Back to Authors

Xu, Jianfeng

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1343-8752

Mayo Clinic

Endeavor Health

Citations 6

Implementation of Germline Testing for Prostate Cancer: Philadelphia Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference 2019
Kelly, William Kevin, Cheng, Heather H. , Cookson, Michael S. , Dahut, William L. , Weissman, Scott M., Soule, Howard R. , Petrylak, Daniel P. , Dicker, Adam P. , AlDubayan, Saud H. , Pettaway, Curtis A. , Daly, Mary B., Mohler, James L. , Parsons, J. Kellogg , Pilarski, Robert , Blanco, Amie , Woodson, Ashley, Taplin, Mary-Ellen, Polascik, Thomas J. , Hyatt, Colette, Feng, Felix Y. , Mullane, Michael P., Powers, Jacqueline, Concepcion, Raoul S. , Lin, Daniel W. , Wender, Richard C. , Mark, James Ryan , Costello, Anthony J. , Isaacs, William B. , Xu, Jianfeng , Weitzel, Jeffrey N. , Andriole, Gerald L. , Beltran, Himisha , Briganti, Alberto , Byrne, Lindsey , Calvaresi, Anne, Chandrasekar, Thenappan , Chen, David Y.T. , Dobi, Albert , Crawford, E. David , Eastham, James A., Eggener, Scott E. , Freedman, Matthew L. , Garnick, Marc B. , Gomella, Patrick T. , Handley, Nathan , Hurwitz, Mark , Izes, Joseph K. , Karnes, R. Jeffrey , Lallas, Costas D. , Languino, Lucia R. , Loughlin, Kevin R. , Lu‐Yao, Grace , Malkowicz, S. Bruce, Mann, Mark, Mille, Patrick , Miner, Martin , Morgan, Todd M. , Mucci, Lorelei A. , Nielsen, Sarah M. , O’Neil, Brock , Pinover, Wayne H., Pinto, Peter A. , Poage, Wendy, Raj, Ganesh V. , Ryan, Charles J. , Schiewer, Matthew J. , Szymaniak, Brittany M. , Tester, William , Trabulsi, Edouard J. , Vapiwala, Neha , Gomella, Leonard G. , Weitzel, Jeffrey N , Morgan, Todd M , Cheng, Heather H , Dicker, Adam P , Giri, Veda N. , Knudsen, Karen E. , Cooney, Kathleen A. , Toland, Amanda Ewart , Pritchard, Colin C. , Carroll, Peter R , Rahm, Alanna Kulchak , Taplin, Mary‐Ellen , Helfand, Brian T. , Morgans, Alicia K. , Burnett, Arthur L. “Bud” , Sartor, Oliver , Den, Robert B. , Loeb, Stacy , López, Ana María , Moreno, Jose, Myers, Ronald E. , Rebbeck, Timothy R. , Sandler, Howard M. , Scott, E. Michael D., Yu, Evan Y , Zeigler-Johnson, Charnita M

Journal of Clinical Oncology | June 9, 2020 | Volume: 38 | Issue: 24 | Pages: 2798-2811

