Briasoulis, Αlexandros

Abstract Background Renal dysfunction is a major determinant of outcomes after heart transplantation (HT). While baseline renal impairment and post-HT dialysis are known predictors of mortality, the prognostic impact of sustained pre-HT renal decline in patients bridged with durable left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) remains unclear. Methods We conducted a retrospective, multicenter cohort study using the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) registry to identify adult patients who underwent HT following durable LVAD support between 2009 and 2024. Sustained renal decline was defined as a ≥40% reduction in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) from listing to HT. Multivariable logistic regression identified predictors of renal decline and post-HT dialysis,while Cox proportional hazards models assessed the impact on post-HT mortality. Results Among 10,454 eligible patients, 624 (6.0%) experienced sustained renal decline during LVAD bridging. Compared with patients without renal decline, affected patients had longer waitlist durations (median 297 vs. 197 days; p<0.001), lower eGFR at HT (42.0 vs. 70.6 mL/min/1.73 m²; p<0.001), and higher rates of post-HT dialysis (23.7% vs. 12.8%; p<0.001). Independent predictors of sustained renal decline included longer waitlist time, perioperative blood transfusions, while the use of HeartMate 3 LVAD was protective. Sustained renal decline was independently associated with increased risk of post-HT dialysis (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.64) and all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.16),with post-HT dialysis strongly predicting mortality (aHR 3.48). Conclusions Sustained renal deterioration while awaiting HT is a significant predictor of post-HT dialysis and mortality in LVAD-bridged patients. Incorporating renal trajectory into risk stratification may enhance candidate selection and promote perioperative renal protection strategies.

Background Pulmonary hypertension (PH) and sensitization adversely affect heart transplant outcomes. Although left ventricular assist devices may reduce PH, they can increase sensitization. We examined the impact of sensitization on heart transplant outcomes in left ventricular assist device‐bridged patients and whether precapillary PH modifies this effect. Methods Adults bridged to heart transplant with an left ventricular assist device between 2005 and 2020 were identified from the United Network for Organ Sharing database. Patients with available panel‐reactive antibody (PRA) and hemodynamic data were included. Associations between PRA and survival and treated rejection were analyzed. Results Among 2469 patients, 1053 had precapillary PH (pulmonary vascular resistance [PVR] >2 Wood units [WU]) and 1416 had PVR ≤2 WU. Elevated PRA (>10%) occurred in 566 patients (24.8% with PVR >2 WU; 21.5% with PVR ≤2 WU). Overall, PRA >10% was associated with increased mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.28 [95% CI, 1.04–1.58], P =0.022), driven by patients with PVR >2 WU (aHR, 1.82 [95% CI, 1.34–2.50], P <0.001), with no association in those with PVR ≤2 WU (aHR, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.47–1.32], P =0.92). PRA >10% was also associated with treated rejection overall (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.41 [95% CI, 1.09–1.82], P =0.008), confined to the PVR >2 WU group (aOR, 1.87 [95% CI, 1.26–2.76], P =0.002) and absent in the PVR ≤2 WU group (aOR, 1.13 [95% CI, 0.80–1.59], P =0.49). Conclusions Elevated PRA predicts worse outcomes in LVAD‐bridged transplant recepients with precapillary PH, but not in those without precapillary PH.

PURPOSE Outcomes in systemic light chain (AL) amyloidosis have improved with modern therapy limiting utility of existing risk stratification models. We validate a new staging system, incorporating longitudinal strain (LS) to the biomarker-based (NT-proBNP and Troponin-T) staging system in the contemporary treatment era (2015-2024). METHODS AL International Staging System (AL-ISS) was derived from a cohort of patients with AL amyloidosis from the UK National Amyloidosis Centre (2015-2019). The model was validated in patient cohorts from Europe (Greece, Italy, the Netherlands, and Switzerland), the United States (2015-2024), and the United Kingdom (2020-2024). RESULTS In total, 2,493 patients were included (derivation, n = 573; validation n = 1,920). In a multivariable model for the derivation cohort, LS ≥ –9% and cardiac biomarkers at previously validated thresholds (NT-proBNP 332 ng/L and 8,500 ng/L and high-sensitivity troponin T ≥ 50 ng/L) were independent poor prognostic factors stratifying patients into stages I, II, IIIA, IIIB, and IIIC. In the validation cohort, the patient stages were stage I: 317 (17%), II: 782 (41%), IIIA: 551 (29%), IIIB: 174 (9%), and IIIC: 96 (5%), respectively (first-line daratumumab treated: 826; 43%). With a median follow-up of 34 months, median overall survival (OS) was not reached (NR); estimated 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year OS was 82%, 74%, and 70% respectively. The median survival for stages I to II, IIIA, IIIB, and IIIC were NR, 67, 26, and 7 months (1-year OS IIIC 53% v 68% for IIIB in the daratumumab-treated patients), respectively ( P < .001). External validation exhibited good predictive performance: 12-month calibration slope was 1.09, Harrell C 0.69, Royston D 1.19, and R 2 D 0.25. Stage IIIC independently discriminated the poorest outcome across all cohorts. CONCLUSION This defines and validates a new staging system from systemic AL amyloidosis with robust identification of an ultra-poor risk stage (IIIC) in contemporarily treated patients.

