Back to Authors

Isaacs, William B.

Mayo Clinic

Johns Hopkins University

Citations 4

gsSKAT: Rapid gene set analysis and multiple testing correction for rare‐variant association studies using weighted linear kernels
McDonnell, Shannon K. , Stanford, Janet L. , Ostrander, Elaine A. , Isaacs, William B., Xu, Jianfeng , Cooney, Kathleen A. , Lange, Ethan M. , Schleutker, Johanna , Carpten, John D. , Powell, Isaac J., Bailey‐Wilson, Joan E. , Cussenot, Olivier , Cancel‐Tassin, Géraldine , MacInnis, Robert J. , Maier, Christiane, Whittemore, Alice S. , Hsieh, Chih‐Lin , Catolona, William J., Mandal, Diptasri , Eeles, Rosalind A. , Ackerman, Michael J. , Olson, Timothy M. , Klein, Christopher J. , Thibodeau, Stephen N. , Schaid, Daniel J. , McDonnell, Shannon, Larson, Nicholas B. , Cannon‐Albright, Lisa , Teerlink, Craig C. , Giles, Graham G. , Wiklund, Fredrik E. , Foulkes, William D. , Kote‐Jarai, Zsofia , Klein, Christopher J , Eeles, Rosalind A , Wilson, Richard K , Schleutker, Johanna , Maclnnis, Robert , Olson, Timothy M , McDonnell, Shannon K

Genetic Epidemiology | February 17, 2017 | Volume: 41 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 297-308

10.1002/gepi.22036 Get It

ABSTRACTNext‐generation sequencing technologies have afforded unprecedented characterization of low‐frequency and rare genetic variation. Due to low power for single‐variant testing, aggregative methods are commonly used to combine observed rare variation within a single gene. Causal variation may also aggregate across multiple genes within relevant biomolecular pathways. Kernel‐machine regression and adaptive testing methods for aggregative rare‐variant association testing have been demonstrated to be powerful approaches for pathway‐level analysis, although these methods tend to be computationally intensive at high‐variant dimensionality and require access to complete data. An additional analytical issue in scans of large pathway definition sets is multiple testing correction. Gene set definitions may exhibit substantial genic overlap, and the impact of the resultant correlation in test statistics on Type I error rate control for large agnostic gene set scans has not been fully explored. Herein, we first outline a statistical strategy for aggregative rare‐variant analysis using component gene‐level linear kernel score test summary statistics as well as derive simple estimators of the effective number of tests for family‐wise error rate control. We then conduct extensive simulation studies to characterize the behavior of our approach relative to direct application of kernel and adaptive methods under a variety of conditions. We also apply our method to two case‐control studies, respectively, evaluating rare variation in hereditary prostate cancer and schizophrenia. Finally, we provide open‐source R code for public use to facilitate easy application of our methods to existing rare‐variant analysis results.
Post hoc Analysis for Detecting Individual Rare Variant Risk Associations Using Probit Regression Bayesian Variable Selection Methods in Case‐Control Sequencing Studies
McDonnell, Shannon K. , Cannon‐Albright, Lisa , Teerlink, Craig C. , Stanford, Janet L. , Ostrander, Elaine A. , Isaacs, William B., Xu, Jianfeng , Cooney, Kathleen A. , Lange, Ethan M. , Schleutker, Johanna , Carpten, John D. , Powell, Isaac J., Bailey‐Wilson, Joan E. , Cussenot, Olivier , Cancel‐Tassin, Géraldine , MacInnis, Robert J. , Maier, Christiane, Whittemore, Alice S. , Hsieh, Chih‐Lin , Catolona, William J., Mandal, Diptasri , Eeles, Rosalind A. , Ackerman, Michael J. , Olson, Timothy M. , Klein, Christopher J. , Thibodeau, Stephen N. , Schaid, Daniel J. , McDonnell, Shannon, Larson, Nicholas B. , Giles, Graham G. , Wiklund, Fredrik E. , Foulkes, William D. , Kote‐Jarai, Zsofia , Klein, Christopher J , Eeles, Rosalind A , Wilson, Richard K , Schleutker, Johanna , Cannon-Albright, Lisa A , Maclnnis, Robert , Olson, Timothy M , McDonnell, Shannon K

Genetic Epidemiology | June 17, 2016 | Volume: 40 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 461-469

