Hughes, Timothy M.

Introduction: Stiffening of the aorta is associated with greater pulse pressure and transmission of pulsatile energy into the cerebral circulation, which can increase susceptibility to microvascular damage in the brain. We tested the hypothesis that higher aortic stiffness measured in late-life is associated with a greater prevalence odds of dementia measured ~5 years later. Methods: Dementia-free ARIC-NCS participants (n=4753; mean age: 75 years; 42% male; 21% black) with measures of aortic stiffness at the visit 5 (2011-2013) examination were included. Aortic stiffness was measured by carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) using the VP-1000 Plus device (Omron Co., Japan) and modeled as continuous (per standard deviation (SD)), categorical into distribution-based quartiles, and as elevated vs. non-elevated cfPWV according to the upper 25 th percentile (13.34 m/s). Cognitive status (normal/mild cognitive impairment (MCI)/dementia) was ascertained at the visit 5 and 6 (2016-2017) examinations with expert review by an adjudication committee of in-person cognitive testing. A multivariable logistic regression model estimated the adjusted association of cfPWV with 5-year odds of dementia. Results: Among dementia-free participants, a 1 SD higher cfPWV was associated with a greater odds of dementia (Odds Ratio (OR): 1.19 (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.03, 1.39). Elevated cfPWV (upper 25 th percentile) was also associated with a greater odds of dementia (OR: 1.54, 95% CI: 1.08, 2.19) in this sample. This association was stronger among participants who were cognitively normal at visit 5 (n=3758, Table): the multivariable-adjusted OR of dementia = 2.16 (95% CI: 1.35, 3.47) for elevated vs. non-elevated cfPWV. The risk of dementia among those with baseline MCI (n=955) was not associated with cfPWV levels. Results were robust to adjustment for vascular risk factors. Conclusions: Among older adults, especially when MCI is not present, greater central aortic stiffness is associated with dementia risk.

Background: Cerebrovascular disease is often the consequence of cardiac disease. Our aim was to examine associations of biomarkers of cardiovascular disease, high sensitivity troponin T (hs-cTnT), NT-proBNP, and galectin-3, with cerebrovascular signs: lacunar infarcts, lobar and subcortical microhemorrhages, cortical infarcts, and white matter hyperintensity (WMH) volume. We also examined total cortical and Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) signature region volumes. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 1748 ARIC participants from the 2011-2013 exam who had biomarker measurements, completed a brain MRI, and did not have a clinical history of stroke. We used linear regression to model brain volumes, modeled as Z scores, and logistic regression for all other outcomes; biomarkers were log transformed. We repeated analyses excluding persons with coronary heart disease, atrial fibrillation, and heart failure. Results: The mean age of participants was 76, 62% were female, and 21% were Black. All biomarkers were associated with total cortical volume. Each standard deviation increase in log hs-cTnT was associated with lower total cortical volume (adjusted beta = -0.08, 95% CI: -0.12, -0.05); results for the other biomarkers were similar (Figure). All biomarkers were associated with lobar microhemorrhages. Hs-cTnT and NT-proBNP were associated with WMH volume, but galectin-3 was not. No biomarker was associated with subcortical microhemorrhages or cortical infarcts. Results were similar in persons without coronary heart disease, atrial fibrillation, or heart failure (conditions associated with cerebral thromboembolism). Conclusions: In persons free of clinical cardiovascular disease, biomarkers of cardiac stretch, strain, and fibrosis were associated cerebral small vessel disease and reduced cortical volume, but not in a specific pattern suggestive of AD pathogenesis. This suggests subclinical vascular insults affect brain structure through mixed pathogenic processes.

Abstract White matter hyperintensities (WMHs) are frequently seen on brain magnetic resonance imaging scans of older people. Usually interpreted clinically as a surrogate for cerebral small vessel disease, WMHs are associated with increased likelihood of cognitive impairment and dementia (including Alzheimer's disease [AD]). WMHs are also seen in cognitively healthy people. In this collaboration of academic, clinical, and pharmaceutical industry perspectives, we identify outstanding questions about WMHs and their relation to cognition, dementia, and AD. What molecular and cellular changes underlie WMHs? What are the neuropathological correlates of WMHs? To what extent are demyelination and inflammation present? Is it helpful to subdivide into periventricular and subcortical WMHs? What do WMHs signify in people diagnosed with AD? What are the risk factors for developing WMHs? What preventive and therapeutic strategies target WMHs? Answering these questions will improve prevention and treatment of WMHs and dementia.

Abstract Increasing evidence recognizes Alzheimer's disease (AD) as a multifactorial and heterogeneous disease with multiple contributors to its pathophysiology, including vascular dysfunction. The recently updated AD Research Framework put forth by the National Institute on Aging–Alzheimer's Association describes a biomarker‐based pathologic definition of AD focused on amyloid, tau, and neuronal injury. In response to this article, here we first discussed evidence that vascular dysfunction is an important early event in AD pathophysiology. Next, we examined various imaging sequences that could be easily implemented to evaluate different types of vascular dysfunction associated with, and/or contributing to, AD pathophysiology, including changes in blood‐brain barrier integrity and cerebral blood flow. Vascular imaging biomarkers of small vessel disease of the brain, which is responsible for >50% of dementia worldwide, including AD, are already established, well characterized, and easy to recognize. We suggest that these vascular biomarkers should be incorporated into the AD Research Framework to gain a better understanding of AD pathophysiology and aid in treatment efforts.

Background: Although inflammation has been implicated in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease, the effects of systemic inflammation on brain amyloid deposition remain unclear. Objective: We examined the association of midlife and late-life systemic inflammation with late-life brain amyloid levels in a community sample of non-demented older adults from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) – PET Study. Methods: 339 non-demented participants (age: 75 [SD 5]) were recruited from the ARIC Study to undergo florbetapir PET (amyloid) imaging. Blood levels of high sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP), a marker of systemic inflammation, were measured 22 years (Visit 2), 16 years (Visit 4), and up to 2 years before PET imaging (Visit 5). Elevated brain amyloid deposition (standardized uptake value ratio >1.2) was the primary outcome. Results: Our primary analyses found no association of midlife and late-life CRP with late-life brain amyloid levels. However, in secondary stratified analyses, we found that higher midlife (Visit 2) CRP was associated with elevated amyloid among males (OR 1.65, 95% CI: 1.13–2.42), and among white (OR 1.33, 95% CI: 1.02–1.75), but not African American, participants ( p-interactions<0.05). Among male participants, those who maintained high CRP levels (≥3 mg/L) throughout mid- and late-life were most likely to have elevated brain amyloid (OR, 8.81; 95% CI: 1.23, 62.91). Conclusions: Although our primary analysis does not support an association between systemic inflammation and brain amyloid deposition, we found evidence for sex- and race-dependent associations. However, findings from subgroup analyses should be interpreted with caution.