Schettle, Sarah

ABSTRACT Background Addition of left heart catheterization (LHC) to exercise protocols allows for a unique focus on parameters of systolic and diastolic responses to increased activity in patients with left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support. Methods A retrospective review was conducted of all consecutive adult patients who underwent LHC with exercise for any indication from June 2017 to June 2023. For all patients, the relationship between exercise and parameters of LV systolic and diastolic response was assessed. Patients were divided into two cohorts based on the indication for testing: hemodynamic optimization (Optim, n = 5) or weaning consideration (Wean, n = 3). Results Eight patients (88% male, median age 57 years (IQR 44, 65)) were included. LVEF was 45% (IQR 45, 56) in Wean and 25% (IQR 20, 42) in Optim. LV systolic work index (LVSWI) increased more rapidly over levels of exercise in Wean vs. Optim (slope 46.3 vs. −0.625; p = 0.044) and LVSWI rose more quickly at lower levels of LV end diastolic pressure (LVEDP) in Wean vs. Optim (slope 219.5 vs. −2.008; p = 0.0026). Pulse power index was higher in Wean patients at baseline (0.046 (IQR 0.04, 0.07) vs. 0.016 (IQR 0.001, 0.04); p = 0.14) and peak exercise (0.12 (IQR 0.12, 0.12) vs. 0.06 (IQR 0.03, 0.1); p = 0.29). Conclusions Patients with favorable remodeling on LVAD support have significantly improved LV systolic and diastolic responses to exercise and a trend of higher systemic pulsatility. Improving our understanding of LV‐LVAD interactions with activity may aid in future efforts to improve exercise tolerance through speed modulation.

AbstractBackgroundGastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) in patients with continuous flow left ventricular assist devices (CF‐LVADs) is often related to GI angiodysplasia (GIAD). We previously reported data on VEGF inhibition with IV bevacizumab in the treatment of LVAD‐associated GIAD bleeding, and now present follow‐up data on patients treated with IV bevacizumab and/or low‐dose oral pazopanib.MethodsAll consecutive adult patients with LVAD‐associated GIB from GIAD treated with bevacizumab or pazopanib, from July 20, 2017 to June 22, 2022, were included in the analysis. Data on hospitalizations, GI endoscopic procedures, and blood transfusions were obtained from first admission for GIB up to a median of 35.7 months following treatment initiation (range 1.3–59.8 months).ResultsEleven patients (91% male, mean 69.5 ± 8.9 years) were included. Eight patients (73%) received IV bevacizumab, two patients (18%) received oral pazopanib, and one patient (9%) received bevacizumab followed by pazopanib therapy. We observed a significantly decreased number of annualized hospitalizations for GIB (median difference − 2.87, p = 0.002), blood transfusions (median difference − 20.9, p = 0.01), and endoscopies (median difference − 6.95, p = 0.007) in patients pre‐ and post‐anti‐angiogenic therapy (bevacizumab and/or pazopanib). Similarly, a significant improvement in these clinical outcomes was noted in the bevacizumab group with decreased annualized hospitalizations (median difference − 2.75, p = 0.014), blood transfusions (median difference − 24.5, p = 0.047), and number of endoscopies (median differences −6.88, p = 0.006).ConclusionAnti‐angiogenic therapy with IV bevacizumab and/or low‐dose oral pazopanib appears to provide benefits in patients with LVAD‐associated GIB with reduced hospitalizations, blood transfusions, and need for GI endoscopic procedures.

The literature regarding Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) in left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) patients is limited. Therefore, we aimed to characterize the clinical course, risk factors, management, and outcomes of LVAD patients who developed CDI. Adult patients who underwent LVAD placement during 2010–2022 and developed CDI were included. To determine risk factors and outcomes, we matched CDI patients with LVAD patients who did not develop CDI. Each CDI case was matched with up to two control subjects by age, sex, and time from LVAD implantation. Forty-seven of 393 LVAD patients (12.0%) developed CDI. The median time from LVAD implantation to CDI was 147 days (interquartile range 22.5–647.0). The most common CDI treatment was oral vancomycin (n = 26, 55.3%). Thirteen patients (27.7%) required treatment extension because of a lack of clinical response. Three patients (6.4%) developed recurrent CDI. When 42 cases were matched to 79 control subjects, antibiotic exposure within 90 days was significantly associated with CDI (adjusted odds ratio 5.77; 95% confidence interval, 1.87–17.74; p = 0.002). Moreover, CDI was associated with 1 year mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 2.62; 95% confidence interval, 1.18–5.82; p = 0.018). This infection occurs most often within the first year after LVAD implantation and was associated with 1 year mortality. Antibiotic exposure is an important risk for CDI.

