Back to Authors

Lin, Daniel W.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2135-1534

Mayo Clinic

Fred Hutch Cancer Center

Citations 10

NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Testicular Cancer, Version 2.2025
Lin, Daniel W. , Feldman, Darren R., Aggarwal, Rahul , Drakaki, Alexandra , Eggener, Scott E. , Humphrey, Peter A. , Leuva, Harshraj , Levine, Ellis G., Maughan, Benjamin L. , Reichert, Zachery R. , Rwigema, Jean‐Claude M. , Shah, Sumit, Singla, Nirmish, Sircar, Kanishka , Zhumkhawala, Ali , Sliker, Bailee , Gilligan, Timothy D. , Adra, Nabil , Bagrodia, Aditya , Yamoah, Kosj , Chandrasekar, Thenappan , Costa, Daniel Nobrega da , Drakaki, Alexandra , Emamekhoo, Hamid , Geynisman, Daniel M. , Graham, Laura , Luckenbaugh, Amy N. , McGregor, Bradley A. , Monk, Paul , Picus, Joel , Pierorazio, Phillip , Rais‐Bahrami, Soroush , Saylor, Philip J. , Shah, Ankeet , Shah, Sumit, VanderWeele, David James , Montgomery, Sarah E.

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | April 9, 2025 | Volume: 23 | Issue: 4 | Pages: No page available

10.6004/jnccn.2025.0018 Get It

The NCCN Guidelines for Testicular Cancer provide recommendations for the multidisciplinary approach to the diagnostic workup, treatment, and follow-up for testicular germ cell tumors, including both seminoma and nonseminoma. These NCCN Guidelines Insights discuss the current treatment recommendations and supporting clinical data for seminomas as presented in Version 2.2025 of the NCCN Guidelines for Testicular Cancer.
SWOG S2210: A phase II study of neoadjuvant carboplatin for localized, high-risk prostate cancer with germline BRCA1/2 mutations.
Callis, Samuel, Lin, Daniel W. , Dorff, Tanya B. , Kase, Adam M. , Petrylak, Daniel P. , Cheng, Heather H. , Yu, Evan Y , Tangen, Catherine M. , Lerner, Seth P.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | January 29, 2024 | Volume: 42 | Issue: 4_suppl | Pages: TPS354-TPS354

10.1200/jco.2024.42.4_suppl.tps354 Get It

TPS354 Background: Carriers of germline pathogenic variants or mutations in BRCA2 and BRCA1 (referred to here as gBRCA1/2m) are enriched in metastatic prostate cancer (PrCa), and now have FDA-approved options for PARP inhibitors in late-stage disease. The NCCN guidelines recommends germline genetic testing for PrCa patients with metastatic, node positive and high risk localized prostate cancer. Prior studies have shown that gBRCA1/2m carriers with PrCa are more likely to have high-risk disease (6,7) and to develop lethal disease even after curative intent treatment (8,9). In other gBRCA1/2m-related cancers (breast, ovarian and pancreas), platinum-based regimens are part of neoadjuvant and front-line metastatic therapy options. Carboplatin is a well-tolerated, widely available and inexpensive DNA-damaging alkylating agent that is familiar to oncologists. The study hypothesis is that 4 cycles of neoadjuvant carboplatin, followed by radical prostatectomy for patients with localized high/very high risk PrCa and g BRCA1/2m will result in a meaningful pathologic complete response (pCR) rate. Methods: S2210 is a single-arm, open label study of 12 wks neoadjuvant carboplatin (4 cycles of AUC 5 every 21 days), followed by radical prostatectomy. Key eligibility criteria include people with high/very high-risk disease: cT3a or Grade Group 4-5 PrCa and/or PSA>20 ng/mL, have no evidence of distant metastases by conventional imaging (PSMA-PET-detected mets permitted if conventional imaging is negative and surgeon deems PSMA-detected sites resectable), who are candidates for radical prostatectomy and carboplatin, and have documented evidence of gBRCA1/2m through testing in a CLIA-certified lab. ADT prior to registration is permitted but must be discontinued on study. The study hypothesis is that the study treatment will result in ³30% rate of pathologic complete response (pCR, primary endpoint). A two-stage design will be used such that if ³1 of first 20 eligible patients achieves pCR, 20 further evaluable patients will be enrolled. This design has a significance level of 4.7%, and a power of 99%. Secondary endpoints include biochemical recurrence-free (at 2-, 3-, 5-yrs), metastasis-free and overall survival. Translational/correlative studies include analysis of 2nd allele inactivation in tumor, HRD signature, and ctDNA signature for monitoring of recurrence. S2210 was activated in August 2023. Clinical trial information: NCT05806515 .
Prostate-specific antigen value at 3 & 7 months (PSA-3mo, PSA-7mo) and overall survival (OS) in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) treated with androgen deprivation (ADT) with or without orteronel (SWOG S1216).
Hussain, Maha , Gupta, Shilpa , Harzstark, Andrea, Zibelman, Matthew R. , Maughan, Benjamin L. , Zhang, Jingsong , Lin, Daniel W. , Dorff, Tanya B. , Lara, Primo N. , Hussain, Maha H A , Parikh, Mamta , Tangen, Catherine M. , Jo, Yeonjung , Paller, Channing J. , George, Saby , Cheng, Heather H. , Pachynski, Russell K. , Bryce, Alan H. , Quinn, David I , Thompson, Ian M. , Agarwal, Neeraj