10.1200/jco.20.00046 Get It

PURPOSE Germline testing (GT) is a central feature of prostate cancer (PCA) treatment, management, and hereditary cancer assessment. Critical needs include optimized multigene testing strategies that incorporate evolving genetic data, consistency in GT indications and management, and alternate genetic evaluation models that address the rising demand for genetic services. METHODS A multidisciplinary consensus conference that included experts, stakeholders, and national organization leaders was convened in response to current practice challenges and to develop a genetic implementation framework. Evidence review informed questions using the modified Delphi model. The final framework included criteria with strong (> 75%) agreement (Recommend) or moderate (50% to 74%) agreement (Consider). RESULTS Large germline panels and somatic testing were recommended for metastatic PCA. Reflex testing—initial testing of priority genes followed by expanded testing—was suggested for multiple scenarios. Metastatic disease or family history suggestive of hereditary PCA was recommended for GT. Additional family history and pathologic criteria garnered moderate consensus. Priority genes to test for metastatic disease treatment included BRCA2, BRCA1, and mismatch repair genes, with broader testing, such as ATM, for clinical trial eligibility. BRCA2 was recommended for active surveillance discussions. Screening starting at age 40 years or 10 years before the youngest PCA diagnosis in a family was recommended for BRCA2 carriers, with consideration in HOXB13, BRCA1, ATM, and mismatch repair carriers. Collaborative (point-of-care) evaluation models between health care and genetic providers was endorsed to address the genetic counseling shortage. The genetic evaluation framework included optimal pretest informed consent, post-test discussion, cascade testing, and technology-based approaches. CONCLUSION This multidisciplinary, consensus-driven PCA genetic implementation framework provides novel guidance to clinicians and patients tailored to the precision era. Multiple research, education, and policy needs remain of importance.
Polygenic risk score for breast cancer in high-risk women.
Black, Mary Helen , Li, Shuwei , LaDuca, Holly , Chen, Jefferey, Hoiness, Robert, Gutierrez, Stephanie, Lu, Hsiao‐Mei, Dolinsky, Jill S. , Xu, Jianfeng , Vachon, Celine M. , Davis, Brigette Tippin, Vachon, Celine M. , Couch, Fergus J.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | September 5, 2018 | Volume: 36 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: 1508-1508

10.1200/jco.2018.36.15_suppl.1508 Get It

Dual role of TGFBR1 as a modifier of colorectal cancer risk.
Pennison, Michael J. , Zeng, Qinghua , Buckhaults, Phillip , Kaklamani, Virginia , Lindor, Noralane M. , Gallinger, Steven , Haile, Robert W. , Edberg, Jeffrey C., Xu, Jianfeng , Yi, Nengjun , Pasche, Boris , Hopper, John L. , Marchand, Loı̈c Le , Newcomb, Polly A. , Baron, John A. , Stram, Daniel O. , Zhang, Hongtao , Manne, Upender , Kimberly, Robert P. , Zhang, Kui

Journal of Clinical Oncology | February 24, 2017 | Volume: 33 | Issue: 3_suppl | Pages: 600-600

10.1200/jco.2015.33.3_suppl.600 Get It

600 Background: Experimental and clinical evidence suggests that constitutively decreased Transforming Growth Factor Beta type I receptor (TGFBR1) signaling predisposes to colorectal cancer (CRC) development. However, associations between TGFBR1 variants and CRC risk in case-control studies have been inconsistent. Methods: We utilized 1,043 CRC cases and their 1,627 unaffected sibling controls obtained from the Colon Cancer Family Registry (C-CFR). Individuals were genotyped for twelve TGFBR1 haplotype tagging SNPs. SNPs associated with CRC risk were validated in 261 CRC cases and 531 controls of African American ancestry and 990 CRC cases and 3,427 controls of Han Chinese ancestry. Validated SNPs were functionally characterized with respect to TGFBR1 expression and TGF-β signaling. Results: The TGFBR1 rs7034462-TT genotype was associated with CRC risk in C-CFR participants (OR 3.80[1.46-9.85]) and African Americans (OR 8.16[2.07-32.08]) (see Table). The TT genotype was associated with stage III and stage IV at diagnosis in C-CFR participants (OR 2.99[1.15-7.81] and OR 9.38[1.54-57.28]) and African Americans (OR 5.89[1.15-30.02] and OR 12.75[1.88-86.33]), respectively. The rs7034462-CT genotype was associated with decreased risk for CRC in African Americans (OR 0.55[0.31-0.99]) and Han Chinese (OR 0.67[0.48-0.95]) (see table). Cells carrying the rs7034462-TT genotype exhibited decreased constitutive TGFBR1 expression, increased SMAD7 expression, and decreased TGF-β signaling. Conclusions: The TGFBR1 rs7034462-T allele has dual, opposite roles with respect to CRC risk. The rare rs7034462-TT genotype is a moderate penetrance genotype associated with risk for CRC and advanced stage disease at diagnosis. In contrast, the common rs7034462-CT genotype is associated with decreased CRC risk. [Table: see text]
gsSKAT: Rapid gene set analysis and multiple testing correction for rare‐variant association studies using weighted linear kernels
McDonnell, Shannon K. , Stanford, Janet L. , Ostrander, Elaine A. , Isaacs, William B., Xu, Jianfeng , Cooney, Kathleen A. , Lange, Ethan M. , Schleutker, Johanna , Carpten, John D. , Powell, Isaac J., Bailey‐Wilson, Joan E. , Cussenot, Olivier , Cancel‐Tassin, Géraldine , MacInnis, Robert J. , Maier, Christiane, Whittemore, Alice S. , Hsieh, Chih‐Lin , Catolona, William J., Mandal, Diptasri , Eeles, Rosalind A. , Ackerman, Michael J. , Olson, Timothy M. , Klein, Christopher J. , Thibodeau, Stephen N. , Schaid, Daniel J. , McDonnell, Shannon, Larson, Nicholas B. , Cannon‐Albright, Lisa , Teerlink, Craig C. , Giles, Graham G. , Wiklund, Fredrik E. , Foulkes, William D. , Kote‐Jarai, Zsofia , Klein, Christopher J , Eeles, Rosalind A , Wilson, Richard K , Schleutker, Johanna , Maclnnis, Robert , Olson, Timothy M , McDonnell, Shannon K

