Stulak, John M.

Introduction: We compared outcome of repeat CABG (RCABG) and PCI in patients with previous CABG. Hypothesis: RCABG may improve survival versus PCI. Methods: From 1993 through 2009, 3,058 patients underwent revascularization after previous CABG. RCABG patients (n=530) were grouped by the use of arterial grafts (n=396), or saphenous vein grafts (SVG; n=134). At previous CABG, 37% of RCABG patients received IMA graft. PCI patients (n=2,528) were grouped into balloon angioplasty (BA; n=491), bare metal stent (BMS; n=1,267), and drug-eluting stent (DES; n=769). PCI patients were further stratified by the treated target into native coronary artery (n=1,637), bypass grafts (n=674), or both (n=216). Propensity score analysis matched 287 patients. Results: RCABG had increased 30-day mortality compared with PCI (HR=3.92; 95% CI, 2.25-6.84; P <.001) in multivariable analysis, while in propensity matched analysis it did not ( P =.09). Overall survival, however, was greater for RCABG compared with PCI in multivariable analysis (HR=0.70; 95% CI, 0.59-0.83; P <.001), as well as in propensity matched analysis (10-year survival rates were 52% vs 37%, respectively [ P =.005]). Compared with RCABG, PCI involving bypass grafts had increased mortality (HR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.09-1.78; P =.008), whereas PCI targeting only the native coronaries did not (HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.85-1.47; P =.43); BMS patients had increased mortality (HR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.06-1.68; P =.013), but DES did not (HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.77-2.12; P =.35). At RCABG, 318 patients (60%) received an IMA graft and late survival was similar to those receiving SVG; The use of IMA in previous CABG was associated with improved survival (HR=0.82; 95% CI, 0.72-0.92; P <.001]. Conclusions: Long-term survival after previous CABG is improved with RCABG compared to PCI, especially when PCI involves bypass grafts. There is no difference in long-term survival between RCABG using arterial grafts vs SVG only if IMA is used in either previous or RCABG.

Introduction: Left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) with magnetically levitated impellers have become standard due to hemocompatibility and survival profile. To optimize LVAD speeds, we previously introduced simultaneous right and left heart (RH/LH) catheterization during ramp studies. Here, we report pairing of this approach with pressure-volume (PV) assessment in a patient with a HeartMate 3 LVAD with mitral regurgitation (MR). The combined approach evaluated left ventricular (LV) hemodynamics and right ventricular (RV) PV-relationships during ramp testing. Methods: A 68-year-old male with ischemic cardiomyopathy, two years following HeartMate3 implantation, presented with NYHA class III symptoms. To evaluate for dyspnea, he underwent a RH/LH catheterization ramp study. RV PV-loops were created by use of a conductance catheter system, allowing creation of PV loops. Results: At the baseline LVAD speed of 5300 rotations per minute (RPM), right atrial pressure was elevated at 16 mmHg and pulmonary artery (PA) pressure of 26 mmHg. Left-end diastolic pressure (LVEDP) was elevated (16mmHg). Baseline cardiac index (CI) was 2.01 L/min/m 2 . Ramp testing was performed, increasing speeds from 5300 to 5800 RPM. Progressive LV unloading was observed with a 5 mmHg drop in LVEDP and a 3 mmHg drop in PA pressure. However, RV PV loop monitoring revealed a negative impact on RV contractility with the maximal elastance (Emax) slope demonstrating a 22% reduction. Furthermore, a 17% reduction in RV stroke volume was documented, while diastolic function remained unchanged. Thus, despite excellent LV offloading and diminishment of RV afterload, the significant negative impact on Emax resulted in no net increase in CI (+0.04 L/min/m 2 ) during the ramp evaluation. Inotrope therapy was initiated for RV function with increased LVAD RPM to outcompete MR. Conclusions: While RH/LH catheterization provides a real-time perspective of the interventricular relationship during ramp, the impact of increasing LVAD speeds on RV function has yet to be directly measured. Here, the RV PV loop relationship during LVAD ramp showed that although LVAD speed increases in the setting of MR may facilitate LV unloading, a drop in RV afterload did not compensate for reduction in RV contractility.

Abstract Background Left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) have an associated infection rate of 13%–80% postimplant. An optimal strategy for surgical infection prophylaxis (SIP) at the time of implantation has not been well defined. We aimed to evaluate the different LVAD implantation antibiotic prophylaxis regimens as well as the incidence of LVAD infection at our institution. Methods We performed a single-center, retrospective study of patients who underwent LVAD implantation between February 2007 and June 2019. The primary outcome was the incidence of LVAD infection (LVADI), within 3 months and 1 year of placement, between patients who received expanded or narrow-spectrum regimens for SIP. We assessed outcomes using Kaplan-Meier, time-to-first event. We used a noninferiority analysis, which was established if the narrow-spectrum event rate was no more than 5% greater than the expanded-spectrum event rate. Results We included 399 patients, 305 (76.4%) patients received narrow-spectrum SIP, whereas the remaining 94 (23.6%) patients received the expanded-spectrum regimen. Statistical noninferiority of the narrow spectrum to the multiple drug regimen was demonstrated at both time points, and statistical superiority of the narrow-spectrum group across 12-month follow up was further evident (P = .037). Conclusions We report evidence supporting noninferiority, or even superiority, of the narrow-spectrum over expanded-spectrum antimicrobial prophylaxis strategy with respect to LVADI. These findings support data-driven antimicrobial prophylaxis strategies.