Journal of Clinical Oncology | June 4, 2023 | Volume: 41 | Issue: 16_suppl | Pages: 5074-5074

10.1200/jco.2023.41.16_suppl.5074 Get It

5074 Background: Analysis of phase 3 studies of patients (pts) with mHSPC in the era of ADT, including in combination with docetaxel and/or androgen receptor axis targeted therapies have established PSA-7mo as a key prognostic marker. Our objective was to evaluate the association between PSA-3mo, PSA 7-mo and OS measured in the phase 3 S1216 trial in mHSPC comparing ADT + orteronel (treatment arm) vs ADT + bicalutamide (control arm) [NCT01809691]. Methods: Pts enrolled in the S1216 trial with available PSA-3mo & PSA-7mo were included in this analysis. PSA responses were defined as complete response (CR) if PSA ≤ 0.2 ng/mL, partial response (PR) for PSA >0.2 and ≤ 4ng/mL, and no response (NR) as PSA >4 ng/mL at month 3 or 7. Landmark OS was measured and Cox regression model applied adjusting for stratification (performance status, extent of disease, early vs late start of treatment, treatment arm). Results: 1251 pts were alive and evaluable for PSA-3mo and 1231 pts were evaluable at 7 mo, out of a total of 1279 pts. The median age was 67 (range: 43-92), 10% of patients were black, 96% had a Zubrod performance status of 0-1. Median PSA at baseline was 29 ng/ml (range: 2-6710). Of pts on treatment vs.control arm, PSA-3mo CR, PR, and NR occurred in 52% vs 35%; 31% vs 42%, and 17% vs 23%, respectively. Of pts on treatment vs control arm, PSA-7mo CR, PR, and NR occurred in 61% vs 46%, 20% vs 26%, and 19% vs 29%, respectively. CR or PR at either timepoint led to significantly better outcomes than those with NR. No interaction between treatment arm and PSA response was observed in terms of OS. Conclusions: PSA-3mo and PSA-7mo are strong prognostic markers for pts with mHSPC. More pts on ADT with orteronel achieved CR at 3 and 7 mo. In addition to its use in counseling patients in the clinic, PSA-3mo and PSA-7mo may be used as parameters for designing future trials in pts with mHSPC, utilizing the next generation of intensification or de-intensification treatment regimens. Clinical trial information: NCT01809691 . [Table: see text]
Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: AUA/ASTRO Guideline. Part III: Principles of Radiation and Future Directions
Eastham, James A., Auffenberg, Gregory B. , Barocas, Daniel A. , Crispino, Tony, Davis, John W. , Eggener, Scott E. , Horwitz, Eric M. , Kirkby, Erin, Lin, Daniel W. , McBride, Sean M. , Rodrigues, George , Wong, William W. , Boorjian, Stephen A. , Chou, Roger , Kane, Christopher J. , Morgans, Alicia K. , Pierorazio, Phillip