Abstract Background: Systemic AL amyloidosis is an incurable disorder caused by misfolded light chain fibrils. Survival is determined by the extent of cardiac involvement and response to therapy. Mayo 2012 (stage I-IV) and European modified Mayo 2004 (stage I-IIIB) prognostic scores were developed in a historic treatment era, prior to widespread bortezomib and daratumumab use. These no longer discriminate those with the poorest outcomes. We presented a new model sub-stratifying IIIB into a high risk, ‘IIIC’ group, incorporating longitudinal strain (LS) to the European modified score (IIIC: LS &gt;-9% + NT-proBNP &gt;8500ng/L + high-sensitivity troponin T [hs-TnT] &gt;50ng/L) in the bortezomib-era (2015-2019) last year (Khwaja et al, ASH 2024). Here, we present an independent external validation of the IIIC model in the modern treatment era. Methods: The ‘IIIC model’ was derived from a large real-world cohort of adults from the UK National Amyloidosis Centre (2015-2019). Performance was externally validated across Europe (Greece, Italy, Netherlands, Switzerland), USA (2015-2024) and UK (2020-2024). Survival estimates were generated from diagnosis to death or last follow-up using the Kaplan-Meier method and groups compared using Cox regression (using Stata v18). Stage IIIB and IIIC were defined as follows IIIB: LS &lt;-9%, NT-proBNP &gt;8500ng/L, hs-TnT &gt;50ng/L and IIIC: LS &gt;-9%, NT-proBNP &gt;8500ng/L, hs-TnT &gt;50ng/L, respectively. Stage I, II and IIIa were defined as previously described in the European modification of Mayo 2004 staging system. Results: 2493 patients were analysed from 2015-2024 (derivation, n=573; validation: Europe, n=374, USA n=458, UK, n=1088). In the derivation cohort, LS ≥-9% and standard cardiac biomarkers (NT-proBNP 332ng/L and 8500ng/L and hs-TnT&gt;50ng/L) were selected as independent prognostic factors in a multivariable model. In the European and UK validation cohort (n=1462), median age at diagnosis was 67 years (range 35-95) with 1014 (69%) cardiac and 869 (60%) renal involvement. Median difference in involved and uninvolved free light chain (dFLC) was 181 mg/L (range 0-24933), NT-proBNP 1911ng/L (range 42-70000), hs-TnT 45ng/L (range 3-1221) and LS -14.7% (range -3- -28). In the US cohort median NT-proBNP was 1764 (range 13-71000) and hs-TnT 44 (6-687). Applying the new model staging, the patient stages were across Europe and UK were stage I: 224 (15%), II: 627 (43%), IIIA: 396 (27%), IIIB: 139 (10%) and IIIC: 76 (5%), respectively. 592 (41%) were treated with first-line daratumumab-based regimens. In the US dataset stage I: 103 (22%), II: 176 (38%), IIIA: 131 (29%), IIIB: 48 (10%) and IIIC: 16 (3%), respectively. 234 (51%) were treated with first-line daratumumab-based regimens. At a median follow-up of 30 months (95% CI 28-32) in the European and UK validation cohort, estimated median overall survival (OS) was not reached and 2-year OS was 74% (95% CI 72-77). Median survival for stages I-II, IIIA, IIIB and IIIC were not reached (NR), 67, 31 and 10 months, respectively (p&lt;0.001). Hazard ratios for stage II, IIIA, IIIB, IIIC were 2.01 (95% CI 1.32-3.07), 3.51 (95% CI 2.31-5.35), 5.67 (95% CI 3.60-8.91) and 11.12 (95% CI 6.93-17.87), respectively (p&lt;0.001). This was confirmed in the US cohort with a median survival for respective stages were NR, NR, NR, 8 and 2 months (p&lt;0.001). External validation in the European and UK cohorts exhibited good predictive performance: 12-month calibration slope was 1.00 (95% CI 0.81-1.20, p=0.98), Harrel's C was 0.90 (95% CI 0.76-1.00), Royston's D 1.07, R2D 0.21 (95% CI 0.15-0.28). In 1462 patients with dataset available, stage IIIC discriminated the poorest outcome despite a greater proportion treated with first-line daratumumab v IIIB in the validation cohort (59% v 40%, p=0.008). 12-month OS for IIIC v IIIB was 44% (95% CI 32-55) v 69% (95% CI 60-76), specificity for 12-month OS 97% v 92% and diagnostic odds ratio 6.62 v 2.36. Conclusions: This study validates the new staging system from stage I-IIIC with robust identification of an ultra-poor prognostic group (Stage IIIC) in a contemporarily treated patient cohort. Despite novel therapies, the OS remains &lt;12 month in the IIIC group and also poor in stage IIIB with median OS 31 months compared to a median of &gt;5 years for all other stages. This staging system can be considered as a new standard of care for risk stratification of AL amyloidosis. Novel approaches are required for patients with advanced risk.

