Moomaw, Charles J.

Background Meeting Recruitment goals in a research study can be challenging. Recruitment for pedigree-based research, in which data and DNA are collected from genetically important family members, is especially difficult. The Familial Intracranial Aneurysm (FIA) study is a multicenter international study whose goal is to identify genetic and other risk factors for the formation and rupture of intracranial aneurysms (IAs). The chosen sites for the study are major referral centers for the diagnosis and treatment of IAs. In this analysis, we sought to determine what factors caused a recruited family to be incomplete, and what impact the methods used in identifying families had on the successful completion of family enrollment. Methods Three recruitment strategies were utilized to identify and enroll families: prospective monitoring of every new case of IA, subarachnoid hemorrhage, or intracranial hemorrhage; retrospective review of IA cases; and advertisement on the Internet, in scientific journals, and at professional meetings. An unexpected additional source of recruitment was exposure to the study through the news media. To help with public accessibility to the study, a web site and toll free number were established. Families were eligible for the study if they fit one of 4 patterns: [1] ≥2 living siblings affected with IA; [2] ≥2 affected siblings, 1 living and 1 genotype reconstructed from living spouse and children; [3] ≥3 affected members, 2 living and 1 reconstructed; [4] ≥ 3 affected members, 1 living, ≥1 reconstructed, and ≥1 living connecting relative. Exclusion criteria included fusiform-shaped IA; IA part of an AVM; family history of polycystic kidney disease; Ehlers-Danlos, Marfan, or moyamoya syndrome; fibromuscular dysplasia; or failure to obtain informed consent. Results Between 8/2002 and 10/2007, 3771 IA patients were screened for family history, and 681 potential families were identified, of which 441 successfully completed enrollment. There were 240 families which did not complete enrollment, due to refusal to participate (97), inability to locate needed relatives (87), exclusion criteria (50), no reason documented (5), and duplication (1 recruited at two sites). Completion of study enrollment was not significantly different by recruitment category (p=.17): 191 of 311 prospectively-recruited (61%), 66 of 89 retrospective (74%), 95 of 145 advertisement (66%), and 89 of 136 methods not documented (65%) families successfully completed enrollment. Conclusion In our study, the major reason for family exclusion was the inability to enroll needed family members, through refusal or failure to locate. All three methods used to identify potential families were successful in completing eligible families. The combination of recruitment strategies can be effectively implemented in future studies.

Introduction: Low rates of enrollment into stroke clinical trials are an ongoing challenge for the stroke research community. We sought to retrospectively describe the association between medical eligibility and recruitment rates for two acute clinical trials. Methods: Within a population of 1.3 million, we screened local hospital admissions in 2010 using ICD-9 discharge codes 430-436, and performed chart review. Within the region are 15 adult acute care hospitals, all of which are covered by the same stroke team for clinical care and trial enrollment. Medical eligibility, the number of eligible patients/total number of patients, was calculated for the IMS-III trial and the CLEAR-ER trials using their inclusion/exclusion criteria. The number of patients enrolled in the trial per month of open enrollment was determined for each hospital. Statistical analysis included paired signed rank test and regression. Results: In 2010, 2035 ischemic strokes (IS) were hospitalized in the region. Regional medical eligibility was 1.7% for IMS III and 4.5% for CLEARER (p=0.001), overall regional hospital enrollment/month was 0.81 for IMS III and 1.84 for CLEAR-ER (p=0.001). Eligibility rates per hospital ranged from 0-9.5%, and recruitment rates per hospital/mo ranged from 0-0.38. Hospital-level eligibility and recruitment rates were significantly correlated (see figure for both trials combined, adjusted r2 = 0.57, p<0.001.) Discussion: Within our population, medical eligibility explained 57% of the variability in hospital-level enrollment rates for two acute IS trials. The use of population-based epidemiology in trial planning may identify optimal trial enrollment criteria, which must be weighed against proper patient selection. Many other factors impact enrollment rates, such as competing trials, which were not considered here. Further evaluation of our population-based eligibility rates in sites outside our region and with additional clinical trials is needed.

