Back to Authors

Schettle, Sarah D.

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

Citations 8

Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Clostridioides difficile Infection in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Device
Chesdachai, Supavit , Schettle, Sarah , Boilson, Barry A. , Shah, Aditya , Mendoza, Maria A. , Schettle, Sarah D., Shah, Aditya S , Chesdachai, Supavit , Yetmar, Zachary A. , Ranganath, Nischal , Razonable, Raymund R.

ASAIO Journal | June 27, 2023 | Volume: 69 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 950-955

10.1097/mat.0000000000002008 Get It

The literature regarding Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) in left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) patients is limited. Therefore, we aimed to characterize the clinical course, risk factors, management, and outcomes of LVAD patients who developed CDI. Adult patients who underwent LVAD placement during 2010–2022 and developed CDI were included. To determine risk factors and outcomes, we matched CDI patients with LVAD patients who did not develop CDI. Each CDI case was matched with up to two control subjects by age, sex, and time from LVAD implantation. Forty-seven of 393 LVAD patients (12.0%) developed CDI. The median time from LVAD implantation to CDI was 147 days (interquartile range 22.5–647.0). The most common CDI treatment was oral vancomycin (n = 26, 55.3%). Thirteen patients (27.7%) required treatment extension because of a lack of clinical response. Three patients (6.4%) developed recurrent CDI. When 42 cases were matched to 79 control subjects, antibiotic exposure within 90 days was significantly associated with CDI (adjusted odds ratio 5.77; 95% confidence interval, 1.87–17.74; p = 0.002). Moreover, CDI was associated with 1 year mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 2.62; 95% confidence interval, 1.18–5.82; p = 0.018). This infection occurs most often within the first year after LVAD implantation and was associated with 1 year mortality. Antibiotic exposure is an important risk for CDI.
Infections in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices: Current State and Future Perspectives
Inglis, Sara S. , Schettle, Sarah , Spencer, Philip J. , Villavicencio, Mauricio A. , Rosenbaum, Andrew , Schettle, Sarah D., Rosenbaum, Andrew N , Inglis, Sara S , Suh, Gina A. , Razonable, Raymund R.

ASAIO Journal | May 5, 2023 | Volume: 69 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 633-641

10.1097/mat.0000000000001956 Get It

Mechanical circulatory support is increasingly being used as bridge-to-transplant and destination therapy in patients with advanced heart failure. Technologic improvements have led to increased patient survival and quality of life, but infection remains one of the leading adverse events following ventricular assist device (VAD) implantation. Infections can be classified as VAD-specific, VAD-related, and non-VAD infections. Risk of VAD-specific infections, such as driveline, pump pocket, and pump infections, remains for the duration of implantation. While adverse events are typically most common early (within 90 days of implantation), device-specific infection (primarily driveline) is a notable exception. No diminishment over time is seen, with event rates of 0.16 events per patient-year in both the early and late periods postimplantation. Management of VAD-specific infections requires aggressive treatment and chronic suppressive antimicrobial therapy is indicated when there is concern for seeding of the device. While surgical intervention/hardware removal is often necessary in prosthesis-related infections, this is not so easily accomplished with VADs. This review outlines the current state of infections in patients supported with VAD therapy and discusses future directions, including possibilities with fully implantable devices and novel approaches to treatment.
Interventricular-Septal Output While Supported on Left Ventricular Assist Device Therapy
Inglis, Sara S. , Villavicencio, Mauricio T., Spencer, Philip J. , Schettle, Sarah , Stulak, John M., Clavell, Alfredo L. , Kushwaha, Sudhir S. , Rosenbaum, Andrew , Schettle, Sarah D., Rosenbaum, Andrew N , Inglis, Sara S , Villavicencio, Mauricio A. , Behfar, Atta

ASAIO Journal | February 2, 2023 | Volume: 69 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 424-428