ABSTRACT Background and Aim This study aimed to provide updated nationwide data on outcomes in heart transplantation for amyloid cardiomyopathy (ACM) compared with other cardiomyopathy etiologies. Methods United Network for Organ Sharing data for patients over 18 who underwent heart transplant for ACM, and other cardiomyopathies including DCM, ICM, RCM, and CHD were reviewed from 2001 through 2022. The data were analyzed with a propensity score‐matched analysis comparing ACM patients with transplant for the cardiomyopathies to measure primary outcomes, including 5‐year, 10‐year, and all‐cause mortality accounting for differences at baseline. Results Of 21 457 heart transplant recipients who met eligibility criteria, there was a 100% increase in the number of heart transplants for ACM from 2010 to 2020 ( p < 0.001). The unadjusted mortality did not differ significantly among ACM, DCM, ICM, RCM, and CHD groups, and 5‐year mortality was comparable between ACM and DCM patients. ACM patients had a significantly lower incidence of postoperative stroke ( p = 0.044), and risk factors for ACM transplant mortality were identified as mechanical ventilation at the time of transplant (HR: 3.8, p = 0.023) and older donor age (HR: 1.1, p = 0.015). Conclusions The number of heart transplants for ACM has increased in recent years, and overall outcomes in these ACM transplants have been similar compared to those for other cardiomyopathies. Despite historical concerns regarding poor prognosis and amyloid recurrence, carefully screened ACM patients can benefit from heart transplantation. Further research and optimization of ACM patient eligibility criteria alongside investigation of concurrent adjunctive therapies could optimize treatment of ACM with heart transplantation.

Background: Despite its use in patients awaiting heart transplant (HT), the impact of continuous inotropic support on short-term complications and long-term transplant outcomes remains unclear. This study evaluated inotrope use at the time of HT on perioperative complications and post-transplant survival, comparing outcomes at 30 days, 1 year, and 10 years with mechanical circulatory support (MCS) strategies including ECMO, IABP, and VADs. Methods: A retrospective analysis of the United Network for Organ sharing (UNOS) registry was performed, stratifying patients based on bridge strategy at the time of transplant: inotropes, ECMO, IABP, or VADs. Baseline characteristics, perioperative complications, and 30-day, 1-year, and 10-year post-transplant survival outcomes were analyzed across groups. Survival was assessed using Kaplan–Meier and Cox proportional hazards models. Results: Among the 11,801 heart transplant patients included, 9330 were on inotropes, 372 were on ECMO, 1072 received an IABP, and 1027 had VADs. Inotrope-bridged patients had significantly lower 30-day and 1-year mortality rates compared to the ECMO, IABP, and VAD groups. They also experienced reduced incidences of post-transplant dialysis and stroke. At 10 years, the inotrope group demonstrated superior long-term survival, with significantly lower mortality risk compared to ECMO (HR: 1.81; CI: 1.49–2.20, p < 0.001), IABP (HR: 1.19; CI: 1.06–1.32, p = 0.005), and VAD (HR: 1.18; CI: 1.10–1.27, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Continuous use of inotropes after waitlisting is associated with lower short, intermediate, and long-term mortality and does not lead to worse outcomes compared to ECMO, IABP, and VAD support. When mechanical support is not an option, inotropic therapy remains a viable and effective strategy.

