Starr, Mark D.

Abstract Lessons Learned Background Endoglin is an angiogenic receptor expressed on proliferating tumor vessels and renal cell carcinoma (RCC) stem cells that is implicated as a mechanism of resistance to vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) inhibitors. This study evaluated an antiendoglin monoclonal antibody (carotuximab, TRC105) combined with axitinib in patients with advanced or metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC) who had progressed following one or more prior VEGF inhibitors. Methods TRAXAR was a multicenter, international randomized 1:1 (stratified by ECOG, 0 vs. 1), phase II study of carotuximab combined with axitinib versus axitinib alone in mccRCC patients who had progressed following one or more prior VEGF inhibitors. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by independent central review (ICR) per RECIST 1.1 Results A total of 150 patients were randomized. The combination therapy resulted in shorter median PFS by RECIST 1.1 than axitinib monotherapy (6.7 vs. 11.4 months). The combination was tolerated similarly to axitinib monotherapy, and there were no treatment related deaths. Exploratory evaluation of pretreatment circulating biomarkers suggested the combination might benefit patients who have low baseline VEGF levels. Conclusion The combination of carotuximab with axitinib did not demonstrate additional efficacy over single agent axitinib in patients with mccRCC who progressed following one or more prior VEGF inhibitor treatment.

Abstract Purpose: GOG-0218, a double-blind placebo-controlled phase III trial, compared carboplatin and paclitaxel with placebo, bevacizumab followed by placebo, or bevacizumab followed by bevacizumab in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Results demonstrated significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS), but no overall survival (OS) benefit with bevacizumab. Blood samples were collected for biomarker analyses. Experimental Design: Plasma samples were analyzed via multiplex ELISA technology for seven prespecified biomarkers [IL6, Ang-2, osteopontin (OPN), stromal cell–derived factor-1 (SDF-1), VEGF-D, IL6 receptor (IL6R), and GP130]. The predictive value of each biomarker with respect to PFS and OS was assessed using a protein marker by treatment interaction term within the framework of a Cox proportional hazards model. Prognostic markers were identified using Cox models adjusted for baseline covariates. Results: Baseline samples were available from 751 patients. According to our prespecified analysis plan, IL6 was predictive of a therapeutic advantage with bevacizumab for PFS (P = 0.007) and OS (P = 0.003). IL6 and OPN were found to be negative prognostic markers for both PFS and OS (P < 0.001). Patients with high median IL6 levels (dichotomized at the median) treated with bevacizumab had longer PFS (14.2 vs. 8.7 months) and OS (39.6 vs. 33.1 months) compared with placebo. Conclusions: The inflammatory cytokine IL6 may be predictive of therapeutic benefit from bevacizumab when combined with carboplatin and paclitaxel. Aligning with results observed in patients with renal cancer treated with antiangiogenic therapies, it appears plasma IL6 may also define those patients with EOC more or less likely to benefit from the addition of bevacizumab to standard chemotherapy.

588 Background: CALGB/SWOG 80405 found no difference in overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) in 1137 patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with either the anti-VEGF agent bevacizumab (Bev) or the anti-EGFR agent cetuximab (Cet) in combination with chemotherapy (FOLFOX or FOLFIRI) as first-line therapy. Additional molecular biomarkers are required for the optimization of treatment choices for patients with mCRC. Methods: Levels of 24 proteins were assayed in EDTA-plasma samples using multiplex ELISA techniques. Plasma samples were collected at baseline and cycle 2 day 1 (C2D1). Analyses of baseline markers have been presented previously. Changes from baseline to C2D1 were expressed as an L-ratio (LR, log2 of C2D1 divided by baseline measure). LRs dichotomized at 0 were analyzed for potential prognostic and predictive effects on OS and PFS using Cox models while adjusting for confounders (post-hoc optimized cutpoints were used for PLGF, TIMP1, VCAM1, and VEGFR3 due to skew in the distributions of these markers). P-values are not corrected for multiple testing. Results: Baseline and matched C2D1 samples from 446 patients (212 Bev/234 Cet) were available for analysis. Thirteen markers were differentially modulated between arms (p < 0.05). Early increases in CD73 (p = 0.001), ICAM1 (p = 0.022), TIMP1 (p = 0.001), TSP2 (p = 0.024), and VEGFR3 (p = 0.006) were prognostic for shorter OS. Increases in ICAM1 (p = 0.008), TIMP1 (p = 0.042), and TGFB1 (p = 0.039) were prognostic for shorter PFS. Changes in VEGFR3 (pint = 0.097) and TGFBR3 (pint = 0.052) were predictive for OS and PFS, respectively. No other markers were predictive for OS or PFS (p < 0.1). Conclusions: Changes in circulating plasma protein biomarkers observed in patients enrolled in CALGB/SWOG 80405 were both prognostic and predictive for OS and PFS and warrant further study. Such changes could provide valuable information and help guide treatment decisions. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U10CA180888, U10CA180830; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00265850. [Table: see text]

11546 Background: TRC105, an endoglin-targeting monoclonal antibody with anti-angiogenic and anti-tumor activity, is being evaluated in multiple diseases. Here we report on pharmacodynamic and prognostic biomarkers in patients (pts) treated with both TRC105 and anti-VEGF agents. Methods: Plasma samples were collected from pts on three phase 2 trials combining TRC105 with an anti-VEGF agent: axitinib in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), pazopanib in advanced soft tissue sarcoma, and bevacizumab in glioblastoma (GBM). Baseline and on-treatment levels of 22 soluble protein biomarkers were assessed. Results: Soluble endoglin markedly increased after TRC105 treatment in all pts ( p< 0.001) as previously reported. BMP9 (a ligand for endoglin) and TGFβR3 (a type III TGFβ receptor) decreased in sarcoma pts at Cycle 2 Day 1 (C2D1) and generally remained below baseline throughout the course of treatment (BMP9, p= 0.004; TGFβR3, p= 0.003). Although TGFβR3 was decreased at C2D1 in mRCC (p = 0.030), no clear patterns were observed over time. Overall BMP9 levels did not change in response to therapy in either mRCC or GBM. Osteopontin (OPN) levels, a downstream effector of TGFβ signaling, were increased in sarcoma pts [ p= 0.002 at C2D15, p< 0.001 at C4D1 and end of study (EOS)]; however, in mRCC ( p= 0.010) and GBM ( p= 0.003), OPN was only elevated at EOS. Increases in PlGF and VEGFD, and decreases in VEGFR2 were observed across all studies, as previously noted for VEGF inhibitors. In the mRCC trial, 5 of 18 pts exhibited a ≥30% tumor reduction. Lower OPN ( p= 0.026) and higher TGFβR3 ( p= 0.003) levels at baseline correlated with radiographic response to treatment. In the sarcoma trial, 6 of 19 pts responded (CHOI criteria) in which lower baseline levels of ICAM1 ( p= 0.018) and TSP2 ( p= 0.042) correlated with stable disease. Conclusions: In these trials, increases of soluble endoglin in response to TRC105 were observed, independent of the presence of any specific VEGF inhibitor. Differential regulation of BMP9, TGFβR3, and OPN suggests potential disease-specific modulation of key TGFβ signaling molecules in response to dual therapy. Baseline levels of OPN and TGFβR3 showed potential prognostic value in mRCC. Confirmation in larger trials is needed.