Introduction: Risk of lobar and non-lobar intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) varies among blacks, whites and Hispanics. We sought to determine whether these differences could be due to variability in the effects of Apolipoprotein E (APOE) epsilon (ε) alleles, the most potent genetic risk factor for ICH. Methods: Primary ICH cases and controls were collected from US and European sites contributing to the International Stroke Genetic Consortium (ISGC). We meta-analyzed the effects of APOE allele status on ICH risk applying a two-stage clustering approach based on race/ethnicity and the contributing study. Models were adjusted for age, sex, history of hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, warfarin, statin and antiplatelet use, smoking and alcohol use. A propensity score analysis was used to model the influence of APOE against the burden of hypertension across races/ethnicities. Results: 13,124 subjects (54.5% male, median age 66 years) were included. In whites, APOE ε2 (odds ratio (OR)=1.85, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.27-2.69, p<0.001) and APOE ε4 (OR=1.94, 95% CI=1.58-2.38, p<0.001) were independently associated with lobar ICH risk, however within self-identified Hispanics and blacks, no associations were found (Figure). After propensity score-matching for hypertension burden, APOE ε4 was associated with lobar ICH risk among whites (OR=1.12, 95% CI=1.08-1.17) and Hispanics (OR=1.07, 95% CI=1.01-1.15, p=0.01), but not blacks (OR=1.02 95% CI=0.98-1.07, p=0.251). APOE ε2 and ε4 did not show an effect on non-lobar ICH risk in any race/ethnicity. Conclusion: APOE ε4 and ε2 alleles affect lobar ICH risk variably by race and ethnicity. Associations are confirmed in whites but can be shown in Hispanics only when the excess burden of hypertension is propensity score-matched. Further studies are needed to explore interactions between APOE alleles and environmental exposures that vary by race and ethnicity in representative populations at risk for ICH.
Vascular dysfunction—The disregarded partner of Alzheimer's disease
Abstract Increasing evidence recognizes Alzheimer's disease (AD) as a multifactorial and heterogeneous disease with multiple contributors to its pathophysiology, including vascular dysfunction. The recently updated AD Research Framework put forth by the National Institute on Aging–Alzheimer's Association describes a biomarker‐based pathologic definition of AD focused on amyloid, tau, and neuronal injury. In response to this article, here we first discussed evidence that vascular dysfunction is an important early event in AD pathophysiology. Next, we examined various imaging sequences that could be easily implemented to evaluate different types of vascular dysfunction associated with, and/or contributing to, AD pathophysiology, including changes in blood‐brain barrier integrity and cerebral blood flow. Vascular imaging biomarkers of small vessel disease of the brain, which is responsible for >50% of dementia worldwide, including AD, are already established, well characterized, and easy to recognize. We suggest that these vascular biomarkers should be incorporated into the AD Research Framework to gain a better understanding of AD pathophysiology and aid in treatment efforts.
Synopsis of Guidelines for the Clinical Management of Cerebral Cavernous Malformations: Consensus Recommendations Based on Systematic Literature Review by the Angioma Alliance Scientific Advisory Board Clinical Experts Panel
Abstract BACKGROUND: Despite many publications about cerebral cavernous malformations (CCMs), controversy remains regarding diagnostic and management strategies. OBJECTIVE: To develop guidelines for CCM management. METHODS: The Angioma Alliance (www.angioma.org), the patient support group in the United States advocating on behalf of patients and research in CCM, convened a multidisciplinary writing group comprising expert CCM clinicians to help summarize the existing literature related to the clinical care of CCM, focusing on 5 topics: (1) epidemiology and natural history, (2) genetic testing and counseling, (3) diagnostic criteria and radiology standards, (4) neurosurgical considerations, and (5) neurological considerations. The group reviewed literature, rated evidence, developed recommendations, and established consensus, controversies, and knowledge gaps according to a prespecified protocol. RESULTS: Of 1270 publications published between January 1, 1983 and September 31, 2014, we selected 98 based on methodological criteria, and identified 38 additional recent or relevant publications. Topic authors used these publications to summarize current knowledge and arrive at 23 consensus management recommendations, which we rated by class (size of effect) and level (estimate of certainty) according to the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association criteria. No recommendation was level A (because of the absence of randomized controlled trials), 11 (48%) were level B, and 12 (52%) were level C. Recommendations were class I in 8 (35%), class II in 10 (43%), and class III in 5 (22%). CONCLUSION: Current evidence supports recommendations for the management of CCM, but their generally low levels and classes mandate further research to better inform clinical practice and update these recommendations. The complete recommendations document, including the criteria for selecting reference citations, a more detailed justification of the respective recommendations, and a summary of controversies and knowledge gaps, was similarly peer reviewed and is available on line www.angioma.org/CCMGuidelines.
Genetic variants in CETP increase risk of intracerebral hemorrhage
ObjectiveIn observational epidemiologic studies, higher plasma high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL‐C) has been associated with increased risk of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). DNA sequence variants that decrease cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) gene activity increase plasma HDL‐C; as such, medicines that inhibit CETP and raise HDL‐C are in clinical development. Here, we test the hypothesis that CETP DNA sequence variants associated with higher HDL‐C also increase risk for ICH.MethodsWe performed 2 candidate‐gene analyses of CETP. First, we tested individual CETP variants in a discovery cohort of 1,149 ICH cases and 1,238 controls from 3 studies, followed by replication in 1,625 cases and 1,845 controls from 5 studies. Second, we constructed a genetic risk score comprised of 7 independent variants at the CETP locus and tested this score for association with HDL‐C as well as ICH risk.ResultsTwelve variants within CETP demonstrated nominal association with ICH, with the strongest association at the rs173539 locus (odds ratio [OR] = 1.25, standard error [SE] = 0.06, p = 6.0 × 10−4) with no heterogeneity across studies (I2 = 0%). This association was replicated in patients of European ancestry (p = 0.03). A genetic score of CETP variants found to increase HDL‐C by ∼2.85mg/dl in the Global Lipids Genetics Consortium was strongly associated with ICH risk (OR = 1.86, SE = 0.13, p = 1.39 × 10−6).InterpretationGenetic variants in CETP associated with increased HDL‐C raise the risk of ICH. Given ongoing therapeutic development in CETP inhibition and other HDL‐raising strategies, further exploration of potential adverse cerebrovascular outcomes may be warranted. Ann Neurol 2016;80:730–740