10.1097/mat.0000000000001851 Get It

The effects of left ventricular unloading on septal function in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have not been well characterized in vivo. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between markers of septal function with echocardiography in relationship to RV dysfunction and late RV failure after LVAD implantation. A retrospective study was conducted of patients supported on centrifugal-flow LVADs implanted over a 10-year period. Echocardiographic data were collected pre-operatively and up to 2 years after implantation. Interventricular septum (IVS) measurements were taken at end-systole and end-diastole. Interventricular-septal output (ISO) was calculated using the formula: (IVSs–IVSd)×heart rate. A total of 110 patients were included. An immediate and sustained reduction in both lateral annulus systolic velocity (RVS’) and TAPSE were observed after implant (p < 0.0001). However, ISO gradually decreased over time (p < 0.0001). While ISO was not predictive of late RV failure, a decrease in ISO by 25% or greater from pre-implant to hospital discharge was associated with late RV failure (OR 4.8; 95% CI, 1.4–16.5; p = 0.012) even after adjusting for relevant clinical variables (p ≤ 0.01 for each model). RV function is known to be influenced by mechanical ventricular interdependence and we demonstrate that measurement of ISO may be a useful marker in assessing RV dysfunction and predicting RV failure in patients following LVAD implantation.
Optimal Hemodynamics and Risk of Severe Outcomes Post-Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation
Rosenbaum, Andrew , Ternus, Bradley W., Stulak, John M., Clavell, Alfredo L., Schettle, Sarah D., Behfar, Atta , Jentzer, Jacob C., Rosenbaum, Andrew N , Behfar, Atta , Ternus, Bradley W., Stulak, John M., Clavell, Alfredo L., Schettle, Sarah D., Jentzer, Jacob C.

ASAIO Journal | May 29, 2021 | Volume: 68 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 325-332

10.1097/mat.0000000000001465 Get It

Data on pre-implant hemodynamic optimization before continuous flow left ventricular assist device placement (CF-LVAD) with respect to patient-centered outcomes remain limited. Consecutive patients undergoing CF-LVAD implant between 2007 and 2017 were identified. Hemodynamic variables, trends, and laboratory studies were evaluated pre-LVAD implant in a logistic regression model to identify predictors of the primary composite endpoint: the need for right ventricular assist device therapy, the requirement for hemodialysis at 90 days, and 30-day mortality. Multivariate modeling identified three variables significantly associated with the primary endpoint: right ventricular stroke work index (RVSWI), right atrial pressure (RAP), and blood urea nitrogen (BUN); all immediately pre-LVAD, p < 0.01. Optimal dichotomization points were 500 mmHg*ml*m−2, 12 mmHg, and 40 mg/dL. The three-component model identified an AUC of 0.77 (p < 0.0001) for the composite endpoint. Optimization of 2/3 parameters, 1/3, and 0/3 was associated with odds ratios of 3.5 (95% CI, 1.1−11.7), 7.2 (95% CI, 2.1−24.2), and 20.6 (95% CI, 5.3−80.6), respectively, relative to those patients who were fully optimized (3/3 parameters). The number of optimized parameters was also associated with 1-year overall survival (p = 0.02). Low RVSWI, high RAP, and high BUN were independently associated with adverse outcomes after the CF-LVAD implant, demonstrating a stepwise association with severe postimplant adverse events.
Predictors and Clinical Outcomes of Vasoplegia in Patients Bridged to Heart Transplantation With Continuous‐Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices
Alnsasra, Hilmi , Daly, Richard C. , Schettle, Sarah , Briasoulis, Αlexandros , Taher, Riad, Stulak, John M., Behfar, Atta , Pereira, Naveen L. , Frantz, Robert P. , Edwards, Brooks S., Clavell, Alfredo L. , Kushwaha, Sudhir S. , Asleh, Rabea , Schettle, Sarah D., Dunlay, Shannon M. , Behfar, Atta , Briasoulis, Alexandros , Frantz, Robert P

Journal of the American Heart Association | November 8, 2019 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 22 | Pages: No page available

