Rajendran, Kishore

PurposePhoton‐counting‐detector‐computed tomography (PCD‐CT) allows separation of multiple, simultaneously imaged contrast agents, such as iodine (I), gadolinium (Gd), and bismuth (Bi). However, PCDs suffer from several technical limitations such as charge sharing, K‐edge escape, and pulse pile‐up, which compromise spectral separation of multi‐energy data and degrade multi‐contrast imaging performance. The purpose of this work was to determine the performance of a dual‐source (DS) PCD‐CT relative to a single‐source (SS) PCD‐CT for the separation of simultaneously imaged I, Gd, and Bi contrast agents.MethodsPhantom experiments were performed using a research whole‐body PCD‐CT and head/abdomen‐sized phantoms containing vials of different I, Gd, Bi concentrations. To emulate a DS‐PCD‐CT, the phantoms were scanned twice on the SS‐PCD‐CT using different tube potentials for each scan. A tube potential of 80 kV (energy thresholds = 25/50 keV) was used for low‐energy tube, while the high‐energy tube used Sn140 kV (Sn indicates tin filter) and thresholds of 25/90 keV. The same phantoms were scanned also on the SS‐PCD‐CT using the chess acquisition mode. In chess mode, the 4 × 4 subpixels within a macro detector pixel are split into two sets based on a chess‐board pattern. With each subpixel set having two energy thresholds, chess mode allows four energy‐bin data sets, which permits simultaneous multi‐contrast imaging. Because of this design, only 50% area of each detector pixel is configured to receive photons of a pre‐defined threshold, leading to 50% dose utilization efficiency. To compensate for this dose inefficiency, the radiation dose for this scan was doubled compared to DS‐PCD‐CT. A 140 kV tube potential and thresholds = 25/50/75/90 keV were used. These settings were determined based on the K‐edges of Gd, and Bi, and were found to yield good differentiation of I/Gd/Bi based on phantom experiments and other literature. The energy‐bin images obtained from each scan (scan pair) were used to generate I‐, Gd‐, Bi‐specific image via material decomposition. Root‐mean‐square‐error (RMSE) between the known and measured concentrations was calculated for each scenario. A 20‐cm water cylinder phantom was scanned on both systems, which was used for evaluating the magnitude of noise, and noise power spectra (NPS) of I/Gd/Bi‐specific images.ResultsPhantom results showed that DS‐PCD‐CT reduced noise in material‐specific images for both head and body phantoms compared to SS‐PCD‐CT. The noise level of SS‐PCD was reduced from 2.55 to 0.90 mg/mL (I), 1.97 to 0.78 mg/mL (Gd), and 0.85 to 0.74 mg/mL (Bi) using DS‐PCD. NPS analysis showed that the noise texture of images acquired on both systems is similar. For the body phantom, the RMSE for SS‐PCD‐CT was reduced relative to DS‐PCD‐CT from 10.52 to 2.76 mg/mL (I), 7.90 to 2.01 mg/mL (Gd), and 1.91 to 1.16 mg/mL (Bi). A similar trend was observed for the head phantom: RMSE reduced from 2.59 (SS‐PCD) to 0.72 (DS‐PCD) mg/mL (I), 2.02 to 0.58 mg/mL (Gd), and 0.85 to 0.57 mg/mL (Bi).ConclusionWe demonstrate the feasibility of performing simultaneous imaging of I, Gd, and Bi materials on DS‐PCD‐CT. Under the condition without cross scattering, DS‐PCD reduced the RMSE for quantification of material concentration in relative to a SS‐PCD‐CT system using chess mode.

Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate if a high-resolution photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCD-CT) system with a 1024×1024 matrix reconstruction can improve the visualization of fine structures in the lungs compared with conventional high-resolution CT (HRCT). Materials and Methods Twenty-two adult patients referred for clinical chest HRCT (mean CTDI vol, 13.58 mGy) underwent additional dose-matched PCD-CT (mean volume CT dose index, 13.37 mGy) after written informed consent. Computed tomography images were reconstructed at a slice thickness of 1.5 mm and an image increment of 1 mm with our routine HRCT reconstruction kernels (B46 and Bv49) at 512 and 1024 matrix sizes for conventional energy-integrating detector (EID) CT scans. For PCD-CT, routine B46 kernel and an additional sharp kernel (Q65, unavailable for EID) images were reconstructed at 1024 matrix size. Two thoracic radiologists compared images from EID and PCD-CT noting the highest level bronchus clearly identified in each lobe of the right lung, and rating bronchial wall conspicuity of third- and fourth-order bronchi. Lung nodules were also compared with the B46/EID/512 images using a 5-point Likert scale. Statistical analysis was performed using a Wilcoxon signed rank test with a P < 0.05 considered significant. Results Compared with B46/EID/512, readers detected higher-order bronchi using B46/PCD/1024 and Q65/PCD/1024 images for every lung lobe (P < 0.0015), but in only the right middle lobe for B46/EID/1024 (P = 0.007). Readers were able to better identify bronchial walls of the third- and fourth-order bronchi better using the Q65/PCD/1024 images (mean Likert scores of 1.1 and 1.5), which was significantly higher compared with B46/EID/1024 or B46/PCD/1024 images (mean difference, 0.8; P < 0.0001). The Q65/PCD/1024 images had a mean nodule score of 1 ± 1.3 for reader 1, and −0.1 (0.9) for reader 2, with one reader having improved nodule evaluation scores for both PCD kernels (P < 0.001), and the other reader not identifying any increased advantage over B46/EID/1024 (P = 1.0). Conclusions High-resolution lung PCD-CT with 1024 image matrix reconstruction increased radiologists' ability to visualize higher-order bronchi and bronchial walls without compromising nodule evaluation compared with current chest CT, creating an opportunity for radiologists to better evaluate airway pathology.

Objective The aims of this study were to quantitatively assess two new scan modes on a photon-counting detector computed tomography system, each designed to maximize spatial resolution, and to qualitatively demonstrate potential clinical impact using patient data. Materials and Methods This Health Insurance Portability Act–compliant study was approved by our institutional review board. Two high–spatial-resolution scan modes (Sharp and UHR) were evaluated using phantoms to quantify spatial resolution and image noise, and results were compared with the standard mode (Macro). Patients were scanned using a conventional energy-integrating detector scanner and the photon-counting detector scanner using the same radiation dose. In first patient images, anatomic details were qualitatively evaluated to demonstrate potential clinical impact. Results Sharp and UHR modes had a 69% and 87% improvement in in-plane spatial resolution, respectively, compared with Macro mode (10% modulation-translation-function values of 16.05, 17.69, and 9.48 lp/cm, respectively). The cutoff spatial frequency of the UHR mode (32.4 lp/cm) corresponded to a limiting spatial resolution of 150 μm. The full-width-at-half-maximum values of the section sensitivity profiles were 0.41, 0.44, and 0.67 mm for the thinnest image thickness for each mode (0.25, 0.25, and 0.5 mm, respectively). At the same in-plane spatial resolution, Sharp and UHR images had up to 15% lower noise than Macro images. Patient images acquired in Sharp mode demonstrated better delineation of fine anatomic structures compared with Macro mode images. Conclusions Phantom studies demonstrated superior resolution and noise properties for the Sharp and UHR modes relative to the standard Macro mode and patient images demonstrated the potential benefit of these scan modes for clinical practice.