Genetic Epidemiology | February 17, 2017 | Volume: 41 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 297-308

10.1002/gepi.22036 Get It

ABSTRACTNext‐generation sequencing technologies have afforded unprecedented characterization of low‐frequency and rare genetic variation. Due to low power for single‐variant testing, aggregative methods are commonly used to combine observed rare variation within a single gene. Causal variation may also aggregate across multiple genes within relevant biomolecular pathways. Kernel‐machine regression and adaptive testing methods for aggregative rare‐variant association testing have been demonstrated to be powerful approaches for pathway‐level analysis, although these methods tend to be computationally intensive at high‐variant dimensionality and require access to complete data. An additional analytical issue in scans of large pathway definition sets is multiple testing correction. Gene set definitions may exhibit substantial genic overlap, and the impact of the resultant correlation in test statistics on Type I error rate control for large agnostic gene set scans has not been fully explored. Herein, we first outline a statistical strategy for aggregative rare‐variant analysis using component gene‐level linear kernel score test summary statistics as well as derive simple estimators of the effective number of tests for family‐wise error rate control. We then conduct extensive simulation studies to characterize the behavior of our approach relative to direct application of kernel and adaptive methods under a variety of conditions. We also apply our method to two case‐control studies, respectively, evaluating rare variation in hereditary prostate cancer and schizophrenia. Finally, we provide open‐source R code for public use to facilitate easy application of our methods to existing rare‐variant analysis results.
Post hoc Analysis for Detecting Individual Rare Variant Risk Associations Using Probit Regression Bayesian Variable Selection Methods in Case‐Control Sequencing Studies
McDonnell, Shannon K. , Cannon‐Albright, Lisa , Teerlink, Craig C. , Stanford, Janet L. , Ostrander, Elaine A. , Isaacs, William B., Xu, Jianfeng , Cooney, Kathleen A. , Lange, Ethan M. , Schleutker, Johanna , Carpten, John D. , Powell, Isaac J., Bailey‐Wilson, Joan E. , Cussenot, Olivier , Cancel‐Tassin, Géraldine , MacInnis, Robert J. , Maier, Christiane, Whittemore, Alice S. , Hsieh, Chih‐Lin , Catolona, William J., Mandal, Diptasri , Eeles, Rosalind A. , Ackerman, Michael J. , Olson, Timothy M. , Klein, Christopher J. , Thibodeau, Stephen N. , Schaid, Daniel J. , McDonnell, Shannon, Larson, Nicholas B. , Giles, Graham G. , Wiklund, Fredrik E. , Foulkes, William D. , Kote‐Jarai, Zsofia , Klein, Christopher J , Eeles, Rosalind A , Wilson, Richard K , Schleutker, Johanna , Cannon-Albright, Lisa A , Maclnnis, Robert , Olson, Timothy M , McDonnell, Shannon K

