Ahmed, Hasaan

Abstract Aims Patients with aortic stenosis (AS) and cardiogenic shock (CS) are an extremely high-risk population with a poor prognosis in the absence of definitive therapy. We aimed to compare the outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with those of surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients with AS–CS. Methods and results We queried the Nationwide Readmission Database (2016–21) to identify patients hospitalized for AS–CS who underwent isolated TAVR or SAVR. In-hospital outcomes of TAVR vs. SAVR were compared using multivariable regression and propensity-matching analyses. Ninety-day readmissions were compared using a Cox proportional hazards regression model. A total of 16 161 patients were hospitalized for AS–CS, of whom 6470 (40.0%) underwent isolated TAVR and 9691 (60.0%) underwent isolated SAVR. From 2016 through 2021, the proportion of TAVR increased from 29.5 to 46.5% and the proportion of SAVR correspondingly decreased in AS–CS (Ptrend < 0.01). After adjustment for baseline characteristics, TAVR was associated with lower odds of stroke [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.63, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.47–0.84], acute kidney injury (aOR 0.80, 95% CI 0.69–0.93), and major bleeding (aOR 0.54, 95% CI 0.40–0.71) and higher odds of vascular complications (aOR 1.56, 95% CI 1.23–1.97) compared with SAVR. In-hospital mortality, myocardial infarction, permanent pacemaker placement, and 90-day all-cause and heart failure readmissions showed similar rates between TAVR and SAVR. However, hospital length of stay was shorter and total costs and non-home discharges were lower with TAVR than with SAVR. Conclusion This nationwide observational analysis showed that TAVR is increasingly performed in patients with AS–CS and is associated with similar rates of in-hospital mortality and 90-day readmissions but lower rates of in-hospital complications and resource utilization compared with SAVR.

Abstract Background A significant proportion of patients requiring mitral valve (MV) intervention have undergone prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Reoperative heart surgery is associated with increased risk. Aims To evaluate the utilization and outcomes of transcatheter vs. surgical MV interventions in patients with prior CABG. Methods We queried the Nationwide Readmission Database (2016–21) to identify adults with prior CABG hospitalized for transcatheter or surgical MV intervention. In-hospital outcomes were compared using multivariable regression and propensity-matching analyses. Readmissions were compared using Cox proportional hazards regression model. Results Of 305 625 weighted hospitalizations for MV intervention, 23 506 (7.7%) occurred in patients with prior CABG. From 2016Q1–2021Q4, the use of transcatheter MV interventions increased among patients with prior CABG (72 to 191 for repair and 6 to 45 for replacement per 100 000 hospitalizations, both ptrend < 0.001). Compared with surgical MV repair and replacement, transcatheter MV repair and replacement were associated with similar in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.20–1.03 for repair; aOR 0.61, 95% CI 0.38–1.02 for replacement) and 180-day heart failure (HF) readmissions (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.56, 95% CI 0.85–2.87 for repair; aHR 1.15, 95% CI 0.63–2.09 for replacement) and lower stroke, acute kidney injury, permanent pacemaker placement, length of stay, and non-home discharges, respectively. Vascular complications were higher with transcatheter vs. surgical MV replacement. Conclusion Transcatheter MV interventions are increasingly used as the preferred modality of MV intervention in patients with prior CABG and are associated with similar in-hospital mortality and 180-day HF readmissions compared with surgical MV interventions.

Background: Outcomes of device-detected AF remain unclear in individuals without a prior history of AF. Methods: A meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate outcomes in individuals with no prior history of AF who experienced device-detected AF. Outcomes assessed were clinical AF, thromboembolism and all-cause mortality. A fixed-effects model was used to calculate RRs with 95% CI. Results: Compared to individuals who did not experience device-detected AF, those who did had increased risks of clinical AF (RR 3.33, 95% CI [1.99–5.57]; p<0.0001) and thromboembolic events (RR 2.21; 95% CI [1.72–2.85]; p<0.0001). The risk of all-cause mortality was similar between both groups (RR 1.19; 95% CI [0.95–1.49]; p=0.13). Subgroup analysis revealed an increased risk of thromboembolic events among device-detected AF ≥24 hours (RR 12.34; 95% CI [2.70–56.36]). Conclusion: While there is an increased risk of clinical AF and thromboembolism in individuals with device-detected AF, mortality was insignificant.