10.1161/jaha.119.013108 Get It

Background The presence of a durable left ventricular assist device ( LVAD ) is associated with increased risk of vasoplegia in the early postoperative period following heart transplantation ( HT ). However, preoperative predictors of vasoplegia and its impact on survival after HT are unknown. We sought to examine predictors and outcomes of patients who develop vasoplegia after HT following bridging therapy with an LVAD . Methods and Results We identified 94 patients who underwent HT after bridging with continuous‐flow LVAD from 2008 to 2018 at a single institution. Vasoplegia was defined as persistent low vascular resistance requiring ≥2 intravenous vasopressors within 48 hours after HT for >24 hours to maintain mean arterial pressure >70 mm Hg. Overall, 44 patients (46.8%) developed vasoplegia after HT . Patients with and without vasoplegia had similar preoperative LVAD , echocardiographic, and hemodynamic parameters. Patients with vasoplegia were significantly older; had longer LVAD support, higher preoperative creatinine, longer cardiopulmonary bypass time, and higher Charlson comorbidity index; and more often underwent combined organ transplantation. In a multivariate logistic regression model, older age (odds ratio: 1.08 per year; P =0.010), longer LVAD support (odds ratio: 1.06 per month; P =0.007), higher creatinine (odds ratio: 3.9 per 1 mg/dL; P =0.039), and longer cardiopulmonary bypass time (odds ratio: 1.83 per hour; P =0.044) were independent predictors of vasoplegia. After mean follow‐up of 4.0 years after HT , vasoplegia was associated with increased risk of all‐cause mortality (hazard ratio: 5.20; 95% CI, 1.71–19.28; P =0.003). Conclusions Older age, longer LVAD support, impaired renal function, and prolonged intraoperative CPB time are independent predictors of vasoplegia in patients undergoing HT after LVAD bridging. Vasoplegia is associated with worse prognosis; therefore, detailed assessment of these predictors can be clinically important.
Diastolic Pulmonary Gradient as a Predictor of Right Ventricular Failure After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation
Alnsasra, Hilmi , Schettle, Sarah , Pereira, Naveen L. , Frantz, Robert P. , Edwards, Brooks S., Clavell, Alfredo L. , Maltais, Simon, Daly, Richard C. , Stulak, John M., Rosenbaum, Andrew , Behfar, Atta , Kushwaha, Sudhir S. , Asleh, Rabea , Schettle, Sarah D., Rosenbaum, Andrew N , Behfar, Atta , Frantz, Robert P

Journal of the American Heart Association | August 14, 2019 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 16 | Pages: No page available

10.1161/jaha.119.012073 Get It

Background Diastolic pulmonary gradient ( DPG ) was proposed as a better marker of pulmonary vascular remodeling compared with pulmonary vascular resistance ( PVR ) and transpulmonary gradient ( TPG ). The prognostic significance of DPG in patients requiring a left ventricular assist device ( LVAD ) remains unclear. We sought to investigate whether pre‐ LVAD DPG is a predictor of survival or right ventricular ( RV ) failure post‐ LVAD . Methods and Results We retrospectively reviewed 268 patients who underwent right heart catheterization before LVAD implantation from 2007 to 2017 and had pulmonary hypertension because of left heart disease. Patients were dichotomized using DPG ≥7 mm Hg, PVR ≥3 mm Hg, or TPG ≥12 mm Hg. The associations between these parameters and all‐cause mortality or RV failure post LVAD were assessed with Cox proportional hazards regression and Kaplan–Meier analyses. After a mean follow‐up time of 35 months, elevated DPG was associated with increased risk of RV failure (hazard ratio [ HR ]: 3.30; P =0.004, for DPG ≥7 versus DPG <7), whereas elevated PVR ( HR 1.85, P =0.13 for PVR ≥3 versus PVR <3) or TPG ( HR 1.47, P =0.35, for TPG ≥12 versus TPG <12) were not associated with the development of RV failure. Elevated DPG was not associated with mortality risk ( HR 1.16, P =0.54, for DPG ≥7 versus DPG <7), whereas elevated PVR , but not TPG , was associated with higher mortality risk ( HR 1.55; P =0.026, for PVR ≥3 versus PVR <3). Conclusions Among patients with pulmonary hypertension because of left heart disease requiring LVAD support, elevated DPG was associated with RV failure but not survival, while elevated PVR predicted mortality post LVAD implantation.
Baseline Thromboelastogram as a Predictor of Left Ventricular Assist Device Thrombosis
Piche, Shannon L., Nei, Scott D. , Frazee, Erin, Schettle, Sarah , Boilson, Barry A. , Plevak, Matthew F., Dierkhising, Ross , Stulak, John M., Schettle, Sarah D., Dierkhising, Ross A, Frazee, Erin

