Ryan, J.

AbstractIntroductionEmerging medical technology has allowed for monitoring of heart rhythm abnormalities using smartphone compatible devices. The safety and utility of such devices have not been established in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). We sought to assess the safety and compatibility of the Food and Drug Administration‐approved AliveCor Kardia device in patients with CIEDs.Methods and ResultsWe prospectively recruited patients with CIED for a Kardia recording during their routine device interrogation. A recording was obtained in paced and nonpaced states. Adverse clinical events were noted at the time of recording. Electrograms (EGMs) from the cardiac device were obtained at the time of recording to assess for any electromagnetic interference (EMI) introduced by Kardia. Recordings were analyzed for quality and given a score of 3 (interpretable rhythm, no noise), 2 (interpretable rhythm, significant noise) or 1 (uninterpretable). A total of 251 patients were recruited (59% with a pacemaker and 41% with ICD). There were no adverse clinical events noted at the time of recording and no changes to CIED settings. Review of all EGMs revealed no EMI introduced by Kardia. Recordings were correctly interpreted in 90% of paced recordings (183 had a score of 3, 43 of 2, and 25 of 1) and 94.7% of nonpaced recordings (147 of 3, 15 of 2, and 9 of 1).ConclusionThe AliveCor Kardia device has an excellent safety profile when used in conjunction with most CIEDs. The quality of recordings was preserved in this population. The device, therefore, can be considered for heart rhythm monitoring in patients with CIEDs.

AbstractBackgroundLeadless cardiac pacing (LCP) has emerged as a new modality for permanent pacing. We sought to describe comparative outcomes between LCP and transvenous pacemakers.MethodsPatients receiving LCP (Micra [Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA] and Nanostim [St. Jude Medical/Abbott Laboratories, Chicago, IL, USA]) between 2014 and 2017 at the Mayo Clinic Heart Rhythm Enterprise practice (Rochester, MN, USA; Jacksonville, FL, USA; and Scottsdale, AZ, USA) were identified. We identified 1:1 age‐ and sex‐matched controls receiving single‐chamber transvenous ventricular pacemakers (TVP). Statistical analyses were performed with JMP 13.0.0 (SAS, Institute Cary, NC, USA).ResultsNinety patients underwent LCP implantation (73 Micra and 17 Nanostim) with a median follow‐up duration of 62 (interquartile range 28‐169) days. Both groups had 100% successful device implant rates. There were no differences in procedure‐related major (0% vs 1%) or minor complications (8% vs 3%) in the LCP versus TVP groups (P > 0.05). Excluding Nanostim patients, there was a lower rate of device‐related revision or extraction in the Micra versus TVP groups (0% vs 5%, P = 0.028). Device endocarditis was more common in the TVP group (0% vs 3%, P = 0.04). Estimated longevity was greater for the LCP group (median 12.0 vs 10.0 years, P < 0.0001). An increase in severity of tricuspid valve regurgitation (TR) by ≥2 grades occurred in none of the LCP patients, and in 19% of the TVP patients (P = 0.017).ConclusionThere are no significant differences in procedural complications among patients receiving LCP versus TVP. The Micra group had lower rates of device‐related revision/extraction compared to the TVP group. Patients with leadless pacemaker were less likely to develop endocarditis or worsening TR.

AbstractBackgroundTransthoracic impedance measurements (TIM) is primarily used for minute ventilation rate adaptive sensors in pacemakers. With elevated impedance, the TIM electrical signal itself is oversensed, causing device malfunction.ObjectiveWe report an increased incidence of TIM oversensing.MethodRetrospective chart review. We review existing records of 18 patients who have demonstrated device malfunction with TIM oversensing.ResultsWe have found a 1.8% incidence of TIM‐related oversensing in our patient population of 959 patients with contemporary Boston Scientific (Marlborough, MA, USA) pacemakers and cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemakers. One patient experienced a syncopal episode.ConclusionOversensing with pacing inhibition is apparent with the potential of adverse effects to patients.

To address the role of atrial natriuretic factor (ANF) in hypothyroidism in the control of cardiorenal-endocrine function during volume loading, the relationships between atrial pressure, ANF, the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, and renal hemodynamic and excretory function were examined during and after acute 10% body wt saline volume infusion in pentobarbital-anesthetized hypothyroid dogs (n = 8). Hormonal changes before and after thyroidectomy were also evaluated. Four to 6 wk after thyroidectomy, ANF decreased and arginine vasopressin (AVP) and plasma renin activity (PRA) increased. Acute saline volume expansion caused an increase in ANF and decreases in AVP and PRA. Atrial pressure increased throughout volume expansion. Despite the absence of an increase in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) during volume expansion, urinary sodium excretion increased due to a marked rise in fractional excretion of sodium. These studies demonstrate that in hypothyroidism 1) ANF is decreased; 2) despite the decrease in basal ANF, increases in atrial pressure can stimulate relase of ANF; 3) despite the absence of an increase in GFR during volume expansion, fractional excretion of sodium increases associated with an increase in ANF; and 4) a lack of an increase in GFR during volume expansion is not related to an inability to increase ANF.