Background: Data on racial/ethnic and sex disparities in the utilization and outcomes of tricuspid valve surgery (TVS) in the United States are scarce. The authors aimed to evaluate the impact of race/ethnicity and sex on the utilization and outcomes of TVS. Methods: The authors analyzed the National Inpatient Sample database from 2016 to 2020 to identify hospitalizations for TVS. Racial/ethnic and sex disparities in TVS outcomes were determined using logistic regression models. Results: Between 2016 and 2020, 19 395 hospitalizations for TVS were identified. The utilization rate (number of surgeries/100,000 hospitalizations) was lower in Black and Hispanic patients compared with White patients for surgical tricuspid valve repair (STVr) (331 versus 493 versus 634, P<0.01) and surgical tricuspid valve replacement (STVR) (312 versus 601 versus 728, P<0.01). Similarly, the utilization rate was lower for women compared with men for STVr (1021 versus 1364, P<0.01) and STVR (930 versus 1,316, P<0.01). Compared to White men undergoing TVS, all women had lower odds of acute kidney injury [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.65, 95% CI 0.55–0.78] and higher odds of blood transfusion (aOR 1.30, 95% CI 1.07–1.59), and Black men had higher odds of blood transfusion (aOR 1.59, 95% CI 1.08–2.35). In-hospital mortality and other surgical complications were similar between all groups (all P>0.05). Conclusions: Significant racial/ethnic and sex disparities exist in the utilization of TVS in the United States. Further studies are needed to understand the reasons for these disparities and to identify effective strategies for their mitigation.

Introduction and importance: Chest pain is one of the most prevalent complaints amongst individuals presenting in healthcare settings, encompassing a broad spectrum of etiologies. Work-up for chest pain often focuses on excluding life-threatening conditions before the consideration of atypical causes. Case presentation: A 47-year-old male with a past medical history of tobacco use and depression presented with persistent left-sided chest pain. Vitals on arrival were notable for mild hypertension. Two consecutive high-sensitivity troponins were unremarkable. The electrocardiogram showed sinus rhythm with no ischemic changes. Due to the atypical presentation of chest pain, the patient’s home medications were reviewed, and his bupropion was discontinued due to concern for medication-induced chest pain. The patient was discharged and presented 2 days for follow-up endorsing complete resolution of his chest pain. Clinical discussion: Prior investigations have shown bupropion to be associated with chest pain, with resolution noted after discontinuation. The etiology of chest pain is likely sympathomimetic, as bupropion has been shown to exhibit positive inotropic effects on myocardial tissue, propagated by catecholamine release. Conclusion: Patients taking bupropion may present with atypical chest pain. Medication discontinuation may be beneficial in alleviating symptoms.

Introduction and importance: Chest pain is a frequent reason patients seek medical attention. The broad spectrum of potential etiologies makes determining the underlying cause of chest pain complex. Among cardiovascular etiologies, aortitis is a rare but life-threatening possibility that should be considered in the differential diagnosis. Case presentation: A 53-year-old female with a history of smoking presented with progressively worsening chest and epigastric pain over several weeks. She had seen multiple physicians previously for the same symptoms with unremarkable work-ups. Physical examination was notable for severe tenderness upon palpation of her lower abdomen. The electrocardiogram and troponins were unremarkable. Computed tomography of the abdomen revealed aneurysmal dilatation of the abdominal aorta, soft tissue thickening, and surrounding inflammatory stranding, consistent with aortitis. Infectious and autoimmune work-ups were unremarkable. Intravenous steroids were initiated, and her symptoms improved significantly. Her aortitis was attributed to inflammation secondary to chronic smoking. Clinical discussion: Aortitis is a rare condition with varied clinical presentations. Etiologies of aortitis include infection and non-infectious inflammation. Diagnosis of aortitis requires a thorough clinical assessment and prompt imaging of the aorta, with computed tomography being the preferred imaging modality. Conclusion: Evaluation for cardiovascular chest pain must extend beyond an electrocardiogram and troponin level. Imaging should be considered in patients with atypical symptoms. Aortitis is a rare but important diagnosis requiring immediate treatment.