Knudsen, Karen E.

Abstract Telemedicine has routinely been used in cancer care delivery for the past 3 years. The current state of digital health provides convenience and efficiency for both health-care professional and patient, but challenges exist in equitable access to virtual services. As increasingly newer technologies are added to telehealth platforms, it is essential to eliminate barriers to access through technical, procedural, and legislative improvements. Moving forward, implementation of new strategies can help eliminate disparities in virtual cancer care, facilitate delivery of treatment in the home, and improve real-time data collection for patient safety and clinical trial participation. The ultimate goal will be to extend high-quality survival for all patients with cancer through improved digital delivery of cancer care.

PURPOSE Germline testing (GT) is a central feature of prostate cancer (PCA) treatment, management, and hereditary cancer assessment. Critical needs include optimized multigene testing strategies that incorporate evolving genetic data, consistency in GT indications and management, and alternate genetic evaluation models that address the rising demand for genetic services. METHODS A multidisciplinary consensus conference that included experts, stakeholders, and national organization leaders was convened in response to current practice challenges and to develop a genetic implementation framework. Evidence review informed questions using the modified Delphi model. The final framework included criteria with strong (> 75%) agreement (Recommend) or moderate (50% to 74%) agreement (Consider). RESULTS Large germline panels and somatic testing were recommended for metastatic PCA. Reflex testing—initial testing of priority genes followed by expanded testing—was suggested for multiple scenarios. Metastatic disease or family history suggestive of hereditary PCA was recommended for GT. Additional family history and pathologic criteria garnered moderate consensus. Priority genes to test for metastatic disease treatment included BRCA2, BRCA1, and mismatch repair genes, with broader testing, such as ATM, for clinical trial eligibility. BRCA2 was recommended for active surveillance discussions. Screening starting at age 40 years or 10 years before the youngest PCA diagnosis in a family was recommended for BRCA2 carriers, with consideration in HOXB13, BRCA1, ATM, and mismatch repair carriers. Collaborative (point-of-care) evaluation models between health care and genetic providers was endorsed to address the genetic counseling shortage. The genetic evaluation framework included optimal pretest informed consent, post-test discussion, cascade testing, and technology-based approaches. CONCLUSION This multidisciplinary, consensus-driven PCA genetic implementation framework provides novel guidance to clinicians and patients tailored to the precision era. Multiple research, education, and policy needs remain of importance.

Abstract Purpose: Protein kinases are known to play a prominent role in oncogenic progression across multiple cancer subtypes, yet their role in prostate cancer progression remains underexplored. The purpose of this study was to identify kinases that drive prostate cancer progression. Experimental Design: To discover kinases that drive prostate cancer progression, we investigated the association between gene expression of all known kinases and long-term clinical outcomes in tumor samples from 545 patients with high-risk disease. We evaluated the impact of genetic and pharmacologic inhibition of the most significant kinase associated with metastatic progression in vitro and in vivo. Results: DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNAPK) was identified as the most significant kinase associated with metastatic progression in high-risk prostate cancer. Inhibition of DNAPK suppressed the growth of both AR-dependent and AR-independent prostate cancer cells. Gene set enrichment analysis nominated Wnt as the top pathway associated with DNAPK. We found that DNAPK interacts with the Wnt transcription factor LEF1 and is critical for LEF1-mediated transcription. Conclusions: Our data show that DNAPK drives prostate cancer progression through transcriptional regulation of Wnt signaling and is an attractive therapeutic target in aggressive prostate cancer.

Abstract Background/purpose: Despite recent advances in the development of androgen deprivation therapies (ADT), prostate cancer (PCa) remains the second leading cause of cancer death in American men. Thus, there is a critical need to improve treatment outcomes for men with aggressive PCa. The purpose of this study was to identify and functionally characterize kinases that can serve as both prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets in PCa. Methods: To identify kinases associated with metastatic progression of PCa, we utilized high-density oligonucleotide arrays to interrogate the expression of all kinases in 545 prostatectomy samples, obtained from high-risk patients with long-term clinical follow-up (>10 years). We ranked all kinases by their fold change in expression between PCas that subsequently metastasized versus those that did not. We then characterized the top ranked kinase in preclinical PCa models with in vitro mechanistic experiments and in vivo therapeutic studies. Results: We nominated DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNAPK) as the top kinase associated with metastatic PCa progression. Interrogation of pathways associated with DNAPK knockdown in PC3, DU145, VCaP and C4-2B, identified canonical Wnt signaling as the top DNAPK-activated pathway. In PCa cells (PC3, LNCaP C.S. {LNCaP grown under charcoal-stripped serum condition}, C4-2B and LNCaP-AR) DNAPK inhibition significantly abrogates Wnt signaling and abolishes cell proliferation, migration and invasion. Interestingly, we found that DNAPK directly modulates the Wnt signaling independent of the androgen receptor (AR), highlighting the therapeutic potential of DNAPK inhibition in cancers resistant to ADT. Indeed, in VCaP xenograft models, pharmacologic inhibition of DNAPK with NU7441 demonstrated 3.4 fold (p<0.01) reduction of tumor growth at non-toxic doses. Using an independent prostate cancer tissue cohort, we validate DNAPK expression as a biomarker for metastatic disease progression (p = 6.4 e−06, hazard ratio = 2). Conclusion: In summary, we nominate DNAPK as a potential biomarker of disease progression and as a novel therapeutic target in aggressive prostate cancer. Our data suggests that DNAPK mediates PCa progression by upregulating Wnt signaling, and demonstrates that DNAPK inhibition results in significant tumor responses in PCa xenografts. Citation Format: Vishal Kothari, Jonathan F. Goodwin, Shuang Zhao, Elai Davicioni, Jeffrey R. Karnes, Robert B. Den, Rohit Mehra, Karen E. Knudsen, Felix Y. Feng. Investigating DNAPK as a biomarker and a novel therapeutic target in aggressive prostate cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 2853. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-2853

Abstract Emerging evidence demonstrates that the DNA repair kinase DNA-PK exerts divergent roles in transcriptional regulation of unsolved consequence. Here, in vitro and in vivo interrogation demonstrate that DNA-PK functions as a selective modulator of transcriptional networks that induce cell migration, invasion, and metastasis. Accordingly, suppression of DNA-PK inhibits tumor metastases. Clinical assessment revealed that DNA-PK is significantly elevated in advanced disease, and independently predicts for metastases, recurrence, and reduced overall survival. Further investigation demonstrated that DNA-PK in advanced tumors is highly activated, independently of DNA damage indicators. Combined, these findings put forth new paradigms for DNA-PK function, identify DNA-PK as a potent driver of tumor progression and metastases, and nominate DNA-PK as a therapeutic target for advanced malignancies. Citation Format: Jonathan F. Goodwin, Vishal Kothari, Justin M. Drake, Shuang Zhao, Emanuela Dylgjeri, Jeffry L. Dean, Matthew J. Schiewer, Christopher McNair, Michael S. Magee, Robert B. Den, Ziqi Zhu, Nicholas A. Graham, Ajay A. Vashisht, James A. Wohlschlegel, Thomas G. Graeber, R Jeffrey Karnes, Mandeep Takhar, Elai Davicioni, Scott A. Tomlins, Nima Sharifi, Owen N. Witte, Felix Y. Feng, Karen E. Knudsen. DNA-PK-mediated transcriptional regulation drives tumor progression and metastasis. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 1860. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-1860