Introduction: Severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is associated with considerable morbidity/mortality in an elderly population with multiple comorbidities. There is interest in transcatheter interventions to manage severe TR in this population. Understanding right heart (RH) anatomy has implications for patient/device selection for transcatheter intervention. Hypothesis: We analyzed RH anatomy by CT of patients referred for TR therapy to determine transcatheter tricuspid intervention device sizing needs. Methods: Retrospective Mayo Clinic study of 29 patients considered for intervention of severe TR from 3/1/2016-12/15/2020; echocardiogram and CT angiogram obtained in all patients. Results: Mean age was 83±8 (83% female), 100% had atrial fibrillation, and 62% had chronic kidney disease ≥3a. 97% were symptomatic, 93% were prescribed loop diuretics, and 24% had device leads. Mean tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion 16.8±4.5 mm, effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA) 81±33 mm 2 , and cardiac index 2.6±0.6 L/min/m 2 . 41% had at least moderate right ventricular (RV) dysfunction with a mean RV systolic pressure of 46±16 mmHg. Patients receiving intervention had significantly larger EROA (101±33 v. 63±22 mm 2 , P=0.033), shorter tricuspid leaflet tenting length (6.5±3.0 v. 8.9±2.7 mm, P=0.042), and smaller annuloplasty diagnostic perimeter during diastole (120.1±16.6 v. 131.1±7.4 mm, P=0.041). Intervention patients tended to have better right ventricular function, smaller RV and IVC size, and more severe symptoms. Max tricuspid annulus diameter in systole and diastole was 51±5 and 53±7 mm, respectively. Conclusions: Severe TR patients referred for transcatheter intervention present with severe RH enlargement with a large proportion having tricuspid annulus dimensions outside the range for current devices available in clinical trials. These data have implications for device development/selection and procedural feasibility.

Primary cardiac angiosarcomas (PCA) are highly aggressive malignant heart tumors. Previous reports have shown a poor prognosis regardless of management, and no consensus or guidelines exist. It is necessary to clarify this information since patients with PCA have a short survival. Therefore, we aimed to systematically review clinical manifestations, management, and outcomes. We systematically searched in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and EMBASE. We intended to include cross-sectional studies, case-control studies, cohort studies, and case series that reported clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes of patients with PCA. As a methodological approach, we used the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Case Series and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohorts. We included six studies (five case series, one cohort). The mean/median age ranged from 39 to 48.9 years. Male sex was predominant. The most frequent manifestations were dyspnea (range: 50%-80%), pericardial effusion (29% & 56%), and chest pain (10%-39%). The mean tumor size ranged from 5.8 to 7.2 cm, with the majority of these localized in the right atrium (70-100%). The most common locations of metastasis were the lung (20%-55.6%), liver (10%-22.2%), and bone (10%-20%). Resection (22.9%-94%), and chemotherapy as neoadjuvant or adjuvant (30%-100%) were the most commonly used methods of treatment. Mortality ranged from 64.7% to 100%. PCA often presents late in its course and usually results in poor prognosis. We strongly recommend performing multi-institutional prospective cohorts to better study disease course and treatments to develop consensus, algorithms, and guidelines for this type of sarcoma.

The optimal antithrombotic therapy following combined coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) and surgical valve replacement (SVR) surgery remains unclear. The aim of this single-center, retrospective cohort study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of a vitamin K antagonist (VKA) plus either aspirin or clopidogrel in patients following combined CABG and SVR. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of bleeding within six months. The secondary endpoint was the occurrence of CV death, stroke, acute coronary syndrome (ACS), or valve dysfunction. Outcomes were identified by pre-specified ICD codes. A total of 629 patients were included in the analysis, with 583 patients receiving aspirin and 46 patients receiving clopidogrel. Bleeding occurred in 1.7% of patients receiving aspirin and in 0% of patients receiving clopidogrel (p = 0.99). CV death, stroke, ACS, or valve dysfunction occurred in 3.1% of patients receiving aspirin and 4.3% of patients receiving clopidogrel (p = 0.65). In this study, there were no differences in the safety or effectiveness of a VKA plus either aspirin or clopidogrel following combined CABG and SVR.

Abstract OBJECTIVES Delayed sternal closure (DSC) after cardiac surgery is a temporizing measure to address coagulopathy or haemodynamic instability after cardiac surgery. We sought to study: (i) indications and temporal trends for DSC, (ii) factors associated with time to chest closure and (iii) its impact on short-term and long-term outcomes. METHODS From January 2007 to December 2017, 494 patients (median age 67 years, 66% males) required DSC after cardiac surgery. Medical records were reviewed for indications, risk factors, time to DSC and outcomes. Multivariable Cox regression via landmark analysis of 486 5-day survivors was used to investigate the impact of time to chest closure on early and late survival. RESULTS Coagulopathy and haemodynamic instability were the most common indications. Median time to chest closure was 2 days. Pre-/intraoperative extracorporeal membranous oxygenation, severe right ventricular dysfunction and diabetes mellitus were associated with longer time to chest closure. Longer time to closure was associated with increased risk of operative complications and operative mortality, but did not have a statistically significant association with late mortality. Increasing age, pulmonary hypertension and a greater number of prior sternotomies were also found to be associated with overall mortality. CONCLUSIONS While longer time to chest closure was associated with increased rates of operative complications and operative mortality, it did not reveal a statistically significant association with long-term survival.