Introduction: Risk of lobar and non-lobar intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) varies among blacks, whites and Hispanics. We sought to determine whether these differences could be due to variability in the effects of Apolipoprotein E (APOE) epsilon (ε) alleles, the most potent genetic risk factor for ICH. Methods: Primary ICH cases and controls were collected from US and European sites contributing to the International Stroke Genetic Consortium (ISGC). We meta-analyzed the effects of APOE allele status on ICH risk applying a two-stage clustering approach based on race/ethnicity and the contributing study. Models were adjusted for age, sex, history of hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, warfarin, statin and antiplatelet use, smoking and alcohol use. A propensity score analysis was used to model the influence of APOE against the burden of hypertension across races/ethnicities. Results: 13,124 subjects (54.5% male, median age 66 years) were included. In whites, APOE ε2 (odds ratio (OR)=1.85, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.27-2.69, p<0.001) and APOE ε4 (OR=1.94, 95% CI=1.58-2.38, p<0.001) were independently associated with lobar ICH risk, however within self-identified Hispanics and blacks, no associations were found (Figure). After propensity score-matching for hypertension burden, APOE ε4 was associated with lobar ICH risk among whites (OR=1.12, 95% CI=1.08-1.17) and Hispanics (OR=1.07, 95% CI=1.01-1.15, p=0.01), but not blacks (OR=1.02 95% CI=0.98-1.07, p=0.251). APOE ε2 and ε4 did not show an effect on non-lobar ICH risk in any race/ethnicity. Conclusion: APOE ε4 and ε2 alleles affect lobar ICH risk variably by race and ethnicity. Associations are confirmed in whites but can be shown in Hispanics only when the excess burden of hypertension is propensity score-matched. Further studies are needed to explore interactions between APOE alleles and environmental exposures that vary by race and ethnicity in representative populations at risk for ICH.

Background and Purpose— Previous studies have suggested that family members with intracranial aneurysms (IAs) often harbor IAs in similar anatomic locations. IA location is important because of its association with rupture. We tested the hypothesis that anatomic susceptibility to IA location exists using a family-based IA study. Methods— We identified all affected probands and first-degree relatives (FDRs) with a definite or probable phenotype in each family. We stratified each IA of the probands by major arterial territory and calculated each family’s proband-FDR territory concordance and overall contribution to the concordance analysis. We then matched each family unit to an unrelated family unit selected randomly with replacement and performed 1001 simulations. The median concordance proportions, odds ratios (ORs), and P values from the 1001 logistic regression analyses were used to represent the final results of the analysis. Results— There were 323 family units available for analysis, including 323 probands and 448 FDRs, with a total of 1176 IAs. IA territorial concordance was higher in the internal carotid artery (55.4% versus 45.6%; OR, 1.54 [1.04–2.27]; P =0.032), middle cerebral artery (45.8% versus 30.5%; OR, 1.99 [1.22–3.22]; P =0.006), and vertebrobasilar system (26.6% versus 11.3%; OR, 2.90 [1.05–8.24], P =0.04) distributions in the true family compared with the comparison family. Concordance was also higher when any location was considered (53.0% versus 40.7%; OR, 1.82 [1.34–2.46]; P <0.001). Conclusions— In a highly enriched sample with familial predisposition to IA development, we found that IA territorial concordance was higher when probands were compared with their own affected FDRs than with comparison FDRs, which suggests that anatomic vulnerability to IA formation exists. Future studies of IA genetics should consider stratifying cases by IA location.

Background Higher mortality for patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage has been reported. Aims In families with intracranial aneurysms, we sought to determine whether mortality among subjects with intracranial aneurysm (affected) was higher and related to rupture, compared with unaffected family members. Methods Subjects enrolled in the Familial Intracranial Aneurysm protocol were contacted yearly and their status was obtained. If reported to be deceased, the cause of death was verified by available records. A Cox proportional hazards model was utilized to compare mortality rates. Results Of the 2794 subjects, 1073 were affected and 1721 were unaffected. There were 8525 person-years of follow-up (mean 3·05 ± 1·73 years) and 85 deaths. Age at study entry for the affected (58·4 ±11·9 years) was significantly older ( P < 0·0001) than for the unaffected (52·2 ± 16·1). After adjusting for age, the overall mortality rate for the affected subjects was not significantly different from that for the unaffected (Rate Ratio [RR] 1·26, 95% confidence interval 0·82–1·93, P = 0·292). There was a strong effect modification due to age. The mortality rate ratio of the affected to the unaffected who were ≤60 years of age was RR = 3·48 (95% confidence interval: 1·59–7·63, P = 0·002), the rate for the affected subjects who were ≥60 was less than the rate for the unaffected (RR = 0·69, 95% confidence interval: 0·404–1·19, P = 0·178). The affected who had ruptures had 2·62 times the mortality rate as those without ruptures (95% confidence interval 1·43–4·80, P = 0·002). Conclusion The overall mortality was similar for the affected and unaffected subjects in this cohort. Among the affected only, those with ruptured intracranial aneurysm had a higher mortality rate than those without ruptured.