Abstract Background It has been hypothesized that combined heart and kidney transplantation (HKT) may lead to immune modulation and attenuation of cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) progression. Sirolimus (SRL) has been shown to mitigate the progression of CAV and confer renal protection. With the increasing use of SRL as primary immunosuppression in heart transplant (HT) recipients, the effect of HKT on CAV progression compared to HT-only remains undetermined. Purpose We sought to investigate the patterns of conversion from calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) to SRL, and its impact on CAV progression and outcomes in HKT compared to HT-only in a cohort with frequent use of SRL as primary immunosuppression. Methods A cohort of 302 patients who underwent either HT only (n=262) or combined HKT (n=40) was analyzed. CAV progression was assessed by measuring the delta (Δ) annual change in plaque volume (PV) normalized to vessel length (PV/VL in mm3/mm) and plaque index (PI) (%) (calculated as the PV to VV ratio) between baseline and last follow-up coronary intravenous ultrasound (IVUS). Clinical adverse outcomes included all-cause death and CAV-associated events. Secondary outcomes included differences in renal function and incidence of SRL-associated proteinuria (defined as Δ urine protein ≥300 mg/24 h at 1 year after conversion to SRL) between HT-only and HKT recipients. Results Overall, 217 (72%) patients were converted from CNI to SRL as primary immunosuppression. HT recipients were more likely to be converted to SRL than combined HKT recipients (74% vs. 55%, P=0.01). HKT was associated with significantly higher ΔPV/VL (P=0.01) and a trend toward a higher ΔPI (P=0.06) than HT-only, but this association was markedly attenuated after adjustment to SRL conversion. HKT was associated with similar risk of death (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.69, 95%CI: 0.28-1.71, P=0.43) and CAV-related events (adjusted HR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.30-2.31, P=0.72). Conversion to SRL was significantly associated with decreased risk of death and CAV-related events in the overall cohort. This association was not modified by the type of organ transplantation (Pinteraction=NS), and without a significant effect on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) or proteinuria. Conclusions HKT recipients compared to HT-only were less likely to be converted from CNI to SRL-based immunosuppression and had a greater CAV progression but without significant differences in all-cause mortality or CAV-related events. The clinical benefit and safety of conversion to SRL appeared similar in the HKT and isolated HT cohorts.

Abstract Background In light of the updated lowered threshold for diagnosing pulmonary hypertension (PH), the reversibility of precapillary PH with left ventricular assist device (LVAD) and the associated post heart transplantation (HT) outcomes remain unclear. Purpose and methods Using data from the United Network for Organ Sharing database, we aimed to investigate predictors of persistent precapillary PH in HT recipients bridged with LVAD, and examine the interrelated post-HT survival, using the updated pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) cutoff of &gt;2 WU for precapillary PH. Results Among 2169 HT recipients bridged with LVAD, 1299 had PVR&gt;2 at baseline; 551 (42.4%) of whom normalized their PVR≤2 and 748 (57.6%) remained with elevated PVR&gt;2 after LVAD implantation. Female sex (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.22, 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.61-3.07, p&lt;0.001) and inotropes-treatment at-listing (aOR 1.31, 95% CI: 1.03-1.66, p=0.028) were associated with persistently elevated PVR post LVAD. Conversely, longer duration of LVAD support (aOR 0.74, 95% CI: 0.65-.84, p&lt;0.001) and use of HeartMate 2 (aOR 0.74, CI: 0.59-0. 93, p=0.011) were protective against persistently elevated PVR post-LVAD. Persistently elevated PVR &gt;2 post-LVAD was associated with increased risk of death compared to those who normalized their PVR (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.26, 95% CI: 1.01-1.57, p=0.037). However, normalized PVR post-LVAD group had comparable survival to those with PVR≤2 at baseline (aHR 0.76, 95% CI: 0.57-1.02, p=0.07). Conclusions Many HT recipients bridged with LVAD remain with PVR&gt;2 post-LVAD implantation, which is associated with increased risk of death post-HT compared to patients with normalized PVR post-LVAD.

AbstractBackgroundUnited Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) allocation criteria changed in 2018 to accommodate the increased prevalence of patients on a ventricular assist device as a bridge to heart transplant and prioritize sicker people in anticipation of a heart graft. We aimed to assess the impact of patient age in the new allocation policy on mortality following heart transplantation. Secondary outcomes included the effect of age ≥70 on post‐transplant events, including stroke, dialysis, pacemaker, and rejection requiring treatment.MethodsThe UNOS Registry was queried to identify patients who underwent heart transplants alone in the US between 2000 and 2021. Patients were divided into groups according to their age (over 70 and under 70 years old).ResultsPatients aged over 70 were more likely to require dialysis during follow‐up, but less likely to experience rejection requiring treatment, compared with patients aged <70. Age ≥70 in the new allocation system was a significant predictor of 1‐year mortality (adjusted HR: 1.41; 95% CI: 1.05–1.91; p = .024), but its effect on 5‐year mortality was not significant after adjusting for potential confounders (adjusted HR: 1.27; 95% CI:.97–1.66; p = .077). Undergoing transplantation under the new allocation policy vs the old allocation policy was not a significant predictor of mortality in patients over 70 years old.ConclusionsAge ≥70 is a significant predictor of 1‐year mortality following heart transplantation, but not at 5 and 10 years; however, the new allocation does not seem to have changed the outcomes for this group of patients.

(1) Background: Heart failure is an extremely impactful health issue from both a social and quality-of-life point of view and the rate of patients with this condition is destined to rise in the next few years. Transplantation remains the mainstay of treatment for end-stage heart failure, but a shortage of organs represents a significant problem that prolongs time spent on the waiting list. In view of this, the selection of donor and recipient must be extremely meticulous, considering all factors that could predispose to organ failure. One of the main considerations regarding heart transplants is the risk of graft rejection and the need for immunosuppression therapy to mitigate that risk. In this study, we aimed to assess the characteristics of patients who need immunosuppression treatment for rejection within one year of heart transplantation and its impact on mid-term and long-term mortality. (2) Methods: The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) Registry was queried to identify patients who solely underwent a heart transplant in the US between 2000 and 2021. Patients were divided into two groups according to the need for anti-rejection treatment within one year of heart transplantation. Patients’ characteristics in the two groups were assessed, and 1 year and 10 year mortality rates were compared. (3) Results: A total of 43,763 patients underwent isolated heart transplantation in the study period, and 9946 (22.7%) needed anti-rejection treatment in the first year. Patients who required treatment for rejection within one year after transplant were more frequently younger (49 ± 14 vs. 52 ± 14 years, p < 0.001), women (31% vs. 23%, p < 0.001), and had a higher CPRA value (14 ± 26 vs. 11 ± 23, p < 0.001). Also, the rate of prior cardiac surgery was more than double in this group (27% vs. 12%, p < 0.001), while prior LVAD (12% vs. 11%, p < 0.001) and IABP (10% vs. 9%, p < 0.01) were more frequent in patients who did not receive anti-rejection treatment in the first year. Finally, pre-transplantation creatinine was significantly higher in patients who did not need treatment for rejection in the first year (1.4 vs. 1.3, p < 0.01). Most patients who did not require anti-rejection treatment underwent heart transplantation during the new allocation era, while less than half of the patients who required treatment underwent transplantation after the new allocation policy implementation (65% vs. 49%, p < 0.001). Patients who needed rejection treatment in the first year had a higher risk of unadjusted 1 year (HR: 2.25; 95% CI: 1.88–2.70; p < 0.001), 5 year (HR: 1.69; 95% CI: 1.60–1.79; p < 0.001), and 10 year (HR: 1.47; 95% CI: 1.41–1.54, p < 0.001) mortality, and this was confirmed at the adjusted analysis at all three time-points. (4) Conclusions: Medical treatment of acute rejection was associated with significantly increased 1 year mortality compared to patients who did not require anti-rejection therapy. The higher risk of mortality was confirmed at a 10 year follow-up. Further studies and newer follow-up data are required to investigate the role of anti-rejection therapy in the heart transplant population.