Kuno, Toshiki

ABSTRACT Background and Aim This study aimed to provide updated nationwide data on outcomes in heart transplantation for amyloid cardiomyopathy (ACM) compared with other cardiomyopathy etiologies. Methods United Network for Organ Sharing data for patients over 18 who underwent heart transplant for ACM, and other cardiomyopathies including DCM, ICM, RCM, and CHD were reviewed from 2001 through 2022. The data were analyzed with a propensity score‐matched analysis comparing ACM patients with transplant for the cardiomyopathies to measure primary outcomes, including 5‐year, 10‐year, and all‐cause mortality accounting for differences at baseline. Results Of 21 457 heart transplant recipients who met eligibility criteria, there was a 100% increase in the number of heart transplants for ACM from 2010 to 2020 ( p < 0.001). The unadjusted mortality did not differ significantly among ACM, DCM, ICM, RCM, and CHD groups, and 5‐year mortality was comparable between ACM and DCM patients. ACM patients had a significantly lower incidence of postoperative stroke ( p = 0.044), and risk factors for ACM transplant mortality were identified as mechanical ventilation at the time of transplant (HR: 3.8, p = 0.023) and older donor age (HR: 1.1, p = 0.015). Conclusions The number of heart transplants for ACM has increased in recent years, and overall outcomes in these ACM transplants have been similar compared to those for other cardiomyopathies. Despite historical concerns regarding poor prognosis and amyloid recurrence, carefully screened ACM patients can benefit from heart transplantation. Further research and optimization of ACM patient eligibility criteria alongside investigation of concurrent adjunctive therapies could optimize treatment of ACM with heart transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous microaxial ventricular assist devices (pVADs) have the potential to reduce mortality of patients with cardiogenic shock (CS). However, the association between the distribution of pVAD-performing centers and outcomes of CS has not been explored. METHODS: This observational study included Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aged 65 to 99 years treated with pVAD for CS from 2016 to 2020. It examined the associations between patient outcomes and 2 exposure variables: hospitals’ procedure volumes of pVAD and patient-hospital distances (in quintiles [Qn]). We developed Cox proportional hazards regression for 180-day mortality and heart failure readmission rates, and multivariable logistic regression for in-hospital outcomes, adjusting for patient demographics, comorbidities, concomitant treatments, and hospital characteristics, including CS volume, teaching status, and the ability to perform extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. RESULTS: A total of 6637 patients with CS underwent pVAD at 1041 hospitals, with the annualized hospital volume ranging widely from 0.3 to 55.6 cases/year. Patients treated at higher-volume centers experienced lower 180-day mortality compared with those treated at lower-volume centers (Qn1=reference; Qn2: adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.88 [95% CI, 0.79–0.97]; Qn3: aHR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.79–0.98]; Qn4: aHR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.78–0.99]; Qn5: aHR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.74–0.95]; P for trend, 0.026), while we found no evidence that patient-hospital distances were associated with mortality (Qn1=reference; Qn2: aHR, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.89–1.09]; Qn3: aHR, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.85–1.04]; Qn4: aHR, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.92–1.11]; Qn5: aHR, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.82–1.01]; P for trend, 0.160). We found no evidence that the hospital volume and patient-hospital distances were associated with in-hospital bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage, or renal replacement therapy initiation. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital volume was more strongly associated with mortality than patient-hospital distances, suggesting that rational distribution of pVAD-performing centers while ensuring adequate procedure volumes may optimize patient mortality.

Abstract Background/Introduction Little is known about the prevalence of high-risk plaque features or cardiometabolic predictors in diverse patient populations with underrepresented minorities, in the setting of stable chest pain. Purpose The goals of our study are to 1) describe plaque characteristics in a diverse patient population with underrepresented minorities and 2) characterize cardiometabolic risk factors associated with high prevalence of high-risk quantitative low attenuation noncalcified plaque (LDNCP) burden. Methods Our study included patients with chest pain undergoing CCTA between June 2016 and October 2021 for stable chest pain, who had a complete cardiometabolic panel including lipoprotein(a) and lipid panel, and at least one blood pressure recording before CCTA. Patients with prior PCI or CABG where excluded. CACS was performed before CCTA as per Agatston method and quantified in Agatston Units (AU). Stenosis was graded as per SCCT guidelines by cardiologists and radiologists with level 3 cardiac CT expertise. Plaque measurements were performed using previously validated semiautomated software (AutoPlaque version 2.5) in all patients with CAD-RADS &gt;0 by expert readers blinded from patients' characteristics. Coronary atherosclerotic plaque volumes were measured. Independent predictors for plaque on CCTA among patients were examined using Wilcox multivariate logistic regression. Results A total of 227 consecutive patients were included in our study (see table; age 55.00 [47.50–62.00] years, 63% female, 16% diabetes, 44% hypertension, 40% hyperlipidemia and 32% with current or previous smoking history). Majority of patients were Hispanic (64%) and the rest were Black (27%), White (6%) and Asian (3%). Patients with LDNCP burden &gt;4% were older (60.00 [52.00–66.50] vs 53.00 [43.75–61.00]; p&lt;0.001), more likely to be diabetic (27.7 vs 11.5%; p=0.005), hypertensive (67.7 vs 33.8%; p&lt;0.001), hyperlipidemic (64.6 vs 29.9%; p&lt;0.001) and present smokers (31.3 vs 13.9%; p=0.003). Almost all patients (63/67) with LDNCP burden &gt;4% had non-obstructive disease (CAD-RADS&lt;4). Patient with LDNCP burden &gt;4% were more likely to be on statin therapy (46.0 vs 30.4%; p=0.041). There was no differences in ethnicity, hemoglobin A1C, TC, LDL-C, HLD-C, TGs, lipoprotein(a), SBP or DBP. By logistic regression analysis, age (OR [CI]: 1.06 [1.01–1.08]), hypertension (2.20, [1.06–4.63]) and hyperlipidemia (2.73 [1.37–5.47]) increased the likelihood of LDNCP burden &gt;4%, but not Lipoprotein (a)&gt;175 nmol/L (OR [CI]: 1.07 [0.48–2.31]. Conclusions In our cohort of patients with high number of unrepresented minorities presenting with stable chest pain, almost all patients (94%) with LDNCP burden &gt;4% had non-obstructive CAD (CAD-RADS&lt;4). There were no differences in prevalence of LDNCP or CAD-RADS among different ethnic groups. Age, hypertension and hyperlipidemia, were the cardiometabolic factors related to LDNCP burden &gt;4%. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