Journal of Urology | May 10, 2022 | Volume: 208 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 26-33

10.1097/ju.0000000000002759 Get It

Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: AUA/ASTRO Guideline, Part II: Principles of Active Surveillance, Principles of Surgery, and Follow-Up
Eastham, James A., Auffenberg, Gregory B. , Barocas, Daniel A. , Crispino, Tony, Davis, John W. , Eggener, Scott E. , Horwitz, Eric M. , Kirkby, Erin, Lin, Daniel W. , McBride, Sean M. , Rodrigues, George , Wong, William W. , Boorjian, Stephen A. , Chou, Roger , Kane, Christopher J. , Morgans, Alicia K. , Pierorazio, Phillip

Journal of Urology | May 10, 2022 | Volume: 208 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 19-25

10.1097/ju.0000000000002758 Get It

Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: AUA/ASTRO Guideline, Part I: Introduction, Risk Assessment, Staging, and Risk-Based Management
Eastham, James A., Auffenberg, Gregory B. , Barocas, Daniel A. , Crispino, Tony, Davis, John W. , Eggener, Scott E. , Horwitz, Eric M. , Kirkby, Erin, Lin, Daniel W. , McBride, Sean M. , Rodrigues, George , Wong, William W. , Boorjian, Stephen A. , Chou, Roger , Kane, Christopher J. , Morgans, Alicia K. , Pierorazio, Phillip

Journal of Urology | May 10, 2022 | Volume: 208 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 10-18

10.1097/ju.0000000000002757 Get It

Implementation of Germline Testing for Prostate Cancer: Philadelphia Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference 2019
Kelly, William Kevin, Cheng, Heather H. , Cookson, Michael S. , Dahut, William L. , Weissman, Scott M., Soule, Howard R. , Petrylak, Daniel P. , Dicker, Adam P. , AlDubayan, Saud H. , Pettaway, Curtis A. , Daly, Mary B., Mohler, James L. , Parsons, J. Kellogg , Pilarski, Robert , Blanco, Amie , Woodson, Ashley, Taplin, Mary-Ellen, Polascik, Thomas J. , Hyatt, Colette, Feng, Felix Y. , Mullane, Michael P., Powers, Jacqueline, Concepcion, Raoul S. , Lin, Daniel W. , Wender, Richard C. , Mark, James Ryan , Costello, Anthony J. , Isaacs, William B. , Xu, Jianfeng , Weitzel, Jeffrey N. , Andriole, Gerald L. , Beltran, Himisha , Briganti, Alberto , Byrne, Lindsey , Calvaresi, Anne, Chandrasekar, Thenappan , Chen, David Y.T. , Dobi, Albert , Crawford, E. David , Eastham, James A., Eggener, Scott E. , Freedman, Matthew L. , Garnick, Marc B. , Gomella, Patrick T. , Handley, Nathan , Hurwitz, Mark , Izes, Joseph K. , Karnes, R. Jeffrey , Lallas, Costas D. , Languino, Lucia R. , Loughlin, Kevin R. , Lu‐Yao, Grace , Malkowicz, S. Bruce, Mann, Mark, Mille, Patrick , Miner, Martin , Morgan, Todd M. , Mucci, Lorelei A. , Nielsen, Sarah M. , O’Neil, Brock , Pinover, Wayne H., Pinto, Peter A. , Poage, Wendy, Raj, Ganesh V. , Ryan, Charles J. , Schiewer, Matthew J. , Szymaniak, Brittany M. , Tester, William , Trabulsi, Edouard J. , Vapiwala, Neha , Gomella, Leonard G. , Weitzel, Jeffrey N , Morgan, Todd M , Cheng, Heather H , Dicker, Adam P , Giri, Veda N. , Knudsen, Karen E. , Cooney, Kathleen A. , Toland, Amanda Ewart , Pritchard, Colin C. , Carroll, Peter R , Rahm, Alanna Kulchak , Taplin, Mary‐Ellen , Helfand, Brian T. , Morgans, Alicia K. , Burnett, Arthur L. “Bud” , Sartor, Oliver , Den, Robert B. , Loeb, Stacy , López, Ana María , Moreno, Jose, Myers, Ronald E. , Rebbeck, Timothy R. , Sandler, Howard M. , Scott, E. Michael D., Yu, Evan Y , Zeigler-Johnson, Charnita M

Journal of Clinical Oncology | June 9, 2020 | Volume: 38 | Issue: 24 | Pages: 2798-2811

10.1200/jco.20.00046 Get It

PURPOSE Germline testing (GT) is a central feature of prostate cancer (PCA) treatment, management, and hereditary cancer assessment. Critical needs include optimized multigene testing strategies that incorporate evolving genetic data, consistency in GT indications and management, and alternate genetic evaluation models that address the rising demand for genetic services. METHODS A multidisciplinary consensus conference that included experts, stakeholders, and national organization leaders was convened in response to current practice challenges and to develop a genetic implementation framework. Evidence review informed questions using the modified Delphi model. The final framework included criteria with strong (> 75%) agreement (Recommend) or moderate (50% to 74%) agreement (Consider). RESULTS Large germline panels and somatic testing were recommended for metastatic PCA. Reflex testing—initial testing of priority genes followed by expanded testing—was suggested for multiple scenarios. Metastatic disease or family history suggestive of hereditary PCA was recommended for GT. Additional family history and pathologic criteria garnered moderate consensus. Priority genes to test for metastatic disease treatment included BRCA2, BRCA1, and mismatch repair genes, with broader testing, such as ATM, for clinical trial eligibility. BRCA2 was recommended for active surveillance discussions. Screening starting at age 40 years or 10 years before the youngest PCA diagnosis in a family was recommended for BRCA2 carriers, with consideration in HOXB13, BRCA1, ATM, and mismatch repair carriers. Collaborative (point-of-care) evaluation models between health care and genetic providers was endorsed to address the genetic counseling shortage. The genetic evaluation framework included optimal pretest informed consent, post-test discussion, cascade testing, and technology-based approaches. CONCLUSION This multidisciplinary, consensus-driven PCA genetic implementation framework provides novel guidance to clinicians and patients tailored to the precision era. Multiple research, education, and policy needs remain of importance.
Testicular Cancer, Version 2.2020, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology
Gilligan, Timothy D. , Lin, Daniel W. , Aggarwal, Rahul , Chism, David D. , Cost, Nicholas G. , Derweesh, Ithaar , LaGrange, Chad A. , Levine, Ellis , Longo, Thomas A., Lowrance, Will, Rais‐Bahrami, Soroush , Sircar, Kanishka , Smith, David C. , Tzou, Katherine S., Vaena, Daniel A. , Vaughn, David J. , Yamzon, Jonathan , Johnson-Chilla, Alyse, Keller, Jennifer , Pluchino, Lenora A. , Tzou, Katherine, Emamekhoo, Hamid , Feldman, Darren Richard , Geynisman, Daniel M. , Hancock, Steven Lee , McGregor, Bradley A. , Monk, Paul , Picus, Joel , Pierorazio, Phillip , Saylor, Philip J. , Yamoah, Kosj

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | December 5, 2019 | Volume: 17 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 1529-1554

