Adams, Bonne J.

Abstract Background: Metastatic undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS) and the genetically related myxofibrosarcoma (MFS) are soft tissue sarcoma (STS) subtypes with poor prognoses. While responses to front line chemotherapy can approach 20%, in the 2nd line setting and beyond, efficacy remains limited. Pazopanib, the only approved treatment in the refractory setting has demonstrated an objective response rate (ORR) of 4%. Envafolimab is a single domain PD-L1 antibody administered rapidly by subcutaneous (SQ) injection that is being studied in two additional pivotal trials: MSI-H cancer and biliary tract cancer. The activity of envafolimab is similar to other PD-1 antibodies administered intra-venously. Envafolimab demonstrated a 32% ORR in MSI-H colorectal cancer that failed three approved chemotherapeutics, similar to the ORR of 28% and 33%, with nivolumab and pembrolizumab, respectively. The rationale for the ENVASARC trial is based on the previously reported efficacy of checkpoint inhibition in UPS/MFS. Single agent pembrolizumab demonstrated a 23% ORR, while the combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab demonstrated a 29% ORR in refractory UPS/MFS. Methods: ENVASARC (NCT 04480502) is a pivotal multicenter (at ~25 U.S. centers) open-label, randomized, non-comparative, parallel cohort study of treatment with envafolimab 300 mg every 3 weeks by SQ injection (cohort A; n=80) or envafolimab 300 mg every 3 weeks by SQ injection combined with ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks intra-venously for four doses (cohort B; n=80) in patients with locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic UPS/MFS who have progressed on one or two lines of prior therapy. The primary objective of each of parallel cohort is to demonstrate an ORR with a lower limit of the 95% confidence interval that excludes 5.0% in each cohort. If ≥ 9 responders are observed of the 80 patients enrolled in each cohort, then the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval will exclude 5.0%. Secondary endpoints include duration of response (DOR), PFS and OS. Key inclusion criteria: ≤ 2 prior lines of therapy (neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy excluded), ECOG ≤ 1. Citation Format: Sandra D'Angelo, Steven Robinson, Joelle Lam, Bonne Adams, James Freddo, Charles P. Theuer, Robert Maki. ENVASARC: A Pivotal Trial of Envafolimab, and Envafolimab in Combination with Ipilimumab, in Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Undifferentiated Pleomorphic Sarcoma or Myxofibrosarcoma who have Progressed on Prior Chemotherapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr CT239.

TPS11581 Background: Metastatic undifferentiated Pleomorphic Sarcoma (UPS) and the genetically related myxofibrosarcoma (MFS) are soft tissue sarcoma (STS) subtypes with poor prognoses. While responses to front line chemotherapy can approach 20%, efficacy remains limited in the 2nd line setting and beyond. Pazopanib, the only approved treatment in the refractory setting, has demonstrated an objective response rate (ORR) of 4%. Envafolimab is a single domain PD-L1 antibody administered rapidly by subcutaneous (SQ) injection that is being studied in two additional pivotal trials: microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) cancer and biliary tract cancer. The activity of envafolimab appears to be similar to other PD-1 antibodies administered i.v. Envafolimab demonstrated a 32% objective response rate (ORR) in MSI-H colorectal cancer patients who failed three approved chemotherapeutics, similar to the ORR of 28% and 33% with nivolumab and pembrolizumab in these patient populations, respectively. The rationale for the ENVASARC trial is based on the previously reported activity of checkpoint inhibition in UPS/MFS. Single agent pembrolizumab demonstrated a 23% ORR, while the combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab demonstrated a 29% ORR in refractory UPS/MFS. Methods: ENVASARC (NCT 04480502) is a pivotal multicenter (at ̃25 U.S. centers) open-label, randomized, non-comparative, parallel cohort study of treatment with envafolimab 300 mg every 3 weeks by SQ injection (cohort A; n = 80) or envafolimab 300 mg every 3 weeks by SQ injection combined with ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks i.v. for four doses (cohort B; n = 80) in patients with locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic UPS/MFS who have progressed on one or two lines of prior therapy. The primary objective of each of parallel cohort is to demonstrate an ORR with a lower limit of the 95% confidence interval that excludes 5.0% in each cohort. If ≥ 9 responders are observed of the 80 patients enrolled in each cohort, then the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval will exclude 5.0%. Secondary endpoints include duration of response (DOR), PFS and OS. Key inclusion criteria: ≤ 2 prior lines of therapy (neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy excluded), ECOG ≤ 1. Clinical trial information: NCT 04480502.