AbstractBackgroundConcerns about the impact of the new donor heart allocation system on posttransplant outcomes have emerged after its implementation. We sought to evaluate the characteristics and outcomes of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) recipients transplanted before and after the implantation of the new policy on October 18, 2018.MethodsData on bridge to transplantation of adult patients with LVAD between January 2015 and October 2021, with durable LVAD as a (BTT), was queried from the United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) registry. The main outcomes were 30‐day all‐cause mortality, 30‐day fatal graft failure, 1‐year all‐cause mortality, treated acute rejection at 1 year and renal replacement therapy (RRT) for acute renal failure.ResultsIn our study, 7096 patients met the inclusion criteria including 2435 in the new allocation system. The transplanted patients in the new allocation system era had older donor age, longer ischemic time, and higher proportion of newer generation LVADs. Adjusted 30‐day all‐cause mortality was significantly lower for LVAD recipients in the new allocation system era (2.5% vs. 3.6%; sub‐hazard ratio [SHR] 0.36, 95% Confidence intervals [CI] 0.27–0.48, p < 0.001) without differences in the risk of fatal graft failure and 1‐year mortality (7.8% vs. 9.6%). Significantly lower adjusted 30‐day mortality with HVAD and HM3 devices than HM2 in the new allocation system era was found, without differences in 1‐year mortality. Acute allograft rejection requiring treatment was significantly lower (Odds Ratio 0.78, 95% CI 0.65–0.94, p = 0.01), whereas a trend toward higher risk of renal failure requiring RRT was identified.ConclusionsDespite changing donor characteristics and longer ischemic times, posttransplant outcomes in LVAD recipients have not worsened with the implementation of the new allocation system and this finding is related to the use of newer generation continuous flow LVADs.

Abstract Background The number of patients with sarcoidosis requiring heart transplantation (HT) is increasing. The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes of isolated HT in patients with sarcoid cardiomyopathy and compare them to recipients with non-ischaemic restrictive or dilated cardiomyopathy. Methods and results Adult HT recipients were identified in the UNOS Registry between 1990 and 2020. Patients were grouped according to diagnosis. The cumulative incidences for the all-cause mortality and rejection were compared using Fine and Gray model analysis, accounting for re-transplantation as a competing risk. Rejection was evaluated using logistic regression analysis. We also reviewed characteristics and outcomes of all HT recipients with previous diagnosis of sarcoid cardiomyopathy from a single centre. A total of 30 160 HT recipients were included in the present study (n = 239 sarcoidosis, n = 1411 non-ischaemic restrictive cardiomyopathy, and n = 28 510 non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy). During a total of 194 733 patient-years, all-cause mortality at the latest follow-up was not significantly different when comparing sarcoidosis to non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy [adjusted subhazard ratio (aSHR) 1.46, 95% confidence intervals (CIs): 0.9–2.4, P = 0.12] or restrictive cardiomyopathy (aSHR 1.12, 95% CI: 0.65–1.95, P = 0.67). Accordingly, multivariable analysis suggested that 1 year mortality was not significantly different between sarcoidosis and non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy (aSHR 1.56, 95% CI: 0.9–2.7, P = 0.12) or restrictive cardiomyopathy (aSHR 1.15, 95% CI: 0.61–2.18, P = 0.66). No differences were observed regarding 30 day mortality, treated and hospitalized acute rejection, and 30 day death from graft failure after HT. Thirty-day mortality did not improve significantly in more recent HT eras whereas there was a trend towards improved 1 year mortality in the latest HT era (P = 0.06). Data from the single-centre case review showed excellent long-term outcomes with sirolimus-based immunosuppression. Conclusions Short-term and long-term post HT outcomes among patients with sarcoid cardiomyopathy are similar to those with common types of non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy.