Piche, Shannon L.

Objective: To describe the use of amiodarone in critically ill, septic shock patients experiencing new-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) during the acute resuscitative phase of septic shock. Methods: Single-center, retrospective review of adult medical or surgical intensive care unit (ICU) patients with septic shock and NOAF. All patients received amiodarone for NOAF during the acute resuscitative phase of septic shock. The cohort was analyzed via descriptive statistics. Associations between amiodarone exposure and clinical outcomes were analyzed via a Cox proportional-hazards model. An a priori defined sensitivity analysis of hospital survivors was also employed. Main Results: A total of 239 patients were included in the analysis. Patients had a median baseline Charlson Comorbidity Index of 4 (interquartile range [IQR]: 2-6) and were acutely ill with a median Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score of 18 (IQR: 13-22) and an incidence of mechanical ventilation of 85%. In-hospital mortality was 56% with median ICU and hospital length of stay (LOS) of 9 and 15 days, respectively. Included patients received a median of 2760 (IQR: 1110-6415) mg of intravenous (IV) amiodarone during their ICU stay. Receipt of more than or equal to 2700 mg of amiodarone was identified as an independent factor associated with longer ICU LOS (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10-2.28). In a sensitivity analysis of hospital survivors (n = 105), receipt of more than or equal to 2700 mg of amiodarone remained independently associated with longer ICU LOS (HR: 1.64; 95% CI, 1.05-2.58). Conclusions: Exposure to more than or equal to 2700 mg of amiodarone in the setting of NOAF and septic shock is positively correlated with longer ICU LOS. Identifying opportunities to limit amiodarone exposure and address/resolve potential precipitating causes of NOAF in this clinical scenario may reduce the morbidity associated with septic shock.

Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) pump thrombosis occurs in up to 8.4% of patients within 3-months postimplantation. Thromboelastography (TEG) could be used to signal hypercoagulability at LVAD implantation to predict patients at high risk for thrombosis. We sought to evaluate whether TEG maximum amplitude (MA) hypercoagulability (MA ≥69 mm) at the time of LVAD implantation predicts pump thrombosis. A single center, retrospective, nested case–control study was conducted using patients from January 1, 2005, to March 31, 2015. Each pump thrombosis case was matched to two control subjects based on age ± 5 years, sex, and duration of follow-up. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed on the matched sets; the odds ratio with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated to estimate the relative risk. Thirty-seven age- and sex-matched case–control sets were included for a total of 111 study participants. TEG-MA hypercoagulability occurred in 10.8% of the case group versus 6.8% of controls. There was no association between TEG-MA hypercoagulability and device thrombosis (odds ratio 1.71, 95% confidence interval 0.42–7.05, p = 0.46). Utilization of baseline TEG-MA hypercoagulability to detect individuals at risk for LVAD thrombosis is a novel concept. This study found no significant association between TEG-MA and LVAD thrombosis.