López, Ana María

PURPOSE The aim of this joint guideline is to provide evidence-based recommendations to practicing physicians and other health care providers on integrative approaches to managing pain in patients with cancer. METHODS The Society for Integrative Oncology and ASCO convened an expert panel of integrative oncology, medical oncology, radiation oncology, surgical oncology, palliative oncology, social sciences, mind-body medicine, nursing, and patient advocacy representatives. The literature search included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials published from 1990 through 2021. Outcomes of interest included pain intensity, symptom relief, and adverse events. Expert panel members used this evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations. RESULTS The literature search identified 227 relevant studies to inform the evidence base for this guideline. RECOMMENDATIONS Among adult patients, acupuncture should be recommended for aromatase inhibitor–related joint pain. Acupuncture or reflexology or acupressure may be recommended for general cancer pain or musculoskeletal pain. Hypnosis may be recommended to patients who experience procedural pain. Massage may be recommended to patients experiencing pain during palliative or hospice care. These recommendations are based on an intermediate level of evidence, benefit outweighing risk, and with moderate strength of recommendation. The quality of evidence for other mind-body interventions or natural products for pain is either low or inconclusive. There is insufficient or inconclusive evidence to make recommendations for pediatric patients. More research is needed to better characterize the role of integrative medicine interventions in the care of patients with cancer. Additional information is available at https://integrativeonc.org/practice-guidelines/guidelines and www.asco.org/survivorship-guidelines .

PURPOSE Germline testing (GT) is a central feature of prostate cancer (PCA) treatment, management, and hereditary cancer assessment. Critical needs include optimized multigene testing strategies that incorporate evolving genetic data, consistency in GT indications and management, and alternate genetic evaluation models that address the rising demand for genetic services. METHODS A multidisciplinary consensus conference that included experts, stakeholders, and national organization leaders was convened in response to current practice challenges and to develop a genetic implementation framework. Evidence review informed questions using the modified Delphi model. The final framework included criteria with strong (> 75%) agreement (Recommend) or moderate (50% to 74%) agreement (Consider). RESULTS Large germline panels and somatic testing were recommended for metastatic PCA. Reflex testing—initial testing of priority genes followed by expanded testing—was suggested for multiple scenarios. Metastatic disease or family history suggestive of hereditary PCA was recommended for GT. Additional family history and pathologic criteria garnered moderate consensus. Priority genes to test for metastatic disease treatment included BRCA2, BRCA1, and mismatch repair genes, with broader testing, such as ATM, for clinical trial eligibility. BRCA2 was recommended for active surveillance discussions. Screening starting at age 40 years or 10 years before the youngest PCA diagnosis in a family was recommended for BRCA2 carriers, with consideration in HOXB13, BRCA1, ATM, and mismatch repair carriers. Collaborative (point-of-care) evaluation models between health care and genetic providers was endorsed to address the genetic counseling shortage. The genetic evaluation framework included optimal pretest informed consent, post-test discussion, cascade testing, and technology-based approaches. CONCLUSION This multidisciplinary, consensus-driven PCA genetic implementation framework provides novel guidance to clinicians and patients tailored to the precision era. Multiple research, education, and policy needs remain of importance.

Abstract Aromatase inhibitors (AI) profoundly suppress estrogen levels in postmenopausal women and are effective in breast cancer prevention among high-risk postmenopausal women. Unfortunately, AI treatment is associated with undesirable side effects that limit patient acceptance for primary prevention of breast cancer. A double-blind, randomized trial was conducted to determine whether low and intermittent doses of letrozole can achieve effective estrogen suppression with a more favorable side-effect profile. Overall, 112 postmenopausal women at increased risk for breast cancer were randomized to receive letrozole at 2.5 mg once daily (QD, standard dose arm), 2.5 mg every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday (Q-MWF), 1.0 mg Q-MWF, or 0.25 mg Q-MWF for 24 weeks. Primary endpoint was suppression in serum estradiol levels at the end of letrozole intervention. Secondary endpoints included changes in serum estrone, testosterone, C-telopeptide (marker of bone resorption), lipid profile, and quality-of-life measures (QoL) following treatment. Significant estrogen suppression was observed in all dose arms with an average of 75% to 78% and 86% to 93% reduction in serum estradiol and estrone levels, respectively. There were no differences among dose arms with respect to changes in C-telopeptide levels, lipid profile, adverse events (AE), or QoL measures. We conclude that low and intermittent doses of letrozole are not inferior to standard dose in estrogen suppression and resulted in a similar side-effect profile compared with standard dose. Further studies are needed to determine the feasibility of selecting an effective AI dosing schedule with better tolerability. Cancer Prev Res; 9(2); 142–8. ©2015 AACR.

Abstract Background: Although breast cancer (BC) may occur at any age, its prevalence is greater postmenopause. Greater than 75 % of postmenopausal BCs are hormone dependent. Aromatase inhibitors suppress postmenopausal estrogen biosynthesis. Letrozole has demonstrated efficacy against BC in the adjuvant and metastatic setting at the treatment dose of 2.5 mg daily. Its potential role in BC prevention has been inferred from reductions in contralateral BCs. Its side effect profile, similar to other AIs, includes exacerbation of menopausal symptoms that negatively impact quality of life (QOL) and may result in discontinuation of the drug. Both anastrazole and exemestane have been demonstrated to reduce BC in high-risk women. Hypothesis: Lower and intermittent doses of letrozole effectively suppress estrogen in the high-risk postmenopausal woman and provide a better side effect profile. Methods: A randomized, double-blind study comparing the impact of varying letrozole doses (2.5 mg daily, 2.5 mg MWF, 1.0 mg MWF, or 0.25 mg MWF) on estrogen suppression and side effects--lipids, bone resorption, menopause, and QOL-- was conducted. Participants randomized to intermittent dosing received placebo on nontreatment days. Results: 112 participants were enrolled at 2 clinical sites. Mean patient age was 62.8 years, and average BMI was 29.8. Analysis of available data after 24 weeks of therapy revealed statistically significant increase in triglycerides (N=94): 114.67±48.39 to 125.79±54.31 (p<0.01); vasomotor symptoms (N=95): 2.25±1.26 to 2.74±1.67 (p<0.01); and C-telopeptide (N=75): 0.39±0.23 to 0.55±0.28 (p<0.0001). Statistically significant decrease in estradiol (N=68): 5.57±5.19 to 1.26±1.41 (p<0.0001) and estrone (N=68): 22.39±13.02 to 1.64±2.66 (p<0.0001) were observed. No differences in QOL (SF 36) were noted after letrozole treatment. P-values were derived from paired t-test (signed rank test) for the difference between baseline and after 24 weeks of study drug. Conclusions: De-escalating doses of letrozole suppress postmenopausal estrogen effectively and result in statistically significant increases in triglycerides, C-telopeptide and vasomotor symptoms without impact on QOL. Presentation will include unblinded intervention arm outcomes. Citation Format: Ana Maria Lopez, Hsiao Hui Sherry Chow, Denise Frank, Sandhya Puthi, Judy Boughey, Paul Hsu, Jose Guillen, Marjorie Perloff, Michelle Ley, Julie E Lang. De-escalating doses of letrozole in post menopausal women at high risk for breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-12-04.