Mechanical circulatory support is increasingly being used as bridge-to-transplant and destination therapy in patients with advanced heart failure. Technologic improvements have led to increased patient survival and quality of life, but infection remains one of the leading adverse events following ventricular assist device (VAD) implantation. Infections can be classified as VAD-specific, VAD-related, and non-VAD infections. Risk of VAD-specific infections, such as driveline, pump pocket, and pump infections, remains for the duration of implantation. While adverse events are typically most common early (within 90 days of implantation), device-specific infection (primarily driveline) is a notable exception. No diminishment over time is seen, with event rates of 0.16 events per patient-year in both the early and late periods postimplantation. Management of VAD-specific infections requires aggressive treatment and chronic suppressive antimicrobial therapy is indicated when there is concern for seeding of the device. While surgical intervention/hardware removal is often necessary in prosthesis-related infections, this is not so easily accomplished with VADs. This review outlines the current state of infections in patients supported with VAD therapy and discusses future directions, including possibilities with fully implantable devices and novel approaches to treatment.

The effects of left ventricular unloading on septal function in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have not been well characterized in vivo. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between markers of septal function with echocardiography in relationship to RV dysfunction and late RV failure after LVAD implantation. A retrospective study was conducted of patients supported on centrifugal-flow LVADs implanted over a 10-year period. Echocardiographic data were collected pre-operatively and up to 2 years after implantation. Interventricular septum (IVS) measurements were taken at end-systole and end-diastole. Interventricular-septal output (ISO) was calculated using the formula: (IVSs–IVSd)×heart rate. A total of 110 patients were included. An immediate and sustained reduction in both lateral annulus systolic velocity (RVS’) and TAPSE were observed after implant (p < 0.0001). However, ISO gradually decreased over time (p < 0.0001). While ISO was not predictive of late RV failure, a decrease in ISO by 25% or greater from pre-implant to hospital discharge was associated with late RV failure (OR 4.8; 95% CI, 1.4–16.5; p = 0.012) even after adjusting for relevant clinical variables (p ≤ 0.01 for each model). RV function is known to be influenced by mechanical ventricular interdependence and we demonstrate that measurement of ISO may be a useful marker in assessing RV dysfunction and predicting RV failure in patients following LVAD implantation.

Abstract Background Lactate hydrogenase (LDH) is a common biomarker utilized in the detection and monitoring of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) hemolysis and thrombosis. Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) are common laboratory tests that can be used to calculate the De Ritis ratio and the De Ritis adjusted AST. Methods A retrospective review of LVAD patients was performed to identify three cohorts of patients: those with confirmed pump thrombosis after device exchange, those with LVAD‐related hemolysis who were medically managed without pump exchange, and those who did not meet these criteria and served as the control cohort. Evaluation of AST, AST/ALT ratio (referred to as the De Ritis ratio) as well as AST x (AST/ALT) or the De Ritis‐adjusted AST (DRA) was performed. Results There were 29 patients who underwent device exchange for thrombosis, 25 patients who were diagnosed with hemolysis and treated medically (clopidogrel ( N = 6), heparin ( N = 13), tirofiban ( N = 8), eptifibatide ( N = 2), and some received more than one of these treatments), and 425 control patients. A qualitatively comparable relative and absolute rise in DRA and LDH were found in both surgically managed pump thrombosis and suspected device‐related hemolysis. Conclusions Both AST and LDH as well DRA are significantly associated with pump thrombosis ( p < 0.0001 for each). DRA is a potential screening biomarker for hemolysis and device thrombosis in stable left ventricular assist device patients.

A 77 year old man previously implanted with a HeartMate II left ventricular assist device (LVAD) as destination therapy and an implantable cardioverter defibrillator presented with a left upper lobe squamous cell lung cancer. Oncology determined that proton beam therapy was indicated for treatment, and a multidisciplinary team of radiation physicists, radiation oncologists, and LVAD providers developed a protocol to proceed safely. He was successfully treated with combined proton beam radiation therapy and reduced dose chemotherapy. This case demonstrates feasibility and considerations of proton beam therapy for malignancy relevant to patients with implantable cardiac devices including LVADs.

