Lee, Richard T.

Importance Neoadjuvant therapy (NT) is an increasingly used treatment strategy for patients with localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Little research has been conducted on cancer care delivery during NT, and the standards for optimal delivery of NT have not been defined. Objective To develop consensus best practices for delivering NT to patients with localized PDAC. Design, Setting, and Participants This study used a modified Delphi approach consisting of 2 rounds of voting, and a series of virtual conferences (from October to December 2023) to reach expert consensus on candidate best practice statements generated from a systematic review of the literature and expert opinion. An interdisciplinary panel was formed including 47 North American experts from surgical, medical, and radiation oncology, radiology, pathology, gastroenterology, integrative oncology, anesthesia, pharmacy, nursing, cancer care delivery research, and nutrition as well as patient and caregiver stakeholders. Main Outcome and Measures Statements that reached 75% agreement or greater were included in final consensus statements. Results Of the 47 participating panel members, 27 (57.64%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 47.6 (8.2) years. Physicians reported completing training a mean (SD) 14.6 (8.6) years prior and seeing a mean (SD) 110.6 (38.4) patients with PDAC annually; 35 (77.7%) were in academic practice. Final consensus was reached on 82 best practices for delivering NT. Of these, 38 statements focused on pre-NT practices, including diagnosis and staging (n = 15), evaluation and optimization (n = 20), and decision-making (n = 3); 29 statements defined best practices during NT, including initiation (n = 3), delivery of therapy (n = 8), restaging practices (n = 12), and management of complications during NT (n = 6); and 15 best practices were identified to guide treatment post-NT, focusing on surgery (n = 7), pathology (n = 4), and follow-up (n = 3). Conclusions Using a modified Delphi consensus technique, best practice guidelines were developed focusing on the optimal standards for delivering NT to patients with localized PDAC. Given the prognostic importance of completing multimodality therapy, efforts to standardize and optimize the delivery of NT represent an immediate opportunity to decrease care variation and improve outcomes for patients with PDAC. Future research should focus on validating and implementing best practice standards into clinical practice.

Abstract Background The legal climate for cannabis use has dramatically changed with an increasing number of states passing legislation legalizing access for medical and recreational use. Among cancer patients, cannabis is often used to ameliorate adverse effects of cancer treatment. Data are limited on the extent and type of use among cancer patients during treatment and the perceived benefits and harms. This multicenter survey was conducted to assess the use of cannabis among cancer patients residing in states with varied legal access to cannabis. Methods A total of 12 NCI-Designated Cancer Centers, across states with varied cannabis-access legal status, conducted surveys with a core questionnaire to assess cannabis use among recently diagnosed cancer patients. Data were collected between September 2021 and August 2023 and pooled across 12 cancer centers. Frequencies and 95% confidence intervals for core survey measures were calculated, and weighted estimates are presented for the 10 sites that drew probability samples. Results Overall reported cannabis use since cancer diagnosis among survey respondents was 32.9% (weighted), which varied slightly by state legalization status. The most common perceived benefits of use were for pain, sleep, stress and anxiety, and treatment side effects. Reported perceived risks were less common and included inability to drive, difficulty concentrating, lung damage, addiction, and impact on employment. A majority reported feeling comfortable speaking to health-care providers though, overall, only 21.5% reported having done so. Among those who used cannabis since diagnosis, the most common modes were eating in food, smoking, and pills or tinctures, and the most common reasons were for sleep disturbance, followed by pain and stress and anxiety with 60%-68% reporting improved symptoms with use. Conclusion This geographically diverse survey demonstrates that patients use cannabis regardless of its legal status. Addressing knowledge gaps concerning benefits and harms of cannabis use during cancer treatment is critical to enhance patient-provider communication.

PURPOSE The aim of this joint guideline is to provide evidence-based recommendations to practicing physicians and other health care providers on integrative approaches to managing pain in patients with cancer. METHODS The Society for Integrative Oncology and ASCO convened an expert panel of integrative oncology, medical oncology, radiation oncology, surgical oncology, palliative oncology, social sciences, mind-body medicine, nursing, and patient advocacy representatives. The literature search included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials published from 1990 through 2021. Outcomes of interest included pain intensity, symptom relief, and adverse events. Expert panel members used this evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations. RESULTS The literature search identified 227 relevant studies to inform the evidence base for this guideline. RECOMMENDATIONS Among adult patients, acupuncture should be recommended for aromatase inhibitor–related joint pain. Acupuncture or reflexology or acupressure may be recommended for general cancer pain or musculoskeletal pain. Hypnosis may be recommended to patients who experience procedural pain. Massage may be recommended to patients experiencing pain during palliative or hospice care. These recommendations are based on an intermediate level of evidence, benefit outweighing risk, and with moderate strength of recommendation. The quality of evidence for other mind-body interventions or natural products for pain is either low or inconclusive. There is insufficient or inconclusive evidence to make recommendations for pediatric patients. More research is needed to better characterize the role of integrative medicine interventions in the care of patients with cancer. Additional information is available at https://integrativeonc.org/practice-guidelines/guidelines and www.asco.org/survivorship-guidelines .