ASAIO Journal | May 16, 2018 | Volume: 65 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 443-448

10.1097/mat.0000000000000828 Get It

Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) pump thrombosis occurs in up to 8.4% of patients within 3-months postimplantation. Thromboelastography (TEG) could be used to signal hypercoagulability at LVAD implantation to predict patients at high risk for thrombosis. We sought to evaluate whether TEG maximum amplitude (MA) hypercoagulability (MA ≥69 mm) at the time of LVAD implantation predicts pump thrombosis. A single center, retrospective, nested case–control study was conducted using patients from January 1, 2005, to March 31, 2015. Each pump thrombosis case was matched to two control subjects based on age ± 5 years, sex, and duration of follow-up. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed on the matched sets; the odds ratio with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated to estimate the relative risk. Thirty-seven age- and sex-matched case–control sets were included for a total of 111 study participants. TEG-MA hypercoagulability occurred in 10.8% of the case group versus 6.8% of controls. There was no association between TEG-MA hypercoagulability and device thrombosis (odds ratio 1.71, 95% confidence interval 0.42–7.05, p = 0.46). Utilization of baseline TEG-MA hypercoagulability to detect individuals at risk for LVAD thrombosis is a novel concept. This study found no significant association between TEG-MA and LVAD thrombosis.
Impact of Diabetes Mellitus on Outcomes in Patients Supported With Left Ventricular Assist Devices
Briasoulis, Αlexandros , Schettle, Sarah , Tchantchaleishvili, Vakhtang , Pereira, Naveen L. , Edwards, Brooks S., Clavell, Alfredo L. , Maltais, Simon, Joyce, David L. , Joyce, Lyle D., Daly, Richard C. , Kushwaha, Sudhir S. , Stulak, John M., Asleh, Rabea , Briasoulis, Alexandros, Schettle, Sarah D., Briasoulis, Alexandros , Tchantchaleishvili, Vakhtang

Circulation: Heart Failure | November 15, 2017 | Volume: 10 | Issue: 11 | Pages: No page available

10.1161/circheartfailure.117.004213 Get It

Background Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a risk factor for morbidity and mortality in patients with heart failure. The effect of DM on post–left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation outcomes is unclear. This study sought to investigate whether patients with DM had worse outcomes than patients without DM after LVAD implantation and whether LVAD support resulted in a better control of DM. Methods and Results We retrospectively reviewed 341 consecutive adults who underwent implantation of LVAD from 2007 to 2016. Patient characteristics and adverse events were studied and compared between patients with and without DM. One hundred thirty-one patients (38%) had DM. Compared with patients without DM, those with DM had higher rates of ischemic cardiomyopathy, LVAD implantation as destination therapy, and increased baseline body mass index. In a proportional hazards (Cox) model with adjustment for relevant covariates and median follow-up of 16.1 months, DM was associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 1.73; 95% confidence interval: 1.18–2.53; P =0.005) and increased risk of nonfatal LVAD-related complications, including a composite of stroke, pump thrombosis, and device infection (hazard ratio, 2.1; 95% confidence interval: 1.35–3.18; P =0.001). Preoperative hemoglobin A1c was not significantly associated with mortality or adverse events among patients with DM. LVAD implantation resulted in a remarkable decrease in hemoglobin A1c levels (7.4±1.9 pre-LVAD versus 6.0±1.5 and 6.3±1.4 after 3 and 12 months post-LVAD, respectively; P <0.0001) and a significant reduction in requirements of DM medications. Conclusions DM is associated with increased rates of all-cause mortality and major adverse events despite favorable glycemic control after LVAD implantation.