlier antibiotics.

Abstract Background Anaplastic sarcoma of the kidney (ASK) is a DICER1 ‐related neoplasm first identified as a distinctive tumor type through the evaluation of unusual cases of putative anaplastic Wilms tumors. Subsequent case reports identified the presence of biallelic DICER1 variants as well as progression from cystic nephroma, a benign DICER1 ‐related neoplasm. Despite increasing recognition of ASK as a distinct entity, the optimal treatment remains unclear. Methods Individuals with known or suspected DICER1 ‐related tumors including ASK were enrolled in the International Pleuropulmonary Blastoma/ DICER1 Registry. Additionally, a comprehensive review of reported cases of ASK was undertaken, and data were aggregated for analysis with the aim to identify prognostic factors and clinical characteristics to guide decisions regarding genetic testing, treatment, and surveillance. Results Ten cases of ASK were identified in the Registry along with 37 previously published cases. Staging data, per Children's Oncology Group guidelines, was available for 40 patients: 13 were stage I, 12 were stage II, 10 were stage III, and five were stage IV. Outcome data were available for 37 patients. Most (38 of 46) patients received upfront chemotherapy and 14 patients received upfront radiation. Two‐year event‐free survival (EFS) for stage I–II ASK was 81.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 67.2%–99.6%), compared with 46.6% EFS (95% CI: 24.7%–87.8%) for stage III–IV ( p = .07). Two‐year overall survival (OS) for stage I–II ASK was 88.9% (95% CI: 75.5%–100.0%), compared with 70.0% (95% CI: 46.7%–100.0%) for stage III–IV ( p = .20). Chemotherapy was associated with improved EFS and OS with hazard ratios of 0.09 (95% CI: 0.02–0.31) and 0.08 (95% CI: 0.02–0.42), respectively. Conclusion ASK is a rare DICER1 ‐related renal neoplasm. In the current report, we identify clinical and treatment‐related factors associated with outcome including the importance of chemotherapy in treating ASK. Ongoing data collection and genomic analysis are indicated to optimize outcomes for children and adults with these rare tumors.