The effects of left ventricular unloading on septal function in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have not been well characterized in vivo. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between markers of septal function with echocardiography in relationship to RV dysfunction and late RV failure after LVAD implantation. A retrospective study was conducted of patients supported on centrifugal-flow LVADs implanted over a 10-year period. Echocardiographic data were collected pre-operatively and up to 2 years after implantation. Interventricular septum (IVS) measurements were taken at end-systole and end-diastole. Interventricular-septal output (ISO) was calculated using the formula: (IVSs–IVSd)×heart rate. A total of 110 patients were included. An immediate and sustained reduction in both lateral annulus systolic velocity (RVS’) and TAPSE were observed after implant (p < 0.0001). However, ISO gradually decreased over time (p < 0.0001). While ISO was not predictive of late RV failure, a decrease in ISO by 25% or greater from pre-implant to hospital discharge was associated with late RV failure (OR 4.8; 95% CI, 1.4–16.5; p = 0.012) even after adjusting for relevant clinical variables (p ≤ 0.01 for each model). RV function is known to be influenced by mechanical ventricular interdependence and we demonstrate that measurement of ISO may be a useful marker in assessing RV dysfunction and predicting RV failure in patients following LVAD implantation.

Abstract Background The incidence of end-stage heart failure necessitating advanced cardiac therapy continues to increase in the United states. Implantable left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) represent an important modality that is utilized both as a bridge to heart transplant or as destination therapy. LVAD-associated infections, ranging from driveline exit site or pocket infections to endovascular infections, are a major complication with high mortality. Antibiotic prophylaxis at time of LVAD implantation is therefore an important strategy to mitigate infections. However, a clear surgical infection prophylaxis regimen and associated outcomes have not been reported. Methods We performed a single center, retrospective cohort study evaluating the impact of antimicrobial prophylaxis on risk of infection in patients who underwent LVAD implantation between February 2007 and June 2019 at Mayo Clinic. LVAD-specific and related infections were defined according to the International Society of Heart Lung Transplantation criteria. Single drug prophylaxis (SDP) included cefazolin only, vancomycin only, or cefazolin and vancomycin; multidrug (MDP) regimen includes either of the SDP regimens plus another antibiotic. We compared incidence of infection within 90-day and within one-year of implantation, as well as risk of C. difficile infections between the SDP and MDP cohorts. Results We reviewed 403 patients who received LVAD implantation (Table 1), 402 of had information on surgical prophylaxis. 307 (76%) patients received SDP and 95 patients (24%) received MDP. 14 patients developed an infection within 1 year of implantation (Table 2). There was no difference in the incidence of infections between SDP and MDP arms both at 90 days and 1-year post-implantation (p=0.11). The median time of infection since LVAD implantation was similar between SDP and MDP (p=0.37) arms. Incidence of C. difficile infection was not different between groups (p=0.10) (Table 3). Conclusion There was no significant difference in incidence or time to first infection, within 90-day and 1-year of implantation, between single- and multidrug antibiotic surgical prophylaxis regimens administered at the time of LVAD implantation. Future prospective trials are needed to develop a clear LVAD antibiotic prophylaxis protocol. Disclosures John C. O'Horo, Sr., MD, MPH, Bates college: Advisor/Consultant|MITRE corporation: Grant/Research Support|nferenec, Inc: Grant/Research Support.

Although continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs) provide an augmentation in systemic perfusion, there is a scarcity of in vivo data regarding systemic pulsatility on support. Patients supported on CF-LVAD therapy (n = 71) who underwent combined left/right catheterization ramp study were included. Aortic pulsatility was defined by the pulsatile power index (PPI), which was also calculated in a cohort of high-output heart failure (HOHF, n = 66) and standard HF cohort (n = 44). PPI was drastically lower in CF-LVAD–supported patients with median PPI of 0.006 (interquartile range [IQR], 0.002–0.012) compared with PPI in the HF population at 0.09 (IQR, 0.06–0.17) or HOHF population at 0.25 (IQR, 0.13–0.37; p < 0.0001 among groups). With speed augmentation during ramp, PPI values fell quickly in patients with higher PPI at baseline. PPI correlated poorly with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in all groups. In CF-LVAD patients, there was a stronger correlation with LV dP/dt (r = 0.41; p = 0.001) than LVEF (r = 0.21; p = 0.08; p int < 0.001). CF-LVAD support is associated with a dramatic reduction in arterial pulsatility as measured by PPI relative to HOHF and HF cohorts and decreases with speed. Further work is needed to determine the applicability to the next generation of device therapy.