Back to Authors

Loughlin, Kevin R.

0000-0001-8209-7085

Mayo Clinic

Harvard University

Citations 2

Implementation of Germline Testing for Prostate Cancer: Philadelphia Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference 2019
Kelly, William Kevin, Cheng, Heather H. , Cookson, Michael S. , Dahut, William L. , Weissman, Scott M., Soule, Howard R. , Petrylak, Daniel P. , Dicker, Adam P. , AlDubayan, Saud H. , Pettaway, Curtis A. , Daly, Mary B., Mohler, James L. , Parsons, J. Kellogg , Pilarski, Robert , Blanco, Amie , Woodson, Ashley, Taplin, Mary-Ellen, Polascik, Thomas J. , Hyatt, Colette, Feng, Felix Y. , Mullane, Michael P., Powers, Jacqueline, Concepcion, Raoul S. , Lin, Daniel W. , Wender, Richard C. , Mark, James Ryan , Costello, Anthony J. , Isaacs, William B. , Xu, Jianfeng , Weitzel, Jeffrey N. , Andriole, Gerald L. , Beltran, Himisha , Briganti, Alberto , Byrne, Lindsey , Calvaresi, Anne, Chandrasekar, Thenappan , Chen, David Y.T. , Dobi, Albert , Crawford, E. David , Eastham, James A., Eggener, Scott E. , Freedman, Matthew L. , Garnick, Marc B. , Gomella, Patrick T. , Handley, Nathan , Hurwitz, Mark , Izes, Joseph K. , Karnes, R. Jeffrey , Lallas, Costas D. , Languino, Lucia R. , Loughlin, Kevin R. , Lu‐Yao, Grace , Malkowicz, S. Bruce, Mann, Mark, Mille, Patrick , Miner, Martin , Morgan, Todd M. , Mucci, Lorelei A. , Nielsen, Sarah M. , O’Neil, Brock , Pinover, Wayne H., Pinto, Peter A. , Poage, Wendy, Raj, Ganesh V. , Ryan, Charles J. , Schiewer, Matthew J. , Szymaniak, Brittany M. , Tester, William , Trabulsi, Edouard J. , Vapiwala, Neha , Gomella, Leonard G. , Weitzel, Jeffrey N , Morgan, Todd M , Cheng, Heather H , Dicker, Adam P , Giri, Veda N. , Knudsen, Karen E. , Cooney, Kathleen A. , Toland, Amanda Ewart , Pritchard, Colin C. , Carroll, Peter R , Rahm, Alanna Kulchak , Taplin, Mary‐Ellen , Helfand, Brian T. , Morgans, Alicia K. , Burnett, Arthur L. “Bud” , Sartor, Oliver , Den, Robert B. , Loeb, Stacy , López, Ana María , Moreno, Jose, Myers, Ronald E. , Rebbeck, Timothy R. , Sandler, Howard M. , Scott, E. Michael D., Yu, Evan Y , Zeigler-Johnson, Charnita M

Journal of Clinical Oncology | June 9, 2020 | Volume: 38 | Issue: 24 | Pages: 2798-2811

10.1200/jco.20.00046 Get It

PURPOSE Germline testing (GT) is a central feature of prostate cancer (PCA) treatment, management, and hereditary cancer assessment. Critical needs include optimized multigene testing strategies that incorporate evolving genetic data, consistency in GT indications and management, and alternate genetic evaluation models that address the rising demand for genetic services. METHODS A multidisciplinary consensus conference that included experts, stakeholders, and national organization leaders was convened in response to current practice challenges and to develop a genetic implementation framework. Evidence review informed questions using the modified Delphi model. The final framework included criteria with strong (> 75%) agreement (Recommend) or moderate (50% to 74%) agreement (Consider). RESULTS Large germline panels and somatic testing were recommended for metastatic PCA. Reflex testing—initial testing of priority genes followed by expanded testing—was suggested for multiple scenarios. Metastatic disease or family history suggestive of hereditary PCA was recommended for GT. Additional family history and pathologic criteria garnered moderate consensus. Priority genes to test for metastatic disease treatment included BRCA2, BRCA1, and mismatch repair genes, with broader testing, such as ATM, for clinical trial eligibility. BRCA2 was recommended for active surveillance discussions. Screening starting at age 40 years or 10 years before the youngest PCA diagnosis in a family was recommended for BRCA2 carriers, with consideration in HOXB13, BRCA1, ATM, and mismatch repair carriers. Collaborative (point-of-care) evaluation models between health care and genetic providers was endorsed to address the genetic counseling shortage. The genetic evaluation framework included optimal pretest informed consent, post-test discussion, cascade testing, and technology-based approaches. CONCLUSION This multidisciplinary, consensus-driven PCA genetic implementation framework provides novel guidance to clinicians and patients tailored to the precision era. Multiple research, education, and policy needs remain of importance.
Abstract LB-313: Development of a non-invasive, multi-analyte assay for the triage of patients presenting with hematuria
Fernández, Cecilia A., Millholland, John M. , Zwarthoff, Ellen C. , Loughlin, Kevin R. , Karnes, R. Jeffrey , Shuber, Anthony P., Feldman, Adam Scott

Cancer Research | July 21, 2012 | Volume: 71 | Issue: 8_Supplement | Pages: LB-313-LB-313

10.1158/1538-7445.am2011-lb-313 Get It

Abstract Introduction The presence of blood in the urine (hematuria) is one of the hallmark symptoms of bladder cancer. Thus, the current best practice policy suggests that patients with hematuria undergo cystoscopic examination. However, hematuria can be present in healthy individuals as well as in individuals with various non-life threatening conditions such that a majority of patients with blood in the urine (∼95%) who are screened by cystoscopy do not have bladder cancer. In addition, recent studies have found that a majority of patients with hematuria are not referred on to a specialist for further invasive tests, despite the guidelines. This suggests that the prevalence of cancer in this population may be lower than 5%, making screening by cystoscopy inefficient and, in a large number of cases, unnecessary. We are developing a non-invasive diagnostic assay utilizing urinary protein and DNA biomarkers to triage those patients who do not have cancer from those who should go on to be existing invasive screening modalities. Methods Urine samples were obtained from 48 cancer patients and 256 patients who were evaluated for hematuria but who did not have cancer upon cystoscopic evaluation (Hem+/Cysto−). Twist1 and Nid2 methylation status was assessed using methylation-specific PCR primers and FGFR3 mutational status was determined by quantitative PCR. Matrix Metalloproteinases (MMPs) levels were determined by ELISA. Results Using a novel combination of these DNA and protein markers we identified with high confidence (99% negative predictive value) those patients who do not have cancer and who could be excluded from further testing. Cutoffs could be adjusted such that at 94% sensitivity, 65% of patients who do not have cancer could be excluded. Conclusions The Multi-Analyte Diagnostic Readout (MADR) assay described here combines the best performance characteristics of protein and DNA biomarkers into one assay for optimal clinical performance. Using this approach, the detection of FGFR3 mutations and Twist1 and Nid2 methylation in the urine of hematuria patients undergoing screening for bladder cancer effectively increases the sensitivity and negative predictive value at an established MMP protein cutoff. This non-invasive urinary diagnostic assay could lead to the more efficient triage of hematuria patients by identifying those patients who do not have cancer and could be excluded from receiving invasive procedures. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-313. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-LB-313