Abstract Lessons Learned Background Endoglin is an angiogenic receptor expressed on proliferating tumor vessels and renal cell carcinoma (RCC) stem cells that is implicated as a mechanism of resistance to vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) inhibitors. This study evaluated an antiendoglin monoclonal antibody (carotuximab, TRC105) combined with axitinib in patients with advanced or metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC) who had progressed following one or more prior VEGF inhibitors. Methods TRAXAR was a multicenter, international randomized 1:1 (stratified by ECOG, 0 vs. 1), phase II study of carotuximab combined with axitinib versus axitinib alone in mccRCC patients who had progressed following one or more prior VEGF inhibitors. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by independent central review (ICR) per RECIST 1.1 Results A total of 150 patients were randomized. The combination therapy resulted in shorter median PFS by RECIST 1.1 than axitinib monotherapy (6.7 vs. 11.4 months). The combination was tolerated similarly to axitinib monotherapy, and there were no treatment related deaths. Exploratory evaluation of pretreatment circulating biomarkers suggested the combination might benefit patients who have low baseline VEGF levels. Conclusion The combination of carotuximab with axitinib did not demonstrate additional efficacy over single agent axitinib in patients with mccRCC who progressed following one or more prior VEGF inhibitor treatment.

268 Background: TRC105, an endoglin antibody, potentiates the activity of sorafenib (S) in preclinical HCC models, and TRC105 + S demonstrated a 33% partial response rate (5/15 pts) by RECIST, at RP2D doses of TRC105 in HCC pts ( Clin Can Res 2017). Adverse events characteristic of each drug were not increased in frequency or severity when the two drugs were administered concurrently. Methods: P1: Compare wkly TRC105 dosing vs four wkly doses followed by every other wkly dosing + S 800 mg daily. P2: Four objective responses are required in 21 pts to reject the null hypothesis that the true response rate probability is < 5% with an alpha level of 0.1 and 80% power. Key inclusion criteria: disease not amendable to surgical or local therapies, ECOG ≤ 1; Child-Pugh A or B (7 points) classification. Results: Thirteen pts were enrolled in phase 1b at TRC105 10 mg/kg wkly for four doses and 15 mg/kg every other week thereafter + S. Mean serum levels of TRC105 exceeded the target conc. following 4 wkly doses of TRC105 at 10 mg/kg (mean = 34 µg/ml, range BLOQ-80). Mean trough conc. decreased following every other week dosing (mean = 13 µg/ml, range BLOQ-31), resulting in infusion reactions or a continued requirement for premedication. Therefore, wkly dosing of TRC105 at 10 mg/kg is the recommended Phase 2 dose. ADA were detected in 10 of 14 pts and correlated with lower than expected PK conc. Common TRC105 related AEs included ≤ G2 epistaxis, ≤ G2 fatigue and ≤ G2 headache. Common S related AEs included ≤ G3 fatigue, ≤ G3 hand foot syndrome and ≤G2 epistaxis. A total of 3 out of 14 evaluable patients (21%) enrolled in phase 1 and 2 achieved durable PR, 2 of these ongoing at week 45 and 17. Conclusions: TRC105 dosed at 10 mg/kg wkly was required to achieve target conc. due to higher clearance in HCC pts, which may have been influenced by a higher rate of ADA compared to studies of TRC105 in other tumor types. The combination of TRC105 + S demonstrated encouraging signs of activity, including durable PR in 2/9 evaluable pts in Phase 1b and 1/5 pts thus far in Phase 2. An additional 16 pts will be enrolled at the RP2D to assess the primary endpoint of ORR by RECIST. Clinical trial information: NCT01806064.