Object Familial predisposition is a recognized nonmodifiable risk factor for the formation and rupture of intracranial aneurysms (IAs). However, data regarding the characteristics of familial IAs are limited. The authors sought to describe familial IAs more fully, and to compare their characteristics with a large cohort of nonfamilial IAs. Methods The Familial Intracranial Aneurysm (FIA) study is a multicenter international study with the goal of identifying genetic and other risk factors for formation and rupture of IAs in a highly enriched population. The authors compared the FIA study cohort with the International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms (ISUIA) cohort with regard to patient demographic data, IA location, and IA multiplicity. To improve comparability, all patients in the ISUIA who had a family history of IAs or subarachnoid hemorrhage were excluded, as well as all patients in both cohorts who had a ruptured IA prior to study entry. Results Of 983 patients enrolled in the FIA study with definite or probable IAs, 511 met the inclusion criteria for this analysis. Of the 4059 patients in the ISUIA study, 983 had a previous IA rupture and 657 of the remainder had a positive family history, leaving 2419 individuals in the analysis. Multiplicity was more common in the FIA patients (35.6% vs 27.9%, p < 0.001). The FIA patients had a higher proportion of IAs located in the middle cerebral artery (28.6% vs 24.9%), whereas ISUIA patients had a higher proportion of posterior communicating artery IAs (13.7% vs 8.2%, p = 0.016). Conclusions Heritable structural vulnerability may account for differences in IA multiplicity and location. Important investigations into the underlying genetic mechanisms of IA formation are ongoing.

Background and Purpose— The purpose of this study was to replicate the previous association of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with risk of intracranial aneurysm (IA) and to examine the relationship of smoking with these variants and the risk of IA. Methods— White probands with an IA from families with multiple affected members were identified by 26 clinical centers located throughout North America, New Zealand, and Australia. White control subjects free of stroke and IA were selected by random digit dialing from the Greater Cincinnati population. SNPs previously associated with IA on chromosomes 2, 8, and 9 were genotyped using a TaqMan assay or were included in the Affymetrix 6.0 array that was part of a genomewide association study of 406 IA cases and 392 control subjects. Logistic regression modeling tested whether the association of replicated SNPs with IA was modulated by smoking. Results— The strongest evidence of association with IA was found with the 8q SNP rs10958409 (genotypic P =9.2×10 −5 ; allelic P =1.3×10 −5 ; OR=1.86, 95% CI: 1.40 to 2.47). We also replicated the association with both SNPs on chromosome 9p, rs1333040 and rs10757278, but were not able to replicate the previously reported association of the 2 SNPs on chromosome 2q. Statistical testing showed a multiplicative relationship between the risk alleles and smoking with regard to the risk of IA. Conclusion— Our data provide complementary evidence that the variants on chromosomes 8q and 9p are associated with IA and that the risk of IA in patients with these variants is greatly increased with cigarette smoking.

Background and Purpose— Risk for both intracranial aneurysms (IAs) and aortic aneurysms (AAs) is thought to be heritable with mounting evidence for genetic predisposition. The concept of shared risk for these conditions is challenged by differences in age of diagnosis and demographic characteristics. We performed a genomewide linkage analysis in multiplex families with both IA and AA from the Familial Intracranial Aneurysm study. Methods— Available medical records of subjects who reported IA or abdominal/thoracic AA were reviewed with adjudication as definite/probable, possible, or not a case. To identify genes contributing to the susceptibility for IA and AA, genomewide linkage analysis was performed in the 26 multiplex IA families who had members who also had thoracic or abdominal AA. Individuals (n=91) were defined as affected if they had an IA (definite/probable) or an aortic or thoracic AA (definite/probable). Results— Maximum logarithm of odds (LOD) scores were found on chromosomes 11 (144 cM; LOD=3.0) and 6 (33 cM; LOD=2.3). In both chromosomal regions, analyses of these same 26 families considering only IA as the disease phenotype produced LOD scores of 1.8 and 1.6, respectively. Conclusions— Our linkage analysis in these 26 families using the broadest disease phenotype, including IA, abdominal AA, and thoracic AA, supports the concept of shared genetic risk. The chromosome 11 locus appears to confirm earlier independent associations in IA and AA. The chromosome 6 finding is novel. Both warrant further investigation.