Background The presence of a durable left ventricular assist device ( LVAD ) is associated with increased risk of vasoplegia in the early postoperative period following heart transplantation ( HT ). However, preoperative predictors of vasoplegia and its impact on survival after HT are unknown. We sought to examine predictors and outcomes of patients who develop vasoplegia after HT following bridging therapy with an LVAD . Methods and Results We identified 94 patients who underwent HT after bridging with continuous‐flow LVAD from 2008 to 2018 at a single institution. Vasoplegia was defined as persistent low vascular resistance requiring ≥2 intravenous vasopressors within 48 hours after HT for >24 hours to maintain mean arterial pressure >70 mm Hg. Overall, 44 patients (46.8%) developed vasoplegia after HT . Patients with and without vasoplegia had similar preoperative LVAD , echocardiographic, and hemodynamic parameters. Patients with vasoplegia were significantly older; had longer LVAD support, higher preoperative creatinine, longer cardiopulmonary bypass time, and higher Charlson comorbidity index; and more often underwent combined organ transplantation. In a multivariate logistic regression model, older age (odds ratio: 1.08 per year; P =0.010), longer LVAD support (odds ratio: 1.06 per month; P =0.007), higher creatinine (odds ratio: 3.9 per 1 mg/dL; P =0.039), and longer cardiopulmonary bypass time (odds ratio: 1.83 per hour; P =0.044) were independent predictors of vasoplegia. After mean follow‐up of 4.0 years after HT , vasoplegia was associated with increased risk of all‐cause mortality (hazard ratio: 5.20; 95% CI, 1.71–19.28; P =0.003). Conclusions Older age, longer LVAD support, impaired renal function, and prolonged intraoperative CPB time are independent predictors of vasoplegia in patients undergoing HT after LVAD bridging. Vasoplegia is associated with worse prognosis; therefore, detailed assessment of these predictors can be clinically important.

Background Diastolic pulmonary gradient ( DPG ) was proposed as a better marker of pulmonary vascular remodeling compared with pulmonary vascular resistance ( PVR ) and transpulmonary gradient ( TPG ). The prognostic significance of DPG in patients requiring a left ventricular assist device ( LVAD ) remains unclear. We sought to investigate whether pre‐ LVAD DPG is a predictor of survival or right ventricular ( RV ) failure post‐ LVAD . Methods and Results We retrospectively reviewed 268 patients who underwent right heart catheterization before LVAD implantation from 2007 to 2017 and had pulmonary hypertension because of left heart disease. Patients were dichotomized using DPG ≥7 mm Hg, PVR ≥3 mm Hg, or TPG ≥12 mm Hg. The associations between these parameters and all‐cause mortality or RV failure post LVAD were assessed with Cox proportional hazards regression and Kaplan–Meier analyses. After a mean follow‐up time of 35 months, elevated DPG was associated with increased risk of RV failure (hazard ratio [ HR ]: 3.30; P =0.004, for DPG ≥7 versus DPG <7), whereas elevated PVR ( HR 1.85, P =0.13 for PVR ≥3 versus PVR <3) or TPG ( HR 1.47, P =0.35, for TPG ≥12 versus TPG <12) were not associated with the development of RV failure. Elevated DPG was not associated with mortality risk ( HR 1.16, P =0.54, for DPG ≥7 versus DPG <7), whereas elevated PVR , but not TPG , was associated with higher mortality risk ( HR 1.55; P =0.026, for PVR ≥3 versus PVR <3). Conclusions Among patients with pulmonary hypertension because of left heart disease requiring LVAD support, elevated DPG was associated with RV failure but not survival, while elevated PVR predicted mortality post LVAD implantation.

International normalized ratio (INR) measurements manage risks of bleeding and clotting sequelae in the population with left ventricular assist device (LVAD). Studies suggest that point-of-care (POC) INR does not significantly differ from plasma INR (P-INR) values in other patient populations, although this has not been validated in a multicenter LVAD study. We sought to determine whether POC-INR and P-INR values differ significantly in the LVAD population and reviewed patients with permanent LVAD implantation at seven institutions internationally. Our cohort comprised of 279 paired POC-INR and P-INR checks in patients supported on average 630 ± 598 days postimplant with predominately HeartWare, HeartMate II, and HeartMate III devices. The population averaged 57.9 years of age, and there were 86.7% male. We found no statistically significant difference between POC-INR and P-INR values. International normalized ratio accuracy correlated weakly with the time between INR measurements (p < 0.001). When the time difference was less than 4 hours, the difference between INR pairs was significantly lower than measurements greater than 8 hours (p = 0.006). There was no statistically significant difference when comparing paired INR values and time after implant to INR check (p = 0.43), age (p = 0.12), known coagulopathy (p = 0.12), bleeding history (p = 0.22), or thrombosis history (p = 0.34). This is the first large multicenter international study comparing POC-INR and P-INR measurements in patients with LVAD and found no statistically significant difference between either methods, particularly when measured within less than 4 hours of each other.