Flemming, Kelly

Abstract Background and aims Patient foramen ovale (PFO) is a stroke risk factor evaluated using transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE), transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE), transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD), and cardiac computed tomography (CCT). TCD is non-invasive, but its diagnostic performance relative to other modalities is unclear. We hypothesized that TCD has high sensitivity but low specificity for PFO detection. Methods We conducted an IRB-approved, single-center retrospective study of patients undergoing TCD for right-to-left shunt (RLS) detection between January 2024 and April 2025. Patients were identified from the Neurosonology Laboratory Quality Database. Records were reviewed for demographics, comorbidities, and TTE, TEE, and CCT findings. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated for TCD, TTE, and CCT relative to TEE, the gold standard. The sensitivity and specificity of TCD versus TTE were compared using McNemar test. Results Ninety-two patients were included. Mean age was 52.66 ± 15.78 years, and 51% were female; qualifying events included ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. RLS was detected in 53 patients (57.6%) by TCD, 17 (30%) by TTE, 18 (28.5%) by TEE, and 3 (21%) by CCT. TCD demonstrated 94% sensitivity and 53% specificity, (PPV 66%, NPV 89%). TTE showed 50% sensitivity and 82% specificity (PPV: 75%, NPV 61%), while CCT showed 33% sensitivity and 100% specificity (PPV 100%, NPV 33.3%). TCD had significantly higher sensitivity than TTE for RLS detection (p=0.039) with a non-significant difference in specificity (p=0.062), using TEE as the reference. Conclusions TCD has high sensitivity for RLS detection in patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. Conflict of interest Rachel Knopp: nothing to disclose; Kelly Flemming: nothing to disclose; Eugene Scharf: nothing to disclose; Zafer Keser: nothing to disclose; Jessica Prink: nothing to disclose; Shari Johnson: nothing to disclose; Guy Reeder: nothing to disclose; Robert Brown: nothing to disclose; William Harmsen: nothing to disclose; Muhib Khan: nothing to disclose Table 1 - belongs to Results

Importance Annual rates of first intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) from unruptured brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are often quoted as 2% to 4% in clinical practice. Precise estimates and risk factors are unavailable to inform treatment decisions. Objective To provide estimates of rates and risk factors for first ICH in a large cohort study of unruptured brain AVMs. Design, Setting, and Participants The Multicenter Arteriovenous Malformation Research Study (MARS) included data from 9 cohorts, each contributing 100 or more unruptured brain AVMs. The study was conducted from 2017 to 2023 with retrospective and prospective data collection for existing cohorts and/or new recruitment. This was an international study (2 population-based and 7 referral-based cohorts) that included participants diagnosed with an unruptured brain AVM. Exposures Demographic, clinical, and angiographic characteristics. Main Outcome and Measure The primary outcome was time to first ICH after diagnosis of unruptured brain AVM. Data were collected using standardized definitions; missing data were imputed. Cox regression analysis was performed, censoring at first brain AVM treatment, death, or last visit, and allowing baseline hazards to vary by cohort. Results A total of 3225 individuals were eligible for participation in this study. After 195 exclusions, 3030 participants (median [IQR] age, 38 [25-50] years; 1524 female [50.3%]) were included. Among 2989 participants with unruptured brain AVMs, 1333 (45%) presented with seizure. The median (IQR) maximal brain AVM diameter was 3.1 (2.2-4.4) cm, 248 of 2466 AVMs (10%) had exclusively deep venous drainage, 297 of 2690 (11%) were in supratentorial deep or cerebellar locations, and 457 of 2440 (19%) had associated arterial aneurysms. First ICH occurred in 159 participants over 11 339 person-years of follow-up for an ICH rate of 1.40 (95% CI, 1.20-1.64) per 100 person-years. Significant independent risk factors included (1) increasing age category at diagnosis (hazard ratio [HR], 0.87; 95% CI, 0.53-1.41 for those aged 20 to 39 years; HR, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.74-2.04 for those aged 40 to 59 years; and HR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.14-3.57 for those aged 60 years vs younger than 20 years; P = .008), (2) presence of associated aneurysms (HR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.06-2.59; P = .03), and (3) cerebellar or supratentorial deep location (HR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.16-3.00; P = .01). Conclusions and Relevance The annual ICH rate from unruptured brain AVM was lower than that commonly cited in clinical practice. Increasing age, associated arterial aneurysms, and cerebellar or supratentorial deep brain AVM location were associated with risk of first ICH. These results may be used to counsel patients about the natural history of unruptured brain AVMs.

BackgroundQuantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) and dynamic contrast‐enhanced quantitative permeability (DCEQP) on magnetic resonance (MR) have been shown to correlate with neurovascular disease progression as markers of vascular leakage and hemosiderin deposition. Applying these techniques as monitoring biomarkers in clinical trials will be necessary; however, their validation across multiple MR platforms and institutions has not been rigorously verified.PurposeTo validate quantitative measurement of MR biomarkers on multiple instruments at different institutions.Study TypePhantom validation between platforms and institutions.Phantom ModelT1/susceptibility phantom, two‐compartment dynamic flow phantom.Field Strength/Sequence3T/QSM, T1 mapping, dynamic 2D SPGR.AssessmentPhilips Ingenia, Siemens Prisma, and Siemens Skyra at three different institutions were assessed. A QSM phantom with concentrations of gadolinium, corresponding to magnetic susceptibilities of 0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, and 0.8 ppm was assayed. DCEQP was assessed by measuring a MultiHance bolus as the consistency of the width ratio of the curves at the input and outputs over a range of flow ratios between outputs.Statistical TestsEach biomarker was assessed by measures of accuracy (Pearson correlation), precision (paired t‐test between repeated measurements), and reproducibility (analysis of covariance [ANCOVA] between instruments).ResultsQSM accuracy of r2 > 0.997 on all three platforms was measured. Precision (P = 0.66 Achieva, P = 0.76 Prisma, P = 0.69 Skyra) and reproducibility (P = 0.89) were good. T1 mapping of accuracy was r2 > 0.98. No significant difference between width ratio regression slopes at site 2 (P = 0.669) or site 3 (P = 0.305), and no significant difference between width ratio regression slopes between sites was detected by ANCOVA (P = 0.48).Data ConclusionThe phantom performed as expected and determined that MR measures of QSM and DCEQP are accurate and consistent across repeated measurements and between platforms.Level of Evidence: 1Technical Efficacy Stage: 2J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;51:1192–1199.

Abstract BACKGROUND Brain cavernous angiomas with symptomatic hemorrhage (CASH) are uncommon but exact a heavy burden of neurological disability from recurrent bleeding, for which there is no proven therapy. Candidate drugs to stabilize the CASH lesion and prevent rebleeding will ultimately require testing of safety and efficacy in multisite clinical trials. Much progress has been made in understanding the epidemiology of CASH, and novel biomarkers have been linked to the biological mechanisms and clinical activity in lesions. Yet, the ability to enroll and risk-stratify CASH subjects has never been assessed prospectively at multiple sites. Biomarkers and other outcomes have not been evaluated for their sensitivity and reliability, nor have they been harmonized across sites. OBJECTIVE To address knowledge gaps and establish a research network as infrastructure for future clinical trials, through the Trial Readiness grant mechanism, funded by National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke/National Institutes of Health. METHODS This project includes an observational cohort study to assess (1) the feasibility of screening, enrollment rates, baseline disease categorization, and follow-up of CASH using common data elements at multiple sites, (2) the reliability of imaging biomarkers including quantitative susceptibility mapping and permeability measures that have been shown to correlate with lesion activity, and (3) the rates of recurrent hemorrhage and change in functional status and biomarker measurements during prospective follow-up. EXPECTED OUTCOMES We propose a harmonized multisite assessment of enrollment rates of CASH, baseline features relevant to stratification in clinical trials, and follow-up assessments of functional outcomes in relation to clinical bleeds. We introduce novel biomarkers of vascular leak and hemorrhage, with firm mechanistic foundations, which have been linked to clinical disease activity. We shall test their reliability and validity at multiple sites, and assess their changes over time, with and without clinical rebleeds, hence their fitness as outcome instruments in clinical trials. DISCUSSION The timing cannot be more opportune, with therapeutic targets identified, exceptional collaboration among researchers and the patient community, along with several drugs ready to benefit from development of a path to clinical testing using this network in the next 5 years.

Abstract BACKGROUND: Despite many publications about cerebral cavernous malformations (CCMs), controversy remains regarding diagnostic and management strategies. OBJECTIVE: To develop guidelines for CCM management. METHODS: The Angioma Alliance (www.angioma.org), the patient support group in the United States advocating on behalf of patients and research in CCM, convened a multidisciplinary writing group comprising expert CCM clinicians to help summarize the existing literature related to the clinical care of CCM, focusing on 5 topics: (1) epidemiology and natural history, (2) genetic testing and counseling, (3) diagnostic criteria and radiology standards, (4) neurosurgical considerations, and (5) neurological considerations. The group reviewed literature, rated evidence, developed recommendations, and established consensus, controversies, and knowledge gaps according to a prespecified protocol. RESULTS: Of 1270 publications published between January 1, 1983 and September 31, 2014, we selected 98 based on methodological criteria, and identified 38 additional recent or relevant publications. Topic authors used these publications to summarize current knowledge and arrive at 23 consensus management recommendations, which we rated by class (size of effect) and level (estimate of certainty) according to the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association criteria. No recommendation was level A (because of the absence of randomized controlled trials), 11 (48%) were level B, and 12 (52%) were level C. Recommendations were class I in 8 (35%), class II in 10 (43%), and class III in 5 (22%). CONCLUSION: Current evidence supports recommendations for the management of CCM, but their generally low levels and classes mandate further research to better inform clinical practice and update these recommendations. The complete recommendations document, including the criteria for selecting reference citations, a more detailed justification of the respective recommendations, and a summary of controversies and knowledge gaps, was similarly peer reviewed and is available on line www.angioma.org/CCMGuidelines.