Genetic Epidemiology | June 17, 2016 | Volume: 40 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 461-469

10.1002/gepi.21983 Get It

ABSTRACTRare variants (RVs) have been shown to be significant contributors to complex disease risk. By definition, these variants have very low minor allele frequencies and traditional single‐marker methods for statistical analysis are underpowered for typical sequencing study sample sizes. Multimarker burden‐type approaches attempt to identify aggregation of RVs across case‐control status by analyzing relatively small partitions of the genome, such as genes. However, it is generally the case that the aggregative measure would be a mixture of causal and neutral variants, and these omnibus tests do not directly provide any indication of which RVs may be driving a given association. Recently, Bayesian variable selection approaches have been proposed to identify RV associations from a large set of RVs under consideration. Although these approaches have been shown to be powerful at detecting associations at the RV level, there are often computational limitations on the total quantity of RVs under consideration and compromises are necessary for large‐scale application. Here, we propose a computationally efficient alternative formulation of this method using a probit regression approach specifically capable of simultaneously analyzing hundreds to thousands of RVs. We evaluate our approach to detect causal variation on simulated data and examine sensitivity and specificity in instances of high RV dimensionality as well as apply it to pathway‐level RV analysis results from a prostate cancer (PC) risk case‐control sequencing study. Finally, we discuss potential extensions and future directions of this work.
A Germline DNA Polymorphism Enhances Alternative Splicing of the KLF6 Tumor Suppressor Gene and Is Associated with Increased Prostate Cancer Risk
Narla, Goutham , DiFeo, Analisa , Reeves, Helen L. , Schaid, Daniel J. , Hirshfeld, Jennifer, Hod, Eldad A. , Katz, Amanda, Isaacs, William B., Hebbring, Scott J. , Komiya, Akira , McDonnell, Shannon K. , Wiley, Kathleen E. , Jacobsen, Steven J. , Isaacs, Sarah D., Walsh, Patrick C., Chang, Bao-Li, Friedrichsen, Danielle M., Stanford, Janet L. , Ostrander, Elaine A. , Chinnaiyan, Arul M., Rubin, Mark A. , Xu, Jianfeng , Thibodeau, Stephen N. , Martignetti, John A., Karyadi, Danielle M. , Zheng, Shusen , Chang, Bao‐Li, Friedman, Scott L. , DiFeo, Analisa , Rubin, Mark A , McDonnell, Shannon K

Cancer Research | September 15, 2005 | Volume: 65 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 1213-1222

10.1158/0008-5472.can-04-4249 Get It

Abstract Prostate cancer is a leading and increasingly prevalent cause of cancer death in men. Whereas family history of disease is one of the strongest prostate cancer risk factors and suggests a hereditary component, the predisposing genetic factors remain unknown. We first showed that KLF6 is a tumor suppressor somatically inactivated in prostate cancer and since then, its functional loss has been further established in prostate cancer cell lines and other human cancers. Wild-type KLF6, but not patient-derived mutants, suppresses cell growth through p53-independent transactivation of p21. Here we show that a germline KLF6 single nucleotide polymorphism, confirmed in a tri-institutional study of 3,411 men, is significantly associated with an increased relative risk of prostate cancer in men, regardless of family history of disease. This prostate cancer–associated allele generates a novel functional SRp40 DNA binding site and increases transcription of three alternatively spliced KLF6 isoforms. The KLF6 variant proteins KLF6-SV1 and KLF6-SV2 are mislocalized to the cytoplasm, antagonize wtKLF6 function, leading to decreased p21 expression and increased cell growth, and are up-regulated in tumor versus normal prostatic tissue. Thus, these results are the first to identify a novel mechanism of self-encoded tumor suppressor gene inactivation and link a relatively common single nucleotide polymorphism to both regulation of alternative splicing and an increased risk in a major human cancer.