Palliative care has evolved to be an integral part of comprehensive cancer care with the goal of early intervention to improve quality of life and patient outcomes. The NCCN Guidelines for Palliative Care provide recommendations to help the primary oncology team promote the best quality of life possible throughout the illness trajectory for each patient with cancer. The NCCN Palliative Care Panel meets annually to evaluate and update recommendations based on panel members’ clinical expertise and emerging scientific data. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the panel’s recent discussions and highlights updates on the importance of fostering adaptive coping strategies for patients and families, and on the role of pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions to optimize symptom management.

268 Background: TRC105, an endoglin antibody, potentiates the activity of sorafenib (S) in preclinical HCC models, and TRC105 + S demonstrated a 33% partial response rate (5/15 pts) by RECIST, at RP2D doses of TRC105 in HCC pts ( Clin Can Res 2017). Adverse events characteristic of each drug were not increased in frequency or severity when the two drugs were administered concurrently. Methods: P1: Compare wkly TRC105 dosing vs four wkly doses followed by every other wkly dosing + S 800 mg daily. P2: Four objective responses are required in 21 pts to reject the null hypothesis that the true response rate probability is < 5% with an alpha level of 0.1 and 80% power. Key inclusion criteria: disease not amendable to surgical or local therapies, ECOG ≤ 1; Child-Pugh A or B (7 points) classification. Results: Thirteen pts were enrolled in phase 1b at TRC105 10 mg/kg wkly for four doses and 15 mg/kg every other week thereafter + S. Mean serum levels of TRC105 exceeded the target conc. following 4 wkly doses of TRC105 at 10 mg/kg (mean = 34 µg/ml, range BLOQ-80). Mean trough conc. decreased following every other week dosing (mean = 13 µg/ml, range BLOQ-31), resulting in infusion reactions or a continued requirement for premedication. Therefore, wkly dosing of TRC105 at 10 mg/kg is the recommended Phase 2 dose. ADA were detected in 10 of 14 pts and correlated with lower than expected PK conc. Common TRC105 related AEs included ≤ G2 epistaxis, ≤ G2 fatigue and ≤ G2 headache. Common S related AEs included ≤ G3 fatigue, ≤ G3 hand foot syndrome and ≤G2 epistaxis. A total of 3 out of 14 evaluable patients (21%) enrolled in phase 1 and 2 achieved durable PR, 2 of these ongoing at week 45 and 17. Conclusions: TRC105 dosed at 10 mg/kg wkly was required to achieve target conc. due to higher clearance in HCC pts, which may have been influenced by a higher rate of ADA compared to studies of TRC105 in other tumor types. The combination of TRC105 + S demonstrated encouraging signs of activity, including durable PR in 2/9 evaluable pts in Phase 1b and 1/5 pts thus far in Phase 2. An additional 16 pts will be enrolled at the RP2D to assess the primary endpoint of ORR by RECIST. Clinical trial information: NCT01806064.

301 Background: Endoglin plays a critical role in angiogenesis and is implicated in resistance to VEGF inhibition. TRC105, an endoglin antibody potentiates anti-tumor activity of sorafenib (S) in preclinical HCC models. The combination of TRC105 and S demonstrated encouraging evidence of activity, including a 33% partial response rate (5/15 pts) by RECIST, at RP2D doses of TRC105 in HCC ( Clin Can Res 2017). Adverse events characteristic of each drug were not increased in frequency or severity when the two drugs were administered concurrently, and most commonly included epistaxis, fatigue, headache and anemia. Methods: Following dose escalation, 21 pts will be enrolled at the RP2D. Four objective responses are required to reject the null hypothesis that the true response rate probability is < 5% with an alpha level of 0.1 and 80% power. Secondary endpoints: DR, PFS, frequency and severity of AEs, PK, immunogenicity, angiogenic biomarkers. Key inclusion criteria: disease not amendable to surgical or local therapies, ECOG ≤ 1; Child-Pugh A or B (7 points) classification. Results: Four pts have been enrolled in phase 1b at TRC105 10 mg/kg (n=4) weekly for four doses and 15 mg/kg every other week thereafter + S 800 mg daily without DLT. One of 3 evaluable pts achieved PR (41% reduction), ongoing at month 4. Serum levels of TRC105 exceeded the target concentration following 4 weekly doses of TRC105 at 10 mg/kg (mean = 59 µg/ml, range 43-80). Mean trough concentration decreased following every other week dosing (mean = 21 µg/ml, range 17-31). Common TRC105 related AEs included ≤ G2 epistaxis and G1 headache. Common S related AEs included G3 hand foot syndrome, ≤G3 periodontal disease, G2 hypertension, ≤G2 increased lipase, ≤G2 fatigue and G1 epistaxis. Conclusions: TRC105 dosed by a hybrid schedule of 10 mg/kg weekly for four doses followed by every other week dosing at 15 mg/kg was tolerable and did not potentiate the toxicity of S. The combination of TRC105 + S demonstrated additional signs of activity, including a PR in 1/3 evaluable pts. 21 pts will be enrolled at the RP2D to assess the primary endpoint of ORR by RECIST. Clinical trial information: NCT01806064.