10.6004/jnccn.2019.0058 Get It

Testicular cancer is relatively uncommon and accounts for <1% of all male tumors. However, it is the most common solid tumor in men between the ages of 20 and 34 years, and the global incidence has been steadily rising over the past several decades. Several risk factors for testicular cancer have been identified, including personal or family history of testicular cancer and cryptorchidism. Testicular germ cell tumors (GCTs) comprise 95% of malignant tumors arising in the testes and are categorized into 2 main histologic subtypes: seminoma and nonseminoma. Although nonseminoma is the more clinically aggressive tumor subtype, 5-year survival rates exceed 70% with current treatment options, even in patients with advanced or metastatic disease. Radical inguinal orchiectomy is the primary treatment for most patients with testicular GCTs. Postorchiectomy management is dictated by stage, histology, and risk classification; treatment options for nonseminoma include surveillance, systemic therapy, and nerve-sparing retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. Although rarely occurring, prognosis for patients with brain metastases remains poor, with >50% of patients dying within 1 year of diagnosis. This selection from the NCCN Guidelines for Testicular Cancer focuses on recommendations for the management of adult patients with nonseminomatous GCTs.
Independent Validation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th Edition Prostate Cancer Staging Classification
Bhindi, Bimal , Karnes, R. Jeffrey , Rangel, Laureano J. , Mason, Ross , Gettman, Matthew T., Frank, Igor, Tollefson, Matthew K. , Lin, Daniel W. , Thompson, R. Houston, Boorjian, Stephen A.

Journal of Urology | June 29, 2017 | Volume: 198 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 1286-1294

10.1016/j.juro.2017.06.085 Get It

Predicting the Outcome of Salvage Radiation Therapy for Recurrent Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy
Stephenson, Andrew J. , Scardino, Peter T. , Kattan, Michael W. , Pisansky, Thomas M. , Slawin, Kevin M., Klein, Eric A. , Anscher, Mitchell S. , Michalski, Jeff M. , Lin, Daniel W. , Forman, Jeffrey D., Zeléfsky, Michael J. , Kestin, Larry L. , Roehrborn, Claus G. , Catton, Charles , DeWeese, Theodore L. , Liauw, Stanley L. , Valicenti, Richard K., Kuban, Deborah A., Pollack, Alan , Sandler, Howard M. , Klein, Eric A , Liauw, Stanley L , Kattan, Michael W

Journal of Clinical Oncology | May 19, 2007 | Volume: 25 | Issue: 15 | Pages: 2035-2041

10.1200/jco.2006.08.9607 Get It

Purpose An increasing serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level is the initial sign of recurrent prostate cancer among patients treated with radical prostatectomy. Salvage radiation therapy (SRT) may eradicate locally recurrent cancer, but studies to distinguish local from systemic recurrence lack adequate sensitivity and specificity. We developed a nomogram to predict the probability of cancer control at 6 years after SRT for PSA-defined recurrence. Patients and Methods Using multivariable Cox regression analysis, we constructed a model to predict the probability of disease progression after SRT in a multi-institutional cohort of 1,540 patients. Results The 6-year progression-free probability was 32% (95% CI, 28% to 35%) overall. Forty-eight percent (95% CI, 40% to 56%) of patients treated with SRT alone at PSA levels of 0.50 ng/mL or lower were disease free at 6 years, including 41% (95% CI, 31% to 51%) who also had a PSA doubling time of 10 months or less or poorly differentiated (Gleason grade 8 to 10) cancer. Significant variables in the model were PSA level before SRT (P < .001), prostatectomy Gleason grade (P < .001), PSA doubling time (P < .001), surgical margins (P < .001), androgen-deprivation therapy before or during SRT (P < .001), and lymph node metastasis (P = .019). The resultant nomogram was internally validated and had a concordance index of 0.69. Conclusion Nearly half of patients with recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy have a long-term PSA response to SRT when treatment is administered at the earliest sign of recurrence. The nomogram we developed predicts the outcome of SRT and should prove valuable for medical decision making for patients with a rising PSA level.