301 Background: Endoglin plays a critical role in angiogenesis and is implicated in resistance to VEGF inhibition. TRC105, an endoglin antibody potentiates anti-tumor activity of sorafenib (S) in preclinical HCC models. The combination of TRC105 and S demonstrated encouraging evidence of activity, including a 33% partial response rate (5/15 pts) by RECIST, at RP2D doses of TRC105 in HCC ( Clin Can Res 2017). Adverse events characteristic of each drug were not increased in frequency or severity when the two drugs were administered concurrently, and most commonly included epistaxis, fatigue, headache and anemia. Methods: Following dose escalation, 21 pts will be enrolled at the RP2D. Four objective responses are required to reject the null hypothesis that the true response rate probability is < 5% with an alpha level of 0.1 and 80% power. Secondary endpoints: DR, PFS, frequency and severity of AEs, PK, immunogenicity, angiogenic biomarkers. Key inclusion criteria: disease not amendable to surgical or local therapies, ECOG ≤ 1; Child-Pugh A or B (7 points) classification. Results: Four pts have been enrolled in phase 1b at TRC105 10 mg/kg (n=4) weekly for four doses and 15 mg/kg every other week thereafter + S 800 mg daily without DLT. One of 3 evaluable pts achieved PR (41% reduction), ongoing at month 4. Serum levels of TRC105 exceeded the target concentration following 4 weekly doses of TRC105 at 10 mg/kg (mean = 59 µg/ml, range 43-80). Mean trough concentration decreased following every other week dosing (mean = 21 µg/ml, range 17-31). Common TRC105 related AEs included ≤ G2 epistaxis and G1 headache. Common S related AEs included G3 hand foot syndrome, ≤G3 periodontal disease, G2 hypertension, ≤G2 increased lipase, ≤G2 fatigue and G1 epistaxis. Conclusions: TRC105 dosed by a hybrid schedule of 10 mg/kg weekly for four doses followed by every other week dosing at 15 mg/kg was tolerable and did not potentiate the toxicity of S. The combination of TRC105 + S demonstrated additional signs of activity, including a PR in 1/3 evaluable pts. 21 pts will be enrolled at the RP2D to assess the primary endpoint of ORR by RECIST. Clinical trial information: NCT01806064.

11546 Background: TRC105, an endoglin-targeting monoclonal antibody with anti-angiogenic and anti-tumor activity, is being evaluated in multiple diseases. Here we report on pharmacodynamic and prognostic biomarkers in patients (pts) treated with both TRC105 and anti-VEGF agents. Methods: Plasma samples were collected from pts on three phase 2 trials combining TRC105 with an anti-VEGF agent: axitinib in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), pazopanib in advanced soft tissue sarcoma, and bevacizumab in glioblastoma (GBM). Baseline and on-treatment levels of 22 soluble protein biomarkers were assessed. Results: Soluble endoglin markedly increased after TRC105 treatment in all pts ( p< 0.001) as previously reported. BMP9 (a ligand for endoglin) and TGFβR3 (a type III TGFβ receptor) decreased in sarcoma pts at Cycle 2 Day 1 (C2D1) and generally remained below baseline throughout the course of treatment (BMP9, p= 0.004; TGFβR3, p= 0.003). Although TGFβR3 was decreased at C2D1 in mRCC (p = 0.030), no clear patterns were observed over time. Overall BMP9 levels did not change in response to therapy in either mRCC or GBM. Osteopontin (OPN) levels, a downstream effector of TGFβ signaling, were increased in sarcoma pts [ p= 0.002 at C2D15, p< 0.001 at C4D1 and end of study (EOS)]; however, in mRCC ( p= 0.010) and GBM ( p= 0.003), OPN was only elevated at EOS. Increases in PlGF and VEGFD, and decreases in VEGFR2 were observed across all studies, as previously noted for VEGF inhibitors. In the mRCC trial, 5 of 18 pts exhibited a ≥30% tumor reduction. Lower OPN ( p= 0.026) and higher TGFβR3 ( p= 0.003) levels at baseline correlated with radiographic response to treatment. In the sarcoma trial, 6 of 19 pts responded (CHOI criteria) in which lower baseline levels of ICAM1 ( p= 0.018) and TSP2 ( p= 0.042) correlated with stable disease. Conclusions: In these trials, increases of soluble endoglin in response to TRC105 were observed, independent of the presence of any specific VEGF inhibitor. Differential regulation of BMP9, TGFβR3, and OPN suggests potential disease-specific modulation of key TGFβ signaling molecules in response to dual therapy. Baseline levels of OPN and TGFβR3 showed potential prognostic value in mRCC. Confirmation in larger trials is needed.