10.1002/gepi.21983 Get It

ABSTRACTRare variants (RVs) have been shown to be significant contributors to complex disease risk. By definition, these variants have very low minor allele frequencies and traditional single‐marker methods for statistical analysis are underpowered for typical sequencing study sample sizes. Multimarker burden‐type approaches attempt to identify aggregation of RVs across case‐control status by analyzing relatively small partitions of the genome, such as genes. However, it is generally the case that the aggregative measure would be a mixture of causal and neutral variants, and these omnibus tests do not directly provide any indication of which RVs may be driving a given association. Recently, Bayesian variable selection approaches have been proposed to identify RV associations from a large set of RVs under consideration. Although these approaches have been shown to be powerful at detecting associations at the RV level, there are often computational limitations on the total quantity of RVs under consideration and compromises are necessary for large‐scale application. Here, we propose a computationally efficient alternative formulation of this method using a probit regression approach specifically capable of simultaneously analyzing hundreds to thousands of RVs. We evaluate our approach to detect causal variation on simulated data and examine sensitivity and specificity in instances of high RV dimensionality as well as apply it to pathway‐level RV analysis results from a prostate cancer (PC) risk case‐control sequencing study. Finally, we discuss potential extensions and future directions of this work.
Truncating Variants in p53AIP1 Disrupting DNA Damage–Induced Apoptosis Are Associated with Prostate Cancer Risk
Wang, Fengwei , Taniguchi, Ken, Seelan, Ratnam S. , Zarfas, Katherine E., McDonnell, Shannon K. , Qian, Chiping , Lu, Youyong , Shridhar, Viji , Tindall, Donald J., Beebe‐Dimmer, Jennifer , Cooney, Kathleen A. , Isaacs, William B., Jacobsen, Steven J. , Schaid, Daniel J. , Thibodeau, Stephen N. , Wang, Xianshu , Wang, Liang , Pan, Kai‐Feng , Couch, Fergus J. , Liu, Wanguo , McDonnell, Shannon K

Cancer Research | November 2, 2006 | Volume: 66 | Issue: 21 | Pages: 10302-10307

10.1158/0008-5472.can-06-0638 Get It

Abstract Germ line mutations in several genes (BRCA1, BRCA2, and CHEK2) whose products are involved in the DNA damage–signaling pathway have been implicated in prostate cancer risk. To identify additional genes in this pathway that might confer susceptibility to this cancer, we analyzed a recently identified DNA damage–response gene, p53AIP1 (a gene encoding for p53-regulated apoptosis-inducing protein 1), for genetic variants in prostate cancer. Five novel germ line variants were identified. The two truncating variants (Ser32Stop and Arg21insG) were found in 3% (4 of 132) of unselected prostate tumor samples. Genotyping of the two variants in an additional 393 men with sporadic prostate cancer showed a frequency of 3.1% (12 of 393) in contrast to 0.6% (2 of 327) in 327 unaffected men (Fisher's exact test, P = 0.018), with an odds ratio (OR) of 5.1 [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.1-23.0]. In addition, two of six tumors carrying the truncating variants were associated with loss of heterozygosity of the wild-type alleles, suggesting that p53AIP1 may act as a tumor suppressor. We also showed that the truncated p53AIP1 was unable to induce apoptosis and suppress cell growth in HeLa and COS-7 cells. These results suggest that loss-of-function variants in p53AIP1 associated with the risk of sporadic prostate cancer and further support the concept that the genetic defects in the DNA damage–response genes play an important role in the development of prostate cancer. (Cancer Res 2006; 66(21): 10302-7)
A Germline DNA Polymorphism Enhances Alternative Splicing of the KLF6 Tumor Suppressor Gene and Is Associated with Increased Prostate Cancer Risk
Narla, Goutham , DiFeo, Analisa , Reeves, Helen L. , Schaid, Daniel J. , Hirshfeld, Jennifer, Hod, Eldad A. , Katz, Amanda, Isaacs, William B., Hebbring, Scott J. , Komiya, Akira , McDonnell, Shannon K. , Wiley, Kathleen E. , Jacobsen, Steven J. , Isaacs, Sarah D., Walsh, Patrick C., Chang, Bao-Li, Friedrichsen, Danielle M., Stanford, Janet L. , Ostrander, Elaine A. , Chinnaiyan, Arul M., Rubin, Mark A. , Xu, Jianfeng , Thibodeau, Stephen N. , Martignetti, John A., Karyadi, Danielle M. , Zheng, Shusen , Chang, Bao‐Li, Friedman, Scott L. , DiFeo, Analisa , Rubin, Mark A , McDonnell, Shannon K

Cancer Research | September 15, 2005 | Volume: 65 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 1213-1222

10.1158/0008-5472.can-04-4249 Get It

Abstract Prostate cancer is a leading and increasingly prevalent cause of cancer death in men. Whereas family history of disease is one of the strongest prostate cancer risk factors and suggests a hereditary component, the predisposing genetic factors remain unknown. We first showed that KLF6 is a tumor suppressor somatically inactivated in prostate cancer and since then, its functional loss has been further established in prostate cancer cell lines and other human cancers. Wild-type KLF6, but not patient-derived mutants, suppresses cell growth through p53-independent transactivation of p21. Here we show that a germline KLF6 single nucleotide polymorphism, confirmed in a tri-institutional study of 3,411 men, is significantly associated with an increased relative risk of prostate cancer in men, regardless of family history of disease. This prostate cancer–associated allele generates a novel functional SRp40 DNA binding site and increases transcription of three alternatively spliced KLF6 isoforms. The KLF6 variant proteins KLF6-SV1 and KLF6-SV2 are mislocalized to the cytoplasm, antagonize wtKLF6 function, leading to decreased p21 expression and increased cell growth, and are up-regulated in tumor versus normal prostatic tissue. Thus, these results are the first to identify a novel mechanism of self-encoded tumor suppressor gene inactivation and link a relatively common single nucleotide polymorphism to both regulation of alternative splicing and an increased risk in a major human cancer.